Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / Low Carb / February 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

I am biased in favor of artificial sweeteners.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jake - 24 Feb 2007 03:49 GMT
I blame my soon-to-be-ex-wife.  She and her sister used to swear that
aspartame gave them migraines and flu-like symptoms.  Until I started
using it for lowcarbing.  She was really bad about reading labels, and
was soon using all kinds of aspartame with no ill effects at all.

Her whole family and most of thier friends were like this - all up on
the granola train and claiming symptoms that miraculously never appeared
when good-old-Jake showed up with a frankensweetner-made cheesecake for
a get together.

I can honestly say that I have never actually met an aspartame-sensitive
person whom I did not suspect was more mentally symptomatic than
physically so.
saintor1@hotmail.com - 24 Feb 2007 13:24 GMT
> I blame my soon-to-be-ex-wife.  She and her sister used to swear that
> aspartame gave them migraines and flu-like symptoms.  Until I started
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> person whom I did not suspect was more mentally symptomatic than
> physically so.

Maybe that because you doubted her claims is one reason why she will
be your ex-wife.  Don't you know that women are always right? :o)))

I agree that it seems to me that aspartame have been badmouthed
unreasonably for decades, even if it is more accepted these days.
Pat - 24 Feb 2007 16:25 GMT
> I can honestly say that I have never actually met an aspartame-sensitive
> person whom I did not suspect was more mentally symptomatic than
> physically so.

Well, then, you didn't ever meet my son who developed headaches from
drinking sodas with aspartame in them at an early age (one of my boys became
lactose intolerant at age 13. Was that all in his head, too?).  Little kids
don't know about chemicals in food. They don't have an agenda. He just had
headaches.  (still does)

Pat in TX
jcderkoeing - 24 Feb 2007 17:10 GMT
It's a tumor.

>> I can honestly say that I have never actually met an aspartame-sensitive
>> person whom I did not suspect was more mentally symptomatic than
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Pat in TX
Cubit - 25 Feb 2007 15:53 GMT
I used aspartame diet soft drinks with no discernable effect.  Now, what
stock symbol do I buy to play aspartame?

>I blame my soon-to-be-ex-wife.  She and her sister used to swear that
>aspartame gave them migraines and flu-like symptoms.  Until I started using
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> person whom I did not suspect was more mentally symptomatic than
> physically so.
Jake - 26 Feb 2007 02:17 GMT
> I used aspartame diet soft drinks with no discernable effect.  Now, what
> stock symbol do I buy to play aspartame?
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>> person whom I did not suspect was more mentally symptomatic than
>> physically so.

What, because I'm a corporate shill if I think the aspartame scare is
overblown?

LOL - USENET's teh funnay.
Pat - 26 Feb 2007 03:27 GMT
> What, because I'm a corporate shill if I think the aspartame scare is
> overblown?
>
> LOL - USENET's teh funnay.

If it's overblown as you say, why do the states require newborns to be
tested??
Jbuch - 26 Feb 2007 03:40 GMT
>>What, because I'm a corporate shill if I think the aspartame scare is
>>overblown?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> If it's overblown as you say, why do the states require newborns to be
> tested??

Perhaps we need newborns to be tested for peanut allergies.

Then, we can add another couple of dozen more allergies to be tested for.

Sometimes perople and states do "good things" for dumb reasons - except
it makes voters feel good that thier legislators are doing something
about some worrisome situation.

Something is better than nothing, isn't it?

Jim
Pat - 26 Feb 2007 23:37 GMT
That wasn't an answer; it was a tap dance.
Jake - 26 Feb 2007 03:46 GMT
>> What, because I'm a corporate shill if I think the aspartame scare is
>> overblown?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> If it's overblown as you say, why do the states require newborns to be
> tested??

Hey, I never said I couldn't be convinced otherwise.  Do you have a cite
for this?  What states require aspartame sensitivity testing in newborns?
Jake - 26 Feb 2007 04:01 GMT
>>> What, because I'm a corporate shill if I think the aspartame scare is
>>> overblown?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Hey, I never said I couldn't be convinced otherwise.  Do you have a cite
> for this?  What states require aspartame sensitivity testing in newborns?

Oh, lol, I just realized what you're talking about.  Identifying infants
with PKU is a LOT different than saying the states agree that Aspartame
is dangerous for use for the general population.  You almost got me
there though.
Pat - 26 Feb 2007 23:40 GMT
>> Hey, I never said I couldn't be convinced otherwise.  Do you have a cite
>> for this?  What states require aspartame sensitivity testing in newborns?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> dangerous for use for the general population.  You almost got me there
> though.

Because it's an inherited disorder. That means the "aspartame scare" is NOT
overblown.

Pat in TX
Deke - 27 Feb 2007 13:11 GMT
>>> Hey, I never said I couldn't be convinced otherwise.  Do you have a cite
>>> for this?  What states require aspartame sensitivity testing in newborns?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Pat in TX

I believe I read that about 10 % of humans are lactose intolerant.  

With a billion people guzzling down diet sodas full of aspartame for
20 years with no ill effects, maybe apartame intolerance reaches the
.000001 percent level - at the most.

Or in other words, I believe your kids suffer from a hysterical
mother syndrone and NOT intolerant to aspartame.

I know you have NOT done a blind study on them.   It is easy to do
and would prove to you and them that they are not really intolerant to
aspartame.
Pat - 27 Feb 2007 13:42 GMT
> I believe I read that about 10 % of humans are lactose intolerant.
>
> With a billion people guzzling down diet sodas full of aspartame for
> 20 years with no ill effects, maybe apartame intolerance reaches the
> .000001 percent level - at the most.

You don't know this! It's just speculation on your part.

> Or in other words, I believe your kids suffer from a hysterical
> mother syndrone and NOT intolerant to aspartame.

So, 10 years of lactose intolerance is all in his head? He's graduated from
college now and is out on his own---without any hysterical parents---and
guess what: still lactose intolerant!  BTW: he's part Chickasaw, Cherokee,
and Choctaw.  You might google for THAT connection and lactose intolerant.

As for the other son, he still gets headaches if he imbibes anything with
aspartame in it---even if he doesn't know there is aspartame in it such as
if he is giving a paper cup with soda in it. Amazing Kresgin, eh?

> I know you have NOT done a blind study on them.   It is easy to do
> and would prove to you and them that they are not really intolerant to
> aspartame.

Shame on you! You don't know these young men! You are so intent on proving
your weak and speculative "theory" that you are truly blind. If it doesn't
"fit" with your speculations, you simply deny, deny, deny.

Pat in TX
Alice Faber - 26 Feb 2007 04:02 GMT
> >> What, because I'm a corporate shill if I think the aspartame scare is
> >> overblown?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Hey, I never said I couldn't be convinced otherwise.  Do you have a cite
> for this?  What states require aspartame sensitivity testing in newborns?

I assume he's talking about the test for PKU. While aspartame is a no-no
for people who have PKU, there are many other things they have to avoid.

Signature

AF
"Non Sequitur U has a really, really lousy debate team."
             --artyw raises the bar on rec.sport.baseball

Aaron Baugher - 26 Feb 2007 14:03 GMT
> If it's overblown as you say, why do the states require newborns to
> be tested??

I don't have a dog in this fight, but *surely* you're not whipping out
"because the state says so" as an argument.  Food pyramid, ya know?

Signature

Aaron -- 285/235/200 -- http://aaron.baugher.biz/

"If you hear hoofbeats, you just go ahead and think horsies, not
zebras."

Doug Freyburger - 27 Feb 2007 19:27 GMT
> I can honestly say that I have never actually met an aspartame-sensitive
> person whom I did not suspect was more mentally symptomatic than
> physically so.

I have one friend who appears to be drunk after drinking a diet
soda with aspartame.  I remember him having a Dr Pepper with
lunch day and a couple of hours later he was almost passed
out at his keyboard.  I went back and asked if they had Diet Dr
Pepper.  Yes, they carried it because so few people could tell
it from regular.

Also aspartame blocks my wife from loss.  No idea what the
mechanism is but she can go a month not losing, drop aspartame,
and she gets a whoosh.  Clearly this can't lasat forever on a low
calorie diet but I have been amazed at the resistance to loss while
on aspartame.

So while I get no ill effects from it myself I have met some who
get physical effects.  I don't know how overblown the claims of
ill are, but I know they have at least some basis is truth.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.