http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20050428/HMARTIN2
7/TPHealth/
Paul Martin trying on South Beach diet for size
By TERRY PEDWELL
Thursday, April 28, 2005
Updated at 1:21 PM EDT
Canadian Press
OTTAWA -- Paul Martin doesn't think he's fat, but it seems his wife
does.
The Prime Minister revealed yesterday that he has been on a
low-carbohydrate diet -- specifically the South Beach diet -- since his
wife, Sheila, pointed out his growing girth recently.
"She asked me to stand sideways and said 'Look in the mirror,' " Mr.
Martin confided in an interview with Canadian Press.
"I thought I looked quite good in that sideways shot, but that was not
her judgment."
Under cover of a navy-blue suit jacket, Mr. Martin doesn't appear all
that chubby. But take off the jacket and there it is -- a stomach that
diet experts say is pretty typical for a man his age.
No one in the Prime Minister's Office will say exactly how much the
66-year-old weighs. When asked the question a year ago, a Martin
spokesman would only reveal that the Prime Minister was at "fighting
weight."
At least one expert has concerns about how the diet might affect Mr.
Martin's brain.
"Cutting carbohydrates means he's also cutting his cognitive
functions," said Beth Mansfield, a registered dietician and fitness
specialist with Peak Performance of Ottawa. "That can't help a man like
the Prime Minister think straight."
Ms. Mansfield also asked why Mr. Martin turned to a commercial diet
program when his own government offers a taxpayer-funded solution?
"Why is he going on this huge diet thing?
"Why not follow Canada's Food Guide, and show people that they should
be doing the same thing to stay healthy?
"He's a figurehead and should be providing an example to Canadians."
Susan Fyshe, a nutritionist who operates Healthy Lifestyles Nutrition
Consulting of Toronto, doesn't think the South Beach diet is a good way
for the prime minister to lose weight, although she commends him for
trying.
"It's not a really balanced diet . . . and in the long term, [it's] not
that easy to sustain."
For the first 14 days of the South Beach program, bread, rice,
potatoes, pasta, and baked goods are completely off limits. So is
fruit.
The South Beach people say their clients can begin adding those things
back into their diets again after two weeks.
And the Prime Minister can't eat candy, cake, cookies, ice cream --
basically anything with sugar. Alcohol is another no-no.
Former U.S. president Bill Clinton used to be on the low-carbohydrate
South Beach diet, too. But that was before doctors discovered his
arteries were clogged and performed a heart-bypass operation last
September.
He was also identified as having a cholesterol problem.
Ms. Mansfield recommends that instead of dieting, the Prime Minister
walk more -- maybe even use a pedometer to measure how many steps he
takes during say, an election campaign. Wink, wink.
"He has a fat belly. That's a big risk factor for diabetes and all
kinds of other illnesses," she warned. "Not to mention the stress he
must be under."
She had other suggestions, too.
"All he really needs to do is cut the cream from his coffee, or get rid
of the white sugar, or eat half a muffin at breakfast instead of a
whole one.
"He can give the other half to his press secretaries, because they
probably need to lose weight, too."
---
TC
Jen in ND - 28 Apr 2005 18:47 GMT
I know I'm preaching to the choir here, but I have to vent...
LOL!! "Cutting carbohydrates also means he's also cutting his
cognitive function" (ah - sugar makes you smart, I guess, never mind
that unstable blood sugar makes most of us flighty and shaky,
uh-huh)... "He's a figurehead and should be providing an example to
Canadians" (uh.. that's what he's DOING by getting healthier!!)...
"It's not really a balanced diet" (really, have you read the book?
It's one of the most balanced diets I've ever laid eyes on).
I honestly can't see how "candy, cakes, cookies, ice cream" constitutes
a balanced diet. Registered dieticians are so brainwashed - the one
that gave me the diet I was supposed to follow for gestational diabetes
was so misinformed, I actually laughed out loud at her. Sixty grams of
carbs for a meal, with only 2-3 oz. protein? That's supposed to LOWER
my blood sugar? Bwaaahahahahaha.
You know, if they simply looked at what he is eating, rather than what
he ISN'T, or what the name of the diet is, they would call it healthy.
--
Jen in ND
184/174/140
trader4@optonline.net - 28 Apr 2005 18:53 GMT
It never ceases to amaze me at how quick the "experts" are to heap
criticisim on someone else's attempt to lose weight. South Beach has
worked for millions of people, yet these whackos have nothing positive
to say about the PM trying it, only that everything he's doing is
wrong. Including that he should be following a Canadian plan, not SB.
Did it every occur to them that if what they thought worked for the
average person that there shouldn't be so many failed dieters out there?
tunderbar@hotmail.com - 28 Apr 2005 19:17 GMT
> It never ceases to amaze me at how quick the "experts" are to heap
> criticisim on someone else's attempt to lose weight. South Beach has
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Did it every occur to them that if what they thought worked for the
> average person that there shouldn't be so many failed dieters out there?
Funny how the dietitians assumed that he didn't try a standard low-fat
diet:
"Ms. Mansfield also asked why Mr. Martin turned to a commercial diet
program when his own government offers a taxpayer-funded solution?"
"Why is he going on this huge diet thing?
"Why not follow Canada's Food Guide, and show people that they should
be doing the same thing to stay healthy?"
Maybe he did a huge diet thing by following the taxpayer-funded food
guide and it didn't work. And the other dietitian assumed he didn't try
portion control:
"All he really needs to do is cut the cream from his coffee, or get rid
of the white sugar, or eat half a muffin at breakfast instead of a
whole one."
Maybe he did try and it failed.
Methinks they doth protesteth way too much.
It is so hard for these experts to admit that they are wrong.
TC
Cheri - 28 Apr 2005 19:58 GMT
That really cracks me up. After years and years of a junk food diet, and
a few weeks of South Beach, blame South Beach for Clinton's health
problems. Very typical though. :-)
--
Cheri
tunderbar@hotmail.com wrote in message
<1114709076.455376.239050@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>...
>http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20050428/HMARTIN2
7/TPHealth/
>Former U.S. president Bill Clinton used to be on the low-carbohydrate
>South Beach diet, too. But that was before doctors discovered his
>arteries were clogged and performed a heart-bypass operation last
>September.
>
>He was also identified as having a cholesterol problem.
trader4@optonline.net - 28 Apr 2005 21:09 GMT
"That really cracks me up. After years and years of a junk food diet,
and
a few weeks of South Beach, blame South Beach for Clinton's health
problems. Very typical though. :-) "
Even worse, they're far too devious to directly blame SB for Clinton's
heart bypass. If you read it, they never come out and cite it as a
causitive factor, they just mention that he was on SB prior to having
his bypass. Then they let guilt by association take over. Funny how
they mention SB, but nothing else like the fact that he was known for
eating lots of junk food and loved McD's. Or that he jogged. Jim Fix
died jogging and now Clinton has problems. Now there's an association
that must be logical, right?