 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers WeightAdviser.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Weight Loss Forum / Low Carb / March 2010Discover The 110 Amazing Fat Fighting Foods Today - Guaranteed To Melt Stubborn Body Fat!
Did you know that there are some scientifically proven foods that are known to aid weight loss? These are foods doctors, scientists, medical researchers and nutritionists know help weight loss. When you order Fat Fighting Foods youll get a 260-page ebook, outlining the foods, explaining why they fight fat and how to prepare them and combine them, so youll know exactly how to get started. There has been no simpler way to boost your weight loss or a more comprehensive list of foods that fight fat until now. This guide contains the most up to date list of foods that will help you lose weight (last updated August 2007). So, you have nothing to lose except your excess body fat when you order Fat Fighting Foods! Click here for more information! http://miniurl.org/r1v In article <17f32901-459a-4109-9232-d3f6a4ad96df@b30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, > Did you know that there are some scientifically proven foods that are > known to aid weight loss? These are foods doctors, scientists, [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > http://miniurl.org/scam So how is Bucharest this morning? Four degrees Celsius? That sucks, but cheer up. It's supposed to get to 10 C this afternoon. So how do you make a living when anyone can google "fat fighting foods" for nothing? Why not take the afternoon off, and go skiing in the Carpathians? Well, time for bed here. Say goodnight, Gracie. Hello, America. The poster is out of the country. If you send money, it would be very difficult to correct a rip-off. Caveat Emptor  Signature"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100119/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_israel_arresting_activists http://www.democracynow.org/2010/1/19/headlines > Click here for more information! You are a scammer. You are trying to execute an Internet get-rich-quick scam. That is why you are using so many pseudonyms (Anne, Ana, Helen, Pam, Sandy, Ted, Tam, Wendy, Zen, etc.). You are not an honest person. You have also posted "The Most Powerful Natural Penis Enlargement Technique" under several different pseudonyms. Don't blindly click on a link unless security is totally locked down, otherwise malware can execute. That's why many spammers conceal the destination URL using miniurl.com or tinyurl.com. Clicking on one of these links could cause all sorts of damage. For example, it could install a keystroke logger to grab passwords or make your computer part of a botnet to send spam or launch denial-of-service attacks. >You are a scammer. You are trying to execute an Internet >get-rich-quick scam. That is why you are using so many [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >a botnet to send spam or launch denial-of-service >attacks. As though all this spam were not enough of a nuisance, your automated responses only waste more band width. I think we're all smart enough to see spam when it gets posted and don't necessarily need you to point it out. I understand you're well intentioned, but I'd rather read your insights about low-carb eating than remonstrations of spammers. Orlando > As though all this spam were not enough of a nuisance, your automated responses There not automated. > only waste more band width. I think we're all smart enough to see spam when it > gets posted and don't necessarily need you to point it out. I understand you're > well intentioned, but I'd rather read your insights about low-carb eating than > remonstrations of spammers. But new people may join the group at any time, and they would not see the warnings about this criminal. >> As though all this spam were not enough of a nuisance, your automated responses > > There not automated. The trouble is posts that only have one line different count as "substantially the same" because it can be calculated by a program. Posting many "substantially the same" messages triggers spam blockers. It looks like your messages use the exact same text cut-n-pasted most of the time and that they are making it under the spam blockers by not being frequent enough. In a sense that makes your reaction too similar to the spam you respond to. On the one hand "silence affirms assent" so newbies who see a high noise group always come in with empty killfiles. They don't know which posts the regulars see and which posts the regulars block. On the other hand dancing around spam blockers in response to spam isn't a good idea either. [*] !kill Xpost %>3 !kill From "webtv.net" !kill Xref "alt.global-warming" !kill Xref "soc.support.fat-acceptance" !kill Xref "alt.slack" !kill From "meow" My global filter list contains a lot of individual spammers and trolls in addition to that. The Xpost line drops any post that went to 4+ groups and it's my single most effective line for ignoring trolls. Other groups help clear out a lot of other noise. [alt.support.diet.low-carb] My group specific list contains 8 specific users that I didn't list here. The trolls you respond to here on ASDLC get filtered out by some line in my filter list because I don't see them. > On the other hand dancing around spam blockers in response to spam isn't > a good idea either. If somebody doesn't see my responses to the criminal, I don't see any reason to try to get around that. They probably don't see the originals, either. That's how people who don't want to see my responses should handle them -- either that or a killfile. > > On the other hand dancing around spam blockers in response to spam isn't > > a good idea either. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > That's how people who don't want to see my responses > should handle them -- either that or a killfile. All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. - Edmund Burke Signature"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Arn3lF5XSUg http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Zinn/HZinn_page.html >> On the other hand dancing around spam blockers in response to spam isn't >> a good idea either. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > That's how people who don't want to see my responses > should handle them -- either that or a killfile. Do you have any interest in using another handle when doing your cut-n-paste responses? Then I could kill them as well but still get your on topic posts. Your number of on topic posts is low on ASDLC, high on RFC. >There not automated. You must have either memorized the script or cut and paste. >But new people may join the group at any time, >and they would not see the warnings about this criminal. I think this criminal's spam is easily spotted. Orlando > >There not automated. > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Orlando A sweeping generalization based on a random sample? So what your saying is that we should just ignore the predators among us? Uh-huh. Signature"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Arn3lF5XSUg http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Zinn/HZinn_page.html >A sweeping generalization based on a random sample? Okay, let's just assume that it's everyone's right to post identical responses to identical spam. Let's say that I too am free to delete them. The spammer posts consistently in hopes of attracting curious attention to a nefarious website. The respondent posts regularly in an effort to save unsuspecting usenetters from spam traps. The spammer fails because too many people are onto their tricks. The respondent vigilante only annoys people looking for low-carb content on the newsgroup. In those scenario, no one is really getting what they want. The spammer doesn't get enough hits, the respondent fails in his spam- stopping crusade and I remain inconvenienced at having to delete or killfile the respondent. I'm trying to find a better solution here. By encouraging Mark not to respond to spammers, I'm trying to echo supportive statements from people who don't want to killfile him because of the content of his on-topic posts. Orlando > >A sweeping generalization based on a random sample? > [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > Orlando It takes, what, 2 seconds to open and close a post? Seems like a small price to pay to protect visitors to a.s.d.l. Signature"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Arn3lF5XSUg http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Zinn/HZinn_page.html |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2012 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.