Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / Low Carb / February 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

I need some help

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Sullen - 11 Feb 2005 17:56 GMT
i'm new to trying to eat low carb and i was wondering what some of you eat
in an average day?
what do you  normally have for breakfast, lunch, dinner?
Kevin_Stevens@hotmail.com - 11 Feb 2005 21:02 GMT
> i'm new to trying to eat low carb and i was wondering what some of you eat
> in an average day?
> what do you  normally have for breakfast, lunch, dinner?

No breakfast or a couple ounces of cheese - just not a breakfast person.

Lunch - typically grilled half chicken (El Pollo Loco four piece chicken
only no sides no tortillas large diet Coke for here please!)

Dinner - typically grilled salmon, chicken, or occasional steak, with
caesar salad and broccoli, often a grilled or boiled shrimp appetizer.

Snacks - I love cheese, but try to keep it to max 4oz/day.  Olives are a
great snack for me.  If I'm actually hungry at night I usually nuke a
package of brussels sprouts w/butter.

My mainstay substitution for lunch/dinner is an entree chicken caesar
salad - that's the thing I can count on getting almost anywhere, without
having to worry too much about carby ingredients.  Probably half those
lunch/dinner choices are actually salads, most of them chicken caesar.

That's just the backbone of my diet - if I'm out with friends or feel like
something else there's no problem incorporating other food, so there's
actually a lot more variety than it sounds.  I average ~1300 calories/day,
about 20g carbs all from vegetables.  I've lost 85 lbs since last August,
and am about 40 from goal.

KeS
Wysong *~ - 11 Feb 2005 23:20 GMT
> i'm new to trying to eat low carb and i was wondering what some of you eat
> in an average day?
> what do you  normally have for breakfast, lunch, dinner?
=============================
While stirct LCing I had bacon, sausage patties or eggs for breakfast.
Pretty greasy fare actually when there's no bread to go with it.  Coffee
w/milk and Sweet & Low.

Lunch was usually another meal of mainly some kind of meat or eggs (boiled
or fried), with a side dish of raw mushrooms and sliced cucumber or celery
sticks.  Yes I like celery.   Sometimes a slice or two of tomato (a bit
carby).  Sometimes canned fish instead of meat (canned mackerel, tuna or
salmon) or cheese.  When I was away from the house a hamburger without the
bun and salad which I never liked.  I'm just no salad eater so didn't enjoy
that very much.  Or I'd order a baked fish plate and tell them to hold the
"fries."  Some restaurants in my area now have low-carb lunch plates.  Some
days lunch was 2 hard boiled eggs and celery sticks.  Herbal tea w/Sweet &
Low.   Some days lunch was more (cold leftover) sausages or bacon.  I didn't
always have time to cook my lunch.

Dinner was always heavy on meat, fish or chicken and low carb veggies.  The
veggies we ate the most were string and wax beans, cauliflower, broccoli,
summer squash, asparagus, mushrooms and all types of greens.  Note thought
that these low-carb veggies may be healthy but they are not filling.   I had
to depend on meat to keep from being hungry all the time.

The things I gave up from my normal diet were: Bagels, whole wheat bread,
rice dishes, potatoes, peas, pasta dishes, corn, lima beans, all "dry"
beans, all cereals such as Quaker Oats, Fiber One which I love.   Giving up
the occasional "treat" such as a piece of pie or potato chips was no
hardship.  I lost 46 lbs the first 5 months, then hit a permanent plateau.
I then gave up nuts, cheese, caffinated coffee & diet soda.  By the end of
the 2 year plateau there was nothing left to give up but the meat and
veggies.....  I gave up the diet instead and switched to Weight Watcher LC.

Atkins does become a restricted, portion controlled low calorie diet for
many people.  Don't believe everything you've read in his books.
Signature

Wysong
Age 60.  Height 5'6"
Starting date: 1/8/05
171/ 165 / 140 lb
Starting date LC 7/01 at 207lbs
Stopped losing on LC 11/01 at 165lbs
==========================================
Crap - I forgot to get my official stamp of approval and sign the
little document promising only to have thoughts that conform to the
official ASDLC guidelines.
I hate it when that happens. (credit Sophie)
~~<~~<~~{@  ~~<~~<~~{@  ~~<~~<~~{@

Kevin_Stevens@hotmail.com - 11 Feb 2005 23:48 GMT
> veggies we ate the most were string and wax beans, cauliflower, broccoli,
> summer squash, asparagus, mushrooms and all types of greens.  Note thought
> that these low-carb veggies may be healthy but they are not filling.   I had

...says the person complaining that she couldn't eat more than 3/4 cup of
them...

KeS
Wysong *~ - 12 Feb 2005 04:02 GMT
> > veggies we ate the most were string and wax beans, cauliflower, broccoli,
> > summer squash, asparagus, mushrooms and all types of greens.  Note thought
> > that these low-carb veggies may be healthy but they are not filling.   I had
>
> ...says the person complaining that she couldn't eat more than 3/4 cup of
> them...
=========================
Did I say I ate 2 or 3 or 4 cups of them per sitting?  Where?  Sure I can
eat maybe 2 cups if I don't eat anything else for dinner.  A lot of people
on this NG seem to keep confusing posters.  I wonder why that is?
Signature

Wysong
Age 60.  Height 5'6"
Starting date: 1/8/05
171/ 165 / 140 lb
Starting date LC 7/01 at 207lbs
Stopped losing on LC 11/01 at 165lbs
==========================================
Crap - I forgot to get my official stamp of approval and sign the
little document promising only to have thoughts that conform to the
official ASDLC guidelines.
I hate it when that happens. (credit Sophie)
~~<~~<~~{@  ~~<~~<~~{@  ~~<~~<~~{@

Roger Zoul - 12 Feb 2005 16:42 GMT
> X-No-Archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> of people on this NG seem to keep confusing posters.  I wonder why
> that is?

:)
Roger Zoul - 12 Feb 2005 16:42 GMT
> X-No-Archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> healthy but they are not filling.   I had to depend on meat to keep
> from being hungry all the time.

3 cups of broccoli is not filling?  I thought you couldn't eat that much.

I told you you ate too much meat and not enough veggies. :)

And what's wrong with a little hunger?

> The things I gave up from my normal diet were: Bagels, whole wheat
> bread, rice dishes, potatoes, peas, pasta dishes, corn, lima beans,
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> nothing left to give up but the meat and veggies.....  I gave up the
> diet instead and switched to Weight Watcher LC.

You were just eating too much of everything.  That's why you had to give up
everything you loved...you loved everything and pigged out on everything.

> Atkins does become a restricted, portion controlled low calorie diet
> for many people.  Don't believe everything you've read in his books.
Wysong *~ - 13 Feb 2005 05:27 GMT
> > X-No-Archive: yes
> >
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> > healthy but they are not filling.   I had to depend on meat to keep
> > from being hungry all the time.
=============================================
> 3 cups of broccoli is not filling?  I thought you couldn't eat that much.

## I thought you couldn't either?  I wasn't on a vegetarian diet - were you?

> I told you you ate too much meat and not enough veggies. :)

##  Yep!  I didn't know Atkins and low-carb diets were vegetarian diets with
a bite or two of meat. :-)))

> And what's wrong with a little hunger?

##  Nothing, as long as it's not all the time, every day, day after day
after day....

> > The things I gave up from my normal diet were: Bagels, whole wheat
> > bread, rice dishes, potatoes, peas, pasta dishes, corn, lima beans,
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> > nothing left to give up but the meat and veggies.....  I gave up the
> > diet instead and switched to Weight Watcher LC.

> You were just eating too much of everything.  That's why you had to give up
> everything you loved...you loved everything and pigged out on everything.

##  Yep!  I consumed so much, and pigged out so much that I was *losing* up
to 2 1/2 lbs some weeks!  ;-)

> > Atkins does become a restricted, portion controlled low calorie diet
> > for many people.  Don't believe everything you've read in his books.
Signature

Wysong
Age 60.  Height 5'6"
Starting date: 1/8/05
171/ 165 / 140 lb
Starting date LC 7/01 at 207lbs
Stopped losing on LC 11/01 at 165lbs
==========================================
Crap - I forgot to get my official stamp of approval and sign the
little document promising only to have thoughts that conform to the
official ASDLC guidelines.
I hate it when that happens. (credit Sophie)
~~<~~<~~{@  ~~<~~<~~{@  ~~<~~<~~{@

tia - 13 Feb 2005 04:46 GMT
> Atkins does become a restricted, portion controlled low calorie diet for
> many people.  Don't believe everything you've read in his books.

um, the point is to be restricted, isnt it?  fix the imbalance and all that?
i find it interesting that you say not to believe everything in his books?
what exactly do you disagree with, and furthermore, what credentials do you
have that can substantiate that suspicion?  im very curious to what you
think isnt valid... as far as ive been experimenting with atkins over the
past 82lbs and few years, he seems to have a very valid point.  the science
behind sugar causing all my panic attacks was extremely dead on.  the theory
about sugar and starches being allergies versus just other foods was dead
on.  the idea that 15000 years ago we killed it, cooked it and ate it made a
lot of sense... and looking back through history it seems the man is right;
this is the richest  we as humans have ever eaten, with sugars and refined
products...its no wonder we're all in a state of panic with the diabetic
epidemic in this country.  please, let me know what exactly you speak of, id
like to do a bit of thinking on the topic.

-tia
Wysong *~ - 13 Feb 2005 07:54 GMT
> > Atkins does become a restricted, portion controlled low calorie diet for
> > many people.  Don't believe everything you've read in his books.
>
> um, the point is to be restricted, isnt it?  fix the imbalance and all that?

# Ummm,... have you read the Atkins books?   What imbalance?  Not everyone
who is overweight got there gobbling cake and chips floating in cheese sauce
or stuffing sugar laden donuts down their throats.  There are several of us
on these NG who developed a weight problem due to other medical conditions.
We were otherwise thin to average all our lives.

> i find it interesting that you say not to believe everything in his books?

#  Well, why should I?  He's not God.  Not everyone reaches goal weight
following the simple advice to eat all those chops, steaks, gravies, salads
etc. and give up the cakes, pies, rice and other carby foods.  I didn't get
the impression from his book that his is a vegetarian type of diet either.
Please read chapter #1 of his "New Diet Revolution" book.  However, I see
that seems to be the case here with a lot of posters.  They're very heavy on
veggies and salads.   A word on salads.  Some of us DESPISE salad.  Even as
a kid I hated it and would not eat it although I loved all veggies and all
fruit.  Part of the problem is some people dislike salad dressings and/or
vinegar so eat it plain, or with some cheese sprinkled over it.  It's still
tasteless to us. I personally can't eat one more salad.

> what exactly do you disagree with, and furthermore, what credentials do you
> have that can substantiate that suspicion?

#  What do YOU agree with in his books and why?  What credentials do you
have to substantiate it's validity?   If it worked and we all reached our
goal weight on salads, some veggies and all those meats he advises obesity
would be a thing of the past.  Too many hit these plateaus and that's that!
Then it's on to the calorie counting, measuring......

im very curious to what you
> think isnt valid...

#  Tell us about all those SUMPTUOUS steaks, chops and gravies he talks
about.....  and not having to count calories, how you can eat MORE then
before you started his diet and watch the fat melt off.

as far as ive been experimenting with atkins over the
> past 82lbs and few years, he seems to have a very valid point.

# Until you no longer lose weight on his plan.  And at some point that seems
to happen to most people - UNLESS they drop the plan and start counting
calories, weighing and measuring everything they eat, becoming near
vegetarians, keeping tract - just like any other low calorie diet.
Everyone I knew who tried these low-carb diets did indeed lose weight, some
a lot of weight, but then the "stall" or plateau hits - like running into a
brick wall.

the science
> behind sugar causing all my panic attacks was extremely dead on.

# I never said sugar wasn't bad for people.  Natural sugars in things like
fruit are not harmful.

the theory
> about sugar and starches being allergies versus just other foods was dead
> on.

# I didn't say it wasn't.  I agree that donuts, breads, cookies, greasy
fries and other garbage is just that - garbage!  It's not anatural food for
human beings no more than a bowl of oatmeal would be for a dog or cat.

the idea that 15000 years ago we killed it, cooked it and ate it made a
> lot of sense...

#  I didn't say it didn't make sense, did I?   I *DID* say at some point the
Atkins diet becomes like all other diets where calories must be counted and
food weighed and measured.  I never mentioned sugar and trash-foods.   Also
from what I learned about human evolution man was mainly a vegetarian BEFORE
he became a hunter gatherer.  Going back before we learned to hunt and kill
we (and our teeth prove it) were eaters of fruit, nuts, berries, seeds,
roots/tubers, greens and probably insects, small lizards and bird's eggs.
Our teeth show they did not evolve for shearing meats.  Look at a dog's or
cat's teeth for a good comparison.

and looking back through history it seems the man is right;
> this is the richest  we as humans have ever eaten, with sugars and refined
> products...its no wonder we're all in a state of panic with the diabetic
> epidemic in this country.

# I am not diabetic and was never on a high "sugar" diet so I can't relate
to that.   Here again, what kind of diet were diabetics on when they
developed their disease?   Every diabetic I know personally (adult onset)
was overweight and *ALL* were fond of high carb foods!    Do you know any
who weren't?

please, let me know what exactly you speak of, id
> like to do a bit of thinking on the topic.

# Please see above.   At first following the low-carb (in my case I didn't
have to give up pies, cookies, fries, donuts etc as they were not a part of
my normal diet) almost everyone loses weight quickly - then when you STOP
losing the weight, it becomes like all other diets - you have to start
counting calories, weighing and measuring your food.  THAT was my point.
Signature

Wysong
Age 60.  Height 5'6"
Starting date: 1/8/05
171/ 165 / 140 lb
Starting date LC 7/01 at 207lbs
Stopped losing on LC 11/01 at 165lbs
==========================================
Crap - I forgot to get my official stamp of approval and sign the
little document promising only to have thoughts that conform to the
official ASDLC guidelines.
I hate it when that happens. (credit Sophie)
~~<~~<~~{@  ~~<~~<~~{@  ~~<~~<~~{@

Roger Zoul - 13 Feb 2005 11:10 GMT
> # Please see above.   At first following the low-carb (in my case I
> didn't have to give up pies, cookies, fries, donuts etc as they were
> not a part of my normal diet) almost everyone loses weight quickly -
> then when you STOP losing the weight, it becomes like all other diets
> - you have to start counting calories, weighing and measuring your
> food.  THAT was my point.

There are plenty of people who manage to lose weight effectively (all the
way to goal) who don't count calories.  They show up right here in this ng
all of the time. You just have to ask.
Wysong *~ - 13 Feb 2005 18:29 GMT
> > # Please see above.   At first following the low-carb (in my case I
> > didn't have to give up pies, cookies, fries, donuts etc as they were
> > not a part of my normal diet) almost everyone loses weight quickly -
> > then when you STOP losing the weight, it becomes like all other diets
> > - you have to start counting calories, weighing and measuring your
> > food.  THAT was my point.
===================
> There are plenty of people who manage to lose weight effectively (all the
> way to goal) who don't count calories.

## And there are plenty of people who must start to count, measure and in
the end end up on low-calorie diets.

They show up right here in this ng
> all of the time. You just have to ask.

##  And so do the others but they're quickly silenced now I see.........
Signature

Wysong
Age 60.  Height 5'6"
Starting date: 1/8/05
171/ 165 / 140 lb
Starting date LC 7/01 at 207lbs
Stopped losing on LC 11/01 at 165lbs
==========================================
Crap - I forgot to get my official stamp of approval and sign the
little document promising only to have thoughts that conform to the
official ASDLC guidelines.
I hate it when that happens. (credit Sophie)
~~<~~<~~{@  ~~<~~<~~{@  ~~<~~<~~{@

tia - 14 Feb 2005 02:25 GMT
FFS EXERCIZE!  force your goddamn body out of stasis lol... you dont have to
quit eating, but get up the goddamn couch!

Signature

_____________________________
This be Tia's SIG!!! YAY!

> X-No-Archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> ##  And so do the others but they're quickly silenced now I see.........
Wysong *~ - 14 Feb 2005 06:31 GMT
> FFS EXERCIZE!  force your goddamn body out of stasis lol... you dont have to
> quit eating, but get up the goddamn couch!
-====================
How many times I do have to REPEAT that I not only do all the house and yard
work (1 acre)  but I also walk between 1.5 and 3 miles a day on a 4% grade
at 3 to 3.2 MPH?   How many times ita?  Maybe YOU need to get off your a.s,
off your computer and exercise more!
Signature

Wysong
Age 60.  Height 5'6"
Starting date: 1/8/05
171/ 165 / 140 lb
Starting date LC 7/01 at 207lbs
Stopped losing on LC 11/01 at 165lbs
==========================================
NOW WALKING 1.5 to 3 MILES DAY.
==========================================
Crap - I forgot to get my official stamp of approval and sign the
little document promising only to have thoughts that conform to the
official ASDLC guidelines.
I hate it when that happens. (credit Sophie)
~~<~~<~~{@  ~~<~~<~~{@  ~~<~~<~~{@

tia - 14 Feb 2005 07:00 GMT
im not the one complaining that im not losing weight.  in fact, when im not
sitting in hospitals, i run with my husband, who is active duty military.
it works.

Signature

_____________________________
This be Tia's SIG!!! YAY!

> X-No-Archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> a.s,
> off your computer and exercise more!
tia - 14 Feb 2005 07:01 GMT
oh..and you repeated it in a few posts, all in the same go around, i guess,
cuz ive been reading your posts with vim and vigor and havent heard about it
until now.  dont forget, im prolly a week old to this ng.

Signature

_____________________________
This be Tia's SIG!!! YAY!

> X-No-Archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> a.s,
> off your computer and exercise more!
Roger Zoul - 14 Feb 2005 14:39 GMT
> X-No-Archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> ## And there are plenty of people who must start to count, measure
> and in the end end up on low-calorie diets.

For some, when weight loss stop, they just start eating less, so it never
becomes necessary to count calories.
For others, they like to track stuff, so they count calories without ever
really needing to.  They find it interesting to track stuff.

> They show up right here in this ng
>> all of the time. You just have to ask.
>
> ##  And so do the others but they're quickly silenced now I
> see.........

Stop deluding yourself.  People don't post just to prove something to you.
Wysong *~ - 15 Feb 2005 05:44 GMT
> > X-No-Archive: yes
> >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> >> There are plenty of people who manage to lose weight effectively
> >> (all the way to goal) who don't count calories.

> > ## And there are plenty of people who must start to count, measure
> > and in the end end up on low-calorie diets.

> For some, when weight loss stop, they just start eating less, so it never
> becomes necessary to count calories.

$$ Same difference - whether you count calories or keep cutting back and
cutting back. You both end up on a low calorie diet in the end.

> For others, they like to track stuff, so they count calories without ever
> really needing to.  They find it interesting to track stuff.

$$ I noticed.

> > They show up right here in this ng
> >> all of the time. You just have to ask.

> > ##  And so do the others but they're quickly silenced now I
> > see.........

> Stop deluding yourself.  People don't post just to prove something to you.

$$ That's not what I said.
Signature

Wysong
Age 60.  Height 5'6"
Starting date: 1/8/05
171/ 165 / 140 lb
Starting date LC 7/01 at 207lbs
Stopped losing on LC 11/01 at 165lbs
==========================================
NOW WALKING 1.5 to 3 MILES DAY.
==========================================
Crap - I forgot to get my official stamp of approval and sign the
little document promising only to have thoughts that conform to the
official ASDLC guidelines.
I hate it when that happens. (credit Sophie)
~~<~~<~~{@  ~~<~~<~~{@  ~~<~~<~~{@

Roger Zoul - 15 Feb 2005 08:27 GMT
> X-No-Archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> $$ Same difference - whether you count calories or keep cutting back
> and cutting back. You both end up on a low calorie diet in the end.

No one loses weight without cutting calories.  And a low-calorie diet is
relative to the dieter.
tia - 13 Feb 2005 15:33 GMT
Signature

_____________________________
This be Tia's SIG!!! YAY!

> X-No-Archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 120 lines]
> losing the weight, it becomes like all other diets - you have to start
> counting calories, weighing and measuring your food.  THAT was my point.

honestly, i wish i had the time today to reply to you in the fashion that
you're expecting.  the one thing you probably didnt get from his book was
the idea of stasis... (yes i have read it, 5 times this year alone as well
as looking stuff up etc, and over the past few years)

you claim that eventually you wont lose weight on atkins.. that is true,
youre not the only one to say that.  its like the scales of justice when you
balance out the carbs and the proteins.  eventually they will even out,
where the body can maintain with what youre eating -- which by the way is
the goal everyone's body has - stasis.  once you hit stasis you have to make
a choice... force your body out of stasis by either making it work harder or
you eat less.  i suspect that youre blaming the diet and not exercising
enough (obviously because youre complaining of stasis) only because you
mention eventually you have to eat less and less to lose weight and its all
a low cal diet... well i can promise you this much, people that run 5 miles
a day arent fat.  as a matter of fact, i havent seen a distance runner that
was.  why?  because their bodies are working much harder than ours to stay
in this stasis, and they keep forcing their bodies out of it - therefore
whatever they eat - trash or not, their bodies are desperately trying to use
it for fuel.

step up the exercise before you criticize the man.  if you ever lost weight
on his plan, he wasnt wrong.  if it never worked, thats one thing.  stasis
is a hard concept, but you can keep the same level of eating if you just
step up the workout.

good luck, love :)

Signature

_____________________________
This be Tia's SIG!!! YAY!

Wysong *~ - 13 Feb 2005 18:49 GMT
> "Wysong *~" <P@P> wrote in message
>> > # Please see above.   At first following the low-carb (in my case I
didn't
> > have to give up pies, cookies, fries, donuts etc as they were not a part
> > of
> > my normal diet) almost everyone loses weight quickly - then when you STOP
> > losing the weight, it becomes like all other diets - you have to start
> > counting calories, weighing and measuring your food.  THAT was my point.
==============

> honestly, i wish i had the time today to reply to you in the fashion that
> you're expecting.  the one thing you probably didnt get from his book was
> the idea of stasis... (yes i have read it, 5 times this year alone as well
> as looking stuff up etc, and over the past few years)

> you claim that eventually you wont lose weight on atkins..

##  I know some people lose all the way to goal.  But many do not!  How many
on this NG alone have reached goal without having to count, measure or
weight their foods - or switch to mainly a diet of mostly low-carb veggies?
I see some of the same people here that were here 3 years ago still TRYING
to lose weight.  Surely you didn't miss all the posts about cups and cups
and cups of broccoli and other veggies.  :-)

that is true,
> youre not the only one to say that.  its like the scales of justice when you
> balance out the carbs and the proteins.  eventually they will even out,
> where the body can maintain with what youre eating -- which by the way is
> the goal everyone's body has - stasis.

## Of course I understand that, and to now lose weight I must drop my
calories so much I start to suffer the symptoms of starvation itself, as I
mentioned several time already.  One of those symptoms can be deadly - the
heart palpitations.

once you hit stasis you have to make
> a choice... force your body out of stasis by either making it work harder or
> you eat less.  i suspect that youre blaming the diet and not exercising
> enough (obviously because youre complaining of stasis) only because you
> mention eventually you have to eat less and less to lose weight and its all
> a low cal diet...

##  What choice have I got?  To consume enough fiber I must eat large
amounts of veggies at the cost of meat and fat.  I can only hold so much
food.  What was left for me to give up?  The veggies or the meat/fat?

well i can promise you this much, people that run 5 miles
> a day arent fat.  as a matter of fact, i havent seen a distance runner that
> was.  why?  because their bodies are working much harder than ours to stay
> in this stasis, and they keep forcing their bodies out of it - therefore
> whatever they eat - trash or not, their bodies are desperately trying to use
> it for fuel.

##  I wish I could run 5 miles a day.  In fact maintaining is not a problem
from me, never was - getting the damn lard off is the problem.

> step up the exercise before you criticize the man.

##  Where in Atkins book does it say one must exercise for many hours a day?
Or must jog for miles and miles?  I'm doing 1.5 to 3 miles a day now plus
all the house work, shopping, cleaning.....   what more can I do?   If I
could jog 5 miles a day like a young person I wouldn't need to be on diet at
all.  No one would need be on a diet.

if you ever lost weight
> on his plan, he wasnt wrong.

##  He was WRONG in not telling people the diet would or could stop at any
time, (and it does for so many people) which would necessitate a switch to
an almost vegetarian low cal diet, or one would have to start to exercise in
excess of 3 miles a day!  Also, as the NYTimes online paper pointed out - at
the end of a year the low carbers lost as much weight as people on other
diets.  Dropout rates were similar.

if it never worked, thats one thing.  stasis
> is a hard concept,

## No it isn't.  It's an easy concept to understand.

but you can keep the same level of eating if you just
> step up the workout.

##  3 miles is about my limit on the treadmill unless I win the Lottery and
can hire household and yard help.  :-)  How many others on this NG are
exercising at all?

> good luck, love :)
Signature

Wysong
Age 60.  Height 5'6"
Starting date: 1/8/05
171/ 165 / 140 lb
Starting date LC 7/01 at 207lbs
Stopped losing on LC 11/01 at 165lbs
==========================================
Crap - I forgot to get my official stamp of approval and sign the
little document promising only to have thoughts that conform to the
official ASDLC guidelines.
I hate it when that happens. (credit Sophie)
~~<~~<~~{@  ~~<~~<~~{@  ~~<~~<~~{@

tia - 14 Feb 2005 02:27 GMT
i could cry.. if 3 miles is your limit on the treadmill - go 3 miles and 1
tenth.  the next day go 3 miles and 2 tenths.. atkins says himself if you
dont exercize you're not doing atkins.  THIS IS NOT A DIET... they even call
it a way of life because it does include exercize.  food alone will not take
the lard off.  god, i love you but sometimes i just get so frustrated....
move.. your body was meant to do it!

Signature

_____________________________
This be Tia's SIG!!! YAY!

>> "Wysong *~" <P@P> wrote in message
>>> > # Please see above.   At first following the low-carb (in my case I
[quoted text clipped - 101 lines]
>
>> good luck, love :)
Hannah Gruen - 14 Feb 2005 14:45 GMT
> Surely you didn't miss all the posts about cups and cups
> and cups of broccoli and other veggies.  :-)

As if that's a bad thing?! Get a grip.

> ## Of course I understand that, and to now lose weight I must drop my
> calories so much I start to suffer the symptoms of starvation itself, as I
> mentioned several time already.  One of those symptoms can be deadly - the
> heart palpitations.

As I've said to you before (with zero response), your so-called starvation
symptoms sound more like hypoglycemia to me. BTDT, cured it with a low-carb
diet. Realize, Wysong, that many people have a somewhat deranged endocrine
system and even though not diabetic, do not handle carbohydrates well, in
that their characteristic hormonal milieau (insulin dominant) does not allow
them to effectively use their fat and protein stores as an energy source. So
when they cut way back on food, they go all hypo. Heart rate abnormalities
and palpitations are common when your body overproduces "stress hormones"
like adreneline, which it typically does in the face of low or rapidly
dropping blood sugar.

The cure usually involves cutting way back on carbs, especially stuff like
that brown sugar and all those carby foods you have been craving. And for
many, this adaptation doesn't happen quickly. I continue to recommend to you
that you read Dr. Schwarzbein, an endocrinologist who advocates a low-carb
diet, among other things.

>  I'm doing 1.5 to 3 miles a day now plus
> all the house work, shopping, cleaning.....   what more can I do?   If I
> could jog 5 miles a day like a young person I wouldn't need to be on diet at
> all.  No one would need be on a diet.

None of what you are doing is anywhere near high-intensity. You don't need
to put in tons of mileage if you do something higher intensity. Maybe you
can't run 5 miles, but you could probably work up to some short sprints
during your daily mile or three. Or do some steep hills, or use a
stairstepper. Crank up the incline to the max on your treadmill. More
importantly, learn to do some serious weight lifting. It's great for older
folks, both for keeping the metabolism reved and for halting bone mineral
loss.

Note: All this has been recommended to you before, but you never comment.
Just keep complaining, and complaining. One would think you just want to do
what you want to do and then complain about why you aren't getting the
results you want.

HG.
tia - 14 Feb 2005 18:05 GMT
One would think you just want to do
> what you want to do and then complain about why you aren't getting the
> results you want.
>
> HG.

maybe shes lonely and this gives her something to talk about?

Signature

_____________________________
This be Tia's SIG!!! YAY!

Wysong *~ - 15 Feb 2005 06:04 GMT
> > Surely you didn't miss all the posts about cups and cups
> > and cups of broccoli and other veggies.  :-)
>
> As if that's a bad thing?! Get a grip.

$$ Did I say it was a BAD thing?  How many other diets don't include
veggies?  Most even include fruit.

> > ## Of course I understand that, and to now lose weight I must drop my
> > calories so much I start to suffer the symptoms of starvation itself, as I
> > mentioned several time already.  One of those symptoms can be deadly - the
> > heart palpitations.

> As I've said to you before (with zero response), your so-called starvation
> symptoms sound more like hypoglycemia to me. BTDT, cured it with a low-carb
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> them to effectively use their fat and protein stores as an energy source. So
> when they cut way back on food, they go all hypo.

$$  That's possible, but I can't run down to the clinic when this happens
for blood work.  My bi-yearly blood work is always normal.

Heart rate abnormalities
> and palpitations are common when your body overproduces "stress hormones"
> like adreneline, which it typically does in the face of low or rapidly
> dropping blood sugar.

$$ Of course it would rapidly DROP on the low-carb diet I was on for 1 1/2
years.

> The cure usually involves cutting way back on carbs, especially stuff like
> that brown sugar and all those carby foods you have been craving.

$$  I didn't use brown sugar at that time.  I was on the LC diet.  So you
believe when someone likes a food it's a CRAVING?  You must have missed many
of my posts.

And for
> many, this adaptation doesn't happen quickly. I continue to recommend to you
> that you read Dr. Schwarzbein, an endocrinologist who advocates a low-carb
> diet, among other things.

$$  Dr's contradict each other all the time.  I don't take any of them as
gospel truths.

> >  I'm doing 1.5 to 3 miles a day now plus
> > all the house work, shopping, cleaning.....   what more can I do?   If I
> > could jog 5 miles a day like a young person I wouldn't need to be on diet
> at
> > all.  No one would need be on a diet.

> None of what you are doing is anywhere near high-intensity. You don't need
> to put in tons of mileage if you do something higher intensity. Maybe you
> can't run 5 miles, but you could probably work up to some short sprints
> during your daily mile or three.

$$  Geeze, so now it's becoming a low-carb, low-calorie, high-veggie and
HIGH INTENSITY exercise diet.  Is everyone on the NG doing these sprints
and/or running several miles a day to lose weight?  It sure is getting
farther and farther away from the Atkins diet.

Or do some steep hills, or use a
> stairstepper. Crank up the incline to the max on your treadmill. More
> importantly, learn to do some serious weight lifting. It's great for older
> folks, both for keeping the metabolism reved and for halting bone mineral
> loss.

$$  Is that what everyone here is doing to lose on a LC diet?  Is that what
the Atkins foundation now recommends?  What about those of us who already
tried that bullshit and lost nothing?  I went to the gym in town, despised
over minute I was there and lost 1 lb those 6 months.  I hate going to the
gym.  It's far from my house, it's expensive, they blare heavy rock music,
and the place smells like a dirty locker room.  Not thanks.

> Note: All this has been recommended to you before, but you never comment.

$$  Because the rest of you never comment on what I write!   You don't seem
to SEE what I write and I get tired of answering the same questions and
comments over and over again.  How many of you are going to gyms, running
miles a day, eating high veggie diets - to lose weight on Atkins?   To lose
those initial 46 lbs all I did was walk a few times a week - 2 miles per
day.   Now suddenly I need the gym, weight lifting, running/sprinting etc.?

> Just keep complaining, and complaining. One would think you just want to do
> what you want to do and then complain about why you aren't getting the
> results you want.

$$  One would think I should do everything you people suggest like before -
with no results.  You missed those posts too?  You tell me how long a senior
is going to last with all this intensive expertise, strength training,
running on 1000 to 1200 calories a day?  LCing no less, trying to do it on
fat and protein.  What qualifies you to give someone my age that kind of
advice?  There is nothing about this intensive workout and running for
seniors in the Atkins book.
Signature

Wysong
Age 60.  Height 5'6"
Starting date: 1/8/05
171/ 165 / 140 lb
Starting date LC 7/01 at 207lbs
Stopped losing on LC 11/01 at 165lbs
==========================================
NOW WALKING 1.5 to 3 MILES DAY.
==========================================
Crap - I forgot to get my official stamp of approval and sign the
little document promising only to have thoughts that conform to the
official ASDLC guidelines.
I hate it when that happens. (credit Sophie)
~~<~~<~~{@  ~~<~~<~~{@  ~~<~~<~~{@

tia - 15 Feb 2005 07:56 GMT
$$  Geeze, so now it's becoming a low-carb, low-calorie, high-veggie and
HIGH INTENSITY exercise diet.  Is everyone on the NG doing these sprints
and/or running several miles a day to lose weight?  It sure is getting
farther and farther away from the Atkins diet.

bullshit.

if youre not exercizing, you're not doing atkins.  read the OTHER half of
the book.  people are doing what they have to so they get out of stasis...;p

Signature

_____________________________
This be Tia's SIG!!! YAY!

>> > Surely you didn't miss all the posts about cups and cups
>> > and cups of broccoli and other veggies.  :-)
[quoted text clipped - 115 lines]
> advice?  There is nothing about this intensive workout and running for
> seniors in the Atkins book.
Carmen - 16 Feb 2005 16:56 GMT
Hi Tia,
Wysong earned the nick "Whine Song"/ "Whinesong" 3 years ago.  Now you
know why.  :-)

Have a good day,
Carmen

Signature

Please note change in Reply To address carmensrt <at> gmail <dot> com
Hotmail isn't working and is being abandoned

Hannah Gruen - 15 Feb 2005 20:03 GMT
> $$  That's possible, but I can't run down to the clinic when this happens
> for blood work.  My bi-yearly blood work is always normal.

Hmmm... yep, I see a decided lack of interest in actually improving your
situation. Wysong, it's likely that it is specifically the types of foods
you were eating while eating very low calorie that were causing your
problems. You're very likely insulin resistant to some degree. When you
dropped calories way down, your body was still producing too much insulin,
instead of going glucagon-dominant enough to be able to live comfortably off
your meager meals and body fat. People with well-functioning endocrine
systems will adapt to a very low calorie diet after a few days and won't
experience the symptoms you described, at least not for a long while when
they deplete body reserves and actual starvation sets in. People on low-carb
diets often approximate that condition by cutting way back on the foods that
stimulate insulin production, so that they are better able to utilize fat
reserves. It also allows them to do that without a lot of discomfort.

It wouldn't help you that much to run to the clinic, as many if not most low
blood sugar symptoms (in non-insulin dependent folks) are related as much to
rapidity of drop of blood glucose as to the actual glucose concentration in
the blood. Clinics aren't well equipped to evaluate that. The best approach
is to experiment with your diet. I don't know that you have either the
motivation or mindset to do that, however.

> $$ Of course it would rapidly DROP on the low-carb diet I was on for 1 1/2
> years.

Actually, Wysong, a low-carb diet typically stabilizes low blood sugar
symptoms for most people (as it does high blood sugar ie. diabetes for many
NIDDM patients). It rarely causes or worsens reactive hypoglycemia, usually
quite the opposite.

> > that you read Dr. Schwarzbein, an endocrinologist who advocates a low-carb
> > diet, among other things.
>
> $$  Dr's contradict each other all the time.  I don't take any of them as
> gospel truths.

Oh Gawd! You really do NOT want help, do you? Fine, stay fat and miserable
as you are, just keep it somewhere else than asdl-c, 'kay?

> $$  Geeze, so now it's becoming a low-carb, low-calorie, high-veggie and
> HIGH INTENSITY exercise diet.  Is everyone on the NG doing these sprints
> and/or running several miles a day to lose weight?  It sure is getting
> farther and farther away from the Atkins diet.

Well, sure, it's nice to go for a little 1--2 mile amble, maybe even a brisk
walk, and think you've got your exercise in. But most people need to stress
their systems with exercise a bit more to get full benefit. They put real
geriatric men and women on a little weight lifting program and the benefits
to them, even those in their 70's, 80's were phenomenal. Far more than if
they'd just shuffled a mile or so. But... if you don't wanna, you won't get
the benefits. It's completely up to you.

> $$  Is that what everyone here is doing to lose on a LC diet?  Is that what
> the Atkins foundation now recommends?  What about those of us who already
> tried that bullshit and lost nothing?  I went to the gym in town, despised
> over minute I was there and lost 1 lb those 6 months.  I hate going to the
> gym.  It's far from my house, it's expensive, they blare heavy rock music,
> and the place smells like a dirty locker room.  Not thanks.

Most people (not all) who get to their goal weight do exercise. Exercise is
quite important in increasing insulin sensitivity, too, so is pretty
important for the folks who are insulin resistant.

> $$  Because the rest of you never comment on what I write!

Bwahahahahah. Get a freakin grip! You get more comments than anyone else
here! I'll admit there are probably more than a few who tired of your bs and
plonked you. I'm about to that point myself, as it's clear you don't want
help, just to bitch and whine.

> toTo lose
> those initial 46 lbs all I did was walk a few times a week - 2 miles per
> day.   Now suddenly I need the gym, weight lifting, running/sprinting etc.?

Well, if you don't try you'll never know. Everybody needs to do something to
increase their calorie deficit as they lose weight, because just from weight
loss your caloric needs keep declining. So... you can keep eating less, or
exercise more. Or both. Most choose both. It's sort of the Law of Dieting
and applies to every dieting program out there. It's the basis of WW's point
allowances and exercise point stuff.

> $$  One would think I should do everything you people suggest like before -
> with no results.  You missed those posts too?  You tell me how long a senior
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> advice?  There is nothing about this intensive workout and running for
> seniors in the Atkins book.

Number one, you work up to it. Duh. You're only 60? Well, I'm a whole 2
years behind you and I do all that stuff. You wouldn't believe the hills I
cycle. And I lift weights. And do yoga. But then... I have a brain and I use
it. What's your excuse?

HG
tia - 16 Feb 2005 18:26 GMT
wysong wrote:
>> toTo lose
>> those initial 46 lbs all I did was walk a few times a week - 2 miles per
>> day.   Now suddenly I need the gym, weight lifting, running/sprinting
> etc.?

YES.  whatever you were doing lost you 46lbs.  then your body got used to
that...you hit stasis.  end of story.  if you dont step it up - aint nuthin
gonna work fer ya, darlin <--thats texan for get off your a.s.

Signature

_____________________________
This be Tia's SIG!!! YAY!

tia - 16 Feb 2005 18:32 GMT
> Number one, you work up to it. Duh. You're only 60? Well, I'm a whole 2
> years behind you and I do all that stuff. You wouldn't believe the hills I
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> HG

heh, my moms up to 63 and while she wont run because shes convinced its bad
for her knees - she does low impact aerobics and can out walk me in
distance.  if you dont want to do the gym/weights/whatever, increase your
distance.  walk 5 miles if you can do 3.

as for what her excuse is... dont ask that :(  shes got quite a few.
hopefully she'll just listen without right away finding a counter for
everything.  the ones replying to her obviously did something right; we're
losing weight.  no reason why she cant.  she wants to cut back on calories,
fine, but theres a balance one has strike.. oh well.. shell always be
overweight until she figures that out.
Hannah Gruen - 17 Feb 2005 11:37 GMT
> heh, my moms up to 63 and while she wont run because shes convinced its bad
> for her knees - she does low impact aerobics and can out walk me in
> distance.  if you dont want to do the gym/weights/whatever, increase your
> distance.  walk 5 miles if you can do 3.

Your mom sounds like she's doing great. I'd agree that running can sometimes
cause injuries. I don't run any more because I have recurring back injuries.
Yoga keeps it under control - pain free - but I'm afraid the stress of
running would be likely to compress discs enough to possibly cause a
problem. Still, at some point with walking you reach a point that it is not
elevating your heart rate any more. So you need to do something more
intense. Just adding mileage really doesn't do that. Low impact aerobics,
using a stair stepper or hiking hills, lifting weights - these can add
intensity without resorting to running.

HG
Lisa - 13 Feb 2005 15:13 GMT
I have found this to be almost true in my case.  Still have anxiety issues,
but very rarely will I have a full blown panic attack.  There are other
issues that trigger attacks in play, but I will say they have been cut down
dramatically due to cutting out the sugar and refined carbs.

Signature

Lisa
208/146.5/140-145
High weight in 2004: 228
Low-carb since June 2004


.  the science
> behind sugar causing all my panic attacks was extremely dead on.
tia - 14 Feb 2005 02:28 GMT
i have panic when i have very stressful things going on, but rarely do they
last as long as they did before.. or come on like they did before.... its
nice to know somebody else knows the hell of panic attacks :(

Signature

_____________________________
This be Tia's SIG!!! YAY!

>I have found this to be almost true in my case.  Still have anxiety issues,
>but very rarely will I have a full blown panic attack.  There are other
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> .  the science
>> behind sugar causing all my panic attacks was extremely dead on.
Lisa - 14 Feb 2005 13:44 GMT
I've discovered that I tend to hold my breath a lot..I mean in stupid
situations like washing dishes, or typing out a lot of email, or writing in
front of people.  That alone can screw around with brain chemicals and blood
sugar levels which in turn can cause an attack.

I think the most uncomfortable attacks I've had are nocturnal...where right
before I drift off, I'll have an attack, or wake up in the middle of the
night, having one.

Look for books written by the late Claire Weeks.  Very informational,
explains the mechanics of a panic attack.

I hope your stresses lift soon.

Lisa

>i have panic when i have very stressful things going on, but rarely do they
>last as long as they did before.. or come on like they did before.... its
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>> .  the science
>>> behind sugar causing all my panic attacks was extremely dead on.
tia - 14 Feb 2005 18:09 GMT
> I've discovered that I tend to hold my breath a lot..I mean in stupid
> situations like washing dishes, or typing out a lot of email, or writing
> in front of people.  That alone can screw around with brain chemicals and
> blood sugar levels which in turn can cause an attack.

yup -- exactly.  my husband and i take turns telling each other to breathe -
we both forget.

> I think the most uncomfortable attacks I've had are nocturnal...where
> right before I drift off, I'll have an attack, or wake up in the middle of
> the night, having one.

thank god i havent been woken up to one.  usually when im away from whatever
stressor at night, its at least enough to get a few breaths in.  i would,
however, grind my teeth a lot.  that would wake up my husband... and at
night theyre worse for him as far as frequency.  once i quit the
anxiety/antidepressants (paxil) oddly enough i quit grinding ;/

> Look for books written by the late Claire Weeks.  Very informational,
> explains the mechanics of a panic attack.
>
> I hope your stresses lift soon.
>
> Lisa

thanks for the advice.  i think my mom recommended that author before, as
she too was suffering from this sh.t for years.  people that dont have them
just cant possibly understand.  i hope things go well for you too, its nice
having somebody that i really know can comprehend how i feel.

-tia

Signature

_____________________________
This be Tia's SIG!!! YAY!

>>i have panic when i have very stressful things going on, but rarely do
>>they last as long as they did before.. or come on like they did before....
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>> .  the science
>>>> behind sugar causing all my panic attacks was extremely dead on.
JC Der Koenig - 15 Feb 2005 02:43 GMT
FFS

Signature

Now piss off.  You cannot possibly be this stupid and remember to
breathe.   You must be trolling.  -- Carmen

>> I've discovered that I tend to hold my breath a lot..I mean in stupid
>> situations like washing dishes, or typing out a lot of email, or writing
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
>>>> .  the science
>>>>> behind sugar causing all my panic attacks was extremely dead on.
Hannah Gruen - 14 Feb 2005 14:49 GMT
> i have panic when i have very stressful things going on, but rarely do they
> last as long as they did before.. or come on like they did before.... its
> nice to know somebody else knows the hell of panic attacks :(

Tia, there are oodles of folks who are/were on this ng who had panic
attacks. Me included. Almost everybody has reported either complete
remission of symptoms, or definite improvement. Mine appear to have been
related to hypoglycemia, which LC controls very nicely. Not that your doctor
will ever tell you this, as he pumps you full of pills... lol!

Yes, it was hell. Only those who have been through a series of full-blown
panic attacks can understand. I'm so glad it worked for you, too.

HG
tia - 14 Feb 2005 18:11 GMT
> Yes, it was hell. Only those who have been through a series of full-blown
> panic attacks can understand. I'm so glad it worked for you, too.
>
> HG

im *really* sorry you had to go thru them too.  mom was telling me for years
it was sugar.  so for years i didnt eat candy or chocolate...... sigh.  heh.
i found a special breathing technique that let me not react to them but it
didnt stop in frequency until i found lc.  now i get the adrenaline, just no
attack... well... if i do its not like before or as long.  im glad youre
over them too.

tia

Signature

_____________________________
This be Tia's SIG!!! YAY!

JC Der Koenig - 12 Feb 2005 02:09 GMT
Did you read the FAQ?

Signature

Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that.  -- MFW

> i'm new to trying to eat low carb and i was wondering what some of you eat
> in an average day?
> what do you  normally have for breakfast, lunch, dinner?
tia - 12 Feb 2005 06:56 GMT
i love you JC.
JC Der Koenig - 12 Feb 2005 14:48 GMT
Learn how to quote.

Signature

Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that.  -- MFW

>i love you JC.
tia - 12 Feb 2005 16:06 GMT
mon ami, its not a lack of knowing how.. its a lack of giving a sh.t.
Saffire - 12 Feb 2005 21:34 GMT
> mon ami, its not a lack of knowing how.. its a lack of giving a sh.t.

Tia, you need to start quoting the posts to which you are responding --
I have NO idea to whom you are speaking or what you are talking about
because there is no context other than the subject line.  Once I read a
post, it's marked read and disappears, so I'm not looking at a long
thread unless I haven't read it yet or I feel like putting in the effort
of Googling it.

Signature

Saffire
205/144/125  -  5'1.5"
Atkins since 6/14/03
Progress photo:  http://photos.yahoo.com/saffire333

Wysong *~ - 13 Feb 2005 05:28 GMT
> mon ami, its not a lack of knowing how.. its a lack of giving a sh.t.
=================
Now there's an honest answer if ever I heard one!  :-))
Signature

Wysong
Age 60.  Height 5'6"
Starting date: 1/8/05
171/ 165 / 140 lb
Starting date LC 7/01 at 207lbs
Stopped losing on LC 11/01 at 165lbs
==========================================
Crap - I forgot to get my official stamp of approval and sign the
little document promising only to have thoughts that conform to the
official ASDLC guidelines.
I hate it when that happens. (credit Sophie)
~~<~~<~~{@  ~~<~~<~~{@  ~~<~~<~~{@

tia - 13 Feb 2005 15:23 GMT
yea yea yea, im using OE now.  i was using google before.

Signature

_____________________________
This be Tia's SIG!!! YAY!

> X-No-Archive: yes
>
>> mon ami, its not a lack of knowing how.. its a lack of giving a sh.t.
> =================
> Now there's an honest answer if ever I heard one!  :-))
Sullen - 15 Feb 2005 18:02 GMT
yes i did.  i was just asking what most people here tend to eat.  i hate to
cook so i ususally tend to go for what's easiest to make, a habit i'm trying
to break.

> Did you read the FAQ?
>
>> i'm new to trying to eat low carb and i was wondering what some of you
>> eat in an average day?
>> what do you  normally have for breakfast, lunch, dinner?
tia - 15 Feb 2005 18:22 GMT
i totally agree, sullen.  i personally love cooking, but despise dishes.
plus, its oftentimes difficult to always get the fresh ingredients (not to
mention expensive) and its so much easier to just go prepacked or fast these
days....

i do want to mention that i can barely afford to eat this way at times.
another reason im eating very infrequently -- we just plain cant afford it
very well.  while its horrible for you, a weeks worth of pasta is a few
dollars... heh.  a weeks worth of protein and fresh veggies - considerably
higher

Signature

_____________________________
This be Tia's SIG!!! YAY!

> yes i did.  i was just asking what most people here tend to eat.  i hate
> to cook so i ususally tend to go for what's easiest to make, a habit i'm
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>> eat in an average day?
>>> what do you  normally have for breakfast, lunch, dinner?
JC Der Koenig - 16 Feb 2005 02:51 GMT
Try aged cheddar and summer sausage.

Signature

Eat less, exercise more.  --  MFW

--

> yes i did.  i was just asking what most people here tend to eat.  i hate
> to cook so i ususally tend to go for what's easiest to make, a habit i'm
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>> eat in an average day?
>>> what do you  normally have for breakfast, lunch, dinner?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.