The urging of wheat-free diets by New Agers, the
politically correct, and their sub-lackeys, the
socially fashionable, as a cure for the allegedly
excessive aggressiveness of the grain-eating peoples
of the European and Caucasian spaces, which is blamed
for the woes of modern civilization, while actually
being responsible for many of its highest
achievements, is unvarnished racism. It is an
attempt to characterize as chemical pathology a diet-
influenced behavioral characteristic which is simply
a tool, to be used for good or bad under the control
of higher processes. This is in keeping with the
current mode, and the core mode of the lackeys
identified above, of avoiding overt conflict on
ethical issues and instead attempting to engineer
materialization of their goal states as faits
accomplis by attempting to subvert the alleged
tendencies of their chosen opposition and denying
free will. This is not only racist (it is the same
as claiming that the products of African culture are
good for sports and sex but not much else, or that
Asians are devious and good at maths), it
demonstrates a broader contempt and self-loathing for
all of humanity. For their dysfunction, we (not just
the European peoples, but all peoples) are to suffer
cultural vandalism against hard-won advances in the
human condition. Done by people who so clearly
wallow in self-indulgence of their own unprocessed
hurts and fail to offer a superior vision of the
human future. This will not stand.
Sie duerfen uns weiter am Arsch lecken, biss es ihnen
schmeckt.
Ils peuvent continuer a nous donner des baisers a nos
culs.
They can continue to lick our a.ses until their
mouths turn brown.
Ooooo my, that was aggressive, wasn't it ?
This content was censored by Google when I tried to
post it via their service.
Xray586 - 11 Jan 2004 04:29 GMT
Now I've seen everything!