Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / Low Carb / April 2010

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Exercise Can Beat Obesity Gene - Human Study

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
pamela - 06 Apr 2010 14:00 GMT
From MedPage Today...

One could claim that this reported study on the value of 1 hr of daily
exercise supports the recent 60 minutes a day of moderate or vigorous
exercise in recent guidelines for adolescents from the U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services.
____________________________________________________________________

Exercise Can Beat Obesity Gene

By Michael Smith, North American Correspondent, MedPage Today
Published: April 05, 2010
Reviewed by Robert Jasmer, MD; Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine,
University of California, San Francisco.
    
Action Points

    * Explain to interested patients that this study suggests that
exercise can overcome the effects of a gene known to predispose people
to obesity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

An hour a day of moderate to vigorous exercise can overcome the effect
of a gene variant that predisposes people to obesity, researchers said.

In a cohort study of 752 European adolescents, those who had one or more
copies of the variant -- but exercised daily -- were no more likely to
be overweight than those who did not have the variant, according to
Jonatan Ruiz, PhD, of Sweden's Karolinska Institute, and colleagues.

They implication, they said in the April issue of Archives of Pediatrics
& Adolescent Medicine, is that recommended exercise levels can
"ameliorate the deleterious effect" of the gene variant.

The gene variant in question -- dubbed rs9939609 -- is the so-called A
allele of the fat mass- and obesity-associated gene, or FTO. Each copy
of the A allele has been estimated to correspond with an extra 1.5
kilograms in body weight.

Some studies have shown that exercise benefits people carrying one or
more copies of the allele, the researchers said, but others have not
found an effect.

To help clarify the issue, they turned to a cross-sectional study known
as Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence (HELENA),
designed to obtain data on nutrition and health-related parameters.

Of the 3,865 adolescents in the study, 752 adolescents (including 413
girls) had data on the FTO variant, body mass index, and physical
activity as measured by accelerometers over a seven-day period.

The researchers divided the group according to whether they achieved the
60 minutes a day of moderate or vigorous exercise in recent guidelines
for adolescents from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Overall, they found, 200 of the 339 boys and 111 of the 413 girls
reached the recommended daily exercise level.

Of the 752 adolescents, 275 had no copies of the allele, 354 had one
copy, and 123 had two, Ruiz and colleagues reported in the journal, but
there was no significant difference among the FTO genotypes in terms of
how many of the participants met the exercise cutoff.

On the other hand, among those who did not meet the cutoff, there was a
significant effect on obesity-related factors. Specifically, after
adjusting for center, sex, and age, the A allele was associated with higher:

    * Body mass index -- at plus 0.65 perallile]copy, which was
significant at P=0.005
    * Body fat percentage -- at plus 1.70% per [allile]copy, which was
significant at P=0.003
    * Waist circumference -- at plus 1.15 centimeters per[allile]copy,
which was significant at P=0.04

On the other hand, there were no significant differences in those
parameters -- based on FTO status -- among participants who met the
exercise level, the researchers said.

Results were similar in boys and girls and did not change when the
researchers adjusted for pubertal stage, rather than age.

Ruiz and colleagues said the study is cross-sectional, so the findings
should be interpreted with caution.

The study had support from the European Community Sixth RTD Framework
Programme, the Spanish Ministry of Education, the Spanish Ministry of
Health, the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research, and
the ALPHA study (a European Union-funded study in the framework of the
Public Health Programme).

The researchers made no financial disclosures.

Primary source: Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
Source reference:
Ruiz JR, et al "Attenuation of the effect of the FTO rs9939609
polymorphism on total and central body fat by physical activity in
adolescents: The HELENA Study" Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2010; 164(4):
328-33.

http://archpedi.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/164/4/328
Billy - 06 Apr 2010 18:48 GMT
A little confusing to find the [allile] inserted into the report was a
misspelling of allele, but it was soon sorted out.

It's been a few years (40) since I've dealt with statistics. Can anyone
tell me what the "P=" in the analysis refers to?

In someways, the original report
http://archpedi.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/164/4/328
is easier to read.

>  From MedPage Today...
>
[quoted text clipped - 96 lines]
>
> http://archpedi.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/164/4/328
Signature

"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Arn3lF5XSUg
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Zinn/HZinn_page.html

Bill who putters - 06 Apr 2010 20:45 GMT
In article
<wildbilly-40EEC3.10482806042010@c-61-68-245-199.per.connect.net.au>,

> A little confusing to find the [allile] inserted into the report was a
> misspelling of allele, but it was soon sorted out.
[quoted text clipped - 106 lines]
> >
> > http://archpedi.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/164/4/328

http://www.graphpad.com/articles/interpret/Analyzing_two_groups/paired_t.
htm
 We Need Jim Chinnis who I miss a lot.

Signature

  Bill   Garden in shade zone 5 S Jersey USA
"I have always looked upon decay as being just as wonderful
and rich an expression of life as growth"  Henry Miller

Bill who putters - 06 Apr 2010 20:53 GMT
<http://www.graphpad.com/articles/interpret/Analyzing_two_groups/paired_t
.htm>

Sorry I did not post this site right b4.

Signature

  Bill   Garden in shade zone 5 S Jersey USA
"I have always looked upon decay as being just as wonderful
and rich an expression of life as growth"  Henry Miller

Billy - 06 Apr 2010 23:42 GMT
> <http://www.graphpad.com/articles/interpret/Analyzing_two_groups/paired_t
> .htm>
>
>  Sorry I did not post this site right b4.

Thanks Bill.
Signature

"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Arn3lF5XSUg
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Zinn/HZinn_page.html

pamela - 07 Apr 2010 04:33 GMT
> A little confusing to find the [allile] inserted into the report was a
> misspelling of allele, but it was soon sorted out.
>
> It's been a few years (40) since I've dealt with statistics. Can anyone
> tell me what the "P=" in the analysis refers to?

The P=0.XXX states that the probability of the result referred to
occurring purely by chance is 0.XXX.

Following the Pearson tradition, P>=0.05 is taken as the customary
definition of when chance is likely not to have been responsible.

The statement of the effect not having been caused by chance isn't the
same as the proof that the effect noted was positively caused by the
experimental variable, because there may have been unnoticed or
uncontrolled other variables causing the effect. It is a common mistake
to make.

> In someways, the original report
> http://archpedi.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/164/4/328
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>> exercise in recent guidelines for adolescents from the U.S. Department
>> of Health and Human Services.

<snip>

>>      * Body mass index -- at plus 0.65 per [allele]copy, which was
>> significant at P=0.005
>>      * Body fat percentage -- at plus 1.70% per [allele]copy, which was
>> significant at P=0.003
>>      * Waist circumference -- at plus 1.15 centimeters per[allele]copy,
>> which was significant at P=0.04
Doug Freyburger - 13 Apr 2010 20:46 GMT
>  From MedPage Today...
>
> One could claim that this reported study on the value of 1 hr of daily
> exercise supports the recent 60 minutes a day of moderate or vigorous
> exercise in recent guidelines for adolescents from the U.S. Department
> of Health and Human Services.

I've been pondering that recently.  Exercise is only a little helpful
during the loss phases but it makes a gigantic difference for preventing
regain.  I decided that even though calories are a poor approximation
they do work in some situations.

Roughly speaking running a marathon burns a pound of fat so that's about
150 calories per mile run or as much as 17 grams of fat per mile run
depending on how much other fuel types are burned.  A three mile run
(5K) is about 50 grams of fat.  With the maximum practical loss rate of
8 pounds per month a daily 3 mile run would account for less than half.
That's respectable but how many starting dieters are in shape to run 3
miles each day.  The "Couch to 5K" plan takes a lot of weeks to build up
to it.  This sure explains why folks who take up running drop weight
across a year but it also shows that it's possible for someone with a
lot to lose to lose it faster independent of exercise.  As usual the key
to using is to start low carbing, start dropping the pounds, and to
build up the exercise plan as you're capable of it.

Running the numbers for regain I quickly come to an understanding of how
exercise works to prevent regain, though.  Before I started low carbing
I tried low fat for 20 years and gained 50 pounds.  That's 2.5 pounds
per year, 10K calories per year, 850 calories per month or a bit under
30 calories of gain per day.  My eating was probably well over 30
calories too high per day.  When I compare the 450ish calories for a 3
mile run with the 30 calorie net gain per day I can see that running
every other day would have been plenty to keep from gaining.  Gain rates
are a lot slower than loss rates so the calories from the exercise
easily beats the gain.

Even falling off the plan I regained around 10 pounds per year for a net
of about 115 calories per day.  Running a mile would cover that so a 3
mile run every day or even every other day would cover it.

The article says that 30 minutes of intense exercise prevents regain.
In the text it lists running as intense.

When I read in the national weight loss registry that folks who keep off
their loss are regular exercisers now that I have run the calorie
arithmetic I understand why that is.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.