Weight Loss Forum / Low Carb / August 2006
More Americans say being pudgy not so unattractive - study finds
|
|
Thread rating:  |
The Mongolian Death Worm - 22 Aug 2006 15:56 GMT More Americans say being pudgy not so unattractive
CANDICE CHOI, Published: 08.21.2006 http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/ss/body/23083
Thin is still in, but apparently fat is nowhere near as out as it used to be. A survey finds America's attitudes toward overweight people are shifting from rejection toward acceptance. Over a 20-year period, the percentage of Americans who said they find overweight people less attractive steadily dropped from 55 percent to 24 percent, the market research firm NPD Group found.
With about two-thirds of U.S. adults overweight, Americans seem more accepting of heavier body types, researchers say. The NPD survey of 1,900 people representative of the U.S. population also found other, more relaxed, attitudes about weight and diet.
While body image remains a constant obsession, the national preoccupation with being thin has waned since the late 1980s and early 1990s, said the NPD's Harry Balzer. Those were the days when fast- food chains rushed to install salad bars. In 1989, salads as a main course peaked at 10 percent of all restaurant meals. Today, those salad bars have all but vanished and salads account for just 5 1/2 percent of main dishes.
"It turns out health is a wonderful topic to talk about," Balzer said. "But to live that way is a real effort."
Fewer people said they're trying to "avoid snacking entirely" - just 26 percent in 2005, down from 45 percent in 1985 - while 75 percent said they had low-fat, no-fat or reduced fat products in the last two weeks, down from 86 percent in 1999, according to the survey. At 5 feet 6 and 230 pounds, Lara Frater likes her body just fine and turns up her nose at trendy diets.
"I don't beat myself up if I have a piece of cake," said Frater, a 34-year-old New Yorker and author of "Fat Chicks Rule."
The survey's findings aren't that surprising, as attitudes about weight constantly shift, said John Cawley, associate professor at Cornell University's College of Human Ecology. While heavy women were idealized at times - think "Rubenesque," a term born of 17th-century painter Peter Paul Rubens' full-figured women - corseted women with tiny waists were preferred in other eras. "I don't think we're going to go back to worshiping obese women, but it's interesting to see how attitudes change as more people become overweight," Cawley said. Others argue that people are merely becoming more politically correct and that bias against fat people is actually growing sharper.
"These studies don't pick up on implicit, unconscious bias," said Kelly Brownell, head of the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity at Yale University.
"It's like if you asked people around the country if they had racial bias. There's a difference between what people say and what actually happens," Brownell said.
Researchers at Cornell also found that negative attitudes about obesity persist.
The NPD study results may simply be a sign of "resignation from overweight people," Brownell said, noting that it's likely a majority of survey respondents are overweight.
The survey also found obese boys and girls were half as likely to date as normal weight kids.
At an obesity doctors' meeting in 2003, a University of Liverpool study indicated that just standing next to a large woman can be bad for a guy's image. The study had young women look at one of two pictures: One of a trim young man standing next to a svelte woman, and the other showing the same man next to a heavy woman.
When the man was shown standing by the large woman, he was rated 22 percent more negatively by the study volunteers than when he was next to the thin woman. When seen with the large woman, he was more likely to be described as miserable, depressed, weak and insecure.
Marilyn Wann, board member of the National Association to Advance Fat Acceptance, said fat people are the target of a witch hunt in a fitness-obsessed nation.
"Everyone thinks it's OK to make fun of fatties," said Wann, who won't use the word "overweight" because she says it's judgmental.
Even if people say they are more accepting of overweight people, many still yearn to be thin. The NPD survey shows the number of people who said "I would like to lose 20 pounds" jumped from 54 percent in 1985 to 61 percent last year.
Weejee - 22 Aug 2006 20:48 GMT Pudge is cute. Especially big bouncy midriff rolls.
Werewolfy - 23 Aug 2006 02:15 GMT > Pudge is cute. Especially big bouncy midriff rolls. Rather indicative of the accuracy of the post.
Ugh
Werewolfy
Perseid - 23 Aug 2006 11:02 GMT After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "The Mongolian Death Worm" <normankwebster@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
> More Americans say being pudgy not so unattractive > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Thin is still in, but apparently fat is nowhere near as out as it used > to be. I think I'll go eat some trail-mix. It's got more calories per gram than you can imagine (but it makes you fart like a race-horse).
Pudgy Weejee - 23 Aug 2006 19:20 GMT > I think I'll go eat some trail-mix. It's got more calories per > gram than you can imagine (but it makes you fart like a race-horse). Giggle. And race horses are supposed to be sooooo elegant!
BlueBrooke - 23 Aug 2006 19:25 GMT > After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "The Mongolian Death Worm" > <normankwebster@hotmail.com> Spat the Words [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > I think I'll go eat some trail-mix. It's got more calories per > gram than you can imagine (but it makes you fart like a race-horse). <hehe> Must be why they're so fast -- they're jet propelled.
jenius - 23 Aug 2006 11:25 GMT "yearning to be thin", could'nt that be the problem?surely self acceptance is key to any change wether it be weight loss or some other issue. yearning to be thin avails one nothing what one needs to accept is the facts as they apply to the person and their self worth. If they are comfotable with who they are, regardless of size, then that is all that really matters.......jenius
Werewolfy - 23 Aug 2006 12:22 GMT If they are comfotable with who they are, regardless of size, then that is all that really matters.......jenius
Show me a wobbly mountain of a girl, and you will also show someone who, despite 'acceptance' hates being so repulsive.
It may well be that a hideous dwarf is 'comfortable' with his appearance. Well, no matter what his thoughts are, he is still a hideous dwarf.
Werewolfy
JTEM - 23 Aug 2006 20:12 GMT > It may well be that a hideous dwarf is 'comfortable' > with his appearance. Well, no matter what his > thoughts are, he is still a hideous dwarf. Your intellect, metaphorically speaking.
Lady Veteran - 24 Aug 2006 02:05 GMT On 23 Aug 2006 12:12:20 -0700, wrote:
>> It may well be that a hideous dwarf is 'comfortable' >> with his appearance. Well, no matter what his >> thoughts are, he is still a hideous dwarf. > >Your intellect, metaphorically speaking. Only to the mental midgets who see him as a hideous dwarf.
LV
I rode a tank and wore a General's rank-When the blitzkrieg raged and the bodies stank.- - - Rolling Stones-Sympathy for the Devil
Daedalus - 23 Aug 2006 14:15 GMT >"yearning to be thin", could'nt that be the problem?surely self >acceptance is key to any change wether it be weight loss or some other >issue. Yeah, I'm sure Jessie Owens' acceptance that he was too slow is what helped him win all those olympic medals.
Dumbass.
Jade -- Too Dangerous for Easynews.
VROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!!!!!!
Freddie - 23 Aug 2006 20:47 GMT >"yearning to be thin", could'nt that be the problem?surely self >acceptance is key to any change wether it be weight loss or some other >issue. yearning to be thin avails one nothing what one needs to accept >is the facts as they apply to the person and their self worth. If they >are comfotable with who they are, regardless of size, then that is all >that really matters.......jenius That may all that matters until they want to go to movie and can't fit in the seat, are planning a trip on an airline and have to pay for two seats, Want to go into a building and they cannot get through the revolving door, are on the 10th floor of a building when the power fails and are unable to walk down ten flights of stairs. Are away from home when they need to use the rest room and the only one they can find is either too small for them to fit and or doesn't have a bidet and they cannot reach their anus. Their car breaks down on a country road and they are unable to walk four miles to get help. They are flat on their back due to a medical emergency and they are too heavy for the 2 person ambulance crew to move them. They die waiting while the ambulance crew calls for more help.
They visit a friends house and break the chair they sit on. A taxi drive is reluctant to stop for them. Kids go oink, oink when they walk by. They have difficulty buying the clothing they desire.
A eat-all-you can restaurant owner locks the door when he sees them approaching.
Freddie
Lady Veteran - 24 Aug 2006 02:11 GMT On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:47:33 -0700, wrote:
>>"yearning to be thin", could'nt that be the problem?surely self >>acceptance is key to any change wether it be weight loss or some [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > >Freddie I love how idiots always deal in the extreme. Roll up all your stereotypes into the ol kit bag and smile...
I think you are guilty of doing these things or at least wanting to do them.
Jenius is right about self acceptance. Wanting to look like little boys to placate some males with pedophilic tendencies is no way to go through life.
Remember that tomorrow never comes so saving good times for "tomorrow" is foolish indeed.
LV
I rode a tank and wore a General's rank-When the blitzkrieg raged and the bodies stank.- - - Rolling Stones-Sympathy for the Devil
Freddie - 24 Aug 2006 07:18 GMT >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] > >LV Has this one happened to you LV.?
>>A eat-all-you can restaurant owner locks the door when he sees them >>approaching. Freddie
Lady Veteran - 26 Aug 2006 22:18 GMT On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:18:23 -0700, wrote:
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>Hash: SHA1 [quoted text clipped - 57 lines] > >Freddie No, reprobate. after a long night of drinking does the thing you brought home for sexual release run screaming from the room when you open your eyes and look at it?
You truly are a mental midget.
You are also gone from my sight.
LV
I rode a tank and wore a General's rank-When the blitzkrieg raged and the bodies stank.- - - Rolling Stones-Sympathy for the Devil
Salty Dog - 25 Aug 2006 09:06 GMT >>>"yearning to be thin", could'nt that be the problem?surely self >>>acceptance is key to any change wether it be weight loss or some [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > boys to placate some males with pedophilic tendencies is no way to go > through life. Who wants to look like little boys?
Are you suggesting that anyone, male or female who looks after their body only does it to allay anger from paedophiles?
Why would paedophiles need placating because an adult didn't look like a little boy? Do you think that they need more choices?
Do you have even the vaguest of clues as to what you are talking about?
Do you have even the vaguest clue about anything?
BTW, you are certainly dealing in extremes with this post, and you have already defined doing so as idiotic. Has that occurred to you?
I gather that you are someone who is heavily into fat denial, forsaking all contact with reality in order to expedite your "take the easy way" philosophy.
Next time, before posting your inanities, why don't you trim diet groups? You obviously don't agree with dieting or living healthily.
Salty
Robin King - 25 Aug 2006 10:04 GMT | >>>"yearning to be thin", could'nt that be the problem?surely self | >>>acceptance is key to any change wether it be weight loss or some [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] | > boys to placate some males with pedophilic tendencies is no way to go | > through life.
| Who wants to look like little boys? | | Are you suggesting that anyone, male or female who looks after their | body only does it to allay anger from paedophiles? Salty, don't be ridiculous. She's referring to fashion models who are held up as paragons of beauty. It has been traditional for models not to be all that curvy so that they don't compete with the clothes they're displaying. I have seen more teenage boys and young men who naturally have that tall skinny look than young women. It is natural for a girl to fatten up when she hits puberty.
| Why would paedophiles need placating because an adult didn't look like a | little boy? Do you think that they need more choices? If some fashion designers are gay, as they are rumored to be, it would be natural for them to have a different esthetic from a straight person. I think that the term "pedophile" is a little extreme here.
| I gather that you are someone who is heavily into fat denial, forsaking | all contact with reality in order to expedite your "take the easy way" | philosophy. If fatness were the easy way out, there would be more fat-accepting folks posting in the fat acceptance group. As it happens, there are very few.
| Next time, before posting your inanities, why don't you trim diet | groups? You obviously don't agree with dieting or living healthily. I personally don't agree that dieting for weight loss is necessarily living healthy. However, that's a topic for another newsgroup and doesn't mean that I don't wish low carbers success with their eating plans.
Robin
| Salty Daedalus - 25 Aug 2006 13:39 GMT >| >>>"yearning to be thin", could'nt that be the problem?surely self >| >>>acceptance is key to any change wether it be weight loss or some [quoted text clipped - 55 lines] > Salty, don't be ridiculous. She's referring to fashion models >who are held up as paragons of beauty. Robin, why do you insist on putting words in her mouth to patch up the hugely insulting holes she left behind.
You have no reason to believe she was solely referring to fashion models. From all appearances, she is once again showing her extensive bigotry by insulting thin people and calling men who are attracted to thin women pedophiles.
> It has been traditional for >models not to be all that curvy so that they don't compete with the >clothes they're displaying. I have seen more teenage boys and >young men who naturally have that tall skinny look than young >women. So you agree that finding thin women beautiful makes a man a pedophile?
> It is natural for a girl to fatten up when she hits puberty. That's a lie. Women are not naturally supposed to fatten up. The weight gain of puberty is negligable for healthy, active girls.
>| Why would paedophiles need placating because an adult didn't look >like a [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >from a straight person. I think that the term "pedophile" is a >little extreme here. Once gain, where do you get the idea that she was talking about fashion designers or gay men? You're completely distorting Bobbie's words. Bobbie has a long history of espousing outrage at men who don't find big women attractive (we can guess why) Now she appears to have called them pedophiles.
Let the nutjob explain for herself. Nobody needs your idiotic cover up. Are you sleeping with her or something?
>| I gather that you are someone who is heavily into fat denial, >forsaking [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > I personally don't agree that dieting for weight loss >is necessarily living healthy. That's because you're a complete idiot, as illustrated by your imaginitive and denial filled musings above.
Jade
-- Too Dangerous for Easynews.
VROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!!!!!!
Salty Dog - 28 Aug 2006 13:24 GMT > "Salty Dog" <p@nty.net> wrote in message
> | > Jenius is right about self acceptance. Wanting to look like little > | > boys to placate some males with pedophilic tendencies is no way to [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > young men who naturally have that tall skinny look than young > women. It is natural for a girl to fatten up when she hits puberty. Tell it to Elle McPherson and her peers. Do you seriously think that Elle, Naomi Campbell, etc., etc. look like little boys? Who is being ridiculous?
> | Why would paedophiles need placating because an adult didn't look > like a [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > from a straight person. I think that the term "paedophile" is a > little extreme here. I didn't introduce the term, I responded to Lady Veteran's "males with paedophilic tendencies".
> | I gather that you are someone who is heavily into fat denial, > forsaking [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > fat-accepting folks posting in the fat acceptance group. As it > happens, there are very few. That makes no sense at all. Would you like to try it again?
> | Next time, before posting your inanities, why don't you trim diet > | groups? You obviously don't agree with dieting or living healthily. > > I personally don't agree that dieting for weight loss > is necessarily living healthy. Nor do I, it takes more than simply dieting.
However, that's a topic for
> another newsgroup and doesn't mean that I don't wish > low carbers success with their eating plans. Hey, if the fat acceptors have their way, this will be the new "Supermodel" standard. http://tinyurl.com/l9hee
Gorgeous aren't they?
Salty
Gandalf Parker - 28 Aug 2006 13:46 GMT Salty Dog <p@nty.net> contributed wisdom to news:4lg5jlF1pad5U1 @individual.net:
>> Salty, don't be ridiculous. She's referring to fashion models >> who are held up as paragons of beauty. It has been traditional for [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Elle, Naomi Campbell, etc., etc. look like little boys? Who is being > ridiculous? You think those women look natural? Come on. Sure they do something with their eyes and face that overcome their other qualities but their figures are not good looking. OK maybe they do manage to not look like little boys. Little girls?
> Hey, if the fat acceptors have their way, this will be the new > "Supermodel" standard. http://tinyurl.com/l9hee > > Gorgeous aren't they? Oh sheesh. How obvious of you. You could at last have found some of the online catalogs that are using heavy models.
Gandalf Parker
Salty Dog - 28 Aug 2006 14:37 GMT Gandalf Parker wrote:
> Salty Dog <p@nty.net> contributed wisdom to news:4lg5jlF1pad5U1 > @individual.net: [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > You think those women look natural? Yes I do. Elle looks pretty natural to me, healthy, attractive with a good, (not fat) figure. Many other of the true supermodels look pretty normal as well. These are the sort of women I grew up with, no idea what your problem is.
Come on. Sure they do something with
> their eyes and face that overcome their other qualities Overcome? Get real.
> but their figures > are not good looking. OK maybe they do manage to not look like little > boys. Little girls? Not many little girls have hips and cleavage. At least they didn't when I was a little boy.
>>Hey, if the fat acceptors have their way, this will be the new >>"Supermodel" standard. http://tinyurl.com/l9hee [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Oh sheesh. How obvious of you. You could at last have found some of the > online catalogs that are using heavy models. Why do that? It wouldn't be making any sort of point at all. The heavy models are quite fit and healthy looking as a rule, not grossly overweight. I have no problem with women who look like that.
> Gandalf Parker Salty
Gandalf Parker - 28 Aug 2006 17:18 GMT Salty Dog <p@nty.net> contributed wisdom to news:4lg9tiF1lp5fU1 @individual.net:
>> Oh sheesh. How obvious of you. You could at last have found some of the >> online catalogs that are using heavy models. > > Why do that? It wouldn't be making any sort of point at all. The heavy > models are quite fit and healthy looking as a rule, not grossly > overweight. I have no problem with women who look like that. Then why are you posting in the fat-support group instead of the morbidly obese group?
Gandalf Parker
Daedalus - 28 Aug 2006 18:02 GMT >Salty Dog <p@nty.net> contributed wisdom to news:4lg9tiF1lp5fU1 >@individual.net: [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >Then why are you posting in the fat-support group instead of the morbidly >obese group? Because fat acceptance is about supporting morbid obesity. We can all take a look at some annual convention photos if you're going to try and deny that.
Most of the real fat acceptors make the women he posted a photo of look like petites.
Jade
>Gandalf Parker -- Too Dangerous for Easynews.
VROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!!!!!!
Lá~ká~ Wáná - 28 Aug 2006 21:47 GMT > Hey, if the fat acceptors have their way, this will be the new > "Supermodel" standard. http://tinyurl.com/l9hee > Gorgeous aren't they? OMG!!!!! I think I'll cut back to 1000c day........ :o(
That's pitiful. How can they possibly have any kind of life?
LW Re-Start - 7/5/06 - 170lbs Today - 155.5 lbs Goal - 130 lbs Height: 5'6" Female. Age: 61 Don't worry about what people think, they don't do it very often. ===================================
Lady Veteran - 26 Aug 2006 22:28 GMT On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:06:21 +1000, wrote:
>>>On 23 Aug 2006 03:25:20 -0700, "jenius" <jenius@rock.com> wrote: >>> [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] > >Who wants to look like little boys? You tell me? Don't you read fashion magazine. Women without curves look like little boys. Males who like that have a problem
>Are you suggesting that anyone, male or female who looks after their > body only does it to allay anger from paedophiles? I am suggesting that you are an idiot who is posting in the wrong newsgroup.
>Why would paedophiles need placating because an adult didn't look >like a little boy? Do you think that they need more choices? Ask one. Psychological experiments had been run and this has been proven. Sex with children is illegal and immoral. Sex with adults who look like children is not illegal. The jury is out as to whether or not it is immoral.
>Do you have even the vaguest of clues as to what you are talking >about? Yes I do. I don't give a tinker's damn what you think about it either.
>Do you have even the vaguest clue about anything? Why don't you stick your head up your a.s and enjoy the view.
>BTW, you are certainly dealing in extremes with this post, and you >have already defined doing so as idiotic. Has that occurred to you? I deal in extremes ever time I post in response to some idiot's stupidity.
>I gather that you are someone who is heavily into fat denial, >forsaking all contact with reality in order to expedite your "take >the easy way" philosophy. I gather that you are someone into stupidity who is so addicted to putting down a fat person that you will risk embarrassing your family to express your drivel.
>Next time, before posting your inanities, why don't you trim diet >groups? You obviously don't agree with dieting or living healthily. You are right-I don't agree with people who have nothing better to do than obsess over a number on a scale-who infest a non-diet group after you know where your postings go. Throw away the food and eat the container it came in and pretend it is good. Spend six hours per day in a gym and demand that others do as well.
I would rather die young and happy than simply exist in my old age because years and years of denial of what makes life good.
If I want a scoop of ice cream I will eat it and you can kiss my broad pretty pink a.s.
You have been trolled you reprobate and you seem to love it.
>Salty LV
I rode a tank and wore a General's rank-When the blitzkrieg raged and the bodies stank.- - - Rolling Stones-Sympathy for the Devil
Salty Dog - 28 Aug 2006 14:27 GMT >>>Jenius is right about self acceptance. Wanting to look like little >>>boys to placate some males with pedophilic tendencies is no way to [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > You tell me? Don't you read fashion magazine. Women without curves > look like little boys. Males who like that have a problem Maybe you need glasses. Women without "bulges" (fat isn't curves) do not look like little boys. Even woman who are quite flat chested are often extremely feminine looking. Does Audrey Hepburn (one of the most feminine women in films) look like a little boy? She has very few curves, but is undeniably feminine.
>>Are you suggesting that anyone, male or female who looks after their >>body only does it to allay anger from paedophiles? > > I am suggesting that you are an idiot who is posting in the wrong > newsgroup. Hmm. No valid response.
>>Why would paedophiles need placating because an adult didn't look >>like a little boy? Do you think that they need more choices? > > Ask one. Psychological experiments had been run and this has been > proven. Crap!
Sex with children is illegal and immoral. Sex with adults who
> look like children is not illegal. You are about the only one who sees any woman who isn't fat as looking childlike. Perhaps the problem in perception lies with your biases rather than any form of reality?
The jury is out as to whether or
> not it is immoral. There is no jury involved, sex with between adults, male or female, is not immoral.
>>Do you have even the vaguest of clues as to what you are talking >>about? > > Yes I do. I don't give a tinker's damn what you think about it > either. Hey, you finally said something that I can believe is true.
>>Do you have even the vaguest clue about anything? > > Why don't you stick your head up your a.s and enjoy the view. No valid comment, yet again.
>>BTW, you are certainly dealing in extremes with this post, and you >>have already defined doing so as idiotic. Has that occurred to you? > > I deal in extremes ever time I post in response to some idiot's > stupidity. No valid comment. You spend a lot of time spewing nonsense - don't you?
>>I gather that you are someone who is heavily into fat denial, >>forsaking all contact with reality in order to expedite your "take [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > putting down a fat person that you will risk embarrassing your family > to express your drivel. I have not put down a fat person.
I have problems with fat people who blame the world and all in it for their problems, who claim that the only reason that others don't find them attractive is because of an acquired bias. I have a problem with people like that who are almost too stupid to draw breath. I have no problem with anyone who is fat and makes no complaint about their fatness, nor expects any special consideration because of their fatness.
>>Next time, before posting your inanities, why don't you trim diet >>groups? You obviously don't agree with dieting or living healthily. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > the container it came in and pretend it is good. Spend six hours per > day in a gym and demand that others do as well. You are not exactly into reality or honesty are you.
There is no possible need to spend anywhere near six hours daily in a gym in order maintain health. Several hours a week can suffice, or no hours at all and a lifestyle that includes physical exertion. Walking is one of the easiest and most effective, as long as it is brisk and regular.
> I would rather die young and happy than simply exist in my old age > because years and years of denial of what makes life good. Exactly how good is your life exactly? You present as very bitter, angry, and unhappy. Your insistence that men who find women who aren't fat attractive must be paedophiles reeks of sour grapes.
> If I want a scoop of ice cream I will eat it and you can kiss my > broad pretty pink a.s. I truly doubt that it is pretty, although have no doubt that it is broad.
> You have been trolled you reprobate and you seem to love it. Of course I do, it breaks the boredom.
Salty
Daedalus - 25 Aug 2006 13:44 GMT >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] >boys to placate some males with pedophilic tendencies is no way to go >through life. I see. Men who find thin women attractive are closet pedophiles?
Here's a new one for the Bobbie's a nutjob archive.
>Remember that tomorrow never comes so saving good times for >"tomorrow" is foolish indeed. That's right. So be an obese abomination, folks. Cram as much tasty food down your throat as you can while you can. The buffet doesn't stay open forever.
Being attractive to a majority of the planet and killing your chances at a normal life aren't that important, after all.
Jade
-- Too Dangerous for Easynews.
VROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!!!!!!
violet_yoshi@hellokitty.com - 25 Aug 2006 21:12 GMT I'm confused, isn't this the fat ACCEPTANCE forum?
FOB - 25 Aug 2006 21:20 GMT This thread is crossposted to a number of groups. Look at the headers. If you can't see them on Google, which is a dreadfully awkward way to read newsgroups, they are: soc.support.fat-acceptance, alt.support.diet.low-carb, alt.prophecies.nostradamus, soc.singles
In news:1156536777.985146.294790@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, violet_yoshi@hellokitty.com <violet_yoshi@hellokitty.com> stated
| I'm confused, isn't this the fat ACCEPTANCE forum? violet_yoshi@hellokitty.com - 25 Aug 2006 21:43 GMT > This thread is crossposted to a number of groups. Look at the headers. If > you can't see them on Google, which is a dreadfully awkward way to read [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > violet_yoshi@hellokitty.com <violet_yoshi@hellokitty.com> stated > | I'm confused, isn't this the fat ACCEPTANCE forum? Oh, isn't that kind of weird?
FOB - 25 Aug 2006 22:18 GMT No, not weird, just bad manners which are typical for trolls.
In news:1156538598.815023.86930@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com, violet_yoshi@hellokitty.com <violet_yoshi@hellokitty.com> stated
|| This thread is crossposted to a number of groups. Look at the || headers. If you can't see them on Google, which is a dreadfully [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] | | Oh, isn't that kind of weird? Toni - 25 Aug 2006 21:48 GMT >I'm confused, isn't this the fat ACCEPTANCE forum?
>>Jenius is right about self acceptance. Wanting to look like little >>boys to placate some males with pedophilic tendencies is no way to go >>through life. Lady Veteran AKA as Bobbi Sanchez is a long time poster of insults here. She has alienated almost every poster here with her personal attacks some even racist and some pornographic. She has created a situation whereby any posts of hers draws non complimentary responses.
Ironically she portrays herself as the defender of the overweight when in practice she is just the opposite. A real genuine hypocrite. Also a NetKook and a Troll.
Toni
 Signature Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Lá~ká~ Wáná - 28 Aug 2006 21:57 GMT > I'm confused, isn't this the fat ACCEPTANCE forum? Someone keeps cross-posting to SSF-A for some reason. I'm on ASDL-C to lose weight.
LW Re-Start - 7/5/06 - 170lbs Today - 155.5 lbs Goal - 130 lbs Height: 5'6" Female. Age: 61 ===================================
dreamwalker - 24 Aug 2006 02:46 GMT > "yearning to be thin", could'nt that be the problem?surely self > acceptance is key to any change wether it be weight loss or some other > issue. yearning to be thin avails one nothing what one needs to accept > is the facts as they apply to the person and their self worth. If they > are comfotable with who they are, regardless of size, then that is all > that really matters.......jenius Fat women and women who smoke have to be the two most disgusting aspects of American life. Not sure what's worse, fattie hammering a burger, or some scrawny hunk of overly tanned beef jerky sucking on a butt. Yuck!
Lady Veteran - 26 Aug 2006 22:32 GMT On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:46:01 -0500, wrote:
>> "yearning to be thin", could'nt that be the problem?surely self >> acceptance is key to any change wether it be weight loss or some [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >burger, or some scrawny hunk of overly tanned beef jerky sucking on >a butt. Yuck! I think you should continue to not use your name. I would not want to embarrass my family either.
That is part of the problem with this world-there are too many people just like you who forgot to put their brains in gear.
LV
I rode a tank and wore a General's rank-When the blitzkrieg raged and the bodies stank.- - - Rolling Stones-Sympathy for the Devil
|
|
|