Weight Loss Forum / Low Carb / January 2004
High Calorie question.
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Matt Scott - 20 Jan 2004 04:08 GMT Hi all,
Have a question that is sort of OT (sort of not as well).
I made up a bowl of boiled eggs that I mashed up with a fork and added some butter, mayonaise and chives. I then stirred and put in the fridge overnight. I then went and calculated how many caloried this concoction was. It was extremely high. Over 1000 calories for 100 grams of the stuff! (But damn it tastes good!).
Question? Will something high in calories (like this stuff) fulfill me the same as something that is high in size but much lower in calories (say like a big bowl of veggies)? Just wondering...
It seems a bit funny really - I ate 100 grams (of the egg mix) for breakfast and 100 grams (of the egg mix) for lunch and here I am at 5pm starving away... gonna eat something a bit lower in calories but am interested by this topic... thats all :-)
Cheers Matt.
FOB - 20 Jan 2004 04:23 GMT How could you get 1000 calories for 100 grams, that is more than any of the components, butter has 717 calories/100 grams, mayo about the same and eggs 210?
In news:400ca9eb$1@clear.net.nz, Matt Scott <scottmj@blah.clear.net.nz> stated
| Hi all, | [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] | Cheers | Matt. JC Der Koenig - 20 Jan 2004 04:36 GMT He's a mathemagician?
 Signature JC
Eat less, exercise more.
--
> How could you get 1000 calories for 100 grams, that is more than any of the > components, butter has 717 calories/100 grams, mayo about the same and eggs [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > | Cheers > | Matt. Lemon Sky - 20 Jan 2004 05:00 GMT I'm pretty sure calories don't matter. Since I started Atkins, all I eat is bacon, eggs, butter and cheese. And lots of them! I've lost 15 pounds and I feel great (except my chest hurts sometimes).
> He's a mathemagician? > [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > > | Cheers > > | Matt. Kevin Gowen - 20 Jan 2004 04:53 GMT > I'm pretty sure calories don't matter. Since I started Atkins, all I eat is > bacon, eggs, butter and cheese. And lots of them! I've lost 15 pounds and I > feel great (except my chest hurts sometimes). That's because of the damage all that fatty food is doing to your heart.
Also, stop top-posting you goofy bastard/bitch. (I cannot tell if you are male or female from your name)
Ta ta, K
Stretch - 20 Jan 2004 09:48 GMT FOAD, troll <plonk>
> I'm pretty sure calories don't matter. Since I started Atkins, all I > eat is bacon, eggs, butter and cheese. And lots of them! I've lost [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] >>>> Cheers >>>> Matt. Kevin Gowen - 20 Jan 2004 15:39 GMT > FOAD, troll <plonk> Haven't you already plonked me? Maybe there is something wrong with your newsreader. That might also explain your top posting.
Ta ta, K
PJx - 20 Jan 2004 14:07 GMT Hey lemonsky.
The amount of calories I eat doesn't matter for me either. I still lose weight on a very high calorie diet. BUT, there are many others that swear that it does and they make of research findings that it will damage the heart. Just ignore them, for they know not what they do.
PJ
>I'm pretty sure calories don't matter. Since I started Atkins, all I eat is >bacon, eggs, butter and cheese. And lots of them! I've lost 15 pounds and I [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] >> > | Cheers >> > | Matt. Jenny - 20 Jan 2004 14:07 GMT FOB,
Long term, you'll do a whole lot better snacking on fiber-filled lower calories low carb foods rather than extremely high calorie low carb foods.
Why?
1. Fiber filled low carb foods (like veggies, sunflower seeds, bran crackers, etc) will help keep your digestive system from plugging up. The longer you are on this diet, the more you will appreciate this.
2. Fiber filled foods have all kinds of other nutrients which your body needs.
3. Calories do count. If you weigh a lot, you might not notice this at first, but as your weight loss continues and you get closer to your goal, most people stall out unless they watch their calories.
4. You'll do a whole lot better on maintenance if you've learned to eat less caloric foods rather than high caloric foods for snacking.
-- Jenny - Low Carbing for 4 years. At goal for weight. Type 2 diabetes, hba1c 5.2. Cut the carbs to respond to my email address!
Low carb facts and figures, my weight-loss photos, tips, recipes, strategies for dealing with diabetes and more at http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/
Looking for help controlling your blood sugar? Visit http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/Newly%20Diagnosed.htm
> Hi all, > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > Cheers > Matt. Roger Zoul - 20 Jan 2004 17:47 GMT :: FOB, I don't think you meant to address this to FOB. FOB made a valid point in response to the OP (I didn't check the numbers but the point seems valid).
:: Long term, you'll do a whole lot better snacking on fiber-filled :: lower calories low carb foods rather than extremely high calorie low [quoted text clipped - 52 lines] ::: Cheers ::: Matt. FOB - 20 Jan 2004 21:56 GMT Where in this thread did I say I snacked on anything? My post simply pointed out the strange results the OP got in attempting to calculate the calorie content of his egg, butter, mayo mixture. Maybe you meant your reply to be to his post??
In news:400d3700$0$15603$61fed72c@news.rcn.com, Jenny <lottadatacarbs@hotmail.com> stated
| FOB, | [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] | Looking for help controlling your blood sugar? | Visit http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/Newly%20Diagnosed.htm Jenny - 21 Jan 2004 14:17 GMT FOB I must have confused you with the Original Poster. Sorry!
-- Jenny - Low Carbing for 4 years. At goal for weight. Type 2 diabetes, hba1c 5.2. Cut the carbs to respond to my email address!
Low carb facts and figures, my weight-loss photos, tips, recipes, strategies for dealing with diabetes and more at http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/
Looking for help controlling your blood sugar? Visit http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/Newly%20Diagnosed.htm
> Where in this thread did I say I snacked on anything? My post simply > pointed out the strange results the OP got in attempting to calculate the [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > | Looking for help controlling your blood sugar? > | Visit http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/Newly%20Diagnosed.htm DigitalVinyl - 20 Jan 2004 14:36 GMT Atkins repeatedly says that calories are not as important as the balance of carbs, fat, protein. I know people talk about reducing calories here, but Atkins book doesn't mention watching calories at all, just carbs. And he was staunchly against the traditional calories in-calorie out=weight loss mentality. The important thing is to not be hungry. If you are hungry then you should be eating. If you are walking around hungry then you are on a more traditional starve-yourself-a-little diet and you will lose lean muscle mass instead of just adipose(fatty) tissue. You should eat till full not stuffed and when hungry snack.
Oddly enough I've lost weight after my 3000 calorie days yet gained a little after 2000 calorie days. COnfusing? That's because we are focusing on calories, which Atkins didn't do. On those 3000 calorie days my fat-to-carb was betweeen 10 and 18. (10x more fat grams than carbs). On my 2000 day my ratio was 8, and I gained. Atkins says the higher the ratio the more ketosis will be induced. And that is the goal of Atkins, not to reduce your caloric intake, but to induce ketosis and not the loss of lean tissue. The fats & protein in the diet will satiate hunger and will naturally control your appetite and eliminate carb cravings. This will allow you to have a normal appetite instead of an over-revved carb-addict one.
>Hi all, > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] >Cheers >Matt. DiGiTAL_ViNYL (no email)
Ignoramus1390 - 20 Jan 2004 15:27 GMT > Hi all, > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > same as something that is high in size but much lower in calories (say like > a big bowl of veggies)? Just wondering... it depends... I easily could eat a pound of stuff like that in one sitting.
I would say, fill yourself up with vegetables first, and then eat your tasty concoction.
> It seems a bit funny really - I ate 100 grams (of the egg mix) for breakfast > and 100 grams (of the egg mix) for lunch and here I am at 5pm starving > away... gonna eat something a bit lower in calories but am interested by > this topic... thats all :-) Calories are important.
i 223/174/180
Matt Scott - 20 Jan 2004 20:12 GMT > > Hi all, > > [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > i > 223/174/180 Cheers for the replies all,
I think I've figured out that I should just take it in moderation. I've been happily maintaining for several years now and never really gave this topic much thought.
On a side note. I've gone with a very high calorie diet over the last 2-3 years while low-carbing and maintained a rather suitable weight. Over the last 2.5 weeks I have reduced my caloric intake to 10-12 calories per pound of weight (while continuing low-carbing) and have noticed a dramatic loss in weight. Quite interesting methinks... The investigations continue :-)
Cheers Matt
|
|
|