http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=healthNews&storyID=2006-02-2
3T173345Z_01_HAR363207_RTRUKOC_0_US-POTATO-RISK.xml
Atkins told us so....
Potato lovers have higher diabetes risk
Thu Feb 23, 2006 12:33 PM ET
By Amy Norton
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Holding that side of fries might help thwart
type 2 diabetes, new research suggests.
In a long-term study of nearly 85,000 U.S. women, researchers at Harvard
University found that those with the highest potato intake had a modestly
elevated risk of developing type 2 diabetes.
The link was strongest among obese women, who are already at increased risk
of the disease, suggesting that heavy potato consumption may pose a
particular problem for them, the researchers point out.
The findings are published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.
Though potatoes have healthful attributes, they also have a high glycemic
index (GI) -- meaning they cause a rapid, strong rise in blood sugar. Over
time, these surges may damage the pancreatic cells that produce the hormone
insulin, which is needed to metabolize blood sugar.
Overweight or sedentary adults may be particularly vulnerable to the effects
of high-GI foods because they often have underlying insulin resistance -- a
precursor to diabetes in which body cells lose their sensitivity to insulin.
So it would make sense for these individuals to lay off the french fries,
Thomas L. Halton, the lead author of the new study, told Reuters Health.
He and his colleagues found that women with the highest potato intake were
14 percent more likely than those with the lowest intake to develop diabetes
over 20 years. And women who ate the most french fries, specifically, had a
21 percent greater risk of diabetes than those who ate the fewest.
Overall diet and other lifestyle habits did not explain the link, and
potatoes seemed to be more problematic when a woman ate them instead of
whole grains.
Whole grains -- as well as many high-fiber vegetables, fruits and legumes --
have a lower GI than potatoes and white-flour products. So eating those
foods in place of potatoes, Halton's team concludes, could potentially cut
diabetes risk.
SOURCE: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, February 2006.

Signature
Ken
"Buddhism elucidates why we are sentient."
"Karma means that you don't get away with anything."
trader4@optonline.net - 25 Feb 2006 12:23 GMT
> http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=healthNews&storyID=2006-02-2
3T173345Z_01_HAR363207_RTRUKOC_0_US-POTATO-RISK.xml
>
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
> "Buddhism elucidates why we are sentient."
> "Karma means that you don't get away with anything."
Ain't this grand? The $400Mil, 8 year study that everyone in the
established medical community thought would prove the benefits of low
fat continues to surprise everyone. First it showed no corelation
between substantially reducing fat intake and either heart disease or
cancer. Next we found out that women taking calcium supplements to
ward off osteoporosis had the same rate of bone problems as those that
did not, but they did have 15% more kidney stone problems. Now, we
find out that those eating more potatoes, a favorite staple of those
believing low fat is the way to go, had a 15% higher incidence of
diabetes.
Roger Zoul - 26 Feb 2006 13:36 GMT
>> http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=healthNews&storyID=2006-02-2
3T173345Z_01_HAR363207_RTRUKOC_0_US-POTATO-RISK.xml
>>
[quoted text clipped - 74 lines]
> believing low fat is the way to go, had a 15% higher incidence of
> diabetes.
I ate a LOT of potatoes during my younger years in various forms. When
trying to lose weight on LF the potato was a staple food. It just figures
that they damn things were deadly. Now, a potato is one of the last carby
foods I'd eat even if I wanted something carby.
But ain't it just f.cking grand? It really gives me a bad attitude when it
think about the sh.t that happens....almost a half billion!
DB - 26 Feb 2006 14:29 GMT
"Roger Zoul" <rogerzoul2@hotmail.com> wrote in
> But ain't it just f.cking grand? It really gives me a bad attitude when
> it think about the sh.t that happens....almost a half billion!
Yea, we're so worried about terrorists and chicken flu, we don't realize the
food we eat has a better chance of killing us.
Had fries just about every other day and grew up on meat & potatoes, I'm
doomed! LOL
jbuch - 26 Feb 2006 17:08 GMT
> <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in message
>>>So it would make sense for these individuals to lay off the french fries,
>>>Thomas L. Halton, the lead author of the new study, told Reuters Health.
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> But ain't it just f.cking grand? It really gives me a bad attitude when it
> think about the sh.t that happens....almost a half billion!
I hope you remember that you said that :
> Good point. History speaks of many "well meaning" folks who did great harm.
The "low fat" doctors were certainly "well meaning", weren't they?
When the eggheads go wrong, they can go very very wrong.
Jim

Signature
1) Eat Till SATISFIED, Not STUFFED... Atkins repeated 9 times in the book
2) Exercise: It's Non-Negotiable..... Chapter 22 title, Atkins book
3) Don't Diet Without Supplimental Nutrients... Chapter 23 title, Atkins
book
4) A sensible eating plan, and follow it. (Atkins, Self Made or Other)