Hey JBA ---
To my mind, the word "full" does not be the same thing as the word
"satisfied".
The reason I mention this is because I used to eat until I couldn't hold any
more food, and I was truly "full". These days, I eat until I'm no long
hungry or satisfied. Being "full" is scary to me because that seems like
the road back....
Just something to think about. I agree with your comment...it just a matter
of terms...
:: ...that people who follow a LC WOE can stuff themselves silly with
:: artery-clogging foods and still lose weight.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
::
:: JBA
Cheri - 14 Jan 2004 01:06 GMT
You're right about that. There is a huge difference. If I ate till I was
full (mentally) I'd never quit eating. :-)
--
Cheri
Type 2, no meds for now.
>Hey JBA ---
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>Just something to think about. I agree with your comment...it just a matter
>of terms...
Jumping Bomb Angel - 14 Jan 2004 02:36 GMT
> Hey JBA ---
>
> To my mind, the word "full" does not be the same thing as the word
> "satisfied".
True dat. In my mind, though, full doesn't equate stuffed...full equals
satisfied. It's the same difference.
JBA
--
**Jumping Bomb Angel**
Remove the "payme" to e-mail me.
AIM: tiffanygalyn78
Y!M: tiffanygalyn
ICQ: 211699658
Duane Storey - 14 Jan 2004 23:45 GMT
you know, my portions are so much smaller now after doing Atkin's..
Even if I go out for lunch, and have a carb meal once a month.. I'd
get a big burger and a salad, and in the old days, plow the whole
thing back.. Now, I'll eat half the burger and the salad, and feel
satisfied.. I just don't eat as much as I used to.
> ...that people who follow a LC WOE can stuff themselves silly with
> artery-clogging foods and still lose weight.
** This is complete crap. I haven't lost one lb. on Atkins after that
first 46 lb. loss over 2 YEARS AGO! I'm still stalled and completely
disgusted. My Cholesterol is still under 200.
> Because of one silly misconception I've seen friends overeat a lot of LC
> foods thinking that somehow those calories will magically disappear along
> with the weight they want to lose. They somehow forget to stop eating when
> they're full...and to them it doesn't matter, because someone told them that
> "on Atkins, you can eat all the beef and butter you can handle and STILL
> lose weight!"
** One of the Atkins books I have pretty much makes that claim.
> It's kind of sad to see, especially now that I know how the WOE works.
>
> JBA
** Tell us how it works.....
Wysong........
|| ...that people who follow a LC WOE can stuff themselves silly with
|| artery-clogging foods and still lose weight.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
| ** One of the Atkins books I have pretty much makes that claim.
| Wysong........
I haven't seen this. Dr. Atkins preaches moderation, with the only
exception I'm aware of being during his two-week induction period.
I really am sorry that it's not working for you, but your lack of success
doesn't invalidate the successes of thousands of people (including me). It
must be terribly frustrating to be stalled for that long. What are you
eating now, Wysong? Have you stuck with the low-carb plan even through the
frustration? How have you been handling it?
I found recently that I'm one of those insulin-resistant people who has to
count calories as well as carbs. Certainly this is not the way it is for
everybody (before everybody starts screaming "starvation mode" and
"metabolism shutdown" <g>), but I think we all have to find what works best
for us. Our bodies all work the same, but each is an individual also.
I had not lost weight for the past year; even gained some. Then I reduced
my calories last month and lowered my carbs even more to accommodate my
newly diagnosed diabetes, and lo and behold ... I started losing like crazy
again!

Signature
Peter
website: http://users.thelink.net/marengo
Jumping Bomb Angel - 14 Jan 2004 02:35 GMT
> ** Tell us how it works.....
>
> Wysong........
A not-so-famous man once said "eat less, exercise more."
That's how this WOE works. But then again, YMMV. ;)
JBA
--
**Jumping Bomb Angel**
Remove the "payme" to e-mail me.
AIM: tiffanygalyn78
Y!M: tiffanygalyn
ICQ: 211699658
Dawn Taylor - 14 Jan 2004 02:57 GMT
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:35:33 -0600, "Jumping Bomb Angel"
<hellosugar@goodbyespam.comcast.net> announced in front of God and
everybody:
>> ** Tell us how it works.....
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>That's how this WOE works.
For more than a few of us, it's rather more complicated than that.
>But then again, YMMV. ;)
Indeed.
Dawn
Preesi - 14 Jan 2004 03:05 GMT
>> ** Tell us how it works.....
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> JBA
Just so I know Im getting this right...
You still eat at DIET level calories to lose weight.
You eat low carbs so you get into fat burning ketosis,
You eat low carbs to also reduce your caloric intake.
You eat more fat so the deficit of calories in carbs
doesnt seem like you are on a diet and you arent hungry.
You eat low carbs to keep your insulin level and you furthermore
dont wanna cheat.
You exercise to further pump up your weghtloss
How'd I do?

Signature
preesi
~~~My Mom and her Sister skip cheerily, arm and arm thru the crowded Mall
loudly singing "Sisters, Sisters" from the movie 'White Christmas' and you
wonder why Im a weirdo?~~~
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/preesi/Portal.htm
(All 5 Of My Sites Under One Easy To Use Link)
http://www.PetitionOnline.com/Splenda1/petition.html
(Sign the Low Carb Splenda Petition-Get Liquid Splenda on the Market!)
http://www.petitiononline.com/KeepTWBS/petition.html
(A PETITION TO STOP THE CANCELLATION OF THE WAYNE BRADY SHOW)
Jean B. - 14 Jan 2004 14:24 GMT
> >> ** Tell us how it works.....
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> preesi
Haven't some recently cited studies claimed you can eat more when
you LC? Of course, this does not mean we can pig out. Also, it
seems, per usual, that this varies from person to person.

Signature
Jean B.
The Queen of Cans and Jars - 14 Jan 2004 02:51 GMT
> I haven't lost one lb. on Atkins after that first 46 lb. loss over 2 YEARS
> AGO! I'm still stalled and completely disgusted. My Cholesterol is
> still under 200.
clearly, ma'am, you're a freak. you should just give up and stay fat.
you're going to die anyhow, so why worry about it?
> ...that people who follow a LC WOE can stuff themselves silly with
> artery-clogging foods and still lose weight.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> JBA
Well, so far I've been one of those who can "eat all you handle" and still
lose weight. It's just that the amount I can handle is overall quite a bit
less than it used to be, and the feeling of fullness and my actual caloric
needs seem to be more in tune with each other.

Signature
Michelle Levin
http://www.mindspring.com/~lunachick
I have only 3 flaws. My first flaw is thinking that I only have 3 flaws.
PJx - 14 Jan 2004 11:20 GMT
>> ...that people who follow a LC WOE can stuff themselves silly with
>> artery-clogging foods and still lose weight.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>less than it used to be, and the feeling of fullness and my actual caloric
>needs seem to be more in tune with each other.
Me too. On Atkins, I consumed at least 1000 more calories a day and
steadily lost weight over 3 months. But I didn't cheat on the carbs
by eating more salads and veges than Atkins allowed on induction. And
I've never had a low carb candy bar.
PJ
PJ
> What SHOULD be simply said is that LCers are able to eat many foods that are
> *more filling* because of the fat and/or protein content so that they stay
> full instead of being hungry and binging 20 minutes later (a la the
> "low-fat" diet).
The above statement is a misconception! Some things a low fat dieter
might eat would be whole foods, not processed. 1 little 2 oz. whole
grain bun, is enough to keep one from being hungry for hours. That
doesn't hold true for 2 ounces of cheese! Whole raw vegetables, grains,
unrefined flours and sugars all keep the body busy digesting, feeling
not hungry.
I think I am one that the LC is not working for. I have been faithfully
following Atkin's since the end of October, eating ~1400 calories a day,
~16 grams of carbs, and exercising twice daily (each session 40-60
minutes) I'm down 4.5 pounds. I said I'd give LC a chance till the end
of January before I bail. I really thought I would have succeeded.

Signature
Judy
197.5/193/160 5' 11"
Start Date: 10/26/03
Some things a low fat dieter
| might eat would be whole foods, not processed. 1 little 2 oz. whole
| grain bun, is enough to keep one from being hungry for hours. That
| doesn't hold true for 2 ounces of cheese! Whole raw vegetables, grains,
| unrefined flours and sugars all keep the body busy digesting, feeling
| not hungry.
This is untrue. For most people, exactly the opposite is true. Fat is
metabolized much more slowly than carbohyrates' tjos [revemts the insulin
spikes and drops associated with eating sugars and starches. I frequently
eat 2 oz of cheese for lunch along with 10 medium-sized olives, and feel
satiated all afternoon until dinner. When ost [people eat starches, they
are metabolized rapidly and get hungry again within 1 or 2 hours when the
insulin drops.
| I think I am one that the LC is not working for. I have been faithfully
| following Atkin's since the end of October, eating ~1400 calories a day,
| ~16 grams of carbs, and exercising twice daily (each session 40-60
| minutes) I'm down 4.5 pounds. I said I'd give LC a chance till the end
| of January before I bail. I really thought I would have succeeded.
Where does Atkins sy to limit your calories to <1400/day? This would be
about right for you if your current weight is around 140 pounds. If this is
true, you will lose slowly on any diet because you are close to your goal
weight. You rate of loss on any "diet" depends on several factors,
including your current weight, exercise (building muscle can cause the
scales not to move very fast), level of committment and whether or not you
cheat. You're right, a net loss f 4.5 pounds in the first 2.5 months on
Atkins is exceptionally small. Most people lose this much rapidly in the
frst few days. Have you posted your menues so they might be analyzed to see
where you are making you rmistakes?
It is possible that Atkins just isn't for you. There are many people who
just aren't willing to let go of the old "carbs-are-good-fat-is-bad" mantra,
and these will never succeed in low-carb eating. They invariably think that
something is bad for them so they don't eat what they should; or think that
it's ok to eat something carby (like the 2 oz whole grain bun) so they eat
that instead of 2 oz of cheese -- then wonder why Atkins doesn't work for
them.
Good luck to you; i wish you well in your weight loss whatever plan you
choose.

Signature
Peter
website: http://users.thelink.net/marengo
HeadRusch - 14 Jan 2004 16:56 GMT
> This is untrue. For most people, exactly the opposite is true. Fat is
> metabolized much more slowly than carbohyrates' tjos [revemts the insulin
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> are metabolized rapidly and get hungry again within 1 or 2 hours when the
> insulin drops.
2 oz of cheese and 10 olives? If thats not starvation then I dont know what
is....
Mirek Fidler - 14 Jan 2004 14:09 GMT
> doesn't hold true for 2 ounces of cheese! Whole raw vegetables, grains,
> unrefined flours and sugars all keep the body busy digesting, feeling
> not hungry.
Well, I cannot speak for whole grains and unrefined sugars (I can hardly
remember how thay taste :), but eating some raw vegatables makes me
hungry within minutes - even if I am not hungry before.
> I think I am one that the LC is not working for. I have been faithfully
> following Atkin's since the end of October, eating ~1400 calories a day,
> ~16 grams of carbs, and exercising twice daily (each session 40-60
> minutes) I'm down 4.5 pounds. I said I'd give LC a chance till the end
> of January before I bail. I really thought I would have succeeded.
OTOH, I believe that LC is not for everybody. YMMV.
Mirek
The Queen of Cans and Jars - 14 Jan 2004 14:35 GMT
> I think I am one that the LC is not working for. I have been faithfully
> following Atkin's since the end of October, eating ~1400 calories a day,
> ~16 grams of carbs, and exercising twice daily (each session 40-60
> minutes) I'm down 4.5 pounds. I said I'd give LC a chance till the end
> of January before I bail. I really thought I would have succeeded.
it sounds to me like you're not eating enough, especially if you're
doing that much exercise. you should also consider upping your carbs.
atkins isn't about staying at less than 20g of carbs forever.
also, the less you have to lose, the longer it takes.
Sam Hain - 14 Jan 2004 14:44 GMT
> > I think I am one that the LC is not working for. I have been faithfully
> following Atkin's since the end of October, eating ~1400 calories a day,
> ~16 grams of carbs, and exercising twice daily (each session 40-60
> minutes) I'm down 4.5 pounds. I said I'd give LC a chance till the end
> of January before I bail. I really thought I would have succeeded.
maybe you should be eating more calories? When I was tracking through
fit day, I was usually eating anywhere from 2,500 to 3,000 a day, and
with exercise 4 to 6 times a week, maintained steady weight loss
art
lc 6/2/03
6'3"
280/235/235
14% bf
Roger Zoul - 14 Jan 2004 16:26 GMT
:: Jumping Bomb Angel wrote:
::
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
:: grains, unrefined flours and sugars all keep the body busy
:: digesting, feeling not hungry.
Keeping the body busy digesting stuff that will cause blood sugar swings
will make you hungry.
:: I think I am one that the LC is not working for. I have been
:: faithfully following Atkin's since the end of October, eating ~1400
:: calories a day, ~16 grams of carbs, and exercising twice daily (each
:: session 40-60 minutes) I'm down 4.5 pounds. I said I'd give LC a
:: chance till the end of January before I bail. I really thought I
:: would have succeeded.
who knows. You might try to gain a better understanding of how LC works.
Maybe that will allow you some adjustments. You might try increasing
calories a bit, right now you're at about 7x bodyweight (shoot for 9 or 10).
Also, upping carbs may help, too.
GoAZ_Wildcats - 14 Jan 2004 17:40 GMT
> I think I am one that the LC is not working for. I have been faithfully
> following Atkin's since the end of October, eating ~1400 calories a day,
> ~16 grams of carbs, and exercising twice daily (each session 40-60
> minutes) I'm down 4.5 pounds. I said I'd give LC a chance till the end
> of January before I bail. I really thought I would have succeeded.
Judy, I am new to this forum, but not to LC. My early days of LC'ing,
I came off of a low fat diet weighing almost 190 lbs. What I found was
a bit of a difficult transition in that I wasn't getting enough
calories. I was keeping my carb count low, but also my calorie count.
So, I upped my calories to about 2000 a day and maintained 20 - 25 net
carbs. Not only was I no longer hungry, the pounds began to fall off.
Atkins
187/139/140
DBrophy479 - 14 Jan 2004 22:24 GMT
Judy wrote: >I think I am one that the LC is not working for. I have been
faithfully
>following Atkin's since the end of October, eating ~1400 calories a day,
>~16 grams of carbs, and exercising twice daily (each session 40-60
>minutes) I'm down 4.5 pounds. I said I'd give LC a chance till the end
>of January before I bail. I really thought I would have succeeded.
Judy,
I agree with those who suggest that you're probably not eating enough.It's
the first thing to try,anyway.
Also,your comment about the 2 oz of chesse vs a bun leads me to believe
you're hungry. :)
I'd try around 2000-2200 calories,and don't skimp on fats--olive oil,butter.
Spend some carbs on avocados,cream cheese,macadamia nuts,etc.
This is assuming you're getting most of your carbs from vegetables.
I'd give that 2 or 3 weeks and see what happens.
You can eat 20 gms a day of carbs,by the way.I'm as metabolically resistant as
they come,and I can lose on 20 a day.
Chances are you could up the carbs,too,but I personally would wait because I
like to change only one thing at a time.It makes figuring things out easier.
But it's entirely possible that you'll lose better at 25,30,35 or more
carbs/day.
Good luck,
Dave
Harold Groot - 15 Jan 2004 05:54 GMT
>I think I am one that the LC is not working for. I have been faithfully
>following Atkin's since the end of October, eating ~1400 calories a day,
>~16 grams of carbs, and exercising twice daily (each session 40-60
>minutes) I'm down 4.5 pounds. I said I'd give LC a chance till the end
>of January before I bail. I really thought I would have succeeded.
There was an article in our local paper which included the results of
a study on exercise and what people ate. The main thrust was to
examine whether people who began to exercise also changed what they
ate, but it included an interesting bit on how much people might be
willing to fool themselves.
People in the study were keeping "food diaries" of what they ate, and
at various times during the study the actual amounts were also being
measured and recorded by outside observers.
On the average, men under-reported what they ate by 200 calories per
day. On the average, women under-reported what they ate by 700
calories per day.
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/7698098.htm
These are just averages - undoubtedly some people reported accurately,
while others under-reported by even higher amounts. But it's
something to keep in mind. I know that when I "eyeball" amounts I'm
not nearly as accurate as when I actually measure them.