Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / Low Carb / May 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Q. about walnuts

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
nanner - 15 May 2006 17:19 GMT
I have package of walnuts that lists the carbs as 3 per ounce. The fiber is
also 3 per ounce, technically this would become a 0 carb food, right? But
really we need to be careful with nuts right?

I remember eating walnuts as a snack, and Macadamia nuts on Atkins pre-"net
carbs" because they were low in carbs and I think, high in protien.

What's really the story here? I love nuts in salads and would love to eat
them daily but don't want to go overboard!
Susan - 15 May 2006 17:24 GMT
> I have package of walnuts that lists the carbs as 3 per ounce. The fiber is
> also 3 per ounce, technically this would become a 0 carb food, right? But
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> What's really the story here? I love nuts in salads and would love to eat
> them daily but don't want to go overboard!

They're extremely low carb, and very heart healthy, but also high
calorie.  I always sprinkle walnuts or pecans on salads, but only about
5 halves (.25 oz.) per person.

Susan
Doug Freyburger - 15 May 2006 17:53 GMT
> I have package of walnuts that lists the carbs as 3 per ounce. The fiber is
> also 3 per ounce, technically this would become a 0 carb food, right? But
> really we need to be careful with nuts right?

As long as you deduct fiber, yes.  But figure the numbers are
rounded to make the net come out zero and count them as
0.5 per ounce anyways if you wish to be conservative.

> I remember eating walnuts as a snack, and Macadamia nuts on Atkins pre-"net
> carbs" because they were low in carbs and I think, high in protien.

And fat as well.  Nuts are both very filling and seem to keep folks
from getting hungry for a long time.  On the minus side they are
high in calories and calories count.

> What's really the story here? I love nuts in salads and would love to eat
> them daily but don't want to go overboard!

I avoid the types I do go over board with and have the ones I don't
tend to go over board with.  I did a simple experiment to figure out
which was which - I poured a bowl of X, ate a coupe of handfulls,
set the bowl down next to me, watched TV for an hour, checked
the bowl.  Turns out with peanuts and cashews the bowl was
empty.  I had eaten them without paying attention.  Other types
of nuts that didn't happen.  So I have other types of nuts around.
nanner - 15 May 2006 18:51 GMT
>> I have package of walnuts that lists the carbs as 3 per ounce. The fiber
>> is
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> rounded to make the net come out zero and count them as
> 0.5 per ounce anyways if you wish to be conservative.

that's about what i figured. i knew it had to add up somehow if it was
multiple servings

>> I remember eating walnuts as a snack, and Macadamia nuts on Atkins
>> pre-"net
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> empty.  I had eaten them without paying attention.  Other types
> of nuts that didn't happen.  So I have other types of nuts around.

I don't really use them that way so it's not so tempting or easy to lose
control. I like to put slivered almonds or walnuts ona salad or eat a
handful of almonds as a snack at night. I won't sit there with a bag or bowl
and i wont buy salted nuts either.
Nicole {Freezing in Wisconsin} - 17 May 2006 15:52 GMT
One thing I find helpful is to buy a huge bag of raw nuts and bag them
separately into 2 oz. portions. I freeze them, but I do have 2 oz. of
nuts most days. I'm on maintenance, so I can afford to do that, but I
had to be careful with the nuts during OWL (I'm on Atkins).

Anyway... portion control really helps. Bag them immediately. There's
no temptation, then, to just dig in and keep eating.

Nicole
Cuz - 15 May 2006 18:31 GMT
|| But really we need to be careful with nuts right?

Yes, we have a number of them in the newsgroup
from time to time. :-)
nanner - 15 May 2006 18:51 GMT
> || But really we need to be careful with nuts right?
>
> Yes, we have a number of them in the newsgroup
> from time to time. :-)

yuck yuck yuck
trader4@optonline.net - 17 May 2006 19:35 GMT
The USDA database lists an oz of walnuts as having 3.9g carb, 1.9
fiber, which seems more consistent with other nuts than the info on
that label.
nanner - 17 May 2006 20:11 GMT
> The USDA database lists an oz of walnuts as having 3.9g carb, 1.9
> fiber, which seems more consistent with other nuts than the info on
> that label.

i have it here now- it's Diamond of California brand. says: 1/4 c (30g) has
210 cal, 180 = fat cal, 20g total fat, total carb - 3g, fiber = 3g

hmmm
trader4@optonline.net - 17 May 2006 21:27 GMT
> > The USDA database lists an oz of walnuts as having 3.9g carb, 1.9
> > fiber, which seems more consistent with other nuts than the info on
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> hmmm

It wouldn't be the first time one of these labels was wrong.  I'd also
check some other brands and see how they compare.  All the nuts I've
seen, the net carb count has never been zero.
Roger Zoul - 17 May 2006 23:46 GMT
:: nanner wrote:
::: <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in message
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
:: also check some other brands and see how they compare.  All the nuts
:: I've seen, the net carb count has never been zero.

the label info on nuts is a complete mess, if you ask  me.  You won't find
any agreement whatsoever on carb/fiber content.  Might as well take a
running average....  But yeah, the net carb count surely isn't zero...you
can be absolutely sure of that.
jackiepatti@gmail.com - 18 May 2006 09:27 GMT
> It wouldn't be the first time one of these labels was wrong.  I'd also
> check some other brands and see how they compare.  All the nuts I've
> seen, the net carb count has never been zero.

I concur.  I don't know of any nuts with 0 carbs.

For a whole food, like nuts, there's not some secret low-carb recipe
that's going to allow the manufacturer to make lower-carb nuts than the
UDSA database has.  The label is simply wrong.
Jbuch - 17 May 2006 23:07 GMT
>>The USDA database lists an oz of walnuts as having 3.9g carb, 1.9
>>fiber, which seems more consistent with other nuts than the info on
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> hmmm

If you work it backwards 30 g fat = 180 Cal (with some likely error for
rounding) and 3 g carb = 12 Cal (plus or minus 2 Cal for rounding errors
in counting carbs) and then, oddly, adding on for the fiber 3 g = anoter
12 Cal (plus or minus 2 Cal for rounding) give a total calories of 180
Cal + 24 = 204 plus or minus 4 four rounding .... eventually giving as
much as 208 Cal (or even 210 Cal if one allows a little rounding error
in the fat gram numbers).

ODD Intrepretation of how to count grams and Calories .... but it is
probably the way that was somehow used.

It is better to assume an ODD intrepretation of the labeling
requirements than outright stupidity in not having the numbers more or
less toatal correctly.

This is nothing unusual. This kind of confusion of intrepretation does
happen here once in a while too.

And if the people designing nutrition labels are recent college grads,
they deserve extra credit for trying hard. This is now the American way
in Education.

:-)

Signature

1) Eat Till SATISFIED, Not STUFFED... Atkins repeated 9 times in the book
2) Exercise: It's Non-Negotiable..... Chapter 22 title, Atkins book
3) Don't Diet Without Supplemental Nutrients... Chapter 23 title, Atkins
book
4) A sensible eating plan, and follow it. (Atkins, Self Made or Other)

Nomad - 18 May 2006 20:26 GMT
>> i have it here now- it's Diamond of California brand. says: 1/4 c (30g) has
>> 210 cal, 180 = fat cal, 20g total fat, total carb - 3g, fiber = 3g
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
>:-)

Wouldn't 30g of fat be 270 calories?
(or 180 calories be 20g of fat?)

Not being picky.....just observing...  :-)
Roger Zoul - 18 May 2006 22:02 GMT
:::: i have it here now- it's Diamond of California brand. says: 1/4 c
:::: (30g) has 210 cal, 180 = fat cal, 20g total fat, total carb - 3g,
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
::
:: Wouldn't 30g of fat be 270 calories?

that's the weigh of the serving...which doesn't imply all fat calories.

:: (or 180 calories be 20g of fat?)

That's what he said....

:: Not being picky.....just observing...  :-)

Try harder! :)
Nomad - 18 May 2006 22:24 GMT
>:::: i have it here now- it's Diamond of California brand. says: 1/4 c
>:::: (30g) has 210 cal, 180 = fat cal, 20g total fat, total carb - 3g,
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
>Try harder! :)

This is the part I was referring to:

>::: If you work it backwards 30 g fat = 180 Cal (with some likely error
>::: for rounding) and 3 g carb = 12 Cal (plus or minus 2 Cal for

The statement says 30g fat......not 30g weight.
If it's 30g fat it would be 270 calories, not 180.
On the other hand, if it's 180 calories, it would be 20g fat.

Wouldn't it????

Again, not trying to be picky......just observing.
Roger Zoul - 19 May 2006 00:44 GMT
:: On Thu, 18 May 2006 17:02:02 -0400, "Roger Zoul"
:: <rogerzoul2@hotmail.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
::
:: The statement says 30g fat......not 30g weight.

It's obvious it's a typo...because above there it says 30g = 1/4 c.  So, 20g
fat = 180 cals, as he said.

:: If it's 30g fat it would be 270 calories, not 180.
:: On the other hand, if it's 180 calories, it would be 20g fat.
::
:: Wouldn't it????

But he did the calculation using 20g fat...he just typoed the 30g fat...

:: Again, not trying to be picky......just observing.

Observe harder! :)
Jbuch - 19 May 2006 02:13 GMT
> :: On Thu, 18 May 2006 17:02:02 -0400, "Roger Zoul"
> :: <rogerzoul2@hotmail.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 68 lines]
>
> Observe harder! :)

Yeah, I made a typo bobo. Calculated with 20 grams fat, typed 30 grams fat.

I do that more and more these days.

Signature

1) Eat Till SATISFIED, Not STUFFED... Atkins repeated 9 times in the book
2) Exercise: It's Non-Negotiable..... Chapter 22 title, Atkins book
3) Don't Diet Without Supplemental Nutrients... Chapter 23 title, Atkins
book
4) A sensible eating plan, and follow it. (Atkins, Self Made or Other)

Jeri - 18 May 2006 11:13 GMT
> I have package of walnuts that lists the carbs as 3 per ounce. The
> fiber is also 3 per ounce, technically this would become a 0 carb
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> What's really the story here? I love nuts in salads and would love to
> eat them daily but don't want to go overboard!

Are the nuts imported? It sounds as if the fiber has already been deducted.
Walnuts are low carb but certainly higher than a trace per ounce.
nanner - 18 May 2006 13:20 GMT
>> I have package of walnuts that lists the carbs as 3 per ounce. The
>> fiber is also 3 per ounce, technically this would become a 0 carb
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> deducted.
> Walnuts are low carb but certainly higher than a trace per ounce.

not impoted. they are from CA and I am in NY
Hannah Gruen - 19 May 2006 11:31 GMT
=
>> Are the nuts imported? It sounds as if the fiber has already been
>> deducted.
>> Walnuts are low carb but certainly higher than a trace per ounce.
>
>not impoted. they are from CA and I am in NY

In general, it's safer to use USDA figures for carbs and fiber. Their
website is so easy to use these days that there is little reason not
to check on basic foods, and when label info seems funky.

http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/search/index.html

By the way, I like your idea of putting nuts on salads. I always enjoy
that. Sunflower seeds, too. I've had the idea of glazing walnuts or
pecans with splenda, or another AS. Similar to how some restaurant use
glazed nuts on their salads. Anyone ever tried that?

HG
readandpostrosie - 19 May 2006 15:47 GMT
yes, i have glazed pecans in butter with splenda.................delicious!

Signature

http://www.pixentral.com/show.php?picture=1DFqNh7uKnv8zcULsHeXFtQ8TV6rqT1

> =
>>> Are the nuts imported? It sounds as if the fiber has already been
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> HG
Roger Zoul - 19 May 2006 17:46 GMT
:: yes, i have glazed pecans in butter with
:: splenda.................delicious!

How is that done?
RRzVRR - 20 May 2006 13:58 GMT
 > By the way, I like your idea of putting nuts on salads. I
always enjoy
> that. Sunflower seeds, too. I've had the idea of glazing walnuts or
> pecans with splenda, or another AS. Similar to how some restaurant use
> glazed nuts on their salads. Anyone ever tried that?
>
> HG

I make spiced almonds or pecans from time to time with a mix of
splenda, salt, cinnamon and cayenne to put on the nuts.

-put nuts in a skillet
-warm them in the oven
-remove the skillet when you just start to smell the nuts
-put a couple of pats of butter in the pan to melt
-toss/coat the nuts with the butter
-then add the mix, toss/coat
-let cool

You could also try Dana Carpenters book on slow cookers, there
were a couple of recipes in there for glazed nuts.  I tried one
that tasted good, but I didn't like the clean-up time it made.

Signature

Rudy - Remove the Z from my address to respond.

"It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!"
 -Emiliano Zapata

Check out the a.s.d.l-c FAQ at:
http://www.grossweb.com/asdlc/faq.htm

Hannah Gruen - 25 May 2006 14:19 GMT
>I make spiced almonds or pecans from time to time with a mix of
>splenda, salt, cinnamon and cayenne to put on the nuts.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>-then add the mix, toss/coat
>-let cool

Thanks a bunch, Rudy! This looks very good, and I almost missed it!  I
do like the addition of cayenne, too.

HG
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.