It's harder to do the lighter you are!
> It seems like an incredible amount of weight to lose when you consider
> that a weight lose of just 2 lbs per week equates to a deficit of 1000
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> 280/263/240
> It seems like an incredible amount of weight to lose when you consider that
> a weight lose of just 2 lbs per week equates to a deficit of 1000 calories
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> 280/263/240
assuming you are carrying more than 40 lbs of fat, 2 lbs per week is
probably a good rate for you. As your body fat % decreases, you may need
to adjust downwards. Rule of thumb is 31 calories deficit per pound of
body fat. Here is an explanation of how much fat you can lose.
http://www.emotionsforengineers.com/2008/06/unified-feed-theory.html
T
DB - 29 Aug 2008 15:59 GMT
>> It seems like an incredible amount of weight to lose when you consider
>> that
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> T
I would be really happy at a loss rate of 2 Ibs per week, but I know my
body's survival program will constantly adjust to resist big losses. That's
why I think it's very important to know how to fuel the body in terms of
timing and content and not just count simple calories.
Everything we eat reacts differently in our system, so a 500 calorie piece
of pizza or cake is very different from a 500 calorie piece of steak and or
chicken dinner. Fried, baked, roasted are other things to conceder too.
More important as well, our machine was designed to move as part of the
survival programming, sitting at a desk all day was never part of the plan,
so it's crucial to find ways to keep moving ! ;-)