 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers WeightAdviser.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Weight Loss Forum / Low Carb / January 2010High-Powered Low Carb Diet That Works And Makes You Look Attractive in 45 days or less
If you want to really look attractive in 45 days or less while eating delicious food you want to read all this. Here’s how a great Low Carb Diet Plan works (great tips!): 1. Stop Drinking Soda & Coke – They have very nutritional value, and they just fill you up. 2. Eat More Veggies – Most people don’t eat vegetables. I know you are different, so eat more veggies! 3. Eat A Little More Fat – This sounds crazy, but if you eat a little more fat, chances are you will eat less. 4. Get Enough Protein – 35% of your diet should be protein, remember this. 5. Quality Beats Quantity – In a low carb diet plan eat quality foods over quantity. 6. Brown Rice Instead of White – Is more nutritional and has way less carbs. 7. Try eating high-fiber low-carb cereals – Try it and see the difference. I’m trying to lose weight like you do, I know how hard it is, however a low carb diet is a good way to start. I think you may agree that having great health is the greatest thing you may ever had, and for real looking good too. Well, I wrote a powerful blog post about the best-kept secret diet that shows you how you can lose 42 pounds and 10 inches of your waist with little or almost no effort (It’s so powerful that I will delete that blog post in a couple of hours, so don’t miss it) See the best- kept secret diet I’m talking about here => http://ultimatediettips.blogspot.com NO rice, NO cereal, not all veggies. | If you want to really look attractive in 45 days or less while eating | delicious food you want to read all this. [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] | kept secret diet I’m talking about here => | http://ultimatediettips.blogspot.com That's one opinion, but not mine. If you were diabetic, NO rice, NO cereal, not all veggies, might make sense, but not for most of us. Just stay away from white flour, white rice, high fructose corn syrup, and sucrose. > NO rice, NO cereal, not all veggies. > [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > | kept secret diet I’m talking about here => > | http://ultimatediettips.blogspot.com  Signature³When you give food to the poor, they call you a saint. When you ask why the poor have no food, they call you a communist.² -Archbishop Helder Camara http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1261364551818&pagename=JPost%2FJPArti cle%2FShowFull http://countercurrents.org/roberts020709.htm >> NO rice, NO cereal, not all veggies. That sounds like the loss phase of successful low carb plans. The "not all veggies" wording is a bit strange as to me it means "don't be a vegitarian" but it works well enough. Most phases of most low carb plans are mostly veggies by volume. > That's one opinion, but not mine. If you were diabetic, NO rice, NO > cereal, not all veggies, might make sense, but not for most of us. Just > stay away from white flour, white rice, high fructose corn syrup, and > sucrose. That sounds like the maintenance phase of successful low carb plans. False - There's something in grains that make them essential. True - Grains can work as an element of many plans so have a specific reason for eating them that's other than a belief that they are somehow essential. True - There exist people with grain intolerences who should avoid eating grain. Some such people have no idea they should avoid grain because they've never gone two weeks grain free in their lives so they are not aware their health could be improved by a dietary change. True - The majority of the population does not have a grain intolerance but refined grains remain a bad idea because of glycemic load. True - Grain agriculture triggered the founding of civilization. False - Therefore eating grains is beneficial to individual humans. True - Should worldwide prosperity continue to increase near current rates there may well come a time in the next couple of centuries that no one in the world is so poor they have no choice but to eat grains. It is unlikely to happen during the lifespan of anyone living now but it is a noble goal. True - Given history it might never happen but it's still a noble goal. Not all veggies means you can't freely eat all veggies, potatoes are off limits, root vegetables should be limited in quantity. Not all veggies was in a series, where things were banned, No, No, not all in this context means limited. | >> NO rice, NO cereal, not all veggies. | [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] | True - Given history it might never happen but it's still a noble | goal. > >> NO rice, NO cereal, not all veggies. > [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > is unlikely to happen during the lifespan of anyone living now but it is > a noble goal. What? > True - Given history it might never happen but it's still a noble goal. To feed the Earth's growing population of people (1/3 of which presently live on less than $2/day), new agricultural land land equally the area of Brazil will be needed to feed the projected 9,000,000,000 people on the planet in 2050. Otherwise, we will have failed nuclear states and food riots, because the Chinese and the Indians think a middle class way of life sounds like a good deal, and they will be competing to buy food stuffs in the open world markets. (By the way, those 2 countries represent 40% of the world's human population. We, the U.S., represent 5%.) What do you think will happen in the U.S.? Will the corporate farmers be forced to sell to Americans, or will they sell to the highest bidder in the world market? Uh-huh. Signature"When you give food to the poor, they call you a saint. When you ask why the poor have no food, they call you a communist." -Archbishop Helder Camara http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1261364551818&pagename=JPost%2FJPArti cle%2FShowFull http://countercurrents.org/roberts020709.htm In article <0380e8e3-8d0a-432d-87fe-bb9b4896cccb@p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, > If you want to really look attractive in 45 days or less while eating > delicious food you want to read all this. [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > kept secret diet I¹m talking about here => > http://ultimatediettips.blogspot.com Looks good to me, except for the word "cereals". If you mean, breakfast cereals, like Kellogg's or Post, avoid them, fiber or not. They are made from the same crap that makes up junk food. They take out at least 25 sources of nutrition and put back 5, and call it enriched. Waste of money. If you mean whole grains, like rolled oats, go for it. Signature³When you give food to the poor, they call you a saint. When you ask why the poor have no food, they call you a communist.² -Archbishop Helder Camara http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1261364551818&pagename=JPost%2FJPArti cle%2FShowFull http://countercurrents.org/roberts020709.htm In article <wldbilly-7DFD62.12015504012010@c-61-68-245-199.per.connect.net.au>, > Looks good to me, except for the word "cereals". If you mean, breakfast > cereals, like Kellogg's or Post, avoid them, fiber or not. They are made [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > If you mean whole grains, like rolled oats, go for it. But, please, to not sweeten with sugar or high fructose sweetener. There is no need for grains in human nutrition. We have only been eating them for 10 kiloyears at most and most of our ancestors for a lot less. SignatureA computer without Microsoft is like a chocolate cake without mustard. > In article > <0380e8e3-8d0a-432d-87fe-bb9b4896c...@p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] > > - Show quoted text -' It looks like more stupid advice from a commerical spammer to me. Eat brown rice on a low carb diet because "Brown rice has "way less carbs?" Nonsense. According to the USDA food database, a 100g of brown rice has 22 carbs vs 28 for white rice. So, while if you want to have some small quantity of rice on a LC plan where you're meeting your goals and it fits into your carb budget, that's fine. But to just say eat brown rice because it has way less carbs is very misleading. And to say eat more veggies, without any qualifications is similarly clueless. In article <235d9656-b0c8-4bbb-a74b-3a66c9f4aa70@p32g2000vbi.googlegroups.com>, > > In article > > <0380e8e3-8d0a-432d-87fe-bb9b4896c...@p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 59 lines] > And to say eat more veggies, without any qualifications is similarly > clueless. Well, what can he do without a brain? Hello!!! You are crediting me with words, I didn't use. Sooo, you a troll? Walk like a duck. Talk like a duck. Yada, yada, yada? Troll. Anyway, if you decide to eat grains (calories or not) whole grains are better for you. In processing gains, the husk (fiber) and the germ (vitamins and minerals) are removed, leaving only the starch. Over 25 nutrients are removed. If processors replace 5 of the nutrients, they can call their products "enriched". The above and 5 servings of fruits and vegetables a day, can't hurt your health, ask your doctor. Signature³When you give food to the poor, they call you a saint. When you ask why the poor have no food, they call you a communist.² -Archbishop Helder Camara http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1261364551818&pagename=JPost%2FJPArti cle%2FShowFull http://countercurrents.org/roberts020709.htm > > It looks like more stupid advice from a commerical spammer to me. > > Eat brown rice on a low carb diet because "Brown rice has "way less [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > words, I didn't use. Sooo, you a troll? Walk like a duck. Talk like a > duck. Yada, yada, yada? Troll. If you can follow the thread, it's clear I was referring to what the OP posted, not you. And if you spent as much time reading real posts in this newsgroup as you do replying to spam and re-posting it, you'd know I've been here for years and am not a troll. I see you still don't know how to trim a post to the relevant parts either. > Anyway, if you decide to eat grains (calories or not) whole grains are > better for you. In processing gains, the husk (fiber) and the germ [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > The above and 5 servings of fruits and vegetables a day, can't hurt your > health, ask your doctor. Sorry, but yes grains can hurt you. Last time I checked, this still is a LC newsgroup. Instead of following an established LC plan that works, eg Atkins, someone could listen to you, eat grains as if they were a LC vegetable, have hunger return, conclude LC doesn't work, give up and stay morbidly obese. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2012 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.