 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers WeightAdviser.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Weight Loss Forum / Low Carb / January 2004Atkins says NOT true about changing position on fats
Just got this from the Atkins email list... We want to assure you that when you follow the Atkins Nutritional Approach (ANA), the consumption of all forms of natural fat is perfectly safe. Let us also remind you that despite numerous studies that have supported the safety and efficacy of the ANA, the conventional nutrition community has no scientific research to back up its claims that consuming fat (including saturated fat) is bad for you in the context of a controlled carbohydrate lifestyle. The fight goes onand will no doubt continue. *** The latest attack comes in the form of an outrageous article in The New York Times, claiming that we at Atkins have changed our position on fat consumption. *** Loud and clear, with the notable exception of man-made trans fats (which Dr. Atkins long ago identified as dangerous), all fats are a healthy component of the Atkins lifestyle. Atkins has not changed its basic tenets in more than 30 years. So what is new? Well, Atkins is changing the way people around the world eat and that should keep us in the headlines for years to come! >Just got this from the Atkins email list... > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >is new? Well, Atkins is changing the way people around the world eat >and that should keep us in the headlines for years to come! That's good news. snipT >>and that should keep us in the headlines for years to come! > > That's good news. hey,, ur still at it ! This is good news :-P power to you PJ ! ============================================================ in an earlier thread PJ said in a top post: ¥rom: PJx <me@privacy.net> ¥Newsgroups: alt.support.diet.low-carb ¥Subject: Re: new to group and scared :) ¥Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 08:02:13 -0600 ¥Lines: 9 ¥Message-ID: <j6dq009goa5hrch043ju8rsalc5rldj2jk@4ax.com> >Me too. Always was and always will be. >PJ [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >>Thanks. I'll have a look and see what they have, but I'm a top poster thru >>and thru ;) MërëMåLË - - *.·´¨¨)) ¸.·´ .·´¨¨))* *((¸¸.·´ ..·´ ((¸¸.·´* How Much? http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/npc/anzfa_npc/ How Does That Work? http://tgos.org/newbie/rules.html http://livinginternet.com/u/ua.htm http://www.forteinc.com/agent/faq.php http://www.urbandictionary.com http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search Need A Friend? http://www-ai.ijs.si/eliza-cgi-bin/eliza_script MereMale, and believe me, you are..... Mere Male, you want people to respond to the various articles but I notice you want them to respond ONLY if they post in the particular way you feel they should. I suppose sitting at your table, we may talk but only talk the way *you* decide we can. Garbage. Frankly, I hope everyone top posts because I would rather have them write in and say what they feel, than have people not respond at all. You live how you see fit, Male, and the rest of us will live how *we* see fit. On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 00:42:11 +0930, MërëMåLË <MërëMåLË@pist.not.ere> wrote: >snipT >>>and that should keep us in the headlines for years to come! [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] >Need A Friend? >http://www-ai.ijs.si/eliza-cgi-bin/eliza_script |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2012 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.