Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / Low Carb / February 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

cholesterol levels

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Discouraged - 31 Jan 2005 20:38 GMT
Just got the results back today.

Lipid Panel griglycerides     97
Cholesterol Total        282

HDL cholesterol        57

LDL chllesterol        206

Chol/HDLC Ratio        4.9

Everything else fell within the lines.

Glucose        76

The doc gave me a 30 day supply of Lipitor 10mg.

So how bad is it?

Dg
Ignoramus2238 - 31 Jan 2005 20:47 GMT
What's been happening to your weight lately?

Keep us posted!

i

> Just got the results back today.
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>  Dg

Signature

223/173.2/180

Steve C - 31 Jan 2005 21:01 GMT
>  The doc gave me a 30 day supply of Lipitor 10mg.
>
>  So how bad is it?
>
>  Dg

It's only bad if you take them...

http://www.statinalert.org/mainpage.html
http://www.thincs.org/

Signature

Steve.

Bob M - 31 Jan 2005 21:06 GMT
>>  The doc gave me a 30 day supply of Lipitor 10mg.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> http://www.statinalert.org/mainpage.html
> http://www.thincs.org/

Certainly the cholesterol skeptics make a good argument that the overall  
death rate of statins isn't better than not taking statins at all.

Signature

Bob in CT

Bob M - 31 Jan 2005 21:10 GMT
>>>  The doc gave me a 30 day supply of Lipitor 10mg.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Certainly the cholesterol skeptics make a good argument that the overall  
> death rate of statins isn't better than not taking statins at all.

Oh yeah, they make an even better argument that statins don't work by  
reducing LDL -- they work through other techniques (such as reduction in  
c-reactive protein).

Signature

Bob in CT

Ignoramus2238 - 31 Jan 2005 21:16 GMT
>>>>  The doc gave me a 30 day supply of Lipitor 10mg.
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> reducing LDL -- they work through other techniques (such as reduction in  
> c-reactive protein).

Even so, the total mortality on statins is higher.
Signature

223/173.2/180

Doug Freyburger - 31 Jan 2005 23:35 GMT
> Just got the results back today.

Unfortunately you don't list the previous test,
nor do you list what plan youre on nor for how
long.

>  So how bad is it?

Could be anywhere from great through terrible.
Could be expected because you're to early in your
plan to test.
marengo - 01 Feb 2005 02:50 GMT
|| Just got the results back today.
||
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
||
|| Chol/HDLC Ratio 4.9

What are your griglycerides supposed to be?

<g>
--
Peter
270/219/180
website:  http://users.thelink.net/marengo
Alan Wright - 01 Feb 2005 17:18 GMT
Those are very healthy numbers. DO NOT take the
statin drug. Read the material refered to in another
post. These drugs are not effective at reducing disease
and have horrible side effects (and cost money).

Alan

> Just got the results back today.
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>  Dg
Ignoramus13812 - 01 Feb 2005 17:35 GMT
> Those are very healthy numbers. DO NOT take the
> statin drug. Read the material refered to in another
> post. These drugs are not effective at reducing disease
> and have horrible side effects (and cost money).

Alan, can you elaborate a little bit?

i

> Alan
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>>
>>  Dg

Signature

223/173.2/180

None Given - 01 Feb 2005 18:00 GMT
> Just got the results back today.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> LDL chllesterol 206
> Chol/HDLC Ratio 4.9

Your HDL and triglycerides are very good, look at one of the bookstore sites
for a book called (IIRC) '50 ways to lower your cholesterol' for help with
lowering your LDL.

Signature

No Husband Has Ever Been Shot While Doing The Dishes

Wysong *~ - 01 Feb 2005 23:45 GMT
> > Just got the results back today.
> >  Cholesterol Total 282
====================
Total Cholesterol should be 180 or below.
Signature

Wysong
Age 60.  Height 5'6"
Starting date: 1/8/05
171/ 166 / 140 lb
==========================================

rosie readandpost - 02 Feb 2005 19:00 GMT
you need to sit down and have a long discussion with your doctor.
if you question the use of statins, talk to him/her about it.
how long have you been low carbing?

Signature

http://img195.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img195&image=dcp00330kx.jpg

: Just got the results back today.
:
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
:
:  Dg
Witchy Way - 03 Feb 2005 00:11 GMT
<<Just got the results back today.
  Lipid Panel griglycerides     97
 Cholesterol Total             282
HDL cholesterol         57
LDL chllesterol         206
Chol/HDLC Ratio         4.9
  Everything else fell within the lines.
  Glucose               76
  The doc gave me a 30 day supply of Lipitor 10mg.
  So how bad is it?
  Dg>>

there is a percentage of people who cannot safely lo carb. my total
cholesterol was 199. after low carbing 1 year it was 235 and my other
numbers weren't good either. the doc wanted to medicate me. instead, i
went on low fat/south beach for 6 months & my cholesterol fell to 180.
if you take the statins only do it for 1 month & get retested. if your
levels have dropped you can go off the drug & try south beach & get
retested.

i'm not knocking low carb. it's just that everyone's body is different.
you must do what is best for you. your health is at stake here.
good luck to you
Aramanth Dawe - 03 Feb 2005 01:35 GMT
>there is a percentage of people who cannot safely lo carb. my total
>cholesterol was 199. after low carbing 1 year it was 235 and my other
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>levels have dropped you can go off the drug & try south beach & get
>retested.

Another option is the Goldberg/O'Mara plan, specifically designed as a
Low Carb plan for people with cholesterol issues.  It's a low-carb,
high fibre plan which includes probiotics (such as live-culture
yoghurt or keffir daily) and many have found it works well for them.
See http://members.tripod.com/go_diet/ for more details.

>i'm not knocking low carb. it's just that everyone's body is different.
>you must do what is best for you. your health is at stake here.
>good luck to you

Isn't that the truth.  My body responds best to 'classic' low carb
without the "Low Carb Products", yours (obviously) works best on a
lower fat plan.  I love the flexibility of the Low Carb concept.

Aramanth
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.