Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / Low Carb / May 2010

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

I was put to test today and I...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
mikesmith9999@hotmail.com - 29 Apr 2010 02:20 GMT
passed! I bragged to everyone I know that I've lost a lot of pounds by
greatly reducing the carbs. People seem to be faster to let you know
that you gained weight than when you lose it... It's more fun to
humiliate someone than encouraging him, I guess.

Anyway, pieces of cake were distributed today at work. They did
everything to convince me to have one or more pieces. I said, "No
thanks. Giving me cake is liking offering a beer to a friend who is
A.A." I'm very happy with me!
trader4@optonline.net - 29 Apr 2010 13:50 GMT
On Apr 28, 9:20 pm, "mikesmith9...@hotmail.com"
<mikesmith9...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> passed! I bragged to everyone I know that I've lost a lot of pounds by
> greatly reducing the carbs. People seem to be faster to let you know
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> thanks. Giving me cake is liking offering a beer to a friend who is
> A.A." I'm very happy with me!

Good for you.   It's amazing how many people can know you're on a diet
and then try to force some food of their choosing on you.   I've never
been able to figure out the psychological motivations behind this.

And I liked the beer analogy.  It's something everyone should use.
Orlando Enrique Fiol - 29 Apr 2010 16:11 GMT
Just to be clear, one slice of cake would not regain all your lost weight.
However, that depends on how many more carb-laden foods would be triggered by
that single slice of cake. That's where portion control comes into play. Some
people are so addicted to carbs that even one taste sends them spiraling
downwards back into old eating habits. Others can have that single occasional
slice of cake and continue on plan for the rest of the day. I'm just trying to
give you some options here. If you feel you can have a slice of cake without
slipping back into a carb-centered diet, you might consider enjoying it next
time.

Orlando
FOB - 29 Apr 2010 16:26 GMT
I find it helps to think of sugar and flour and their yummy products as
poison to me.  If you eat some and it doesn't hurt you then you think you
can eat more.  I confess I slip once in a while, like a little left over
Halloween candy, but it's better to just keep the attitude that "I don't eat
that."

| Just to be clear, one slice of cake would not regain all your lost
| weight. However, that depends on how many more carb-laden foods would
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
|
| Orlando
Orlando Enrique Fiol - 29 Apr 2010 17:28 GMT
>I find it helps to think of sugar and flour and their yummy products as
>poison to me.  If you eat some and it doesn't hurt you then you think you
>can eat more.  I confess I slip once in a while, like a little left over
>Halloween candy, but it's better to just keep the attitude that "I don't eat
>that."

I understand how that all-or-nothing approach helps people, but it intimidates
and discourages me. My goal in life is not to be the kind of eater who avoids
carbs at all costs. There are plenty of culturally and aesthetically
significant situations in which carbs form a vital part of the foods consumed;
I don't want to be excluded from those situations. In other words, it doesn't
help my weight loss to resolve never to eat cake, bread, potatoes, pasta or
rice. On the contrary, it helps to know that I can have these treats
occasionally and in limited portions, while I can eat as many proteins and low
glycemic vegetables as I need to satiate my hunger. But allowing myself the
occasional carby treat doesn't translate to inattention about portion sizes and
meal balances. For instance, I don't eat carbs by themselves and never let the
portion of carbs exceed protein and vegetables. I also don't include carbs in
one set daily meal as the CAD or Heller diet advocates. Rather, I become
judicious about which carby delicacies will get my attention. Whereas before, I
would scarf down nearly any food I could find that didn't contain melted
cheese, cream or most fish, I'm now much pickier. So, at the original poster's
work party, I would have scoped out the cake and tried to ascertain where or
how it was baked and if quality ingredients were used. I wouldn't have wasted
my carbs on a mass produced factory cake from a box store. I similarly don't
waste carbs on fast foods, convenience foods or foods from questionable
establishments that don't prepare them with any care for quality.

Orlando
trader4@optonline.net - 29 Apr 2010 17:43 GMT
> >I find it helps to think of sugar and flour and their yummy products as
> >poison to me.  If you eat some and it doesn't hurt you then you think you
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> meal balances. For instance, I don't eat carbs by themselves and never let the
> portion of carbs exceed protein and vegetables.

So, what would you do when the office jerk is trying to shove that
piece of cake in your mouth?    Tell him it's OK, but you have to go
out and get some steak and vegs to go with it?

> I also don't include carbs in
> one set daily meal as the CAD or Heller diet advocates. Rather, I become
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Orlando

Seems to me scoping out the situation and making his judgement is
exactly what he did.  How many office cakes have you typically seen
that were that great?

I think Mike's real point is how annoying it is to have some people
around that insist you have to eat what they want you to eat.  Why
people do this remains a mystery, but I think Mike's answer to them
was a good one.
Orlando Enrique Fiol - 29 Apr 2010 18:19 GMT
>So, what would you do when the office jerk is trying to shove that
>piece of cake in your mouth?    Tell him it's OK, but you have to go
>out and get some steak and vegs to go with it?

Given the probable lack of quality in that office cake, I would have declined.

>Seems to me scoping out the situation and making his judgement is
>exactly what he did.  How many office cakes have you typically seen
>that were that great?

Not many.

>I think Mike's real point is how annoying it is to have some people
>around that insist you have to eat what they want you to eat.  Why
>people do this remains a mystery, but I think Mike's answer to them
>was a good one.

I agree and was never suggesting that Mike's answer should have been different.
He scoped out the situation and decided to decline the cake as I so often do. I
was just letting him know that in other cases when the carb is of good quality
or especially appetizing, he can probably have some without derailing his
success.

Orlando
Billy - 29 Apr 2010 21:06 GMT
> >So, what would you do when the office jerk is trying to shove that
> >piece of cake in your mouth?    Tell him it's OK, but you have to go
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Orlando

We're not going to open a confessional, or anything weird, are we?
Signature

- Billy
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Arn3lF5XSUg
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Zinn/HZinn_page.html

Doug Freyburger - 29 Apr 2010 22:48 GMT
> I understand how that all-or-nothing approach helps people, but it intimidates
> and discourages me. My goal in life is not to be the kind of eater who avoids
> carbs at all costs.

For some people specific foods or foods over some glycemic load do have
to be avoided at all costs or they get driven off the plan.

For some people they can eat anything on occasion and not get driven off
the plan.

Thinking you fall in one class or the other is just a guess.  It's
something that has to be tried and learned for certain by experiment.
And it's not just binary on or off.  There are shades of gray in between
that may need to be learned.
trader4@optonline.net - 30 Apr 2010 00:50 GMT
> > I understand how that all-or-nothing approach helps people, but it intimidates
> > and discourages me. My goal in life is not to be the kind of eater who avoids
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> And it's not just binary on or off.  There are shades of gray in between
> that may need to be learned.

I agree completely.  It also makes a big difference where you are in
terms of a plan like Atkins.   If you're only a month into it and have
50lbs more to lose it's a lot different than if you're at goal weight
and in maintenance.   In the first instance, you have a lot to lose,
(no pun) in terms of screwing up the whole thing.  In the latter case,
you know how your body reacts and a few days or a week of eating the
wrong stuff you can likely recover from without a long term screw-
up.   An example for me personally is when I'm traveling on vacation.
If I'm in Paris or Italy, while I still choose a lot of LC type food,
I'm also not going to deny myself some delicious desserts, some
lasagna, and pizza.

I think we are all on the same page here on this one.
mikesmith9999@hotmail.com - 30 Apr 2010 03:15 GMT
> > I understand how that all-or-nothing approach helps people, but it intimidates
> > and discourages me. My goal in life is not to be the kind of eater who avoids
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> And it's not just binary on or off.  There are shades of gray in between
> that may need to be learned.

I'm sure they did not mean wrong; they just don't know how much just
one piece of cake can screw up my plan. I don't trust myself yet to
eat that stuff yet. I'm sure I would have gotten more than one.
Possibly 3 or 4. After that, I would have gone to Tim Horton's and get
one or two of wonderful dougnuts. Then the water retention for a few
days. And then two bagles the next day... If I go ahead with a
dessert, I will be extremely selective and it will be on my own time
when I know I have the discipline to have only one piece, but a high-
quality one.
Orlando Enrique Fiol - 30 Apr 2010 04:18 GMT
>I'm sure they did not mean wrong; they just don't know how much just
>one piece of cake can screw up my plan. I don't trust myself yet to
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>when I know I have the discipline to have only one piece, but a high-
>quality one.

I'm very proud of you for being this honest with yourself and with us complete
strangers. It's unfortunately very easy to turn one piece of cake into a high-
carb binge lasting days, weeks or months. But, the other side is also true; I
know because I've been there. I've had that piece of cake, sometimes just a
bite, and continued on plan without backsliding. I just want you to know that
when and if you're ready, that option is always open to you if you think you
can handle it.

Orlando
mikesmith9999@hotmail.com - 30 Apr 2010 04:41 GMT
> mikesmith9...@hotmail.com <mikesmith9...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >I'm sure they did not mean wrong; they just don't know how much just
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Orlando

Thanks for your support, Orlando. Soon or late, I will try a piece of
these "foods of the devil". I'm going to my family in a few months.
They always have them. It's gonna be hard because I'm not the one who
will do the cooking. As much as possible, I will eat the food I know
will not hurt me. I expect people rising eyebrows on some of the
things I love to eat like banana with natural peanut butter.
Absolutely to avoid: Milk! It surely makes me overeat!
trader4@optonline.net - 30 Apr 2010 14:52 GMT
On Apr 29, 11:41 pm, "mikesmith9...@hotmail.com"
<mikesmith9...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> > mikesmith9...@hotmail.com <mikesmith9...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >I'm sure they did not mean wrong; they just don't know how much just
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> things I love to eat like banana with natural peanut butter.
> Absolutely to avoid: Milk! It surely makes me overeat!

There's also a lot of desserts besides cake and there are many that
are or can be made LC.   Also, I like the Breyers LC ice cream.  It
does contain some sugar alcohols, which is another issue we, but if
used in moderation, it can be fine.  An example would be some fresh
strawberries with a couple scoops of vanilla.
FOB - 30 Apr 2010 18:04 GMT
I recently got hooked on sugar free popsicles, a nice treat with negligible
carbs/calories.

| There's also a lot of desserts besides cake and there are many that
| are or can be made LC.   Also, I like the Breyers LC ice cream.  It
| does contain some sugar alcohols, which is another issue we, but if
| used in moderation, it can be fine.  An example would be some fresh
| strawberries with a couple scoops of vanilla.
Billy - 30 Apr 2010 19:36 GMT
> I recently got hooked on sugar free popsicles, a nice treat with negligible
> carbs/calories.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> | used in moderation, it can be fine.  An example would be some fresh
> | strawberries with a couple scoops of vanilla.

And no Aspartame, right?

ASPARTAME (NUTRASWEET®) ADDICTION
http://www.dorway.com/tldaddic.html
Signature

- Billy
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Arn3lF5XSUg
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Zinn/HZinn_page.html

FOB - 30 Apr 2010 21:17 GMT
Splenda instead.

| And no Aspartame, right?
|
| ASPARTAME (NUTRASWEET®) ADDICTION
| http://www.dorway.com/tldaddic.html
trader4@optonline.net - 30 Apr 2010 22:16 GMT
> Splenda instead.
>
> | And no Aspartame, right?
> |
> | ASPARTAME (NUTRASWEET®) ADDICTION
> |http://www.dorway.com/tldaddic.html

Interesting, I'll have to look for them.  Who makes the SF popsicles?
FOB - 30 Apr 2010 22:29 GMT
There are several kinds, my favorites are Ice Pix from Kroger, they show a
few carbs but I think those are from sugar alcohols which make them softer
than the ones with just Splenda.

|| Splenda instead.
||
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
|
| Interesting, I'll have to look for them.  Who makes the SF popsicles?
Cheri - 12 May 2010 00:41 GMT
>> I recently got hooked on sugar free popsicles, a nice treat with
>> negligible
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> ASPARTAME (NUTRASWEET®) ADDICTION
> http://www.dorway.com/tldaddic.html

Aspartame works fine for me.

Cheri
Billy - 12 May 2010 06:28 GMT
> >> I recently got hooked on sugar free popsicles, a nice treat with
> >> negligible
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Cheri

So you recommend them?
Signature

- Billy
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Arn3lF5XSUg
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Zinn/HZinn_page.html

Cheri - 12 May 2010 14:27 GMT
>> >> I recently got hooked on sugar free popsicles, a nice treat with
>> >> negligible
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> So you recommend them?

I eat LC treats once in awhile. They don't cause me to binge or anything,
but can't speak for others.

Cheri
Billy - 12 May 2010 17:35 GMT
> >> >> I recently got hooked on sugar free popsicles, a nice treat with
> >> >> negligible
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Cheri

I find the claim of addiction silly for aspartame, but I do have a knee
jerk reaction to man made chemicals in my food. Just an idiocentricity
on my part, I presume.

Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine found that
individuals with mood disorders are particularly sensitive to this
artificial sweetener, and its use in this population should be
discouraged.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspartame#Safety_controversy

With all the other problems in the world, this would seem to be minor.
Signature

- Billy
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Arn3lF5XSUg
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Zinn/HZinn_page.html

Doug Freyburger - 12 May 2010 19:37 GMT
>> I eat LC treats once in awhile. They don't cause me to binge or anything,
>> but can't speak for others.

With the furor over aspartame who'd think the majority of people have
some issue with it.  No, only a small minority.

> I find the claim of addiction silly for aspartame,

You have not yet encountered someone who gets a couple of weeks of
headaches worse than caffeine withdrawal when they stop taking
aspartame.  That happens with my wife.  She's in the small minority who
have problems with aspartame.

> With all the other problems in the world, this would seem to be minor.

It happens enough that Dr A included it in the Q-n-A section of his 1999
edition.  It occurs often enough to consider it a suspect when there are
problems.  I have no idea what percentage that is, probably closer to 1%
than to any higher number.
trader4@optonline.net - 13 May 2010 14:11 GMT
> >> I eat LC treats once in awhile. They don't cause me to binge or anything,
> >> but can't speak for others.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> problems.  I have no idea what percentage that is, probably closer to 1%
> than to any higher number.

What exactly did Atkins say about aspartame addiction or withdrawl?  I
only recall him saying that from his clinical experience he believed
it could inhibit weight loss in some people and that he prefered other
artificial sweetners.

Regarding the alleged evils of aspartame, using Wikipedia, which
anyone with any agenda can freely edit, is not a compelling source.
In particular, the study cited that showed an adverse reaction in
psychiatric patients was a study of a whopping 14 patients, including
the control group.  They halted it because of alleged adverse
reactions, which means it's based on the results of just a very few
individuals.    It would seem to me that if aspartame was causing this
severe of a reaction in mental patients with depression, it would be
widely observed and acknowledged by others by now.
mikesmith9999@hotmail.com - 01 May 2010 01:49 GMT
> I recently got hooked on sugar free popsicles, a nice treat with negligible
> carbs/calories.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> | used in moderation, it can be fine.  An example would be some fresh
> | strawberries with a couple scoops of vanilla.

How about those sugarless"fudges"? I'm not sure of the word in
English. It's frozen chocolate milk on a stick. It's easy to have the
whole container of six.
FOB - 01 May 2010 03:13 GMT
I haven't seen any of those.  We call them fudgesicles here.

| How about those sugarless"fudges"? I'm not sure of the word in
| English. It's frozen chocolate milk on a stick. It's easy to have the
| whole container of six.
mikesmith9999@hotmail.com - 01 May 2010 03:26 GMT
> I haven't seen any of those.  We call them fudgesicles here.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> | English. It's frozen chocolate milk on a stick. It's easy to have the
> | whole container of six.

I have not had one in about 16 years. They were pretty good back then.
They possibly got better.
Doug Freyburger - 03 May 2010 20:25 GMT
> | How about those sugarless"fudges"? I'm not sure of the word in
> | English. It's frozen chocolate milk on a stick. It's easy to have the
> | whole container of six.
>
> I haven't seen any of those.  We call them fudgesicles here.

In the US the low fat fudgesicles tend to be filled with chemicals.
That's a hint that the sugarless ones might be made with chemicals as
well.  Read the labels and go in knowing what you're eating - I am not
anti-chemical but I am against not having any idea what your food is
made of because you forgot to read the label.
Doug Freyburger - 03 May 2010 20:33 GMT
> Thanks for your support, Orlando. Soon or late, I will try a piece of
> these "foods of the devil". I'm going to my family in a few months.

Atkins is a process that teaches you what foods your body can and can't
handle.  Whether you're on Atkins or not I suggest looking up the "carb
ladder" on the www.atkinscenter.com web site - It suggests what order to
try ingredients as you progress through the phases and experiment to
find you're body's limits.  The "carb ladder" lists whole grains near
the end so refined grains and added sugar or off the ladder on the far
end.

> Absolutely to avoid: Milk! It surely makes me overeat!

For me it's wheat that is my worst binge trigger.  Feed me some wheat
and I end up eating everything in reach.  Plus corn as a more subtle
slippery slope item.  Feed me some and the next day I'm more hungry.
Plus sugar alcohols don't work for me.  If I have sugar alcohol candy
the next day I sneak real candy.  Yet I can handle tiny amounts like a
stick of gum.
mikesmith9999@hotmail.com - 02 May 2010 02:16 GMT
I had one large chocolate bar yesterday and two small ones today! lol.
It did not provide me the usual comfort, though. It even bothered my
stomach. I felt a bit like throwing up. It seems to be so heavy. Yet,
I could have easily stomached 5 bars Jersey Milks last year! Now two
is huge!!! I will don't think I will ever have a whole bar again. One
or two pieces will probably be enough.
Walter Bushell - 04 May 2010 14:07 GMT
In article
<f72714cb-7929-413e-8c54-0c606e98fd38@a34g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,

> I had one large chocolate bar yesterday and two small ones today! lol.
> It did not provide me the usual comfort, though. It even bothered my
> stomach. I felt a bit like throwing up. It seems to be so heavy. Yet,
> I could have easily stomached 5 bars Jersey Milks last year! Now two
> is huge!!! I will don't think I will ever have a whole bar again. One
> or two pieces will probably be enough.

This comes as no surprise.

OTOH, some people handle sugar like alcoholics handle alcohol. One drink
and its a bender. (Though not indeed for all alcoholics.)

Signature

A computer without Microsoft is like a chocolate cake without mustard.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.