> >Carb Fit is part of the Hain Celestial Group. These are the same
> >folks who produce Westsoy Soy Slender. I think I should have
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Em
>Oh ack! Now did those cookies contain erythritol and inulin like
>the ones I got the other day? (They don't have two different
>formulas, do they?)
Yes, they do have erythritol and inulin. I've eaten other products with
those ingredients and didn't get the same BG rise that I got with these
cookies, though, so I don't blame them. But the second ingredient is
"evaporated cane juice" -- i.e., sugar.
Ingredients: natural palm oil, evaporated cane juice, whey protein
concentrate, chocolate chips (evaporated cane juice, chocolate, cocoa
butter, soy lecithin, vanilla), corn starch, erythritol, egg whites, wheat
flour, inulin (a natural extract of chicory), rice flour, dried egg whites,
natural flavor (vanilla, butterscotch, butter, vegetable glycerin,
vegetable gum), leavening (baking soda, cream of tartar, monocalcium
phosphate), salt.
Serving size: 2 cookies
Cal: 110
Fat cal: 70
Carb: 12 g
Dietary fiber: 3 g
Sugars: 4 g
Erythritol: 2 g
Protein: 3 g
I was leary of some of the ingredients, so I only ate one, and the increase
in BG was almost the same as with a regular cookie.
Em
Jean B. - 15 Jan 2004 10:13 GMT
> >Oh ack! Now did those cookies contain erythritol and inulin like
> >the ones I got the other day? (They don't have two different
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> I was leary of some of the ingredients, so I only ate one, and the increase
> in BG was almost the same as with a regular cookie.
Yes, I saw that "evaporated cane juice". To me, this seems to be
a fancy name for sugar, and the cookies are lower carb but not
really low carb. Seems to me also that if you want to consume
that many carbs, you can have a "real" cookie--and most of us
elect not to squander our carb allotments that way. Oh well.
Anyway, last night I was thinking that while it's exciting to see
all the new products and ingredients, they are beginning to make
me nervous. If I eat junk food, even if it is LC junk food, that
is unnecessary calories. Ditto if I get back into eating
desserts, thinking I need one after dinner. I have to be able to
view these things as rare treats--not as something I am entitled
to every day.

Signature
Jean B.
Ignoramus12172 - 15 Jan 2004 13:49 GMT
>> >Oh ack! Now did those cookies contain erythritol and inulin like
>> >the ones I got the other day? (They don't have two different
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> view these things as rare treats--not as something I am entitled
> to every day.
I agree.
If I see a product that contains "cane juice", I know two things:
1) it really contains sugar
2) the manufacturer is a liar. Honest ones would just say sugar
instead of trying to mislead me.
Hence, I do not buy anything with "cane juice".
i
Jean B. - 15 Jan 2004 15:32 GMT
> I agree.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> i
I wonder why we are seeing that ingredient now? Is it because
manufacturers know some of us don't want to see the word "sugar"?
Is it an attempt to rehabilitate the product by renaming it?
(Like prunes new being called dried plums?) I guess it does rule
out beet sugar, but still...

Signature
Jean B.
Ignoramus12172 - 15 Jan 2004 15:38 GMT
>> I agree.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I wonder why we are seeing that ingredient now? Is it because
> manufacturers know some of us don't want to see the word "sugar"?
I would think so, yes.
> Is it an attempt to rehabilitate the product by renaming it?
> (Like prunes new being called dried plums?) I guess it does rule
> out beet sugar, but still...
I think that it's just simply wanting to sell sweet stuff (because
that's what people buy), without being honest about it, that's all.
i