Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / Low Carb / March 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

an interesting experience with pizza...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
heron stone - 01 Dec 2003 01:02 GMT
.i've been doing low-carb (semi-atkins) for about 3 months
.i never did real induction, just started off at about 30 g
   carbs per day, sometimes a little more
.so far i've lost 20 pounds
.got about 50-60 more to go
.no problem... i love eating this way... especially since
   Breyer's Carb Smart ice cream appeared

.one of the things i missed the most was pizza
.i used to live on DiGorno's frozen rising crust spicy
   chicken pizzas

.i decided to take some starch blocker and treat myself to
   a little pizza (it's the first time since i've started
   that i've eaten a high-carb item)

.within 5 minutes of finishing the single serving pizza
   i found myself getting VERY drowsy

.it wouldn't be far off to say that i passed out
.i took a 1-hour "nap"
.i never sleep after eating

.i felt slow and drugged for a couple of hours afterward

.i was ok the next morning

.i may repeat this experiment in a month or so because
   this time i was caught unaaware... it sneaked up on me
.next time i'm going to be paying very close attention to
   my reactions

?has anyone else had a similar experience

heron

Signature

unDO email address
___
Nature,                                                     heron stone
 to be commanded,                     mailto:heronstoneDO@comcast.net
        must be obeyed.         http://home.comcast.net/~heronstone/

Anne - 01 Dec 2003 02:34 GMT
> ?has anyone else had a similar experience

No, but I never risk eating pizza crust.

I scrape all the topping off a couple of slices, and eat that (dumping the
crust down the disposal immediately). The topping's super yummy and much
lower carb than eating the whole slice! Try it sometime.  (Best when you
get several different toppings on one pizza.)

- Anne
Scott Franz - 06 Dec 2003 00:51 GMT
It's also great to take the toppings off  and roll them inside a low carb
tortilla for a pizza burrito.

Scott

> > ?has anyone else had a similar experience
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> - Anne
Lorelei - 06 Dec 2003 06:30 GMT
I've tried the whole pizza experience, it doesn't live up to my memories,
except maybe Pizza Factory but we have ordered that one time since Jan (last
week)

--
Peace,
Lori
220/143/135
LC since 1/17/03
My Closure of the year 2003 Challenge goal: 145/140
http://community.webshots.com/user/lorismiller-date
Jenna - 01 Dec 2003 02:46 GMT
I've noticed that now that I've been on LC, I don't need that much sleep
to get along in life.  In the morning, I wake up just alive.   When I
look at the clock, I'm amazed how early it is.  Those extra hours and
energy really come in handy. .....and NO afternoon "naps" either!
mena - 01 Dec 2003 03:52 GMT
> .i decided to take some starch blocker and treat myself to
>     a little pizza (it's the first time since i've started
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> heron

I've never had this experience but I would not discount the starch blocker.
People react strangely to some substance and one never knows.  It sounds too
scary to repeat, IMHO.
Harold Groot - 01 Dec 2003 05:41 GMT
>.i decided to take some starch blocker and treat myself to
>    a little pizza (it's the first time since i've started
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>.i was ok the next morning

This sounds to me like the carbs caused a big release of insulin,
which in turn caused your blood sugar to go far too low and stay low
for quite a while. If you have access to a way to measure your blood
glucose levels (i.e. a glucometer), repeat the process and test to get
some solid numbers.  Since blood sugar levels tend to change quickly,
you might try testing every 15 minutes after a meal for 2-3 hours to
try to get close to the real high and low numbers.

I've never heard of Starch Blockers having any real effect on this
process.  They are made from a protein derived from a type of bean,
and protein gets digested in the stomach - so it never gets to the
intestines where it would theoretically do its work preventing
absorption of carbs.  That is why they say "They work in a test tube
but not in the body".
Mrs. Cephusiss - 02 Dec 2003 01:05 GMT
*snip*
> .within 5 minutes of finishing the single serving pizza
>     i found myself getting VERY drowsy
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> .i felt slow and drugged for a couple of hours afterward

it sounds to me like exactly the same reaction i get when eating
high-carb foods... knocks me right out, gives me stomachaches,
sometimes even headaches.  i would guess that the starch/carb-blocker
thing you took didn't do anything.  the first time i saw them
advertised i laughed myself right off the couch.

jen

red meat isn't bad for you... fuzzy blue-green meat is bad for you
metoo - 07 Dec 2003 15:00 GMT
That 'forced nap' response is one of the reasons why I avoid carbs. The
other is weight gain.

jo

> .i've been doing low-carb (semi-atkins) for about 3 months
> .i never did real induction, just started off at about 30 g
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> heron
newbie_to_lowcarb - 08 Dec 2003 17:43 GMT
Why do this for another month and put yourself thru that? Also, you might
want to think that another month of doing that may ruin all your hard work
to drop those 20 lbs. and instead you may gain it all back. Then think how
you will feel. Why go to sleep when you don't want to for another month when
you can just give up the addiction and feel better? I know it is hard but
you should just give it up.

lowcarb_newbie
352/352/185
> That 'forced nap' response is one of the reasons why I avoid carbs. The
> other is weight gain.
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> >   to be commanded,                     mailto:heronstoneDO@comcast.net
> >          must be obeyed.         http://home.comcast.net/~heronstone/
qTrader - 18 Mar 2004 22:36 GMT
I love pizza but I don't eat it very often.  My diet is a TKD diet (targeted
ketogenic diet), which means that I eat extra carbs before and after major
workouts (things like trail runs of over 100 mins or bike rides of 2 to 4
hours).  This works great for me because I have the energy I need for high
intensity efforts, and also I can eat some of my favorite carb foods at a
time when my body really wants them.   After an intense trail run of 2 hours
I can readily absorb 2 or 3 pieces of pizza with no side effects - but if I
eat pizza at other times it knocks me out and I even feel groggy the next
morning - like a carb hangover.  This just shows that carbs are not only a
high energy food source, but also effectively a potent drug.  No wonder
people are so addicted.

heron stone wrote in message ...
>.i've been doing low-carb (semi-atkins) for about 3 months
>.i never did real induction, just started off at about 30 g
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>  to be commanded,                     mailto:heronstoneDO@comcast.net
>         must be obeyed.         http://home.comcast.net/~heronstone/
Pat - 18 Mar 2004 23:05 GMT
> I love pizza but I don't eat it very often.  My diet is a TKD diet (targeted
> ketogenic diet), which means that I eat extra carbs before and after major
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> high energy food source, but also effectively a potent drug.  No wonder
> people are so addicted.

I think the effective definition of a drug is something that will kill you
if you take too much of it.  And addiction? That's having an escalating
craving for something to the point of nearly driving someone mad.  How about
let's ratchet down the claims a bit?  Even when people talk about having a
chocolate "addiction" it's not likely that going without chocolate will
drive them to rob a bank to pay for their supply.

Pat in TX
Cate - 19 Mar 2004 00:45 GMT
> I think the effective definition of a drug is something that will kill
> you if you take too much of it.

Don't think so. There are prescription-only drugs that don't kill you if
you overdose on them. Some antidepressants, for instance.

And addiction? That's having an
> escalating craving for something to the point of nearly driving
> someone mad.

The clinical definition of addiction has to do more with physiology (e.g.,
tolerance, withdrawal) than it does with Reefer Madness.

How about let's ratchet down the claims a bit?  Even
> when people talk about having a chocolate "addiction" it's not likely
> that going without chocolate will drive them to rob a bank to pay for
> their supply.

While I don't agree with your criteria, I agree that it's not possible to
be addicted to chocolate. At least--not that any study has found *so far.*
<g>

Cate
Pat - 19 Mar 2004 00:56 GMT
Do you agree with the OP's contention that  carbohydrates are "a potent
drug" that people become "addicted" to?  I think that's nonsense.

Pat in TX
Cate - 19 Mar 2004 01:05 GMT
"Pat" <me@privacy.net> wrote in news:c3dcve$26c9bi$1@ID-194653.news.uni-
berlin.de:

> Do you agree with the OP's contention that  carbohydrates are "a potent
> drug" that people become "addicted" to?

I think it's entirely reasonable to assert that for some people, eating
simple carbs leads to the compulsion to eat more carbs--not only
psychologically, but physiologically. Simple carbs can also cause
withdrawal--e.g., a post-sugar crash.

I myself wouldn't call simple carbs drugs but I'm open to convincing that
one could develop an addiction to simple carbs.

Cate
Pat - 19 Mar 2004 01:16 GMT
> > Do you agree with the OP's contention that  carbohydrates are "a potent
> > drug" that people become "addicted" to?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Cate

Well, then, how do you explain all of us on the Atkins diet just giving them
up 'cold turkey' for two weeks and then coming to testify that once we had
finished the Induction period items with sugar in them seem too sweet--and
even repellant? It must not be much of an "addiction" if it is so easily
broken.  Psychologically, maybe, but I am not convinced of the physiological
addictive characterization.

Pat in TX
Nancy Howells - 19 Mar 2004 03:39 GMT
> > > Do you agree with the OP's contention that  carbohydrates are "a
> > > potent
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Pat in TX

I think it depends on the individual's insulin response, amongst other
things.  I think perhaps, that for someone who is not diabetic nor
insulin resistant, the abstinance from simple carbs is the breaking of a
habit, but for someone insulin resistant/hyper-insulinemic/diabetic,
it's the breaking of a cycle.

Signature

Nancy Howells (don't forget to switch it, and replace the ;) to send mail).

Doug Freyburger - 19 Mar 2004 22:20 GMT
Pat wrote:
> Cate wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> it is so easily broken.  Psychologically, maybe, but I am not convinced
> of the physiological addictive characterization.

Because of falling off the wagon.  A two week detox program may be
enough, once.  But many who eat sugar the next time head quickly into
a binge and they have to detox all over again.  That's a classic
addictive behavior pattern no matter that the detox phase is less
intense than injected drugs.

I'm lucky from a straight carbs and glycemic index and insulin rush
account.  But I still have addiction problems from the other half of
the Atkins plan.  Trigger foods.  I have problems with wheat, corn
and some other foods.  If I eat those I have a severe danger of
falling off the wagon and needing to detox again.
Cate - 19 Mar 2004 04:02 GMT
> Well, then, how do you explain all of us on the Atkins diet just
> giving them up 'cold turkey' for two weeks and then coming to testify
> that once we had finished the Induction period items with sugar in
> them seem too sweet--and even repellant?

It's not 'all of us' that respond that way. Metabolism, food cravings,
insulin issues, and addiction are all individualized processes. What you
crave and why probably isn't the same as what I experience. After a month
of doing LC, I still want sweet things. I just don't want them as much as I
want to lose weight.

It must not be much of an
> "addiction" if it is so easily broken.  

Congratulations on finding it so easy. That's an accomplishment to revel
in.

Cate
DG511 - 19 Mar 2004 04:21 GMT
>Cate notreally.orson14850@yahoo.com

writes:

>> Well, then, how do you explain all of us on the Atkins diet just
>> giving them up 'cold turkey' for two weeks and then coming to testify
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>of doing LC, I still want sweet things. I just don't want them as much as I
>want to lose weight.

I can't tell if I still want sweet things or not.  I look at them in the store
and feel sort of wistful, but I don't feel the physical cravings.  I remember
liking them a lot, but I don't feel drawn to them.  It's almost as though I now
have a disembodied sweet tooth.  Or disembodied taste buds.  Still there, but
not entirely there.  It's really weird -- and hard to explain, obviously.

Daria
166/148/140
sugar-free since 2/1/04
low-carb since 2/17/04
Cate - 19 Mar 2004 15:59 GMT
> It's almost as though I now
> have a disembodied sweet tooth.  Or disembodied taste buds.  Still
> there, but not entirely there.  It's really weird -- and hard to
> explain, obviously.

Actually I think 'disembodied' is an apt way to describe what I'm feeling
as well. I see the Reese's, the ice cream, the French bread--and I just
don't picture myself buying it or eating it anymore, although I long for
the taste of it in my mouth. But the compulsion to have the stuff in my
mouth and sliding down my throat has somehow lessened.

Cate
Damsel in dis Dress - 19 Mar 2004 01:17 GMT
>Do you agree with the OP's contention that  carbohydrates are "a potent
>drug" that people become "addicted" to?  I think that's nonsense.

Hi Pat,

It sounds likely that the OP has been involved with Overeaters Anonymous.
That's what they preach.

Carol
Signature

227/220.5/150
Atkins since March 12, 2004
Type 2 Diabetic since May 15, 2001

This is what backsliding does:
http://photos.yahoo.com/carol_arie

Pat - 19 Mar 2004 01:29 GMT
> >Do you agree with the OP's contention that  carbohydrates are "a potent
> >drug" that people become "addicted" to?  I think that's nonsense.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Carol

Oh. It sounded like it was going to the "it's not my fault that I'm fat--I
had no choice!' argument that I get so weary of hearing.  I got this way one
spoonful at a time. I can't even blame the caffeine because I went off of
that in 1991--cold turkey. Such a headache I had! But after several hours,
it was gone, never to plague me again. But carbohydrates? Food as an
addiction? Bah humbug!

Pat in TX
Cailleachschilde - 19 Mar 2004 03:49 GMT
>Oh. It sounded like it was going to the "it's not my fault that I'm fat--I
>had no choice!' argument that I get so weary of hearing.  I got this way one
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Pat in TX

I disagree.  I think I'm am psychologically and physiologically addicted to
sugar.  When I eat something with too many carbs or too sweet, it sets up an
intense craving.  Even after low carbing for a year. I actually feel like I'm
jonesing for sugar.

But even though I feel I am addicted to sugar, I still claim full
responsibility for my eating habits.  

Yvonne
LCer09 - 19 Mar 2004 04:45 GMT
>I disagree.  I think I'm am psychologically and physiologically addicted to
>sugar.  When I eat something with too many carbs or too sweet, it sets up an
>intense craving.  Even after low carbing for a year. I actually feel like I'm
>jonesing for sugar.

I use to believe I had psychological problems with sugar/food. If anything,
Atkins has shown me that I was physiologically addicted. And yes, I'll say
addicted. My PCOS and insulin resistance took my body over the edge with
cravings every time I ate even moderate amounts of carbs. When my body betrays
me like that over a substance, I'll call it an addiction. Obviously it wasn't
beyond my control, since once I had the proper tools (information that is) I
could not only slam the brakes on it, but throw in back in to reverse.

LCing since 12/01/03-
Me- 5'7" 265/220/140
& hubby- 6' 310/239/180
revek - 19 Mar 2004 02:27 GMT
Cate  burbled across the ether:
> The clinical definition of addiction has to do more with physiology
> (e.g., tolerance, withdrawal) than it does with Reefer Madness.

Digressing for a moment:  have you seen that bizzare propoganda piece?
It is so surreal that you wonder how any person ever believed it even
for a second.  I wonder if the folks who were involved in making it are
ashamed of themselves.

Signature

revek   www.geocities.com/tanirevek/LowCarb.html  lowcarbing since June
           2002 5'2" 41 F  165+/too much/size seven petite please
Define the Universe and give three examples. - Anonymous

Cate - 19 Mar 2004 03:58 GMT
"revek" <pphillps1962@hotmail.com> wrote in news:c3diah$25li5n$1@ID-
190183.news.uni-berlin.de:

> Digressing for a moment:  have you seen that bizzare propoganda piece?

No, I haven't, but it came to mind so readily because I just read in the
New Yorker that it's being remade. Very tongue-in-cheek this time.

Cate
FOB - 19 Mar 2004 03:58 GMT
It's best viewed when high. <G>

In news:c3diah$25li5n$1@ID-190183.news.uni-berlin.de,
revek <pphillps1962@hotmail.com> stated
| Digressing for a moment:  have you seen that bizzare propoganda piece?
| It is so surreal that you wonder how any person ever believed it even
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
| please
| Define the Universe and give three examples. - Anonymous
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.