Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / Low Carb / February 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

But, in a way, Wysong is right

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Martha Gallagher - 23 Feb 2005 19:53 GMT
Sorry, I just like provocative subject lines.

But what I mean is that when I started low-carbing, I could eat pretty
good sized portions of fatty meats, add quite a bit of cheese to my salad,
etc. while still losing weight.

Once I got down to the point that my body doesn't like to go below, then I
found I needed to shift my eating somewhat (YMMV). I found I could eat
more, and carbier foods than when I was starting, but that I needed to
limit the amount of protein and fat.

I don't think that Atkins lied to me, cause 1. I was never his patient and
2.  I could still eat enough protein and fat that I continue to feel
satisfied after a meal (which is all Atkins ever promised, not that you
could stuff yourself silly). But, for me at least, I've found I have the
best results by shifting the percentages so that I'm getting rather more
carbs than in the beginning. I still find that my meals can be a sumptous
as I have any desire for them to be, because a moderate portion of ribeye
and a heaping salad drenched w/ balsamic vinaigrette still seems like a
fine dinner to me. But, it's true that, for me, I can no longer eat as
much steak as I'd like and expect the pounds to stay off.

Of course, all the above means is that I've rediscovered the fact that
maintenance eating isn't *supposed* to be exactly the same as induction.

My next astonishing discovery is that I probably do eat about 2lbs or less
of food a day. But, that only works 'cause I make good food choices - and
lettuce doesn't weigh very much.

Martha

Signature

Sig pending

Ada Ma - 24 Feb 2005 02:26 GMT
I don't quite get what Wysong has said.  I think I had tried to summarise what
she said but because of the volume of posts she's posted, I don't think I can
ever quite do that.  Since I don't know what Wysong has actually said, and I
don't know what you think she said is right, I think I'll just respond to what
you have said in your post and talk about my experience.

It's the same case for me - I can eat quite a bit of carbs and not put on weight
after the first half year of LCing.  But I can't lose any either when I'm eating
too much carbs.  More than 50g a day and that's it, no losing.  I also agree
with you that I can't eat a lot of protein without putting on weight.  For a few
months I was gaining weight very very very slowly (like 0.25lb per month) eating
lots of protein and moderate amount of carb - but I know I was eating too much
in terms of calories.  I was eating 2400 kcals a day.  It was lucky that I
escaped without turning back into the human balloon that I once was - mind you,
I'm still a half balloon.  What I discovered was that I can eat loads of protein
and still keep on eating it and nothing in my body will ring a bell and tell me
to stop.  I have to tell myself to stop.  The "stop eating too much" warning
system kicks in, however, when I eat leafy vegetables with protein.  I have so
far worked out a very short list of veg which gives me a good satiated feeling -
romaine lettuce, broccoli.  (Part of it is the very bouncy lettuce leaves tend
to escape under my fork and chasing leaves around on a plate gets a bit boring
after a while. :-) )  Things like cooked cauliflower doesn't work too well in
getting me to lose weight although it helps to ward it off.  YMMV, the list of
veg that work for you might be shorter or longer, I dunno.

So may be for me it only works if I eat lots of extremely low carb veg (like
less than 2g per 100g) with my protein, otherwise I'll still end up eating too
much protein (thus calories) for losing unless I pay attention and measure
everything that I eat.  I guess in a way this is my OWL level.

Talking about it in this post gets me thinking about what works for me, and as I
write my reply to your post the bits of info that has been swooshing around in
my head gets a tad more organised.  So loads of thanks to Martha for posting.

Cheers,
Ada

> Sorry, I just like provocative subject lines.
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Martha
Roger Zoul - 24 Feb 2005 09:16 GMT
How is it that you're eating all this protein and no fat?

> X-No-Archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 83 lines]
>>
>> Martha
Ada Ma - 24 Feb 2005 18:24 GMT
well, there was actually loads of fat in the meat I ate!

but the fat didn't stop me eating.  well, may be it did, because otherwise I'd
had put on weight much much quicker.  i think romaine lettuce is my answer.

:-)

> How is it that you're eating all this protein and no fat?
Roger Zoul - 24 Feb 2005 19:41 GMT
:: well, there was actually loads of fat in the meat I ate!
::
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
::
:: :-)

You may be eating more fat than portein!

:: Roger Zoul wrote:
::: How is it that you're eating all this protein and no fat?
Ada Ma - 25 Feb 2005 14:54 GMT
> :: well, there was actually loads of fat in the meat I ate!
> ::
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> You may be eating more fat than portein!

oh god, was I too generous with the olive oil???  now I'm back to the drawing
board...

> :: Roger Zoul wrote:
> ::: How is it that you're eating all this protein and no fat?
Wysong *~ - 24 Feb 2005 07:54 GMT
> Sorry, I just like provocative subject lines.
>
> But what I mean is that when I started low-carbing, I could eat pretty
> good sized portions of fatty meats, add quite a bit of cheese to my salad,
> etc. while still losing weight.

## That's how it worked for me as well, for those 5 months.  I was seldom
hungry.

> Once I got down to the point that my body doesn't like to go below, then I
> found I needed to shift my eating somewhat (YMMV). I found I could eat
> more, and carbier foods than when I was starting, but that I needed to
> limit the amount of protein and fat.

## The only thing working now is LOW calorie as well as LOW-Carb.  :*(   Not
as low-carb as before, but a lot less carbs than I consumed before the
weight problem started several years ago.
Signature

Wysong
Age 60.  Height 5'6"
Starting date: 1/8/05
171/ 164 / 140 lb
~~
Starting date LC 7/01 at 207lbs
Stopped losing on LC 11/01 at 165lbs
==========================================
NOW WALKING 1.5 to 3 MILES DAY.
==========================================

Doug Freyburger - 26 Feb 2005 00:03 GMT
> But what I mean is that when I started low-carbing, I could eat pretty
> good sized portions of fatty meats, add quite a bit of cheese to my salad,
> etc. while still losing weight.

More to lose, faster to lose it, less need for portion control.

> Once I got down to the point that my body doesn't like to go below, then I
> found I needed to shift my eating somewhat (YMMV).

Less to lose, slower to lose it, more need for portion control.
Overeating is forbidden by Atkins as soon as the initial
cravings of Induction are gone, but later on the appetite
suppression of ketosis makes portion control not trigger
hunger.  If the portions are tapered off carefully and
gradually is concert with your loss ...

> I found I could eat
> more, and carbier foods than when I was starting, but that I needed to
> limit the amount of protein and fat.

That's the core Atkins process after all.  Induction a very
low undershoot.  OWL as much carbs as you can while staying
in ketosis.  Premaint figuring out what the max carbs (and
hence min fat) you can have without regain.  Maintenance
bouncing around in the range between those to levels.

> I don't think that Atkins lied to me, cause 1. I was never his patient and
> 2.  I could still eat enough protein and fat that I continue to feel
> satisfied after a meal (which is all Atkins ever promised, not that you
> could stuff yourself silly). But, for me at least, I've found I have the
> best results by shifting the percentages so that I'm getting rather more
> carbs than in the beginning.

Following the directions in a plan that is far from obvious
how it works, but you did grat doing so.

> I still find that my meals can be a sumptous
> as I have any desire for them to be, because a moderate portion of ribeye
> and a heaping salad drenched w/ balsamic vinaigrette still seems like a
> fine dinner to me. But, it's true that, for me, I can no longer eat as
> much steak as I'd like and expect the pounds to stay off.

Sumptuous does not mean stuff-uous.  It's a hard thing to
learn and you have learned it well.

> Of course, all the above means is that I've rediscovered the fact that
> maintenance eating isn't *supposed* to be exactly the same as induction.
>
> My next astonishing discovery is that I probably do eat about 2lbs or less
> of food a day. But, that only works 'cause I make good food choices - and
> lettuce doesn't weigh very much.

Uh-oh.  The magic words.  ;^)  I've never tracked the total
weight because I'm an American and most American recipes go
by volume not weight.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.