Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / Low Carb / May 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Atkins new shakes "TOTALLY SUCK"

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Michael - 28 May 2008 00:27 GMT
This is what I wrote as feedback on the Atkins.com site.
______________________________________________________

I and my wife consume 3 shakes each per day. We drink vanilla and
chocolate royale. We have been drinking at this rate since 2001.

Your new packaging makes it more difficult to open without spilling. It
makes it more difficult to handle after it is open. We are in our 60s
and this product had been a nice daily treat for us.

The "new" flavor sucks. The only good thing about this is that it will
save is us a considerable monthly expense for these shakes.

But please know that it is unlikely that we are the only people who are
dissatisfied with this change. Saving money on packaging and ingredients
will cost your dearly in sales.

The expression penny-wise and pound-foolish comes to mind.

I doubt that this degradation of product would have occurred had Dr.
Atkins been still alive. Those of us who were daily consumers have been
blown off by what is left of the company. We would have paid a higher
price to get the original product.

I realize you will not change your course just for customers. Some
executive somewhere in your company with an ego has made the decision
that we customers are stupid enough to buy this "new crap". I am sure
you think it is better to protect the ego of the executive than cater to
your customers.

You can tell I am angry. This is the end of a very nice treat that my
wife and I have enjoyed for years. She even came up with a way to make
extremely low carb desserts with it. No more shakes, no more desserts.

I wonder who or what this executive will blame when sales go in the toilet.

See you on the newsgroups.
Susan - 28 May 2008 00:40 GMT
> This is what I wrote as feedback on the Atkins.com site.
> ______________________________________________________
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> I doubt that this degradation of product would have occurred had Dr.
> Atkins been still alive.

Dr. Atkins sold off this part of his business before he died and had no
control over product.

Susan
Roshi - 28 May 2008 01:09 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Susan

could be
Michael - 28 May 2008 02:21 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Susan

Thanks for the reply Susan,
These shakes have been high quality up until about three weeks ago. At
least that is when the "new improved" shakes hit the local walmart in town.

You know, when he died, my wife and I conjectured how long it would be
before his business fell apart. Without him to test and approve
products, it was only a matter of time before some young executive found
a way to cheapen the products.

I am sure this young executive has been proclaimed as a hero of the
company by dramatically reducing production costs. When sales take a
nosedive I am sure he will blame someone else.

He could really reduce costs by just packaging colored water and calling
it a shake. God, he must think his customers our too stupid to notice
the difference. How arrogant.

Maybe Haliburton will hire him when the Atkins line goes broke.
Haliburton has captive customers and no competition allowed. He's a
natural.
Susan - 28 May 2008 02:50 GMT
> Thanks for the reply Susan,
> These shakes have been high quality up until about three weeks ago. At
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> products, it was only a matter of time before some young executive found
> a way to cheapen the products.

He had nothing to do with quality or formulation of products *before* he
died.  And for my money, I thought every single thing they made was
crud, except the muffin mixes.  He sold Atkins Nutritionals and gave up
control of it before his death.

> I am sure this young executive has been proclaimed as a hero of the
> company by dramatically reducing production costs. When sales take a
> nosedive I am sure he will blame someone else.

I guess I don't understand why anyone would buy premade shakes full of
chemicals? Why not buy a quality protein powder, some frozen berries and
sweetener, use real milk, cream or yogurt and make your own?

I eat very low carb, zero starch.  I never buy packaged low carb
Frankenfoods or shakes.  Atkins shakes years ago tasted good to me, but
made me wheeze and cough, something a lot of folks experienced.

Susan
trader4@optonline.net - 28 May 2008 14:21 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> crud, except the muffin mixes.  He sold Atkins Nutritionals and gave up
> control of it before his death.

I liked the Atkins liquid shakes, the muffins, and the cereal.   I
haven't had an Atkins shake in years though, so can't really comment
on how they taste now vs before.  I do have muffin mix that I'm still
using, as well as one last box of the cereal.  I loaded up when it was
being sold cheap after the LC bust.   Surprisingly, even the cereal
still tastes excellent.

If you liked the old shakes, since they just changed, you can probably
find some in stores, online, etc and stock up.

> > I am sure this young executive has been proclaimed as a hero of the
> > company by dramatically reducing production costs. When sales take a
> > nosedive I am sure he will blame someone else.

Having survived the years when the popularity of LC first soared, then
crashed, it's likely the company will survive this too.   What makes
you think the executives are young?   I've seen plenty of older execs
make bad decisions.   How about Amerian Airlines, where the CEO isn't
a young guy.  They just decided to start charging $15 for the first
checked bag.   I can imagine where that's going to lead.   My first
thought is the chaos that will now result at the gate as everyone has
the largest size carry-on allowed, plus another over stuffed personal
item and they all try to get on with it.

> I guess I don't understand why anyone would buy premade shakes full of
> chemicals? Why not buy a quality protein powder, some frozen berries and
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Susan
Michael - 28 May 2008 18:52 GMT
>> x-no-archive: yes
>>
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>>
>> Susan

Your right trader4,
It is not necessarily a young exec. I guess I was showing my prejudice
because I am old. Some old or middle aged exec could have made the same
horrible decision. I have 10 more "new" chocolate royales to get down. I
could throw them out but I paid money for them so I feel obligated to
drink them. I promised myself not to drink and "old" shake in my
basement stock until I have choked down all 10 garbage shakes. I have 67
cans of the "old" formula and will drink it much more miserly than I
have been doing. In fact I will probably not even drink them, just use
them to make ice cream. That is the best use of what I have left.

May that exec, young or old, rot in hell.

Michael
Roger Zoul - 28 May 2008 19:06 GMT
> May that exec, young or old, rot in hell.

Michael,

Come now, let's not lose perspective here.  That's just one food item of
many. You and your wife would be fine without the shakes. I'm sure whomever
made the decision to change things up did so for reasons that make sense in
their world, even though it messes up your game.

I too was pissed off when it seemed as though Hood's Calorie Countdown
Chocolate dairy beverage was discontinued.  I asked my local supermarket
manager to check as to why the no longer offered them while still offering
the regular version.  Final word I got from him was that the chocolate had
been discontinued. Yes, I was indeed upset. This must have been 6 or 7 month
ago...however, two weeks ago I found my favorite product in another
supermarket. Turns out it is alive and well! Guess who won't be getting my
business from now on?

Continue your letter writing and leave off the evil wishes.
Michael - 29 May 2008 01:05 GMT
>> May that exec, young or old, rot in hell.
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Continue your letter writing and leave off the evil wishes.

OK Roger,
I really don't want him to rot in hell. I was just venting. My wife and
I have enjoyed these shakes as treats since about the year 2000. That is
 8 years of a habit. It is hard to let go.

The good news is that my wife makes me pancakes for breakfast. She makes
them out of cream, soy flour, splenda, and eggs. I think that is all.
Anyway with a generous bunch of Davinci syrup on top they make a very
nice breakfast. I tried cooking once myself and I ruined everything. I
never tried again. It was humiliating. I leave food preparation for my
wife. She has been cooking for me since I was 14. Everyone else's
cooking is always second best. She even makes bread out of cheese and
some other stuff for making sandwiches.

Michael
Susan - 29 May 2008 02:33 GMT
> The good news is that my wife makes me pancakes for breakfast. She makes
> them out of cream, soy flour, splenda, and eggs. I think that is all.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> cooking is always second best. She even makes bread out of cheese and
> some other stuff for making sandwiches.

So here's a tip, though I never have it any more:  buy some natural
maple extract and add it to your sf maple syrup.  Gives it enough maple
punch up to make it taste like the real thing.  I found Da Vinci to be
awfully bland and watery, but the extract helped.

Better yet; think about getting away from fake substitutes for the old
food that was bad for you.  It tends to lead to eating a lot of ersatz
foods instead of what's best for your health overall.  IMO.

Susan
trader4@optonline.net - 28 May 2008 20:59 GMT
> trad...@optonline.net wrote:
> >> x-no-archive: yes
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
> have been doing. In fact I will probably not even drink them, just use
> them to make ice cream. That is the best use of what I have left.

Since you like the shakes so much, I woulld suggest not wasting them
on ice cream.   There are lots of recipes for ice cream.  Check out
Foodtv.com.   Basicly, it's cream, 1/2 and 1/2, egg yolks, flavoring,
a dash of salt and a sugar substitute.   For 1 cup of sugar
replacement in ice cream or baking, I use:

1 Cup polydextrose
2 Tbsp Xylitol
2 Tbsp Erythritol
1/3 sweetening equivalent of Splenda

You can get the PD at Honeyville Farms.   The others are available at
many health food stores, online, etc.   I think this mix works best,
as it gives it a nicer texture, and comes out better than the
commercially available LC ice creams, like Breyers Carbsmart.  You can
also make it with just Splenda, etc. and I bet it's as good as or
better than using the Atkins shakes.   And a lot less expensive.

> May that exec, young or old, rot in hell.
>
> Michael- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Cubit - 28 May 2008 16:25 GMT
> This is what I wrote as feedback on the Atkins.com site.
> ______________________________________________________
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> See you on the newsgroups.

The best low-carb products are not made and labeled for low-carb.  Often
products that claim to be for low carb are poorly designed "Frankenfoods"
and contain carbs.

eggs
meats
heavy cream
cheeses
mayo
butter
most nuts
coconut milk
coconut oil

Protein shake powder does not have to come from Atkins, and some such
products are low carb.
trader4@optonline.net - 28 May 2008 17:29 GMT
> > This is what I wrote as feedback on the Atkins.com site.
> > ______________________________________________________
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

The "Frankenfood" term is highly debateable and is usually used to
vaguely disparage some product one simply doens't like or agree with.
For example,  I could quite easily call protein powder, which you just
recommended,  a Frankenfood too, as it's a processed, extracted food
component, very different from the original source.   Yet you recommed
that, but if a company uses it in a shake, it becomes a "Frankenfood?"
Cubit - 28 May 2008 19:44 GMT
>> eggs
>> meats
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>
>> - Show quoted text -

> The "Frankenfood" term is highly debateable and is usually used to
> vaguely disparage some product one simply doens't like or agree with.
> For example,  I could quite easily call protein powder, which you just
> recommended,  a Frankenfood too, as it's a processed, extracted food
> component, very different from the original source.   Yet you recommed
> that, but if a company uses it in a shake, it becomes a "Frankenfood?"

Good point.  It is hard to avoid Frankenfoods.  Perhaps some are worse than
others.

Since I like to argue, sometimes, I would point out that meats are commonly
from livestock fed GMO corn and pumped with antibiotics, since the corn
makes them progressively sick.  God knows what they do to chickens, and
thus, their eggs.  Pasteurization may protect us from Ecoli, but much of the
nutritional value is supposed to be lost along with the bacteria that are
found in raw milk.  (It is said that many who are thought to have milk
allergies do fine on raw milk.)  Many supermarket nuts come with exotic
salts, sugars, and flavorings coating them.  Almonds are being chemically
sterilized with a toxic chemical (hydrazine?).  Most canned coconut milk has
added sugar.  Even hotdogs are a Frankenfood, and may have MSG, or God knows
what else.

You just can't win.  I compromise by trying to keep the number of
ingredients low, as contrasted to about 50, or so, of many processed foods.
Susan - 28 May 2008 20:10 GMT
> Good point.  It is hard to avoid Frankenfoods.  

No it isn't.  I don't use any.  I eat meat, fish, fruits, veggies, nuts,
olives, cheeses, etc.

Whole, undadulterated stuff.

Susan
Doug Freyburger - 28 May 2008 22:28 GMT
> > Good point.  It is hard to avoid Frankenfoods.  

It's hard to define them but not to avoid them.

> No it isn't.  I don't use any.  I eat meat, fish, fruits, veggies, nuts,
> olives, cheeses, etc.
>
> Whole, undadulterated stuff.

Chortle.  Olives have to be soaked in salt, lye or other
minerals to be rendered edible.  Cheese has to be
fermented from milk.  The fact that these foods have
been available for millenia does not make them
unprocessed or unadulterated.  It seems to make them
not frankenfoods, though.

So what type of olives?  I like black olives.  I like green
olives more.  I like kalmata olives more still.  I like small
farm brands best.  Green olives tend to burn so very few
pizza places ever use them - They have to be put under
the cheese.  Then again very few pizza places offer
sausage crust or soy crust either.  Sigh.
Susan - 28 May 2008 22:53 GMT
> Chortle.  Olives have to be soaked in salt, lye or other
> minerals to be rendered edible.  Cheese has to be
> fermented from milk.  The fact that these foods have
> been available for millenia does not make them
> unprocessed or unadulterated.  It seems to make them
> not frankenfoods, though.

Processing isn't synonymous with adulterated.  Fermenting is a good
thing, salt is a good thing, minerals are good things.

> So what type of olives?  I like black olives.  I like green
> olives more.  I like kalmata olives more still.  I like small
> farm brands best.  Green olives tend to burn so very few
> pizza places ever use them - They have to be put under
> the cheese.  Then again very few pizza places offer
> sausage crust or soy crust either.  Sigh.

I haven't found an olive I don't like yet.

Susan
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.