Weight Loss Forum / Low Carb / March 2006
on Atkins, but...
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Norma - 15 Mar 2006 03:10 GMT I'm hoping you can help here. I've been trying to follow it fairly closely. I'm between 20 and 30 grams of carbs daily. I've found that high protein, low carb helps me with my hiatus hernia, and I am almost migraine free. I've never lost any weight, but I stay with it because of the above benefits. I could stand to lose abut 20 lbs, but maybe I'm just not following it closely enough. I have the book. and I tend to eat a lot of eggs, and meat, and green salad. No starches, and very little sweetener. Any suggestions on how to kick start? Thanks
ddgm
Pat in TX - 15 Mar 2006 03:44 GMT > I'm hoping you can help here. I've been trying to follow it fairly > closely. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > ddgm Some people think they are following it closely, but upon examination, it turns out that they are using a lot of caffeine (which stalls some people), or Aspartame (ditto), or coffee (ditto). You also didn't say how long you have been doing the diet.
Pat in TX
ddgm - 15 Mar 2006 04:04 GMT Hi Pat. I"ve been doing it now for about 3 months. I was on it for about 2 1/2 years a couple of years ago, and it was the same thing. I felt much better but didn't lose any weight. I stopped gradually over time ( lost my mom, etc) and started getting the pain from the hernia and was back up to a migraine a week. Seem my body doesn't like carbs much. Nothing else has ever cut back on the frequency. I've only had 1 headache since going back to Atkins. My typical day is - -1/2 cup egg salad with hellmans on lettuce. -1 decaf coffee a day with one splenda and table cream -coleslaw about 1/2 cup -either chicken breast or a pork chop (or 2) fried in olive oil, -a bowl of special K for a snack, (with cream) -and lots of water through the day. -some days I have bacon, and/or cheese
I work standing, so don't get much time during the day for exercise, and right now you are taking your life in your hands to try walking outside( very icy around here) my exercise consists of climbing the stairs and practising 2-3 times a day Polynesian dancing. probably about 5 minutes or so each time. (Just started this a few months ago.)
ddgm
>> I'm hoping you can help here. I've been trying to follow it fairly >> closely. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Pat in TX lizard-gumbo - 15 Mar 2006 04:27 GMT > -a bowl of special K for a snack, (with cream) That's probably your major staller.
 Signature Lizard Gumbo
ddgm - 15 Mar 2006 04:35 GMT Ah shoot! I will stop that then. Darn it! LOL
ddgm
>> -a bowl of special K for a snack, (with cream) > > That's probably your major staller. Saffire - 15 Mar 2006 05:58 GMT > > -a bowl of special K for a snack, (with cream) > > That's probably your major staller. You might also check on the contents of the coleslaw. It can be LOADED with sugar, depending upon how it's made.
 Signature Saffire 205/133/125 Atkins since 6/14/03 Progress photo: http://photos.yahoo.com/saffire333
*** This post originated in alt.support.diet.low-carb -- its appearance in any other forum is deceptive and unauthorized. ***
ddgm - 15 Mar 2006 15:31 GMT Hi Saffire, I just checked the label on the bottle of dressing - 3g sugars.
ddgm
>> > -a bowl of special K for a snack, (with cream) >> >> That's probably your major staller. > > You might also check on the contents of the coleslaw. It can be LOADED > with sugar, depending upon how it's made. Joe the Aroma - 16 Mar 2006 15:59 GMT > Hi Saffire, > I just checked the label on the bottle of dressing - 3g sugars. I find any amount of sugar is a huge problem, just the taste of it increases your appetite. Plus coleslaw is made with very starchy vegetables... the carrots at least.
Roger Zoul - 16 Mar 2006 18:11 GMT ::: Hi Saffire, ::: I just checked the label on the bottle of dressing - 3g sugars. :: :: I find any amount of sugar is a huge problem, just the taste of it :: increases your appetite. Plus coleslaw is made with very starchy :: vegetables... the carrots at least. Actually, typical not many calories or carbs from the tiny amount of carbs in carrots. Added sugar can be a problem, though.
eliz_reid@yahoo.com - 15 Mar 2006 15:48 GMT > -a bowl of special K for a snack, (with cream) According to the Special K web site, one serving of Special K has 22 grams of carbohydrate.
Beth
Roger Zoul - 15 Mar 2006 16:55 GMT :: ddgm wrote: :: ::: -a bowl of special K for a snack, (with cream) :: :: According to the Special K web site, one serving of Special K has 22 :: grams of carbohydrate. Yeah, but how many serving is a bowl?
:: Beth eliz_reid@yahoo.com - 15 Mar 2006 17:27 GMT > :: ddgm wrote: > :: [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Yeah, but how many serving is a bowl? Oh, don't get me wrong, I wasn't trying to say Special K is OK - to the contrary, I was pointing out that in a single serving she's getting 22 of her theoretical 20-30 grams of carbohydrate. You're right, that's assuming she's measuring a strict serving instead of just pouring a bowlful.
Beth
ddgm - 15 Mar 2006 19:48 GMT cheez, I never thought of measuring the serving. and you are right, that is too much isn't it? That clinches it, no more special K. ddgm
>> :: ddgm wrote: >> :: [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Beth Saffire - 15 Mar 2006 22:28 GMT > cheez, I never thought of measuring the serving. and you are right, that is > too much isn't it? That clinches it, no more special K. You need to get into the habit of measuring EVERYTHING, one way or another. I usually WEIGH most things because things fit into cup measures differently, depending on their shape, whereas grams or ounces are the same regardless of the shape the item is. Of course, something as light as puffy cereal can be a little flaky in the weighing dept.
Always read the labels on packaged foods and check for what THEY consider to be a "serving". You'd be AMAZED at how small their servings usually are. What you consider a serving might actually be 2-3 servings as far as the nutritional panel goes. Also, even if they portion it out somehow within the packaging, they may not be portioning it to match the stated serving size. A Scharffen-Berger 99% (baking) chocolate bar says it has SEVEN "servings", but the long, solid bar is scored into only FIVE blocks, so I had to figure it out by the grams.
 Signature Saffire 205/133/125 Atkins since 6/14/03 Progress photo: http://photos.yahoo.com/saffire333
*** This post originated in alt.support.diet.low-carb -- its appearance in any other forum is deceptive and unauthorized. ***
Baby Strange - 16 Mar 2006 00:18 GMT > You need to get into the habit of measuring EVERYTHING, one way or > another. I usually WEIGH most things because things fit into cup > measures differently, depending on their shape, whereas grams or ounces > are the same regardless of the shape the item is. Of course, something > as light as puffy cereal can be a little flaky in the weighing dept. This is great advice--very often what we're used to thinking of as "one serving" is *way* off base. I got quite a shock when I started measuring out salad dressings and oils--I'd always used far more than I thought.
I'd also like to suggest using FitDay (www.fitday.com) to keep track of everything you eat. It's free, and does all the math for you. I've found it incredibly helpful in keeping count of how many calories I've been eating, and of what kind. I also use it to plan meals, sometimes--if I'm debating between two choices for dinner, I'll enter the ingredients and see which one is a better fit, both carb- and calorie-wise. It's really helped me pay attention to what I'm eating, and has helped steer me away from some of my excesses--I used to eat a lot more cheese, for example, until I saw how many calories I was actually eating!
There's other features you may find useful--for example, the journal's a good place to record changes in weight or measurements, or even just to vent...
Joe the Aroma - 16 Mar 2006 16:01 GMT >> cheez, I never thought of measuring the serving. and you are right, that >> is [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > it has SEVEN "servings", but the long, solid bar is scored into only > FIVE blocks, so I had to figure it out by the grams. It's not a bad idea, although you don't have to do this. Personally I just assume everything has more carbs than it says or I'm eating a larger serving size and adjust my diet accordingly. Works like a charm.
Roger Zoul - 16 Mar 2006 17:52 GMT :: In article <XtZRf.8803$ng.406665@news20.bellglobal.com>, :: ddgm@sympatico says... [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] :: long, solid bar is scored into only FIVE blocks, so I had to figure :: it out by the grams. I find this practice most frustrating and even dishonest for something like a scored bar. Serving sizes should always be practical measure, IMO.
:: -- :: Saffire [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] :: *** This post originated in alt.support.diet.low-carb -- its :: appearance in any other forum is deceptive and unauthorized. *** Pat in TX - 15 Mar 2006 22:54 GMT > cheez, I never thought of measuring the serving. and you are right, that > is too much isn't it? That clinches it, no more special K. > ddgm That dressing you said has 3 grams of carbs also has to be measured. Is that 1 tablespoon for 3 grams? If so, how many tablespoons of it are you using?
Pat in TX
Joe the Aroma - 16 Mar 2006 16:00 GMT >> -a bowl of special K for a snack, (with cream) > > According to the Special K web site, one serving of Special K has 22 > grams of carbohydrate. You gotta love some of these posts huh? "I'm doing Atkins but I'm eating 4 snickers bars a day, plus a bottle of Coke and I can't seem to lose any weight!"
Roger Zoul - 16 Mar 2006 18:53 GMT :: You gotta love some of these posts huh? "I'm doing Atkins but I'm :: eating 4 snickers bars a day, plus a bottle of Coke and I can't seem :: to lose any weight!" That's why our work is never done.
Roger Zoul - 15 Mar 2006 03:47 GMT :: I'm hoping you can help here. I've been trying to follow it fairly :: closely. I'm between 20 and 30 grams of carbs daily. I've found that [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] :: starches, and very little sweetener. Any suggestions on how to kick :: start? Thanks Daily exercise. Walking, weight lifting.
ddgm - 15 Mar 2006 04:07 GMT Hi Roger, my exercise consists of climbing the stairs several times a day and probably 5 minutes or so of Polynesian dancing. believe me, that is harder than it looks! I will try weight lifting of some sort as soon as my tennis elbow subsides. Thanks.
D.D.G.M.
> :: I'm hoping you can help here. I've been trying to follow it fairly > :: closely. I'm between 20 and 30 grams of carbs daily. I've found that [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Daily exercise. Walking, weight lifting. Roger Zoul - 15 Mar 2006 13:17 GMT Dancing is good, though. Can you increase that? Also, if you have one of those swiss balls, you can use it to do wall squats and hamstring exercises. That way, you can workout the large muscles in your legs.
:: Hi Roger, :: my exercise consists of climbing the stairs several times a day and [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] ::: ::: Daily exercise. Walking, weight lifting. ddgm - 15 Mar 2006 15:32 GMT sorry Roger, what is a 'Swiss ball'?
> Dancing is good, though. Can you increase that? Also, if you have one of > those swiss balls, you can use it to do wall squats and hamstring [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > ::: > ::: Daily exercise. Walking, weight lifting. Roger Zoul - 15 Mar 2006 16:52 GMT :: sorry Roger, what is a 'Swiss ball'? http://www.stretchnow.com.au/training/fitball.htm
Just one of many from google.
ddgm - 15 Mar 2006 19:52 GMT Roger I think my hubby would kill me if I went and bought one of those! LOL I've have several pieces of equipment over the years. But I've never been able to make myself stick with any of them :-( just lazy at heart)
> :: sorry Roger, what is a 'Swiss ball'? > > http://www.stretchnow.com.au/training/fitball.htm > > Just one of many from google. Luna - 16 Mar 2006 01:27 GMT I bet you're not lazy. Just none of those exercise equipment things were a good fit for you and your preferences. The best exercise is something that is fun for you. Most of those things advertised on tv are all "Just 20 minutes a day!" or whatever, but that pretty much says to me "Using this equipment really sucks and is boring, so you only have to do it for a little while." There are so many fun things we can do for exercise (like your dancing) so why in the world would anyone ever choose something that's not fun? What's the point? I don't get it. Keep on dancing.
> Roger I think my hubby would kill me if I went and bought one of those! LOL > I've have several pieces of equipment over the years. But I've never been [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > > > Just one of many from google. OmManiPadmeOmelet - 15 Mar 2006 15:45 GMT > Dancing is good, though. Can you increase that? Also, if you have one of > those swiss balls, you can use it to do wall squats and hamstring exercises. > That way, you can workout the large muscles in your legs. Heheheheh..... If you think Polynesian dancing does not work out the legs.......
 Signature Peace, Om.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack Nicholson
Roger Zoul - 15 Mar 2006 16:53 GMT :: In article <121g1b76mc6peaf@news.supernews.com>, :: "Roger Zoul" <rogerzoul2@hotmail.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] :: Heheheheh..... :: If you think Polynesian dancing does not work out the legs....... No, I don't think that....just giving options.
:: -- :: Peace, Om. :: :: "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." :: -Jack Nicholson ddgm - 15 Mar 2006 19:50 GMT This is true! LOL doesn't do a lot for the upper body though. I did just get one of those balls that come in the cereal box given to me.
> Heheheheh..... > If you think Polynesian dancing does not work out the legs....... OmManiPadmeOmelet - 15 Mar 2006 21:38 GMT > > Heheheheh..... > > If you think Polynesian dancing does not work out the legs....... > > This is true! LOL doesn't do a lot for the upper body though. I did just get > one of those balls that come in the cereal box given to me. Nah... Just do Poly' dancing for the lower legs and Tai Chi for the upper body. ;-)
Seriously tho', working the larger muscle groups burns the most calories, and working lower body still benefits the upper due to the overall physiology of the human body.
I know that sounds odd, but it works.
 Signature Peace, Om.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack Nicholson
OmManiPadmeOmelet - 15 Mar 2006 03:55 GMT > I'm hoping you can help here. I've been trying to follow it fairly closely. > I'm between 20 and 30 grams of carbs daily. I've found that high protein, [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > ddgm Are you exercising? :-)
 Signature Peace, Om.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack Nicholson
ddgm - 15 Mar 2006 04:11 GMT Hi Om, I am trying to exercise as much as I can. mostly dancing and climbing the stairs.
 Signature In Star love and friendship, Norma Woods D.D.G.M. District 21
> >> I'm hoping you can help here. I've been trying to follow it fairly [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Are you exercising? :-) OmManiPadmeOmelet - 15 Mar 2006 15:39 GMT > Hi Om, I am trying to exercise as much as I can. mostly dancing and climbing > the stairs. Polynesian dancing is EXCELLENT exercize, but you need to increase it to a minimum of 20 to 30 minutes sustained per day. :-)
That sounds like a helluva lot of fun. I've considered belly dancing, I just need to find a good tape.
You might consider giving up the "special K". It might be stalling you, and get your carbs from more leafy greens instead. A higher fiber diet causes the gut to burn more calories just to digest the stuff. <G>
Avoid the gassers tho'. That's misery.
 Signature Peace, Om.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack Nicholson
lizard-gumbo - 15 Mar 2006 16:56 GMT > I've considered belly dancing, I just need to find a good tape. My local continuing education program offers a class (at least 1) every semester, as well as flamenco, both of which I adore. You might try your closest university and see if they have a continuing education program.
OmManiPadmeOmelet - 15 Mar 2006 18:00 GMT > > I've considered belly dancing, I just need to find a good tape. > > My local continuing education program offers a class (at least 1) every > semester, as well as flamenco, both of which I adore. You might try > your closest university and see if they have a continuing education program. If I get back to the university, I'd probably re-join the fencing club...... ;-) I fenced Saber and it's VERY good exercize.
And fun.
 Signature Peace, Om.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack Nicholson
trader4@optonline.net - 15 Mar 2006 14:33 GMT Apparently Norma and ddgm are one and the same? If so, this is quite amazing. She's says she's been on Atkins this time for 3 months and was on it for 2 1/2 years previously, without being able to lose weight, despite following Atkins closely and consuming 20-30g or carbs a day. Yet, the first sample menu includes a bowl of Special K as a snack?
And if she's that far off course, it's very likely that there are other things wrong here. Like it leaves me wondering what she means by "very little sweetner." Normally, I would think that probably means very little artificial sweetner, but after the above, who knows.
Get the book, read it and follow the plan. It works.
ddgm - 15 Mar 2006 15:42 GMT Thanks, I have the book, and followed it religiously those 2 years, yet didn't lose. I write down everything that I eat, and I use one packet of Splenda with my coffee in the morning, and one packet of splenda with the one bowl of special K - that's it. (and yes, Norma and ddgm are one and the same. I munged my identity only because I am trying to rid myself of some spam, and right now can't change my address.) age mid 50s, height 5'2", weight 150lbs.
> Apparently Norma and ddgm are one and the same? If so, this is quite > amazing. She's says she's been on Atkins this time for 3 months and [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Get the book, read it and follow the plan. It works. Susan - 15 Mar 2006 16:05 GMT > Thanks, > I have the book, and followed it religiously those 2 years, yet didn't lose. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > munged my identity only because I am trying to rid myself of some spam, and > right now can't change my address.) age mid 50s, height 5'2", weight 150lbs. I not only didn't lose weight when I tried Atkins, I gained 20lbs and slowed my metabolism terribly, due to the lowering of my active T3 hormone on induction levels. This hormonal effect happens with ketogenic and also with very low calorie diets, both cause the body to downregulate metabolism.
I lose better on about 50-60 net carbs per day, but now have to keep calories low and fat more moderate than before I tried Atkins.
One good thing that did come out of that time was the reversal of my hypoglycemia, but that would likely have happened with my present levels over time (I had been eating very high carb, very low fat). I should add that I was not overweight when I tried Atkins induction, but I was extremely insulin resistant.
Susan
Doug Freyburger - 17 Mar 2006 21:14 GMT > I not only didn't lose weight when I tried Atkins, I gained 20lbs and > slowed my metabolism terribly, due to the lowering of my active T3 > hormone on induction levels. This hormonal effect happens with > ketogenic and also with very low calorie diets, both cause the body to > downregulate metabolism. There are studies hat show that going low enough in carbs causes T3 to start falling after 2 weeks. Funny how the directions state that OWL starts on day 15, that Induction is very low in carbs, and OWL moves back up in carbs. It adds up nicely as the standard process being designed to handle T3 issues. Yet another reason to move on to OWL on schedule.
> I lose better on about 50-60 net carbs per day, but now have to keep > calories low and fat more moderate than before I tried Atkins. The point of OWL is that each person has a carb level that gives them their best loss and that the initial 20 is only an undershoot to get nearly everyone into ketosis.
> One good thing that did come out of that time was the reversal of my > hypoglycemia, but that would likely have happened with my present levels > over time (I had been eating very high carb, very low fat). I should > add that I was not overweight when I tried Atkins induction, but I was > extremely insulin resistant. trader4@optonline.net - 15 Mar 2006 17:53 GMT > Thanks, > I have the book, and followed it religiously those 2 years, yet didn't lose. Tell us where in the Atkins book it says that if you aren't losing, it's OK to have a bowl of Special K for a snack. Or how you can eat that and be at 20-30g of carbs?
> I write down everything that I eat, and I use one packet of Splenda with my > coffee in the morning, and one packet of splenda with the one bowl of [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > > > Get the book, read it and follow the plan. It works. ddgm - 15 Mar 2006 19:57 GMT sorry, I should have said that I didn't have the cereal back then, like I have been this time. But everyone that has told me to cut the cereal is right, I will not be having any of that from now on.
>> Thanks, >> I have the book, and followed it religiously those 2 years, yet didn't [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] >> > >> > Get the book, read it and follow the plan. It works. OmManiPadmeOmelet - 15 Mar 2006 17:58 GMT > Thanks, > I have the book, and followed it religiously those 2 years, yet didn't lose. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > munged my identity only because I am trying to rid myself of some spam, and > right now can't change my address.) age mid 50s, height 5'2", weight 150lbs. Have you had your thyroid checked?
 Signature Peace, Om.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack Nicholson
JC Der Koenig - 15 Mar 2006 18:47 GMT >> I write down everything that I eat, and I use one packet of Splenda with >> my >> coffee in the morning, and one packet of splenda with the one bowl of >> special K - that's it.
> Have you had your thyroid checked? Her thyroid causes uncontrolled eating of Special K?
OmManiPadmeOmelet - 15 Mar 2006 18:55 GMT > >> I write down everything that I eat, and I use one packet of Splenda with > >> my [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Her thyroid causes uncontrolled eating of Special K? Sweetheart, that item's been beaten to death already. I think she got the point.
If you have nothing more constructive to contribute, shut up please and go back to molding those young little minds like you do so well........
Just be sure to wear a condom.
 Signature Peace, Om.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack Nicholson
JC Der Koenig - 15 Mar 2006 23:15 GMT >> >> I write down everything that I eat, and I use one packet of Splenda >> >> with [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Sweetheart, that item's been beaten to death already. > I think she got the point. IOW, you're not really sure if her thyroid has anything to do with the situation...
OmManiPadmeOmelet - 15 Mar 2006 23:29 GMT > >> >> I write down everything that I eat, and I use one packet of Splenda > >> >> with [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > IOW, you're not really sure if her thyroid has anything to do with the > situation... That remains to be seen... The thing is, several other people had mentioned that that Special K might be an issue ( I know it would be for me!) so you did not need to go there.
If you want to help, be a help. Quit being a c.nt.
But if she DOES have thyroid issues which is common with chronic dieters, it needs to be addressed.
Especially total and free T-3.
Not T4.
Not TSH.
T3.
Thanks and have a nice day!
 Signature Peace, Om.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack Nicholson
JC Der Koenig - 16 Mar 2006 00:01 GMT >> >> >> I write down everything that I eat, and I use one packet of Splenda >> >> >> with [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > If you want to help, be a help. You wouldn't recognize good help if it busted you upside your fat head.
> But if she DOES have thyroid issues... Internet medical analysis. How wonderful.
OmManiPadmeOmelet - 16 Mar 2006 15:25 GMT > > If you want to help, be a help. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Internet medical analysis. How wonderful. You, sir, are an a.shole.
Why are you so proud of that?
 Signature Peace, Om.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack Nicholson
ddgm - 15 Mar 2006 19:59 GMT not lately, but I will speak to the doc about that, next time I see him. Thanks for the suggestion.
>> Thanks, >> I have the book, and followed it religiously those 2 years, yet didn't [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Have you had your thyroid checked? OmManiPadmeOmelet - 15 Mar 2006 15:47 GMT > Apparently Norma and ddgm are one and the same? If so, this is quite > amazing. She's says she's been on Atkins this time for 3 months and > was on it for 2 1/2 years previously, without being able to lose > weight, despite following Atkins closely and consuming 20-30g or carbs > a day. Yet, the first sample menu includes a bowl of Special K as a > snack? She may have not yet learned about the concept of "net carbs".
My body responds the same to starch of ANY kind the same way it responds to sugar.
But I had to learn that, and it took me damned near 10 years. :-(
I'm not proud of that but some of us are more stubborn (or whatever) than others.
> And if she's that far off course, it's very likely that there are other > things wrong here. Like it leaves me wondering what she means by "very > little sweetner." Normally, I would think that probably means very > little artificial sweetner, but after the above, who knows. > > Get the book, read it and follow the plan. It works. Unless you are HIGHLY insulin resistant, then there are better methods.
I had to really cut the fat.
And the total calories.
 Signature Peace, Om.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack Nicholson
Baby Strange - 15 Mar 2006 20:39 GMT OmManiPadmeOmelet wrote:>
> My body responds the same to starch of ANY kind the same way it responds > to sugar. > > But I had to learn that, and it took me damned near 10 years. :-( I have the same response--I'm back on OWL right now, and were I to eat the occasional bowl of Special K (or an equivalent amount of any grain- or potato-based carbs), I not only wouldn't be losing weight, but I'd probably gain it back. I can't eat that stuff at all--not even in moderation, not even while on Maintenance (as I discovered over the holidays).
It sounds like Norma can maintain while eating Special K, but not while losing weight. And the dressing on the cole slaw doesn't help.
Also, while I don't know how much heavy cream Norma's using on the cereal, I do know that it's whoppingly high in calories. A quarter-cup of heavy cream is 205 calories. One cup of Special K is 115 calories. That's a 320-calorie snack. Worse, it has roughly 24g of carbs (net!) and *less than one gram* of fiber. Bad! You have to eat a lot of veggies to get to 24g net. However, in the process you get plenty of fiber and nutrients. I don't see any vegetables other than lettuce and 1/2 cup of cabbage in on the sample menu Norma provided, and that's a big problem.
And if she's using more than 1/4 cup of cream, well--that's a hell of a lot of calories, without a correspondingly large nutritional payoff. While Atkins de-emphasized counting calories, and it's true that you can eat more calories when doing Atkins properly than you can on a low-fat diet, there are limits.
That said, there are plenty of other snacks you can eat that are just as satisfying, are lower in carbs, possibly lower in calories, and more nutritious than Special K.
For Induction/early OWL snacks, I like celery or halved red/green peppers with tuna salad or cream cheese, hard-boiled or devilled eggs (made without sweet relish), deli meats (roast beef, ham, or turkey, not bologna or other Mystery Meat), raw veggies with blue cheese dressing, or even a 1/4-lb hamburger patty with some sliced tomato. A small salad with chopped egg, bacon, cheese, chicken, or any other low-carb protein source, plus dressing (with no sugar!) is good, too. I sometimes make homemade chicken-vegetable soup and heat up a big mug full in the microwave--it makes a great snack on a cold day.
So my biggest piece of advice to Norma is to start getting carbs from fresh vegetables, and learn to cook them and make them a major part of your diet. Counting carbs is only part of it; the quality of the carbs matters, too. And vegetables are much better for you than processed cereal.
OmManiPadmeOmelet - 15 Mar 2006 21:41 GMT > OmManiPadmeOmelet wrote:> > > My body responds the same to starch of ANY kind the same way it responds [quoted text clipped - 47 lines] > matters, too. And vegetables are much better for you than processed > cereal. I'll second that... Fat really is over-rated.
 Signature Peace, Om.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack Nicholson
Baby Strange - 15 Mar 2006 22:32 GMT > I'll second that... > Fat really is over-rated. I still eat lots of fat--I'm in my second week back on OWL right now, looking to lose the last 20 pounds, and get about 60-65% of my calories from it--but I don't often eat something that's just a big fat-bomb, containing realtively little nutrient value in exchange for all those calories. I don't go out of my way to avoid fat, but I don't slather butter or mayonnaise on everything, either. I measure out salad dressings, and I don't eat huge amounts of cheese. I do pay attention to calories, and try to avoid "empty" calories whenever possible.
I think what screws many people up when they try Atkins is that they latch onto the idea that they can eat all kinds of high-fat foods normally forbidden on diets. In doing so, they lose sight of the fact that Atkins *encourages* eating a lot more fresh vegetables. I see this a lot with people who weren't veggie-eaters before trying Atkins, or who say they dislike vegetables (corn and potatoes usually excepted).
Having been given permission to eat all the fat you want for the first time in your life, it's easy to ignore where it says that you need to eat your broccoli or asparagus or peppers, too. And that's where the common miconceptions about Atkins--that it only allows you to eat bacon and eggs, or that all carbs are to be avoided whenever possible--come in. I didn't look at Atkins for several years because that was exactly the sort of crap I'd heard, and it sounded like another crackpot crash diet. It was only after reading the book and seeing that it eventually allowed all the green and yellow vegetables I liked that I gave it a shot. I've had family members get surprised when they see me eating big salads--"I thought you were doing Atkins?" "I am!"
I admit that I'm a real veggie crusader, and not above bashing folks over the head with a stalk of broccoli or pelting them with peppers to make my point...[laughs]
OmManiPadmeOmelet - 15 Mar 2006 22:53 GMT > > I'll second that... > > Fat really is over-rated. [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > over the head with a stalk of broccoli or pelting them with peppers to > make my point...[laughs] All excellent points......... :-)
See, no matter WHAT diet you try, total calories in vs. calories burned are still going to count.
And if you really read the entire book by Atkins (and I have), he agrees......
 Signature Peace, Om.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack Nicholson
Luna - 16 Mar 2006 01:16 GMT > > I'll second that... > > Fat really is over-rated. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > a lot with people who weren't veggie-eaters before trying Atkins, or > who say they dislike vegetables (corn and potatoes usually excepted). What's interesting to me is that I never used to like vegetables much, whenever I tried low-fat diets and tried to fill up on steamed veggies. So when I first got serious about low-carb, I did indeed eat a lot of meat and cheese. But I started really _craving_ vegetables. And all of a sudden, without having my tastebuds all messed up from sugary treats, vegetables actually started to taste quite good! Fresh spinach salads are sweet, even without sweet dressing. And I do have to also add, for the sake of honesty, that broccoli, while quite good steamed with a little butter and salt, is positively a decadent treat for me now with melted cheese on it as well.
Jo Anne Slaven - 16 Mar 2006 02:24 GMT >Also, while I don't know how much heavy cream Norma's using on the >cereal, I do know that it's whoppingly high in calories. A quarter-cup >of heavy cream is 205 calories. One cup of Special K is 115 calories. >That's a 320-calorie snack. Worse, it has roughly 24g of carbs (net!) >and *less than one gram* of fiber. Special K comes in different flavours now. If she's eating Special K with Soy, it has 210 calories per 1 cup serving. And 40 grams of carbs. It does have a moderately better 5 grams of fiber, though.
Jo Anne
norma - 16 Mar 2006 02:43 GMT Thank you Baby Strange, all good advice and I appreciate it. Tomorrow, I start again in earnest!
> OmManiPadmeOmelet wrote:> >> My body responds the same to starch of ANY kind the same way it responds [quoted text clipped - 47 lines] > matters, too. And vegetables are much better for you than processed > cereal. Baby Strange - 17 Mar 2006 21:48 GMT > Thank you Baby Strange, all good advice and I appreciate it. Tomorrow, I > start again in earnest! You're welcome! Best of luck to you--let us know how it goes!
jackiepatti@gmail.com - 17 Mar 2006 17:48 GMT > > Apparently Norma and ddgm are one and the same? If so, this is quite > > amazing. She's says she's been on Atkins this time for 3 months and [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > I'm not proud of that but some of us are more stubborn (or whatever) > than others. IMO, it's not relevant. Atkins has a list of induction foods in the book. Cereal is not on the list. Pretty straightforward.
You don't have to know a whole heck of a lot to follow induction. All the "advanced" knowledge isn't necessary to know, eat lots of meat and eggs, limited amounts of cheese and cream, a few cups of low-starch veggies, and drink lotsa water.
It's really pretty damned simple - and utterly amazing how people manage to f.ck it up.
Roger Zoul - 17 Mar 2006 18:16 GMT :: It's really pretty damned simple - and utterly amazing how people :: manage to f.ck it up. Damn tootin!
ddgm - 15 Mar 2006 04:12 GMT Oops, sorry I should have mentioned that I changed my sig to ddgm.
> I'm hoping you can help here. I've been trying to follow it fairly > closely. I'm between 20 and 30 grams of carbs daily. I've found that high [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > ddgm The Queen of Cans and Jars - 15 Mar 2006 04:58 GMT > I'm hoping you can help here. I've been trying to follow it fairly closely. > I'm between 20 and 30 grams of carbs daily. I've found that high protein, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > green salad. No starches, and very little sweetener. Any suggestions on how > to kick start? Thanks Calories still count. If you eat too many of them, you won't lose weight.
ddgm - 15 Mar 2006 15:34 GMT I have a feeling that I am under rather than over with the calories. Maybe I should try to eat more! I don't have much of an appetite, which is another thing I noticed before with Atkins.
> Calories still count. If you eat too many of them, you won't lose > weight. JC Der Koenig - 15 Mar 2006 16:55 GMT >I have a feeling that I am under rather than over with the calories. Maybe >I should try to eat more! That's how you got fat in the first place.
ddgm - 15 Mar 2006 19:54 GMT snort, I guess that's true ( and obvious if I really think about it)
>>I have a feeling that I am under rather than over with the calories. Maybe >>I should try to eat more! > > That's how you got fat in the first place. Saffire - 15 Mar 2006 22:35 GMT > snort, I guess that's true ( and obvious if I really think about it) > > > >>I have a feeling that I am under rather than over with the calories. Maybe > >>I should try to eat more! > > > > That's how you got fat in the first place. Norma, I recommend ignoring JC. He's the resident troll and he insults EVERYONE. It's what he does. Responding to him just makes him feel special. He's been uncharacteristically quiet for a while (I'm guessing he forgot he wasn't on-line and started talking to people face-to-face the way he talks to people here and someone finally beat the sh.t out of him, putting him in a coma for a while).
 Signature Saffire 205/133/125 Atkins since 6/14/03 Progress photo: http://photos.yahoo.com/saffire333
*** This post originated in alt.support.diet.low-carb -- its appearance in any other forum is deceptive and unauthorized. ***
JC Der Koenig - 15 Mar 2006 23:16 GMT >> snort, I guess that's true ( and obvious if I really think about it) >> > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > the way he talks to people here and someone finally beat the sh.t out of > him, putting him in a coma for a while). Wishful thinking on your part, you old wrinkle-bag.
OmManiPadmeOmelet - 15 Mar 2006 23:29 GMT > >> snort, I guess that's true ( and obvious if I really think about it) > >> > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Wishful thinking on your part, you old wrinkle-bag. Prick.
 Signature Peace, Om.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack Nicholson
JC Der Koenig - 16 Mar 2006 00:02 GMT >> >> snort, I guess that's true ( and obvious if I really think about it) >> >> > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Prick. Calling out for that which you cannot obtain, again?
OmManiPadmeOmelet - 16 Mar 2006 15:26 GMT > > Prick. > > Calling out for that which you cannot obtain, again? <snork> You'd not believe the number of offers I've gotten off of Austin.singles. ;-) And that's with a photograph.
Jealous???????
 Signature Peace, Om.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack Nicholson
JC Der Koenig - 16 Mar 2006 16:03 GMT >> > Prick. >> >> Calling out for that which you cannot obtain, again? > > <snork> You'd not believe the number of offers I've gotten You are correct.
OmManiPadmeOmelet - 16 Mar 2006 17:34 GMT > >> > Prick. > > You are correct. Thank you for being man enough to admit it...
 Signature Peace, Om.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack Nicholson
Roger Zoul - 16 Mar 2006 18:51 GMT :: <snork> You'd not believe the number of offers I've gotten off of :: Austin.singles. ;-) And that's with a photograph. Got links? :)
OmManiPadmeOmelet - 16 Mar 2006 18:57 GMT > :: <snork> You'd not believe the number of offers I've gotten off of > :: Austin.singles. ;-) And that's with a photograph. > > Got links? :) Heh! I do, but It is fully dressed... <G>
I'm still not quite ready to post "before" and "after" pics. I have a ways to go. <sigh>
I am serious tho'. There are a number of nice men that don't mind a "rubenesque" woman.
 Signature Peace, Om.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack Nicholson
Roger Zoul - 16 Mar 2006 19:29 GMT :: In article <121j9ameuednp31@news.supernews.com>, :: "Roger Zoul" <rogerzoul2@hotmail.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] :: :: Heh! I do, but It is fully dressed... <G> No probs...
:: I'm still not quite ready to post "before" and "after" pics. :: I have a ways to go. <sigh> I understand.
:: I am serious tho'. There are a number of nice men that don't mind a :: "rubenesque" woman. No question. Brains and nice personality are more important, especially later down the road.
OmManiPadmeOmelet - 16 Mar 2006 19:47 GMT > :: In article <121j9ameuednp31@news.supernews.com>, > :: "Roger Zoul" <rogerzoul2@hotmail.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > No question. Brains and nice personality are more important, especially > later down the road. Thank you! :-) :-) ;-)
 Signature Peace, Om.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack Nicholson
JC Der Koenig - 16 Mar 2006 20:26 GMT > I have a ways to go. <sigh> You don't say.
It must be the T3.
OmManiPadmeOmelet - 16 Mar 2006 21:14 GMT > > I have a ways to go. <sigh> > > You don't say. > > It must be T3. Yep... It's the sequal to T2.
Arnold is a great role model.
Thanks for understanding!
 Signature Peace, Om.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack Nicholson
Luna - 16 Mar 2006 01:20 GMT > > snort, I guess that's true ( and obvious if I really think about it) > > > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > the way he talks to people here and someone finally beat the sh.t out of > him, putting him in a coma for a while). Seems like Norma did just fine with JC. She didn't choose to be insulted, so he can't insult her. She's insult-proof, so she doesn't have to worry about talking to JC or anyone else if she wants to.
Pat in TX - 16 Mar 2006 04:05 GMT > Norma, I recommend ignoring JC. He's the resident troll and he insults > EVERYONE. It's what he does. Responding to him just makes him feel > special. He's been uncharacteristically quiet for a while (I'm guessing > he forgot he wasn't on-line and started talking to people face-to-face > the way he talks to people here and someone finally beat the sh.t out of > him, putting him in a coma for a while). You could help by not quoting him in your posts. Otherwise, I wouldn't see his rants at all....
Pat in TX
Saffire - 17 Mar 2006 07:00 GMT > You could help by not quoting him in your posts. Otherwise, I wouldn't see > his rants at all.... Oops, that's usually what *I* say :-) Sorry about that. He's been gone for a while, so I've been out of practice.
 Signature Saffire 205/136/125 Atkins since 6/14/03 Progress photo: http://photos.yahoo.com/saffire333
*** This post originated in alt.support.diet.low-carb -- its appearance in any other forum is deceptive and unauthorized. ***
ddgm - 15 Mar 2006 19:59 GMT Thanks to everyone who has tried to help me here. I will take your suggestions and get on track.
OmManiPadmeOmelet - 15 Mar 2006 15:44 GMT > > I'm hoping you can help here. I've been trying to follow it fairly closely. > > I'm between 20 and 30 grams of carbs daily. I've found that high protein, [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Calories still count. If you eat too many of them, you won't lose > weight. Truer words were never spoken. :-)
No matter WHAT diet you follow, calories still count. (Altho' due to biochemistry, some calories count more than others.....)
That's why Lyle's PSMF works better for me than Atkins. Atkins preaches a bit too much fat, but that is very much a personal opinion! Don't take it as gospel. <G>
It's just that since fat contains 9 calories per gram while protein and carbs contain only 4 calories per gram, it's easier to cut total calories by cutting fat, and it allows you to eat more volume.
My personal savior lately has been Shirataki.
 Signature Peace, Om.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack Nicholson
ddgm - 16 Mar 2006 03:14 GMT O my gosh! I just went on Fitday, and I'm way over! I really didn't realize my caloric intake. Boy, tomorrow, is a new day! Thanks for telling me about that site!
Joe the Aroma - 16 Mar 2006 15:56 GMT > I'm hoping you can help here. I've been trying to follow it fairly > closely. I'm between 20 and 30 grams of carbs daily. I've found that high [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > ddgm Exercise and try counting calories. I estimate calories and so far it works pretty well.
|
|
|