 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers WeightAdviser.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Weight Loss Forum / Low Carb / January 2010What you think about burning fat?
It’s so wonderful to see such a group with people who are so impassioned about Burn Fat. People just don’t understand how really important is to Burn Fat. That’s why we should make sure that such the right info is available to anyone. I truly believe that by reading it, others will be able to gain some useful information and knowledge for burning your fat in the right way. You can check it out at my new blog http://malagut-dietmaster.blogspot.com/ In article <f4953362-6ed5-4c31-b61e-98fce086f197@21g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>, > It¹s so wonderful to see such a group with people who are so > impassioned about Burn Fat. People just don¹t understand how really [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > way. You can check it out at my new blog > http://dietma$ter.com/ We are all watching. Go ahead and tell us, although, I think I'd rather see your fat burning on a bonfire.  Signature"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100119/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_israel_arresting_activists http://www.democracynow.org/2010/1/19/headlines > We are all watching. Go ahead and tell us, although, I think I'd rather > see your fat burning on a bonfire. > -- Why is it that you are not only compelled to reply to every last bit of spam, but to also repost it, complete with link? In article <81e31287-a85d-49a1-9f4a-de0c3bcf24fd@p24g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, > > We are all watching. Go ahead and tell us, although, I think I'd rather > > see your fat burning on a bonfire. > > -- > > Why is it that you are not only compelled to reply to every last bit > of spam, but to also repost it, complete with link? Your consistency at always being wrong is truly inspiring. If you don't want to see my posts, use your kill file, or do you prefer to piss and moan? Signature"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100119/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_israel_arresting_activists http://www.democracynow.org/2010/1/19/headlines In message <wldbilly-31EF0B.07410929012010@c-61-68-245-199.per.connect.net.au> >If you don't want to see my posts, use your kill file Good advice. >> way. You can check it out at my new blog >> http://dietma$ter.com/ > > We are all watching. Go ahead and tell us ... Very amusing morph of the spammer's URL. Thanks for the laugh today. But since the topic is burning fat I'll make a comment on it. Folks love to say calories in equals calories out and that's all there is. The trouble is it's not what we're here for. We're actually here for fat grams into storage minus fat grams out of storage, and no matter what the calorie situation as long as there's a net flow of fat out of storage the loss is working. Stepping on the scale isn't what we're really here for. In almost every case we're here for size loss. The scale just happens to give an easy measurement that's a side effect of that size loss. But it doesn't work all the time - Very many folks report a pattern of inch loss followed by pound loss. Counting calories is similar to why we use the scale. Calories are easier to count than the effort it takes to understand how the various macronutrients impact flow of fat in or out of storage. Calories, like the scale, are simple and easy and not based on a skilled approach. Getting fat out of storage can be done by burning it or whatever. I don't care as much if it was burned or what, just that there's less of it in storage. If I could figure out how to eat so that I sweat oil I would do that. ;^) > >> way. You can check it out at my new blog > >> http://dietma$ter.com/ [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > it in storage. If I could figure out how to eat so that I sweat oil I > would do that. ;^) Huh? For the last 5 months, I've been trying to reduce the carbs that I'm eating. I haven't done it in any kind of organized approach, but nonetheless, I'm 20 lbs lighter today (I'm presuming that there is a connection.) Now I'm trying to get my carbs down to 100g/day, which hasn't been a terribly difficult task. If I can hold this plateau for awhile, I may try to go lower. Bottom line, low carbs seem to be working for me. As for the paraphrased 1st Law of Thermodynamics (calories in equals calories out), there are too many cases where people feel that they are starving on 1700 Kcal/day, and don't lose weight, rather they lose metabolic energy. Conversely, there are those who have lost weight on 3000 Kcal/day. The former will eat a reduced calorie diet, and the latter a reduced carbohydrate diet (calories not restricted). At least this is the contention of Gary Taubes, and it seems to work. Signature"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100119/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_israel_arresting_activists http://www.democracynow.org/2010/1/19/headlines > Getting fat out of storage can be done by burning it or whatever. I > don't care as much if it was burned or what, just that there's less of > it in storage. If I could figure out how to eat so that I sweat oil I > would do that. ;^) Just be sure you don't excrete fat too fast through the rectum, or you better carry an extra pair of trousers with you. SignatureA computer without Microsoft is like a chocolate cake without mustard. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2012 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.