 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers WeightAdviser.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Weight Loss Forum / Low Carb / February 2005#1 way to loose weight
29 people needed to loose weight. All natural, Dr recommended. Please me with a call back # and I will get back to you. healthyu@sympatico.ca > 29 people needed to loose weight. All natural, Dr recommended. Please > me with a call back # and I will get back to you. > > healthyu@sympatico.ca DIE SPAMMER DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DIE SPAMMER DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DIE SPAMMER DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DIE SPAMMER DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DIE SPAMMER DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DIE SPAMMER DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DIE SPAMMER DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DIE SPAMMER DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > 29 people needed to loose weight. All natural, Dr recommended. Please > me with a call back # and I will get back to you. > > healthyu@sympatico.ca Nah, if I loosed my weight I might not be able to find it again and I would hate to lose it. Regards David  SignatureTo email me, please include the letters DNF anywhere in the subject line. All other mail is automatically deleted. > 29 people needed to loose weight. You're misspelling "to". It should be "too". SignatureBob Kanyak's Doghouse http://www.kanyak.com > > 29 people needed to loose weight. > > You're misspelling "to". It should be "too". No, he spelled 'to' correctly in this usage. It's 'lose' that is incorrectly spelled. SignatureNo Husband Has Ever Been Shot While Doing The Dishes >> > 29 people needed to loose weight. >> >> You're misspelling "to". It should be "too". > > No, he spelled 'to' correctly in this usage. It's 'lose' that is > incorrectly spelled. I agree with this poster - to is correct, loose is not - should be lose "Diane Ball" <dball2@satx.rr.com> wrote in news:bUzNd.27501$uA.7980 @fe1.texas.rr.com: >>> > 29 people needed to loose weight. >>> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > I agree with this poster - to is correct, loose is not - should be lose You are both idiots. b > "Diane Ball" <dball2@satx.rr.com> wrote in news:bUzNd.27501$uA.7980 > @fe1.texas.rr.com: [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > You are both idiots. Thank you very much! > b > I agree with this poster - to is correct, loose is not - should be lose I only care about how something is spelled when it's a real post, and not some blathering spam, anyway, and even then, in a real post, I just let the spelling, typos, and grammar slide ;) >>> > 29 people needed to loose weight. >>> >>> You're misspelling "to". It should be "too". >> >> No, he spelled 'to' correctly in this usage. It's 'lose' that is >> incorrectly spelled. But given he's a louse - do we care? Nicky. SignatureA1c 10.5/4.5/<6 Weight 95/78/72Kg 1g Metformin, 87.5ug Thyroxine T2 DX 05/2004 "None Given" <nonegiven@invalid.invalid> wrote .. >> > 29 people needed to loose weight. >> You're misspelling "to". It should be "too". > No, he spelled 'to' correctly in this usage. It's 'lose' > that is > incorrectly spelled. Not if he meant "29 people needed weight that was too loose" or (in the subject line) "the #1 weight that was way too loose". SignatureBob Kanyak's Doghouse http://www.kanyak.com > "None Given" <nonegiven@invalid.invalid> wrote > .. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Not if he meant "29 people needed weight that was too loose" or (in the > subject line) "the #1 weight that was way too loose". I think J.W. Ott was being sarcastic about the extra 'o' in lose... since it was spelled "loose" then "to" should be "too" just to make them match. That's how I took it anyway. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2012 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.