Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / Low Carb / February 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

OT I'm still alive

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
luna - 17 Feb 2005 01:19 GMT
Ok,we were moving from one house to another, got phones turned off at
the old house last thursday, but never got the phone turned on at the
new house because the phone company sucks and they don't show up when
they say they will.

Then, Sunday night at the new house, while we were all asleep, around
2AM, three masked guys with shotguns kicked in the doors. They were
wearing SWAT caps and jackets with "Police" on them.  They brought us
all out to the living room and made us lie down facing the floor. At
first they said they were the cops and they suspected us of terrorist
activities, then they started yelling that they wanted the drugs and the
money and the guns. They took about 300 bucks from my dad's pants
pocket, the small tv from our roommate's room, and my 6 year old iMac.

We don't know if the people who rented the house before us were dealing
drugs, or if the guys just saw us moving in and figured we were an easy
target because we weren't settled in yet, or if the movers told some
friends that we didn't have a phone line yet and my roommate had a nice
car so they figured we had money or something. Anyway, we got out of
there that night and slept at my uncle's apartment, and now we're in the
process of moving into a condo we're going to rent from some cousins.

Thankfully, none of us were hurt, but it's a pain in the a.s to have to
move again. And, I really loved that house, it was a really nice place,
and I spent so much time, money and effort painting and setting
everything up, but we would never feel safe there. The condo's in a
gated community but it's pretty small and dumpy, and we're having to get
rid of a bunch of stuff, which might actually be a blessing in disguise
because we have too much crap anyway.  My cat's adjusting suprisingly
well to being uprooted twice in a week, but I'm still a bit shaken up
and can't eat much or sleep very long at a time.  I'm at my sister's
house using her computer right now, and her husband may be able to lend
me one until I can afford a new one. I'll try to check in again when I
can get a break and get back over here.
Crafting Mom - 17 Feb 2005 01:29 GMT
Top posting only to leave in the info -
Luna, what a horrible ordeal!  I cannot imagine how you must have felt!
Scary!

Take care of yourself, and let us know how you are doing.

> Ok,we were moving from one house to another, got phones turned off at
> the old house last thursday, but never got the phone turned on at the
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> me one until I can afford a new one. I'll try to check in again when I
> can get a break and get back over here.
Lorelei - 18 Feb 2005 01:34 GMT
>> Ok,we were moving from one house to another, got phones turned off at
>> the old house last thursday, but never got the phone turned on at the
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>> me one until I can afford a new one. I'll try to check in again when I
>> can get a break and get back over here.

Holy sh.t!!!
hope things get better.
Lori
FOB - 17 Feb 2005 01:38 GMT
Oh, Luna, how awful! I'm so sorry this happened.  I hope everything looks up
for you.

In news:wiSQd.2$f04.1@fe56.usenetserver.com,
luna <lunachick@mindspring.com> stated
| Ok,we were moving from one house to another, got phones turned off at
| the old house last thursday, but never got the phone turned on at the
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
| may be able to lend me one until I can afford a new one. I'll try to
| check in again when I can get a break and get back over here.
Carmen - 17 Feb 2005 01:44 GMT
Holy crap Luna!  Damn, I'm glad you guys didn't get hurt!
Although the real cops probably won't be able to track these bastards
unless someone squeals we can hope.

Take care,
Carmen

> Ok,we were moving from one house to another, got phones turned off
> at
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
> I
> can get a break and get back over here.

Signature

Please note change in Reply To address carmensrt <at> gmail <dot> com
Hotmail isn't working and is being abandoned

Ignoramus11962 - 17 Feb 2005 02:00 GMT
Luna, please accept my condolences.

If people broke into my house with guns etc, in the middle of the
night, they would quite possibly get shot by me.

Signature

223/172.9/180

luna - 17 Feb 2005 02:26 GMT
> Luna, please accept my condolences.
>
> If people broke into my house with guns etc, in the middle of the
> night, they would quite possibly get shot by me.

My friend Gary said the fact that they were shouting "police" when they
smashed the doors in would probably make him hesitate to shoot them,
even though he keeps a loaded gun by his bed.  I know I was only half
awake anyway, and it happened so damn fast I didn't even realize it
wasn't a dream until I was being pushed into the living room. It took a
while to even process the clues that they weren't really police too.  I
mean, you do hear about cops doing drug raids at the wrong address, and
that's what I thought it was at first, just a mistake.
Ignoramus11962 - 17 Feb 2005 02:42 GMT
>> Luna, please accept my condolences.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> mean, you do hear about cops doing drug raids at the wrong address, and
> that's what I thought it was at first, just a mistake.

What an upsetting story. It's probably difficult to wake up quickly
enough to shoot intruders in time. I am glad that yo two are alive,
and would not shed a tear if the robbers were killed.

Signature

223/172.9/180

tia - 17 Feb 2005 03:45 GMT
damn... im sorry that had to happen to you.

Signature

_____________________________
This be Tia's SIG!!! YAY!

>>> Luna, please accept my condolences.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> enough to shoot intruders in time. I am glad that yo two are alive,
> and would not shed a tear if the robbers were killed.
Trianna - 17 Feb 2005 03:59 GMT
Oh, Luna, I am so sorry!  What a horrible experience.

> > Luna, please accept my condolences.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> smashed the doors in would probably make him hesitate to shoot them,
> even though he keeps a loaded gun by his bed.

Exactly.  Ig, I think very few law-abiding people would be likely to
shoot someone who burst in shouting "Police! Freeze!" if the home
invaders were putting up even a slightly believable impersonation of
same.

T.
Roger Zoul - 18 Feb 2005 14:57 GMT
> Oh, Luna, I am so sorry!  What a horrible experience.
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> invaders were putting up even a slightly believable impersonation of
> same.

It an interesting statement when someone says they'd start shooting at
several people who busrt in, in the middle of the night, with no warning and
with guns.  shows just how dangerous people with guns can possibly be, to
themselves and others, IMO.
Martha Gallagher - 18 Feb 2005 21:11 GMT

> It an interesting statement when someone says they'd start shooting at
> several people who busrt in, in the middle of the night, with no warning and
> with guns.  shows just how dangerous people with guns can possibly be, to
> themselves and others, IMO.

Well, not a gun nut here, but can you think of a *better* time to start
shooting? Yeah, I mean if the other people didn't have guns it would be
safer, but rather less sporting, and besides it would take away the whole
"self defense" slant if they'd burst in armed with plastic light sabers.
And, who better to start shooting at than someone who bursts in with no
warning and w/ guns?

Martha

Signature

Sig pending

Ignoramus29670 - 18 Feb 2005 21:21 GMT
>  
>> It an interesting statement when someone says they'd start shooting at
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Well, not a gun nut here, but can you think of a *better* time to start
> shooting?

Good point.

Strictly speaking, a sunny day at a gun range _would_ be a better time
to start shooting, but sometimes we do not choose circumstances. I am
not a drug dealer and see no reason why the police should suspect me
of being one. So, if people break in with guns and shout something
incomprehensible, I can assume that they are not police, and I will
shoot. I am relatively good at shooting from the hip, by the way, due
to time spent training doing just that.

Thankfully, we have a constitutional amendment that protects out right
to keep and bear arms.

                            ________~._____     !\
                ---------_:~ ____===_:-----W====!==____
                }W ____-----\: /"| |  ~~~~~       ~~~~~~
                -~~        ||~~  \ \
                           ~      \_\

``A well regulated militia, being necessary for the security of a free
State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be
infringed.''
None Given - 18 Feb 2005 22:23 GMT
> ``A well regulated militia, being necessary for the security of a free
> State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be
> infringed.''

Gun Control:
The theory that a woman found dead in an alley,
strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally
superior to a woman explaining to police how her
attacker got that fatal bullet wound.
AngieRose - 19 Feb 2005 01:30 GMT
>>> It an interesting statement when someone says they'd start shooting at
>>> several people who busrt in, in the middle of the night, with no warning
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be
> infringed.''

Hi Ignoramus

My dad would have liked you. He was a competition shooter, he ran shoots in
PA, helped run some in NY, was the president of a few shooting clubs and
owned a gun shop, but eventually needed a better income. He also shot in the
Bianchi Cup for a few years then gave it up after my mom passed on...he was
going to go last year, but passed on before he had the chance. When I was a
kid he was asked to be a professional team shooter. I don't remember for
who. Much like his army career, he turned it down because he didn't want to
be away from his family or drag us all over the world. I wanted him to do
it.

I was a great shot and really miss going to the shooting range. He wanted me
to shoot in his matches, he said I was better then most of the guys there. I
didn't because I was 15 at the time and scared that I might piss off  the
big men if I won. lol So I would just take photos for them, for a long time
my camera bag was a blue Dillon bag.

Angie

Ignoramus29670 - 19 Feb 2005 01:55 GMT
> Hi Ignoramus
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> be away from his family or drag us all over the world. I wanted him to do
> it.

Sounds great.

> I was a great shot and really miss going to the shooting range. He wanted me
> to shoot in his matches, he said I was better then most of the guys there. I
> didn't because I was 15 at the time and scared that I might piss off  the
> big men if I won. lol So I would just take photos for them, for a long time
> my camera bag was a blue Dillon bag.

Unfortunately, I am not a great shot as far as precision shooting goes
(with scope and all that), although I try to practice.

We had a nanny who was, in the past, a "master of sports" in shooting
and a member of some prestigious shooting team of some Soviet military
academy.

Signature

223/172.9/180

AngieRose - 19 Feb 2005 05:42 GMT
>> Hi Ignoramus
>>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> Unfortunately, I am not a great shot as far as precision shooting goes
> (with scope and all that), although I try to practice.

To me practice is the fun part!!!

My big problem was that I always used my dads guns so obviously they were
not callibrated correctly for me. My first shot was always off but then I
could aim so much above/below the target so my second shot would be on
target, third would be darn close to mark.

> We had a nanny who was, in the past, a "master of sports" in shooting
> and a member of some prestigious shooting team of some Soviet military
> academy.

Wow thats imprressive you must have learned a lot from this person.

Angie
Carmen - 18 Feb 2005 23:19 GMT
Hi,

> > Oh, Luna, I am so sorry!  What a horrible experience.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> can possibly
> be, to themselves and others, IMO.

I don't agree, and here's why: The homeowner knows the turf far better
than the home invaders.  If he/she has decided, in advance, that they
will defend against force with force then that gives them an
additional psychological advantage in addition to the first factor.
The criminals will be expecting the victims to submit, and the failure
of the homeowner to comply with the script as written may well give
the homeowner those split seconds that can make all the difference.
If the homeowner is familiar and skilled with their weapon fighting
back isn't necessarily the wrong response.
In the situation Luna was presented with, I'd have done exactly what
she did *because* they looked like they were legit.  The outcome would
have been the same BUT if they hadn't appeared to be the authorities
and I'd had a weapon available my choice might be different.  It's one
of those things people ought to decide in advance how they plan to
deal with.

Take care,
Carmen
Off to the Home Show!  W00T!

Signature

Please note change in Reply To address carmensrt <at> gmail <dot> com
Hotmail isn't working and is being abandoned

Ignoramus29670 - 19 Feb 2005 00:21 GMT
> I don't agree, and here's why: The homeowner knows the turf far better
> than the home invaders.  If he/she has decided, in advance, that they
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> If the homeowner is familiar and skilled with their weapon fighting
> back isn't necessarily the wrong response.

The key, as with everything, is practice with a particular weapon and
consistency in training.

Signature

223/172.9/180

Ignoramus29670 - 19 Feb 2005 00:40 GMT
More on the gun issue.

Some people become very frustrated selling brass from fired cartridges:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7135441836

Signature

223/172.9/180

Carmen - 19 Feb 2005 01:20 GMT
Hi,
On 18-Feb-2005, Ignoramus29670 <ignoramus29670@NOSPAM.29670.invalid>
wrote:

> More on the gun issue.
>
> Some people become very frustrated selling brass from fired
> cartridges:
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7135441836

Thank you Ig - Howard and I couldn't stop laughing.  The poor guy.
Ebay really is the realm of the Rulemeister - and the mod bots exhibit
all the intelligence of rocks.

Take care,
Carmen
---
Please note change in Reply To address carmensrt <at> gmail <dot> com
Hotmail isn't working and is being abandoned
Kevin_Stevens@hotmail.com - 17 Feb 2005 08:16 GMT
> > Luna, please accept my condolences.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> mean, you do hear about cops doing drug raids at the wrong address, and
> that's what I thought it was at first, just a mistake.

Exactly why allowing police to "serve a warrant" by kicking down doors in
the middle of the night was A Bad Thing.  No being able to tell the good
guys from the bad guys is the ultimate expression of the ends justifying
the means.  But hey, we wrapped that war on drugs up right quick and
clean, didn't we?

KeS
tia - 17 Feb 2005 08:54 GMT
its good that i dont care about the risk of being unpopular.  it seems my
opinions infuriate folks, but oh well.  the war on drugs was the worst thing
we ever did.  if people want to kill themselves, let em.  tax it and make
money.  /sigh.

Signature

_____________________________
This be Tia's SIG!!! YAY!

>> > Luna, please accept my condolences.
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> KeS
Cubit - 17 Feb 2005 03:11 GMT
I'm sorry to hear about your ordeal, Luna.

I would make a list of who knew what and try to make sense of it.

I'm not sure I see the point of moving again.  Emotionally, yes, you may not
feel comfortable there, but now they know you are not drug dealers with
mountains of cash....

> Ok,we were moving from one house to another, got phones turned off at
> the old house last thursday, but never got the phone turned on at the
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> me one until I can afford a new one. I'll try to check in again when I
> can get a break and get back over here.
luna - 17 Feb 2005 05:17 GMT
> I'm sorry to hear about your ordeal, Luna.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> feel comfortable there, but now they know you are not drug dealers with
> mountains of cash....

Yeah, but if they thought we had stuff, then other people might too.
Ignoramus11962 - 17 Feb 2005 05:42 GMT
>> I'm sorry to hear about your ordeal, Luna.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>
> Yeah, but if they thought we had stuff, then other people might too.

Put an NRA sticker on your vehicle, it might help.

Signature

223/172.9/180

BJPruett - 17 Feb 2005 07:31 GMT
I agree with her that they should move as soon as possible. If the house
was used by drug pushers in the past, I think she is right in thinking
that different atttackers might come again in the future. I assume the
police and the landlord/home owner know about her horrible experience.
The house should be closely watched in the future so that anyone else
who moves will get some protection.  It's certainly a shame she and her
family weren't told of the past history of the house. If the
landlord/owner knew of past problems with the house, I wonder if she can
sue for not being warned and therefore the safety of her and her family
endangered.
Barbara

>  
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>  
The Queen of Cans and Jars - 17 Feb 2005 06:06 GMT
> > I'm sorry to hear about your ordeal, Luna.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> >
> Yeah, but if they thought we had stuff, then other people might too.

people anywhere can think that, though.  moving won't change that.
Hannah Gruen - 17 Feb 2005 12:45 GMT
> > Yeah, but if they thought we had stuff, then other people might too.
>
> people anywhere can think that, though.  moving won't change that.

I believe she said they moved to a condo in a gated community. Not that that
is inherently safer, but if they feel safer that's a plus.

HG
The Queen of Cans and Jars - 17 Feb 2005 15:05 GMT
> > > Yeah, but if they thought we had stuff, then other people might too.
> >
> > people anywhere can think that, though.  moving won't change that.
>
> I believe she said they moved to a condo in a gated community. Not that that
> is inherently safer, but if they feel safer that's a plus.

feeling safer and actually being safer are two different things.  i
agree that living in a gated community reduces some of the risk - anyone
wanting to get in there for illicit purposes will have to think twice
and is likely to just go for something easier - but it doesn't sound
like a great place to live for other reasons.

and there's no guarantee that other people living *inside* the gated
community wouldn't rip you off.

don't get me wrong, i'm glad Michelle and her family are ok and i don't
blame them for being rattled, i just don't think you can ever really
escape from people wanting to do stupid/mean things.  they're
everywhere, even behind the gates of a gated condo community.  
luna - 19 Feb 2005 17:06 GMT
>>>>Yeah, but if they thought we had stuff, then other people might too.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> escape from people wanting to do stupid/mean things.  they're
> everywhere, even behind the gates of a gated condo community.  

Oh, I totatlly agree.  I'm never under the illusion that I'm perfectly
safe anywhere. The best any of us can do is find a way to balance
minimizing risks with having a life. I think it's actually a small
chance that house was a drug house in the past, and a smaller chance
we'd get broken into again.  But, no matter the actuall percentage of
risk, I don't think we'd ever be able to relax and enjoy ourselves in
that house again. Just being over there in the day, with friends, to
move our stuff, every time I heard a car drive by I'd stop what I was
doing to listen if they slowed down outside the house or something. I
don't know whether or not I'd ever be able to talk myself out of feeling
tense there, but I do know it would take quite a long time if it could
ever happen.
The Queen of Cans and Jars - 20 Feb 2005 16:11 GMT
> >>>>Yeah, but if they thought we had stuff, then other people might too.
> >>>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> tense there, but I do know it would take quite a long time if it could
> ever happen.

i do understand, and i'm glad you're all ok.  
AngieRose - 18 Feb 2005 03:43 GMT
>> I'm sorry to hear about your ordeal, Luna.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>>
> Yeah, but if they thought we had stuff, then other people might too.

I agree with you Luna. Moving was the right thing if you ask me.

Angie
Kevin Martin (Homebrewer) - 18 Feb 2005 03:51 GMT
> Yeah, but if they thought we had stuff, then other people might too.

Damn good point.
Signature


370/280/270
Single malt scotch is awesome (NO it does NOT have carbs as DON'T vodka,
gin, rum, bourbon, etc generally)
Malt can be made low carb through the judicious use of yeast.
Low carb beer? Uh...yeah.
Read the books.
You can have more than eggs for breakfast.
Yes calories do count.
Ketosticks are not neccessary to lose weight.

Email: Actually my feet are big not medium.

Roger Zoul - 17 Feb 2005 03:11 GMT
Damn.  Twlight Zone!  I'm really glad you guys are okay.  Hang tight!!

> Then, Sunday night at the new house, while we were all asleep, around
> 2AM, three masked guys with shotguns kicked in the doors. They were
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the money and the guns. They took about 300 bucks from my dad's pants
> pocket, the small tv from our roommate's room, and my 6 year old iMac.
marengo - 17 Feb 2005 04:22 GMT
| Ok,we were moving from one house to another, got phones turned off at
| the old house last thursday, but never got the phone turned on at the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
| Then, Sunday night at the new house, while we were all asleep, around
| 2AM, three masked guys with shotguns kicked in the doors.

Geez Michelle, what a scary experience.  I'm just glad you and your Dad and
your roommate are ok -- physically anyway.  I know that something like this
has a lingering effect on your psyche.  It feels like rape when your home is
violated; I had something similar happen a few years ago and I had to move
too; couldn't stay there another night.

I firmly believe that there's a reason for everything that happens to us.
Although you liked that house, it apparently wasn't the right place for you
to be.  Good things will come out of the move to your condo, wait and see!
Signature

Peter
http://users.thelink.net/marengo

Hannah Gruen - 17 Feb 2005 12:48 GMT
> I firmly believe that there's a reason for everything that happens to us.
> Although you liked that house, it apparently wasn't the right place for you
> to be.  Good things will come out of the move to your condo, wait and see!

That's a great way to look at it. Who knows, it might have happened again
but with worse consequences, too. So maybe this was a relatively harmless,
if traumatic, warning.

Luna, I'm glad you all came out of this ok and were able to find somewhere
else to move so quickly.

HG
Wysong *~ - 17 Feb 2005 06:26 GMT
> Ok,we were moving from one house to another, got phones turned off at
> the old house last thursday, but never got the phone turned on at the
> new house because the phone company sucks and they don't show up when
> they say they will.
=====================
What a nightmare!   :-(
Signature

Wysong
Age 60.  Height 5'6"
Starting date: 1/8/05
171/ 165 / 140 lb
Starting date LC 7/01 at 207lbs
Stopped losing on LC 11/01 at 165lbs
==========================================
NOW WALKING 1.5 to 3 MILES DAY.
==========================================
Crap - I forgot to get my official stamp of approval and sign the
little document promising only to have thoughts that conform to the
official ASDLC guidelines.
I hate it when that happens. (credit Sophie)
~~<~~<~~{@  ~~<~~<~~{@  ~~<~~<~~{@

Saffire - 17 Feb 2005 09:09 GMT
> Then, Sunday night at the new house, while we were all asleep, around
> 2AM, three masked guys with shotguns kicked in the doors. They were
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> money and the guns. They took about 300 bucks from my dad's pants
> pocket, the small tv from our roommate's room, and my 6 year old iMac.

Jesus Christ, what an ordeal!!  I'm glad you and your father (and
roommate?) weren't physically hurt.  I imagine the trauma will take some
time to abate, though!  

Signature

Saffire
205/144/125  -  5'1.5"
Atkins since 6/14/03
Progress photo:  http://photos.yahoo.com/saffire333

Xtile - 17 Feb 2005 09:48 GMT
> Then, Sunday night at the new house, while we were all asleep, around
> 2AM, three masked guys with shotguns kicked in the doors. They were
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> money and the guns. They took about 300 bucks from my dad's pants
> pocket, the small tv from our roommate's room, and my 6 year old iMac.

Wow, Luna, that sucks!  I hope they get the f.ckers who did that and
string them up!
Tom G - 17 Feb 2005 17:21 GMT
 Sorry to hear this happened. I'm glad that you were not hurt.
    Tom

> Ok,we were moving from one house to another, got phones turned off at
> the old house last thursday, but never got the phone turned on at the
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> me one until I can afford a new one. I'll try to check in again when I
> can get a break and get back over here.
Ada Ma - 17 Feb 2005 18:14 GMT
I'm sorry to hear about your ordeal.  It's great that neither you or your family
got physically injured.  May be it's time to think of adding better security to
your new home like stronger doors, sensors, etc.  Have you by chance got any
home insurance?

<snipped>
> Then, Sunday night at the new house, while we were all asleep, around
> 2AM, three masked guys with shotguns kicked in the doors. They were
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> money and the guns. They took about 300 bucks from my dad's pants
> pocket, the small tv from our roommate's room, and my 6 year old iMac.
<snipped>
Amanda - 17 Feb 2005 19:05 GMT
I'm so sorry this happened to you and your family. Glad you are all
safe.

-----
285.5/259/120 monthly-goal: 8 month-start: 265.5
Mogget - 18 Feb 2005 00:28 GMT
<snip>

Holy cow, Luna.  {{{{{Hugs}}}}}
Signature

Mogget, the Churl in the Puce Greatcoat

Bob M - 18 Feb 2005 12:55 GMT
> <snip>
>
> Holy cow, Luna.  {{{{{Hugs}}}}}

No kidding!

Signature

Bob in CT

Aramanth Dawe - 18 Feb 2005 02:14 GMT
I'm glad you're physically unharmed, Luna.  It's going to take a while
to feel safe again but you will get there, I'm sure.

Aramanth
AngieRose - 18 Feb 2005 03:39 GMT
> Ok,we were moving from one house to another, got phones turned off at the
> old house last thursday, but never got the phone turned on at the new
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> one. I'll try to check in again when I can get a break and get back over
> here.

This must have been so scarry.

I'm glad you didn't get hurt and that you are now safe.

Angie
Alibi - 19 Feb 2005 12:49 GMT
>We don't know if the people who rented the house before us were dealing
>drugs, or if the guys just saw us moving in and figured we were an easy
>target because we weren't settled in yet, or if the movers told some
>friends that we didn't have a phone line yet and my roommate had a nice
>car so they figured we had money or something.

Hello, I really don't know anyone here. My father was a private
investigator. No he wasn't a bona fide policeman. But we still got all
the juice. and the problems.

When I first read this ordeal I thought that it may have been crooked
cops. But then I read where they took money and items. crooked cops
usually just want the drugs or the drug money. and when they make a
mistake on their crooked take they arrest someone  (suspicion) just to
have had a reason to be there. So then I got thinking about criminals
that would've had information about the mark. It's just too weird. So
I'm left with this..... A team of bad guys case freeways looking for
moving vans. They'll usually case the large trucks because they'll get
large screen TV's and stereos and such. they are practiced in their
deception and the actual police have probably been stumped because the
bad guys probably case the highways and their crime spree spans entire
states.

I know this doesn't make you feel any better but if you had actually
shot one of them, that would probably be the first time anyone has
actually taken a stance against them, and it would be the beginning of
the end for them. Criminals like this count on your submissiveness.
And for what it's worth..... you're better off submitting. they didn't
want a confrontation, they wanted your stuff.

I'm so sorry you had to endure this. We had many times when people
tried to kill my dad or intimidate us. once my brother and I were
kidnapped, not for ransom, but for leverage.

We all had to take gun safety lessons and learn how to fire a weapon.
As a result I am capable of shooting to kill. To me it's just as easy
as pointing my finger. I wouldn't hesitate, so therefore I won't own a
gun.

motion detectors go a long way to make you feel more confident with
your surroundings. our basement windows all have alarms. not the kind
that alert a security company, the kind that let out a 120 DB blast
that scares the hell out of all involved. It's only gone off once in
17 years but whoever set it off was long gone before we even got out
of bed.

Good luck, and keep safe.

Patti
Cheri - 19 Feb 2005 13:34 GMT
This makes no sense to me. If you are capable of  shooting to kill you
must be capable of shooting to wound and stop, such as taking out a
kneecap, etc.

--
Cheri

>We all had to take gun safety lessons and learn how to fire a weapon.
>As a result I am capable of shooting to kill. To me it's just as easy
>as pointing my finger. I wouldn't hesitate, so therefore I won't own a
>gun.
Ignoramus8911 - 19 Feb 2005 13:40 GMT
> This makes no sense to me. If you are capable of  shooting to kill you
> must be capable of shooting to wound and stop, such as taking out a
> kneecap, etc.

A kneecap is difficult to hit.

i

>>We all had to take gun safety lessons and learn how to fire a weapon.
>>As a result I am capable of shooting to kill. To me it's just as easy
>>as pointing my finger. I wouldn't hesitate, so therefore I won't own a
>>gun.

Signature

223/172.9/180

Cheri - 19 Feb 2005 13:44 GMT
But the etc isn't. :-)

--
Cheri

Ignoramus8911 wrote in message ...
>> This makes no sense to me. If you are capable of  shooting to kill you
>> must be capable of shooting to wound and stop, such as taking out a
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>--
>223/172.9/180
JC Der Koenig - 19 Feb 2005 13:47 GMT
The best tactic is to aim for center-of-mass.

Signature

Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that.  -- MFW

> This makes no sense to me. If you are capable of  shooting to kill you
> must be capable of shooting to wound and stop, such as taking out a
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>as pointing my finger. I wouldn't hesitate, so therefore I won't own a
>>gun.
Marsha - 19 Feb 2005 15:05 GMT
> This makes no sense to me. If you are capable of  shooting to kill you
> must be capable of shooting to wound and stop, such as taking out a
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>as pointing my finger. I wouldn't hesitate, so therefore I won't own a
>>gun.

Wound and stop would give them a second chance at harming
you.  These people aren't in your house to be your friend.
I would aim to kill.

Marsha/Ohio
Carmen - 19 Feb 2005 15:28 GMT
Hi,
Patti:
> >>We all had to take gun safety lessons and learn how to fire a
> >>weapon.  As a result I am capable of shooting to kill. To me it's
> >>just as
> >>easy as pointing my finger. I wouldn't hesitate, so therefore I
> >>won't
> >>own a gun.

> > This makes no sense to me. If you are capable of  shooting to kill
> > you must be capable of shooting to wound and stop, such as taking
> > out
> > a kneecap, etc.

Marsha:
> Wound and stop would give them a second chance at harming
> you.  These people aren't in your house to be your friend.
> I would aim to kill.

If they have a gun and they are *in* my house I wholeheartedly agree.
If they only have a knife I'd shoot to stop them if they refused to
leave when ordered.  I say that because I'm a good shot and have
enough knowledge of anatomy to know good places to aim for.

It really does pay to run scenarios through in your mind ahead of time
so that you don't lose precious time making decisions if the time
comes.  It's like "What would I do if someone grabbed me and threw me
in their car?"  My answer would be "Anything it takes.  Kick out
windows, turn and kick the steering wheel and/or driver, grab the keys
if possible and chuck them out the window, poke the guy's eye with a
finger.  Yeah, I'll probably get injured, possibly badly, but it'd
lessen the odds of my body showing up in a ditch or field a couple of
days/weeks down the road."

Damn, I'm a mean-assed liberal.  <G>

Take care,
Carmen
Signature

Please note change in Reply To address carmensrt <at> gmail <dot> com
Hotmail isn't working and is being abandoned

Ignoramus8911 - 19 Feb 2005 15:42 GMT
> If they have a gun and they are *in* my house I wholeheartedly agree.
> If they only have a knife I'd shoot to stop them if they refused to
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> so that you don't lose precious time making decisions if the time
> comes.

It also helps practicing, besides merely thinking. Acquiring odd
placed targets quickly, going around obstacles with a weapon, etc.

My favorite home defense weapon is a Kalashnikov. A very handy gun,
plus, it also sends the right message to the person ordered to stop
(if, say, I caught an unarmed burglar).

A dead home invader is, also, preferable to a live and injured home
invader who needs permanent medical care. That said, legally, we are
only supposed to shoot to stop a threat. "Finishing off" an injured
person is a crime, for good reasons. Let's be mindful of that.

i
Carmen - 19 Feb 2005 15:53 GMT
Hi,
On 19-Feb-2005, Ignoramus8911 <ignoramus8911@NOSPAM.8911.invalid>
wrote:

> > If they have a gun and they are *in* my house I wholeheartedly
> > agree. If they only have a knife I'd shoot to stop them if they
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> only supposed to shoot to stop a threat. "Finishing off" an injured
> person is a crime, for good reasons. Let's be mindful of that.

Of course.  My goal would be to stop the person.  If an armed person
saw me with a gun and dropped theirs I've gotten what I wanted -
especially if they leave my house if ordered.  The police will find
them eventually.  I just want them away from my family.

Take care,
Carmen

Signature

Please note change in Reply To address carmensrt <at> gmail <dot> com
Hotmail isn't working and is being abandoned

Marsha - 19 Feb 2005 15:56 GMT
> Of course.  My goal would be to stop the person.  If an armed person
> saw me with a gun and dropped theirs I've gotten what I wanted -
> especially if they leave my house if ordered.  The police will find
> them eventually.  I just want them away from my family.

Carmen,

Would that really satisfy you?  Sure, they would be away
from your family, but would the police find them in time
before someone else's family was harmed?

Marsha/Ohio
Ignoramus8911 - 19 Feb 2005 16:02 GMT
>> Of course.  My goal would be to stop the person.  If an armed person
>> saw me with a gun and dropped theirs I've gotten what I wanted -
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> from your family, but would the police find them in time
> before someone else's family was harmed?

That would definitely satisfy _me_.

Signature

223/172.9/180

Carmen - 19 Feb 2005 16:10 GMT
Hi,

> > Of course.  My goal would be to stop the person.  If an armed
> > person saw me with a gun and dropped theirs I've gotten what I
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> from your family, but would the police find them in time
> before someone else's family was harmed?

No, it's not anything close to a perfect solution, but it's the best
decision under the circumstances.  If I try and maintain custody of
them until law enforcement arrives they have more time to gain the
upper hand and harm my family, or do something stupid and end up
having to be shot.
At a certain point I have to trust the police to do their job.

Take care,
Carmen

Signature

Please note change in Reply To address carmensrt <at> gmail <dot> com
Hotmail isn't working and is being abandoned

Marsha - 19 Feb 2005 16:27 GMT
>>>Of course.  My goal would be to stop the person.  If an armed
>>>person saw me with a gun and dropped theirs I've gotten what I
>>>wanted -
>>>especially if they leave my house if ordered.  The police will
>>>find them eventually.  I just want them away from my family.

>>Marsha:
Would that really satisfy you?  Sure, they would be away
>>from your family, but would the police find them in time
>>before someone else's family was harmed?
>
> Carmen:
No, it's not anything close to a perfect solution, but it's
the best
> decision under the circumstances.  If I try and maintain custody of
> them until law enforcement arrives they have more time to gain the
> upper hand and harm my family, or do something stupid and end up
> having to be shot.
> At a certain point I have to trust the police to do their job.

I understand that that is the best decision for you under
those circumstances.  No one would actually enjoy killing
someone.  But if someone else in your neighborhood thought
that way, your family could be the next target along with
who knows how many others.  Police response time on a busy
weekend isn't very good around here.  I would just shoot 'em
and stop the whole cycle.

Marsha/Ohio
Carmen - 19 Feb 2005 17:04 GMT
Hi,

> >>>Of course.  My goal would be to stop the person.  If an armed
> >>>person saw me with a gun and dropped theirs I've gotten what I
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> weekend isn't very good around here.  I would just shoot 'em
> and stop the whole cycle.

Naw, that's not me and I've thought about it enough to know it.  It's
the "liberal" gene I guess.  :-)

Take care,
Carmen

Signature

Please note change in Reply To address carmensrt <at> gmail <dot> com
Hotmail isn't working and is being abandoned

Marsha - 19 Feb 2005 17:26 GMT
> Hi,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>weekend isn't very good around here.  I would just shoot 'em
>>and stop the whole cycle.

Carmen:
> Naw, that's not me and I've thought about it enough to know it.  It's
> the "liberal" gene I guess.  :-)

Well, okay then.  That's not your fault any more than being
messed up from living in Long Island  : )

Marsha/Ohio
Marsha - 19 Feb 2005 15:47 GMT
>>>This makes no sense to me. If you are capable of  shooting to kill
>>>you must be capable of shooting to wound and stop, such as taking
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>>you.  These people aren't in your house to be your friend.
>>I would aim to kill.

Carmen:
> If they have a gun and they are *in* my house I wholeheartedly agree.
> If they only have a knife I'd shoot to stop them if they refused to
> leave when ordered.  I say that because I'm a good shot and have
> enough knowledge of anatomy to know good places to aim for.

Well, then they get to waste a bunch of taxpayers' money to
go through the whole trial thing and eventually get out on
probation to do it again.  If you kill 'em, you don't have
to worry about any of that (tongue firmly in cheek).

> Damn, I'm a mean-assed liberal.  <G>
> Take care,
> Carmen

Yeah, but other then that, you're okay  : p~~~

Marsha/Ohio
Carmen - 19 Feb 2005 16:04 GMT
Hi
> > Marsha:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> probation to do it again.  If you kill 'em, you don't have
> to worry about any of that (tongue firmly in cheek).

Yeah well, this is Tennessee not Texas.  TN doesn't have a "he needed
killin' " defense.  ;-)

> > Damn, I'm a mean-assed liberal.  <G>
>
> Yeah, but other then that, you're okay  : p~~~

;-)

Take care,
Carmen
Signature

Please note change in Reply To address carmensrt <at> gmail <dot> com
Hotmail isn't working and is being abandoned

JC Der Koenig - 19 Feb 2005 16:19 GMT
> Hi
>> > Marsha:
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Yeah well, this is Tennessee not Texas.  TN doesn't have a "he needed
> killin' " defense.  ;-)

This is very difficult for Texans to understand.

Yes, that includes me.
Carmen - 19 Feb 2005 17:01 GMT
Hi,

> >> Well, then they get to waste a bunch of taxpayers' money to
> >> go through the whole trial thing and eventually get out on
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Yes, that includes me.

I was born in Texas (Lubbock) but living on Long Island for 10 years
screwed with my head.  ;-)

Take care,
Carmen
Signature

Please note change in Reply To address carmensrt <at> gmail <dot> com
Hotmail isn't working and is being abandoned

JC Der Koenig - 19 Feb 2005 17:13 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> I was born in Texas (Lubbock) but living on Long Island for 10 years
> screwed with my head.  ;-)

It's not your fault then.

;-)
None Given - 19 Feb 2005 21:53 GMT
> Yeah well, this is Tennessee not Texas.  TN doesn't have a "he needed
> killin' " defense.  ;-)

Even a 'make my day' law doesn't make it legal to shoot the guy in the back
as he's running away from you.

Signature

No Husband Has Ever Been Shot While Doing The Dishes

Cheri - 19 Feb 2005 16:35 GMT
Yes Carmen, and as the old saying goes, "don't ask permission, ask
forgiveness." ;-)

--
Cheri

>If they have a gun and they are *in* my house I wholeheartedly agree.
>If they only have a knife I'd shoot to stop them if they refused to
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>Please note change in Reply To address carmensrt <at> gmail <dot> com
>Hotmail isn't working and is being abandoned
Cheri - 19 Feb 2005 16:33 GMT
So would I, and I've never lived in a house without a gun. :-)

--
Cheri

Marsha wrote in message ...
>Wound and stop would give them a second chance at harming
>you.  These people aren't in your house to be your friend.
>I would aim to kill.
>
>Marsha/Ohio
Brigid Nelson - 19 Feb 2005 17:04 GMT
>> This makes no sense to me. If you are capable of  shooting to kill you
>> must be capable of shooting to wound and stop, such as taking out a
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Wound and stop would give them a second chance at harming you.  These
> people aren't in your house to be your friend. I would aim to kill.

I was raised in an NRA household, and also did target shooting as a kid.
 I was taught that you never aim a gun at anyone unless you mean to
kill them.

brigid
Cheri - 19 Feb 2005 17:44 GMT
I would do the same. :-)

--
Cheri

Brigid Nelson wrote in message ...

>I was raised in an NRA household, and also did target shooting as a kid.
>  I was taught that you never aim a gun at anyone unless you mean to
>kill them.
>
>brigid
Alibi - 20 Feb 2005 02:12 GMT
>This makes no sense to me. If you are capable of  shooting to kill you
>must be capable of shooting to wound and stop, such as taking out a
>kneecap, etc.

I wouldn't shoot to wound. only kill.

Patti
Cheri - 20 Feb 2005 02:39 GMT
I know. You said that's the reason you don't have a gun. So, you would
sooner be unarmed than kill someone who is attacking you? It still makes
no sense to me, but it doesn't have to make sense to me, if it makes
sense to you, that's all that counts. :-)
--
Cheri

>>This makes no sense to me. If you are capable of  shooting to kill you
>>must be capable of shooting to wound and stop, such as taking out a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Patti
JC Der Koenig - 20 Feb 2005 02:39 GMT
Maybe she's afraid she'll kill her kids or something.

Signature

Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that.  -- MFW

>I know. You said that's the reason you don't have a gun. So, you would
> sooner be unarmed than kill someone who is attacking you? It still makes
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>
>>Patti
Marsha - 20 Feb 2005 13:53 GMT
> Maybe she's afraid she'll kill her kids or something.

Heh.  Can't say that there haven't been times I've thought
about doing away with SO and vice versa : )

BTW, when I reply to some messages (yours for instance),
only your reply shows up.  What happened to the rest of what
you were quoting?

Marsha/Ohio
JC Der Koenig - 20 Feb 2005 14:23 GMT
>> Maybe she's afraid she'll kill her kids or something.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> BTW, when I reply to some messages (yours for instance), only your reply
> shows up.  What happened to the rest of what you were quoting?

Haha.  It's the magical post-condensing and limiting device.
Marsha - 20 Feb 2005 14:30 GMT
>>>Maybe she's afraid she'll kill her kids or something.

>>Marsha wrote:
>>Heh.  Can't say that there haven't been times I've thought about doing
>>away with SO and vice versa : )
>>
>>BTW, when I reply to some messages (yours for instance), only your reply
>>shows up.  What happened to the rest of what you were quoting?

> Haha.  It's the magical post-condensing and limiting device.

So that we may see only the great one's words?  It can't be
because of top posting; I've replied to other top posters
and get the whole thing.

Marsha/Ohio
The Queen of Cans and Jars - 20 Feb 2005 16:10 GMT
> >>>Maybe she's afraid she'll kill her kids or something.
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> because of top posting; I've replied to other top posters
> and get the whole thing.

it's because he top posts and uses a sig delimiter, which is designed to
prevent people from endlessly quoting other people's sigs.  when used
improperly, as by a top posting moron, it deletes entire conversations.

hth.
Marsha - 20 Feb 2005 16:49 GMT
>>>>>Maybe she's afraid she'll kill her kids or something.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> hth.

Thanks.
Aramanth Dawe - 20 Feb 2005 23:38 GMT
>It can't be
>because of top posting; I've replied to other top posters
>and get the whole thing.
>
>Marsha/Ohio

As others have said, it's the .sig delineator - that is, just before
his .sig he has a line with "--" which tells your software to cut the
quote at this point.

You CAN overcome it if you really want to (although why you'd WANT to
post to JC I can't imagine - I happily killfiled him months ago)
simply by highlighting the whole page, including the area below the
"-- " BEFORE you hit reply.  In most newsreading software this tells
you to quote everything highlighted.

It's also a good way to pick out just the bit you want to reply to in
a very long post - highlight the pertinent area, hit 'reply' and it
will be all that shows up.

Aramanth
JC Der Koenig - 20 Feb 2005 14:32 GMT
>> Maybe she's afraid she'll kill her kids or something.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Marsha/Ohio

I promise not to be an a.s anymore. Sorry
Marsha - 20 Feb 2005 14:51 GMT
>>> Maybe she's afraid she'll kill her kids or something.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>
> I promise not to be an a.s anymore. Sorry

Nice try, imposter.

Marsha/Ohio
Carmen - 20 Feb 2005 16:01 GMT
> >> Maybe she's afraid she'll kill her kids or something.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> >
> I promise not to be an a.s anymore. Sorry

You can't make promises for JC, but you can make them for yourself.
Can we count on *you* to not be an a.s anymore Bunky?

Carmen
Signature

Please note change in Reply To address carmensrt <at> gmail <dot> com
Hotmail isn't working and is being abandoned

JC Der Koenig - 20 Feb 2005 19:09 GMT
>>>>Maybe she's afraid she'll kill her kids or something.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Carmen

I'll be an a.s all I want : sh.t for brains!
Carmen - 20 Feb 2005 19:30 GMT
> >>I promise not to be an a.s anymore. Sorry
> >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> I'll be an a.s all I want : sh.t for brains!

Bunky, why is the above sort of behavior wrong when JC does it but
acceptable when you use it?

Carmen

Signature

Please note change in Reply To address carmensrt <at> gmail <dot> com
Hotmail isn't working and is being abandoned

marengo - 20 Feb 2005 21:10 GMT
| > >>I promise not to be an a.s anymore. Sorry
| > >
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
|
| Carmen

Not to mention that it's a violation of the Usenet COC to pose as another
user, using their id.  He can lose his ISP newsgroup privileges in a
heartbeat for doing this.
Signature

Peter
http://users.thelink.net/marengo

Brigid Nelson - 20 Feb 2005 04:43 GMT
> I know. You said that's the reason you don't have a gun. So, you would
> sooner be unarmed than kill someone who is attacking you? It still makes
> no sense to me, but it doesn't have to make sense to me, if it makes
> sense to you, that's all that counts. :-)
> --

I'm not the poster to whom you're directing this question, but I was
raised in a house *full* of guns and I have chosen not to have any
despite having been burglarized more than once.

My reasoning is that I spook easily.  Any bump in the night would mean
that I would need to have that gun in my hand.  The risk of shooting a
housemate, spouse, or child in a blind panic is too great, and the
possiblilty that my house will be broken into while I and my kids are in
it just isn't *as* great.  There's also the fact that as I grew up I
knew of more than one kid at my jr high school who got daddy's gun and
showed it to their friend with the all-to-predictable result.  I'm not
willing to gamble that my kids are smarter than that.

The final reason is that my dad had some guns stolen, probably by
friends of my (at the time, she's grown up well in spite of her earlier
troubles) delinquent step-sister.  Everyone knew my dad had a cache of
weapons, and that's just a whole 'nother level of socially irresponsible.

All the while I will defend the right to bear arms - and by "bear arms"
I *do* mean have access to the same weaponry that the military does.
How else can we hope to "defend ourselves against tyranny"?

brigid
Alibi - 20 Feb 2005 13:51 GMT
>I know. You said that's the reason you don't have a gun. So, you would
>sooner be unarmed than kill someone who is attacking you? It still makes
>no sense to me, but it doesn't have to make sense to me, if it makes
>sense to you, that's all that counts. :-)

Cheri

what if i mistook my husband for a burgler. I had a very bad dream one
night where I thought a stranger was in my room. My husband is a
musician and comes in at all hours. Anyway I was having a bad dream to
begin with when he walked into the room to kiss me on my cheek. So I
scrambled to the other side of the bed more or less screaming when he
finally got me to wake up. If I had a gun I might not have tried to
run away from him, I'm sure i would've shot him. I canb't trust myself
to shoot only the bad guys.

besides my beagles raise holy hell if anyone comes near the house.
they smell them long before they get very close.

Patti
Cheri - 20 Feb 2005 15:46 GMT
Hey, I'm 100% for the right to bear arms, or not to bear them, as a
person chooses.

--
Cheri

>what if i mistook my husband for a burgler. I had a very bad dream one
>night where I thought a stranger was in my room. My husband is a
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Patti
Cheri - 20 Feb 2005 15:49 GMT
One final thought. The beagles wake you up so you'll be alert while
you're being attacked? Or do you pummel the intruder dog biscuits? Just
kidding. Take care, and I hope none of us have to go through what Luna
did.

--
Cheri

Cheri wrote in message ...

>>besides my beagles raise holy hell if anyone comes near the house.
>>they smell them long before they get very close.
>>
>>Patti
Alibi - 21 Feb 2005 01:37 GMT
>One final thought. The beagles wake you up so you'll be alert while
>you're being attacked? Or do you pummel the intruder dog biscuits? Just
>kidding. Take care, and I hope none of us have to go through what Luna
>did.

hehehe, the beagles are on LC so I'd have to pummel them with pig feet
:)

Patti
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.