Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / Low Carb / February 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

hoodia gordonii

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Dorothy Roper - 10 Feb 2005 22:35 GMT
Someone I know is taking this - it is an appetite suppressor.  According to
research I did, it was discussed on 60 minutes on a recent show.  Does
anyone on here have any experience/personal knowledge about it?  I am
wondering if it is safe.  Thanks.
marengo - 11 Feb 2005 00:05 GMT
|| Someone I know is taking this - it is an appetite suppressor.
|| According to research I did, it was discussed on 60 minutes on a
|| recent show.  Does anyone on here have any experience/personal
|| knowledge about it?  I am wondering if it is safe.  Thanks.

Why would you ask this on a low-carb diet group, when it is off-topic
and you have never posted here before? And you don't know how to use Google?

I'd give 100 to 1 odds that now your sock puppet is going to post a
reply about where we can buy this amazing, miracle weight loss product.
It's really a tired old usenet spam scam.

You may want to try it over on alt.support.diet.low-fat; they're always
hungry over there so theire brains aren't quite as sharp.

Peter
Cubit - 11 Feb 2005 01:54 GMT
If you check the website for the company cited in the 60 Minutes episode,
you will find that they tested the Hoodia products currently on the market.
They found little or no Hoodia in them.

> Someone I know is taking this - it is an appetite suppressor.  According to
> research I did, it was discussed on 60 minutes on a recent show.  Does
> anyone on here have any experience/personal knowledge about it?  I am
> wondering if it is safe.  Thanks.
Cindy - 11 Feb 2005 02:28 GMT
Hi Dorothy,
   I had been a poster years ago, but now a lurker in the low carb
group for about 4 years now. I was really surprised to see the kind of
reaction you got from your post.  
   Although Hoodia is not directly related to the LC lifestyle, I feel
that many of us, (speaking for myself) who try to low carb, search for
other ways to get results.
   I bought Hoodia and found it didn't have much effect on me.  My
husband seems to feel it works for him. I also work with a lady who had
spectacular results.
You will find most of the Hoodia offered on websites are very low in
milligrams, and will not have any effect.
    I spoke with my friend at the Vitamin Outlet and the NOW brand
clearly states, 300 mg , yet also says it's equivalent of 6000 mg of the
whole plant.
He says they are flying off the shelves.

  There is no danger in taking them, however I think your mileage may
vary with the results.
Good luck :)
JJ - 11 Feb 2005 03:58 GMT
> Hi Dorothy,
>    I had been a poster years ago, but now a lurker in the
> low carb
> group for about 4 years now. I was really surprised to see
> the kind of
> reaction you got from your post.

You've been lurking (and presumably reading) here for 4
years now and you are "really surprised to see the kind of
reaction" that this original post received?

Really?

Signature

JJ.

marengo - 11 Feb 2005 05:36 GMT
|| Hi Dorothy,
||     I had been a poster years ago, but now a lurker in the low carb
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
|| may vary with the results.
|| Good luck :)

EXACTLY as I predicted:  Cindy is the Dorothy Roper's hand-puppet to sell
the product.

Honestly, can't you people come up with something original?
--
Peter
website:  http://users.thelink.net/marengo
Cindy - 11 Feb 2005 11:10 GMT
Cindy - 11 Feb 2005 11:26 GMT
Sorry, I certainly didn't mean to put my signature on this group....but
hit the send before I knew it.

Peter~
I have no idea who Dorothy is, and simply wanted to respond to her, as I
had recently learned of Hoodia myself. I probably should have responded
by e-mail.
Yes, I was surprised to see your response to her...as you didn't seem to
be one who would be so abrupt, over a seemingly innocent post.
It's just your kind of attitude, that keeps me lurking, instead of
posting.
I haven't had a decent conversation with anyone since Bridgett was in
here.
Back to lurking...
geesh~
Ignoramus12588 - 11 Feb 2005 11:44 GMT
You and the OP both appear from the same area of Florida. What a coincidence.

i

> Sorry, I certainly didn't mean to put my signature on this group....but
> hit the send before I knew it.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>  Back to lurking...
> geesh~

Signature

223/173.0/180

Cindy - 11 Feb 2005 12:05 GMT
Cindy - 11 Feb 2005 12:12 GMT
OH sh.t! I did it again!

>You and the OP both appear from the same area
> of Florida. What a coincidence.

yep, Looks like she is in Tampa. I am about 2 hours south of her.
I simply responded. I am not selling Hoodia. I even said it didn't seem
to work for me.
I have been on the LC rollercoaster for years, and haven't reached my
goal, is all.
When I saw the results it had for my co-worker, I looked into it myself.
Carmen - 11 Feb 2005 12:54 GMT
Hello,

> OH sh.t! I did it again!

If you're referring to an HTML .sig it didn't come through that way
for me.

Take care,
Carmen

Signature

Please note change in Reply To address carmensrt <at> gmail <dot> com
Hotmail isn't working and is being abandoned

Carmen - 11 Feb 2005 13:00 GMT
Hi,

> OH sh.t! I did it again!

I saw your .sig in in the Google archive.  It's quite a production
number.  <G>  I guess my ISP strips them off.
Take care,
Carmen

Signature

Please note change in Reply To address carmensrt <at> gmail <dot> com
Hotmail isn't working and is being abandoned

Cindy - 11 Feb 2005 13:18 GMT
Thank you Carmen.
I know better than to use the sig, in this, and some other groups I go
to.

I anticipated some cracks about us lowly webtv-ers.
Carmen - 11 Feb 2005 13:38 GMT
Hello,

> Thank you Carmen.
> I know better than to use the sig, in this, and some other groups I
> go to.
>
> I anticipated some cracks about us lowly webtv-ers.

The biggest pet peeve aside from the flashy .sig files tends to be the
tendency to not quote the message being responded to as far as WebTV
users go.  It seems to be a big production number to quote on a WebTV
device from what I've read on the 'net.
For some reason though Ig and Peter seem to think you and the OP
(Dorothy Roper) may be the same person shilling hoodia.  That's pretty
clearly not the case though.  :-)

Take care,
Carmen
Signature

Please note change in Reply To address carmensrt <at> gmail <dot> com
Hotmail isn't working and is being abandoned

Cindy - 11 Feb 2005 14:21 GMT
>The biggest pet peeve aside from the flashy .sig
> files tends to be the tendency to not quote the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>same person shilling hoodia. That's pretty clearly
> not the case though. :-)

Quoting is obviously do-able but inconvenient. Some of us do try to use
"netiquette" in these situations.
I thought it very unnecessary for him to lash out at the other poster,
for an OT post...( how does he react when something REALLY bad happens!
LOL), and even more ridiculous when I was deemed the "sock puppet" for
responding.

Cindy
Ada Ma - 11 Feb 2005 12:39 GMT
how do you work that out?  from the headers?

> You and the OP both appear from the same area of Florida. What a coincidence.
Carmen - 11 Feb 2005 12:58 GMT
Hi,
On 11-Feb-2005, Ada Ma <ada_ma2001@DONOTSPAMMEYOUEEJIThotmail.com>
wrote:

> > You and the OP both appear from the same area of Florida. What a
> > coincidence.

> how do you work that out?  from the headers?
Yes, but one posts from Road Runner and one posts from a WebTV
device.  Unlikely to be the same person, especially since they have
quite different posting histories.

Take care,
Carmen
Signature

Please note change in Reply To address carmensrt <at> gmail <dot> com
Hotmail isn't working and is being abandoned

Ada Ma - 11 Feb 2005 13:34 GMT
> Hi,
> On 11-Feb-2005, Ada Ma <ada_ma2001@DONOTSPAMMEYOUEEJIThotmail.com>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Take care,
> Carmen

Thanks Carmen.  Is it very easy to pretend to be someone else if the person is
posting from a WebTV device?
Carmen - 11 Feb 2005 13:53 GMT
Hi,
On 11-Feb-2005, Ada Ma <ada_ma2001@DONOTSPAMMEYOUEEJIThotmail.com>
wrote:

> > Hi,
> > On 11-Feb-2005, Ada Ma <ada_ma2001@DONOTSPAMMEYOUEEJIThotmail.com>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Thanks Carmen.  Is it very easy to pretend to be someone else if the
> person is posting from a WebTV device?

I don't know.  I know it's pretty easy for an AOLer to pretend to be
another AOLer, but I've got no idea what sort of procedure there is
for changing the "Reply To" email in WebTV.  Maybe Cindy can enlighten
us?

take care,
Carmen
Signature

Please note change in Reply To address carmensrt <at> gmail <dot> com
Hotmail isn't working and is being abandoned

Cindy - 11 Feb 2005 14:37 GMT
>Maybe Cindy can enlighten us?

Actually, I don't know any way to change the  RE: name and addy. The
only way to come in with a different name would be to use a different
account on the same service, so it would still show up as a webtv addy,
only with a different nickname.

Perhaps there are more advanced webtv-ers that do know a way, but not
this girl. :)

Cindy
christopher.a.dowling@gmail.com - 11 Feb 2005 11:33 GMT
Yeah. Seems to work for me.  I 've used some of the NOW Foods Hoodia
Complex and Mega Hoodia. Takes a while to "kick in".....
christopher.a.dowling@gmail.com - 11 Feb 2005 11:50 GMT
Some reputable supplement brands are now producing hoodia supplements,
but, as to long term safety, I suppose only the bushmen know for sure.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.