Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / Low Carb / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Question for JC Re: body fat....

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
warren - 24 Mar 2005 14:49 GMT
JC....
A real question for you
I swim every night for at least 1/2 hour( most night 40 minutes)... Im
196 to 193... 6 ft and have about 30% body fat..... (188 seems to be a
very good weight for me)
In your world (not the stupid you are fat world) do me a favor and work
with me on this... What % fat, carb, and protein should I shoot for? And
what total calorie count for a day should I take aim at to reduce to
about 20% body fat.....
And what is the best way to track it.

Thanks
Warren

PS... you have a lot to say and I like what you say when you are not
being your alter ego. I try not to get hung up on the small stuff
because I am looking to learn, not debate.... so, if you are interested
in this it's in your court.....
A_M - 24 Mar 2005 22:18 GMT
> JC....
> A real question for you
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> because I am looking to learn, not debate.... so, if you are interested
> in this it's in your court.....

I don't think JC would give you dietary advice - other than that you
should eat less calories to lose weight - but he'd almost definitely
tell you to start lifting weight.
Anthony - 24 Mar 2005 22:26 GMT
> JC....
> A real question for you
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> looking to learn, not debate.... so, if you are interested in this it's in
> your court.....

I'll be interested to see what JC has to say.  But on the off-chance you're
not a troll here's my 10c.  At 193 and 30% fat your LBM is 135.  If the LBM
doesn't change, and it won't unless you do some serious exercise, you need
to lose 23 lbs to get to 20% fat.  So, buy the Atkins book and get with the
program.
warren - 24 Mar 2005 23:32 GMT
No Im not a troll or anything like that.....
I swim everyday but to get to 20% sounds very difficult... so what is
realistic in your opinion....
Warren

> I'll be interested to see what JC has to say.  But on the off-chance you're
> not a troll here's my 10c.  At 193 and 30% fat your LBM is 135.  If the LBM
> doesn't change, and it won't unless you do some serious exercise, you need
> to lose 23 lbs to get to 20% fat.  So, buy the Atkins book and get with the
> program.
Anthony - 25 Mar 2005 00:03 GMT
> No Im not a troll or anything like that.....
> I swim everyday but to get to 20% sounds very difficult... so what is
> realistic in your opinion....
> Warren

What are your age and gender?
warren - 25 Mar 2005 00:19 GMT
55 in may and male.....
w

>>No Im not a troll or anything like that.....
>>I swim everyday but to get to 20% sounds very difficult... so what is
>>realistic in your opinion....
>>Warren
>>
> What are your age and gender?
Anthony - 25 Mar 2005 00:31 GMT
> 55 in may and male.....
> w
Look, I'm not a doctor or a professional trainer, and perhaps you need to
consult one or both such people.  But IMO based on the information you've
given you should aim to increase your LBM by quite a lot and reduce your
body fat to 15% or below.  I bet you'd look and feel good at 200 lbs and 15%
fat.  This'd mean a serious commitment to exercise, both weights and cardio,
and to following an appropriate diet.  Whether you want to amke that
commitment is of course up to you.

By way of comparison, I'm male, 62, 180lbs and 10% body fat.
warren - 25 Mar 2005 00:38 GMT
thanks.....
w

>>55 in may and male.....
>>w
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> By way of comparison, I'm male, 62, 180lbs and 10% body fat.
Laureen - 25 Mar 2005 02:19 GMT
Holy crap! 62? Thats how old my father is. You lift?????? KEWL!!!!
My trainer is 8%, thin waisted bulked out on top, ripped abs, and a
teeny well muscled tight a.s LOL!!!

Laureen

> > 55 in may and male.....
> > w
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> By way of comparison, I'm male, 62, 180lbs and 10% body fat.
Marengo - 25 Mar 2005 06:06 GMT
|| Holy crap! 62? Thats how old my father is. You lift?????? KEWL!!!!
|| My trainer is 8%, thin waisted bulked out on top, ripped abs, and a
|| teeny well muscled tight a.s LOL!!!
||
|| Laureen

Well, at least now we know your true motivation to go to the gymn ...

Peter
Laureen - 26 Mar 2005 00:44 GMT
Even being married I still enjoy a nice tight a.s Peter!!!!!!! LOL

> || Holy crap! 62? Thats how old my father is. You lift?????? KEWL!!!!
> || My trainer is 8%, thin waisted bulked out on top, ripped abs, and a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Peter
JC Der Koenig - 25 Mar 2005 03:20 GMT
How do you know that you have 30% bodyfat?  However you came to that
conclusion, do that again regularly until you get down to 20% bodyfat.
Unless you are just guessing. In that case, find another way to calculate
your bodyfat.

As far as exercise goes, swimming is just about as good as anything,
although I would add some weightlifting.

Here's how to figure out how much to eat:

30% bodyfat at 194 pounds is  194 ( .3) = 135.8 pounds of lean mass.  (which
we will assume you can maintain through proper exercise and diet)

Given 135.8 pounds of lean mass, and wanting 20% bodyfat, I would use the
equation  x / ( 135.8 + x) = .2  to figure about how much you would have to
lose.  Work the equation so that  x = 27.16 + .2x    or  .8x = 27.16 ,
therefore  x = 33.95  (of bodyfat)  which I add to your lean mass which
gives a total of 169.75 pounds. Round that to 170, and of course you should
lose about 24 pounds to get down to around 20% bodyfat, if all other things
are approximately right.  (There's a lot of conjecture here).

To lose the 24 pounds, I would eat about 1360 calories per day, with about
40% protein,  15% carbs,  and 45% fat.

If I stalled, I would cut some protein calories and probably exercise more.

Signature

Eat less, exercise more.  --  MFW

--

> JC....
> A real question for you
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> looking to learn, not debate.... so, if you are interested in this it's in
> your court.....
Chris Smolinski - 25 Mar 2005 15:06 GMT
> How do you know that you have 30% bodyfat?  However you came to that
> conclusion, do that again regularly until you get down to 20% bodyfat.
> Unless you are just guessing. In that case, find another way to calculate
> your bodyfat.

Are there any methods you would suggest for estimating bodyfat at home,
that don't use specialized equipment?

Signature

---
Chris Smolinski
Black Cat Systems
http://www.blackcatsystems.com

warehouse - 25 Mar 2005 15:35 GMT
> > How do you know that you have 30% bodyfat?  However you came to that
> > conclusion, do that again regularly until you get down to 20% bodyfat.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Black Cat Systems
> http://www.blackcatsystems.com

Bodyfat calipers are inexpensive and while not highly accurate, will
produce decent ball-park results.  Just remember to pinch until it
hurts.
Laureen - 26 Mar 2005 00:46 GMT
And dont pinch your ball sack like JC does ok? It hurts! Thats why he
is so bitchy all the time!!!!

ROFLMFAO!!!
Laureen

 Just remember to pinch until it
> hurts.
Xtile - 29 Mar 2005 23:02 GMT
>  And dont pinch your ball sack like JC does ok? It hurts! Thats why he
> is so bitchy all the time!!!!
>
> ROFLMFAO!!!
> Laureen

He'd prefer his "partner" to do that with *** teeth!
JC Der Koenig - 25 Mar 2005 15:51 GMT
http://www.shapeup.org/bodylab/tools/index.asp

Not very accurate, but it can help you measure in a relative sense (better
than just guessing):
http://www.am-i-fat.com/body_fat_percentage.html

Signature

http://www.fuckinggoogleit.com/

>> How do you know that you have 30% bodyfat?  However you came to that
>> conclusion, do that again regularly until you get down to 20% bodyfat.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Are there any methods you would suggest for estimating bodyfat at home,
> that don't use specialized equipment?
Anthony - 25 Mar 2005 16:11 GMT
> Are there any methods you would suggest for estimating bodyfat at home,
> that don't use specialized equipment?

The folks at Duke University Wellness Center told me that the gold standard
is the water immersion test, second best is the skinfold test done by an
experienced person and that impedence machines are least accurate.  I have
my trainer use the skinfold test every few months and I think that the
consistency this gives makes the result a useful measure.  Whether it is
absolutely accurate or not isn't that important to me.
GaryG - 25 Mar 2005 19:11 GMT
> > How do you know that you have 30% bodyfat?  However you came to that
> > conclusion, do that again regularly until you get down to 20% bodyfat.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Are there any methods you would suggest for estimating bodyfat at home,
> that don't use specialized equipment?

The "Navy" method uses simple body circumference measurements that you can
take using a fabric tape measure.  It's reasonably accurate for most adults
(the Dept. of Defense uses this method in their personnel fitness
evaluations).

An online version of the Navy method can be found here:
http://www.he.net/%7Ezone/prothd2.html (just ignore their odd
recommendations for "Ideal Weight" - that has nothing to do with the Navy
method for estimating body fat percentage).

I've also included the Navy method in my WeightWare program
(www.WeightWare.com), along with the ability to track changes in your body
fat percentage over time.

GG
http://www.WeightWare.com
Your Weight and Health Diary
RRzVRR - 25 Mar 2005 22:55 GMT
>>How do you know that you have 30% bodyfat?  However you came to that
>>conclusion, do that again regularly until you get down to 20% bodyfat.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Are there any methods you would suggest for estimating bodyfat at home,
> that don't use specialized equipment?

Slim Guide calipers are fairly cheap (around $20.00) and are a
reasonable option.  Get spring-loaded calipers if your going to
purchase any calipers for your use.

Can you get someone to help you do the test?

If you don't have someone's help, you might consider going to a
gym and paying for a trainer to just do a BF% test.  I'm a
trainer at a YMCA and we're suppose to charge the "visitor
day-rate" of $15.00 for a BF% test.   But frankly if I had he
time I would likely do it for free in the hopes of getting a new
member or client.  Plus, I've had my BF% tested by trainer at a
commercial gym just by walking in and asking.  I'm sure that
trainer did it for the same reasons that I mentioned.  Or maybe
he just wanted to see me without my shirt -- who knows.

Whoever you get to test your BF%, go back to that same person
again.  Even if they are technically "off" in their methods
(where they test, how hard they pull, were they put the calipers
in relation to their fingers, ect.), they will be consistently
"off" but your gain/loss would probably be correct.

Also don't workout prior to the test.

Signature

Rudy - Remove the Z from my address to respond.

"It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!"
 -Emiliano Zapata

Check out the a.s.d.l-c FAQ at:
http://www.grossweb.com/asdlc/faq.htm

warren - 26 Mar 2005 01:39 GMT
JC
Thank you. I knew your answer would be right on...
I bought a good scale that does body fat. BUT...BUT if you think this is
not an accurate method I'll ask a trainer at the gym to do it.....
Ok, now to lose 24 pounds... The plan.....
swim at least 5 to 6 days a week and weight train at least 3.
I'll swim in the AM and then shoot over to the gym at night...
Does this sound reasonable... Is there a point of overdoing???
And the 1300 calories makes sense... I'll track it thru fit day...
Again
thanks
Warren

> How do you know that you have 30% bodyfat?  However you came to that
> conclusion, do that again regularly until you get down to 20% bodyfat.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> If I stalled, I would cut some protein calories and probably exercise more.
JC Der Koenig - 26 Mar 2005 03:06 GMT
There are no really accurate methods other than an autopsy, so using your
scale for a relative measurement is just fine.

There is a point of overdoing it, but most people don't have the kind of
time it takes to make that happen.

Your exercise plan sounds reasonable, if you can stick to it.  Try to pick
exercises that you enjoy, at least a little.

Signature

Eat less, exercise more.  --  MFW

--

> JC
> Thank you. I knew your answer would be right on...
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>> If I stalled, I would cut some protein calories and probably exercise
>> more.
Suze - 26 Mar 2005 07:34 GMT
Quoting warren <warren@optonline.net>:
[...]
>6 ft and have about 30% body fat.....

When you posted that pic in html, I took a look at it.  I doubt that
you're 30% bodyfat unless you happened to be wearing a rather tight
girdle under that sweater.  30% is pretty darned chunky for a guy.
JC Der Koenig - 26 Mar 2005 14:48 GMT
> Quoting warren <warren@optonline.net>:
> [...]
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> you're 30% bodyfat unless you happened to be wearing a rather tight
> girdle under that sweater.  30% is pretty darned chunky for a guy.

But if he thinks he's at 30% and uses the same measuring device to believe
he's at 20%, after he loses some weight, then it all pretty much balances
out.  In the end, it's not the number than matters, it's the mirror.
Suze - 30 Mar 2005 21:06 GMT
Quoting JC Der Koenig:

> But if he thinks he's at 30% and uses the same measuring device to believe
> he's at 20%, after he loses some weight, then it all pretty much balances
> out.  In the end, it's not the number than matters, it's the mirror.

True, if the measuring device can be counted on for some sort of
consistency. I personally don't find that to be the case with bodyfat
scales.  I've had them put me at both several % points under and over
what caliper or hydrostatic says I am.  So I can't even count on them to
be consistently inaccurate in any one direction.
JC Der Koenig - 31 Mar 2005 03:30 GMT
> I can't even count on them to
> be consistently inaccurate in any one direction.

That could make things difficult.

Personally, I wouldn't waste the money on one of those scales anyway. It's
much easier and more direct to just keep losing weight until the mirrored
image starts looking right.
warren - 26 Mar 2005 16:05 GMT
Suze... that what the scale sez... I thought I was about 20-25ish.......
But even though I look thin I put weight on in the middle. That was
taken 1 year ago January so it's 15 months and I am up about 2 pounds
from there..... So I pretty much look the same, just without the tan.....
And I am not a cross dresser... other things maybe but not that.......
and I agree 30% is chunky.. this has me perplexed. I am going to do what
someone recommended and that is get it done from a pro... then I'll
solve the question...
Thanks
Warren

> Quoting warren <warren@optonline.net>:
> [...]
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> you're 30% bodyfat unless you happened to be wearing a rather tight
> girdle under that sweater.  30% is pretty darned chunky for a guy.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.