Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / Low Carb / February 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Carls JR. No carb Burger Sucks

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
BillKirch - 28 Jan 2004 05:03 GMT
I tried it tonight and was VERY disappointed. In the Ads it VERY CLEARLY shows
the patty wrapped in a type of leaf lettuce, when in reality it's wrapped in
cheap Iceburg lettuce. I assume the same story holds true at Hardees which is
owned by the same company.  BG
The Queen of Cans and Jars - 28 Jan 2004 05:56 GMT
> I tried it tonight and was VERY disappointed. In the Ads it VERY CLEARLY shows
> the patty wrapped in a type of leaf lettuce, when in reality it's wrapped in
> cheap Iceburg lettuce. I assume the same story holds true at Hardees which is
> owned by the same company.  BG

hmmm ... crappy fast food ... imagine that.
Me - 28 Jan 2004 06:07 GMT
I've had it a few times, and I really enjoy it.  I just use a fork to
eat it instead of picking it up.  You're right about the lettuce, tho..
it would be nice to have a good leafy one.  But, really.. the burger
tastes great :)

(tho it COULD be because I haven't eaten at fast food restaurants in
well over a year:)

-Nora Mae
PEZfreak!

>>I tried it tonight and was VERY disappointed. In the Ads it VERY CLEARLY shows
>>the patty wrapped in a type of leaf lettuce, when in reality it's wrapped in
>>cheap Iceburg lettuce. I assume the same story holds true at Hardees which is
>>owned by the same company.  BG
>
> hmmm ... crappy fast food ... imagine that.
Steven C. \(Doktersteve\) - 28 Jan 2004 06:57 GMT
> I tried it tonight and was VERY disappointed. In the Ads it VERY CLEARLY shows
> the patty wrapped in a type of leaf lettuce, when in reality it's wrapped in
> cheap Iceburg lettuce. I assume the same story holds true at Hardees which is
> owned by the same company.  BG

I guess then you have an option - Don't eat it.
Great to live in a free country, isn't it?
BillKirch - 28 Jan 2004 08:18 GMT
>I guess then you have an option - Don't eat it.
>Great to live in a free country, isn't it?

################
THE point IS...they advertise one thing and serve another.  BG
The Queen of Cans and Jars - 28 Jan 2004 15:37 GMT
> >I guess then you have an option - Don't eat it.
> >Great to live in a free country, isn't it?
>
> ################
> THE point IS...they advertise one thing and serve another.  BG

and this is a surpise to you?  

fast food has never lived up to the pictures in its advertisements.
Lady o' the house - 28 Jan 2004 17:38 GMT
> > >I guess then you have an option - Don't eat it.
> > >Great to live in a free country, isn't it?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> fast food has never lived up to the pictures in its advertisements.

I watched a program on tv years ago about a photographer who shot pics of
food for magazines, advertisements, etc.  They purposely undercook food to
make it look fresher.  And they make sure that every little ingredient on
the food is placed just right before snapping any pics.  I've NEVER gotten
anything from any restaurant that resembled anything I saw in an ad.

Linda
Sue Larkin - 28 Jan 2004 19:38 GMT
In article
<isSRb.128541$6y6.2511313@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, "Lady o'
the house" <mslew64@hotmail.com> wrote:
:I watched a program on tv years ago about a photographer who shot pics of
:food for magazines, advertisements, etc.  They purposely undercook food to
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
:
:Linda

Food Stylists are hired for most any type of food
advertising...including the new Subway/Atkins campaign. They're highly
specialized and employ many tricks of the trade, such as glycerin. It's
fascinating to watch these stylists in action. In addition to every
ingredient being placed right, every ingredient must look perfect.
Therefore, monumental amounts of ingredients are purchased to find just
the right lettuce leaf, just the right tomato slice, just the right
onion slice, etc. Representatives of the advertiser are present on the
set to approve (or disapprove, as the case may be!) any food shots
prior to the camera rolling. I've worked on many McDonalds commercials
over many decades and I've never tired of watching food stylists!

Aloha...Sue (a 4 year lurker in asdl-c!)
reelserviceshawaii.com
incam@adelphia.net - 16 Feb 2005 03:14 GMT
the new Subway/Atkins campaign.

 That should be interesting -- just about everything Subway sells is
associated with (high carb) bread.
 Anyone familiar with how Subway is getting around the bread issue?
Touting salads, perhaps?
Steve Knight - 16 Feb 2005 03:57 GMT
they are nothing fantastic but they are not bad. the famous star is all I get.
now the 6 dollar burger in the low carb version does suck.

Signature

Knight-Toolworks & Custom Planes
Custom made wooden planes at reasonable prices
See http://www.knight-toolworks.com  For prices and ordering instructions.

Amanda - 16 Feb 2005 12:18 GMT
> the new Subway/Atkins campaign.
>
>  That should be interesting -- just about everything Subway sells is
>associated with (high carb) bread.
>  Anyone familiar with how Subway is getting around the bread issue?
>Touting salads, perhaps?

They're doing warps, and imo they aren't all that low carb. The tuna
wrap at 7 net carbs is the lowest - but who wants a tuna wrap? Not me
anyway ;p

Turkey bacon melt has 11 net carbs, chicken bacon ranch has 9 net
carbs, as does savoury turkey breast wrap.

Oh and the tuna salad is 8 net carbs.

Maybe if I was at the point where I could eat 50-100 carbs a day, but
as someone trying to find my CCLL and only at 25 carbs currently
(moving up to 30 tomorrow) I'm not going to waste them on a wrap for
10 carbs.

-----
285.5/259/120 monthly-goal: 8 month-start: 265.5
None Given - 16 Feb 2005 22:16 GMT
> They're doing warps, and imo they aren't all that low carb. The tuna
> wrap at 7 net carbs is the lowest - but who wants a tuna wrap? Not me
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Oh and the tuna salad is 8 net carbs.

None of their low carb items interested me so I asked for my favorite
sandwich made on the wrap, I had really missed it.

Signature

No Husband Has Ever Been Shot While Doing The Dishes

None Given - 16 Feb 2005 22:13 GMT
>  the new Subway/Atkins campaign.
>
>   That should be interesting -- just about everything Subway sells is
> associated with (high carb) bread.
>   Anyone familiar with how Subway is getting around the bread issue?
> Touting salads, perhaps?

They have salads and low carb wraps.  The wrap they have is kind of gummy, I
like Santa Fe brand tortillas better
Emil - 17 Feb 2005 13:52 GMT
I also use the Santa Fe Low Carb tortillas but have noticed I can keep them
in the fridge for 90 days and they don't spoil.
I have never had any go bad.
Scary for sure....

Signature

Emil

>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 09:38:37 -1000, Sue Larkin <suereel@xobop.com>
The wrap they have is kind of gummy, I
> like Santa Fe brand tortillas better
warehouse - 17 Feb 2005 14:02 GMT
> I also use the Santa Fe Low Carb tortillas but have noticed I can keep them
> in the fridge for 90 days and they don't spoil.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>  The wrap they have is kind of gummy, I
> > like Santa Fe brand tortillas better

Cardboard has been known to have a tendency to do that though.
Diane Ball - 17 Feb 2005 02:10 GMT
> the new Subway/Atkins campaign.
>
>  That should be interesting -- just about everything Subway sells is
> associated with (high carb) bread.
>  Anyone familiar with how Subway is getting around the bread issue?
> Touting salads, perhaps?

The subways here say "turn any sandwich into a salad". They put the meat
from the sub in the asalad and you tell them what other toppings you want -
like tomatoes, black olives, cucumbers, peppers, etc and what dressing.
jbuch - 17 Feb 2005 14:40 GMT
>  the new Subway/Atkins campaign.
>
>   That should be interesting -- just about everything Subway sells is
> associated with (high carb) bread.
>   Anyone familiar with how Subway is getting around the bread issue?
> Touting salads, perhaps?

I've had the Subway low carb wraps a few times in the last year.

They taste OK.

But they are fairly expensive. Then too, most of their sandwiches are
moderately pricey.

I found the book :
"Start Small, Finish Big: 15 Key Lessons to Start--and Run--Your Own
Successful Business"
by John P. Hayes, Fred DeLuca

very revealing of the Subway Success and philosophy.

In the beginning, they literally staggered along making one mistake
after another, and still managing to stay in business.
Abbey Smart - 17 Feb 2005 15:22 GMT
> I found the book :
> "Start Small, Finish Big: 15 Key Lessons to Start--and Run--Your Own
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> In the beginning, they literally staggered along making one mistake
> after another, and still managing to stay in business.

Driving the highway and byways subway is the only restauraunt
that's low carb friendly that you can find almost anywhere.
Their salads are great and the wraps are ok. But they are
high quality everywhere.
incam@adelphia.net - 18 Feb 2005 19:25 GMT
>Driving the highway and byways subway is the only restauraunt
>that's low carb friendly that you can find almost anywhere.
>Their salads are great and the wraps are ok. But they are
>high quality everywhere.

Personally, I never cared for Subway's bread -- especially because the
crust is soft, unlike the crusty kind I like in what otherwise looks
similar to a loaf of French or Italian bread.
But I'm really surprised you'd think that "driving the highway and
byways subway is the only restauraunt that's low carb friendly that
you can find almost anywhere" because nowadays, if worse came to worse
and you were really famished driving just about anywhere in the US,
ANY McDonalds or BK or Carls Jr. etc. would be able to make a low-carb
burger for you.
 
Abbey Smart - 18 Feb 2005 23:43 GMT
> Personally, I never cared for Subway's bread

I never eat the bread so it's not a problem for me :-)

> you can find almost anywhere" because nowadays, if worse came to worse
> and you were really famished driving just about anywhere in the US,
> ANY McDonalds or BK or Carls Jr. etc. would be able to make a low-carb
> burger for you.

Carls has a great low carb burger, but they have very few outlets
comparatively. Otherwise i would eat there. I don't want just
a crappy patty either. Subway gives you a very tastey *meal*
Steve Knight - 19 Feb 2005 07:52 GMT
>Carls has a great low carb burger, but they have very few outlets
>comparatively. Otherwise i would eat there. I don't want just
>a crappy patty either. Subway gives you a very tastey *meal*

subway is tasty? all their meats and cheese's and such are very low quality and
not very flavorful.

Signature

Knight-Toolworks & Custom Planes
Custom made wooden planes at reasonable prices
See http://www.knight-toolworks.com  For prices and ordering instructions.

Kitt - 19 Feb 2005 11:47 GMT
Don't you think flavorful is kind of subjective?   I know people that
love liver and onions. Some folks will enjoy it and others won't, just
like the Carl's Jr./Hardees stuff.  Believe it or not, there are people
who detest that lovely leafy lettuce and can't get enough of the
iceberg variety.

Regarding not finding low carb, I find just the opposite to be true as
compared to ten years ago when I first started low carb.  Applebee's,
Ryan's, Friday's, Arby's, Bonanza, Ponderosa.. everybody's on the band
wagon.  Heck, even Cracker Barrel has a low carb breakfast.  The one's
that tickle me are the fast food restaurants like Subway that offer a
low carb wrap and then offer you a discount on the combo if you get a
drink and chips or fries.  At least they're headed in the right
direction.  ;o)

An after thought just landed.  Somebody mentioned any burger joint
could make a low carb burger.  Maybe not.  Some of them used to mix in
textured vegetable protein, don't know if they still do or not.
Abbey Smart - 19 Feb 2005 15:56 GMT
> Regarding not finding low carb, I find just the opposite to be true as
> compared to ten years ago when I first started low carb.  Applebee's,
> Ryan's, Friday's, Arby's, Bonanza, Ponderosa.. everybody's on the band
> wagon.  Heck, even Cracker Barrel has a low carb breakfast.

All paces you'll find in a bigger city. Not a little one.
I suggest you take a road trip through the continental us,
canada, and alaska. You won't see very many of the restauraunts
you list at all.
Diane Ball - 19 Feb 2005 18:20 GMT
>> Regarding not finding low carb, I find just the opposite to be true as
>> compared to ten years ago when I first started low carb.  Applebee's,
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> canada, and alaska. You won't see very many of the restauraunts
> you list at all.

I grew up in a town of 1900 people - we didn't have any of the above
restaurants - but near almost every tiny town there are larger cities and I
had access to almost all of the above in about a 10-30 minute drive.  Even
if you only have mom and pop restaurants - a person on a LC WOE should know
what is healthy and what isn't.
Kitt - 20 Feb 2005 01:44 GMT
> > Regarding not finding low carb, I find just the opposite to be true as
> > compared to ten years ago when I first started low carb.  Applebee's,
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> canada, and alaska. You won't see very many of the restauraunts
> you list at all.

I don't even live in a small city, but rather a small town.  Every one
of the chains I listed, except Friday's (20 minutes) are available
within a ten minute drive.  Our entire county is around 100,000 people.
All the surrounding counties in PA and MD have some or all of them and
none of them have a town of over 50,000 people.  I'm thinking maybe
it's not me needing the trip.  I agree that some areas are lacking
where chains are concerned, but as somebody else stated, if you want
low carb, just ask.  As I said in the original, I've been at it for
some time now and in the beginning when you asked for no bread, they
looked at you like you were from another planet.  Not so today.
There's hardly a comment made about it these days because everybody
knows why you're asking.  The fact is, it was probably better when it
was harder.  Now, it's too easy to over eat thinking it's all good.
The original Atkins book had a section in it on eating too much as a
reason for a stall and I think accessibility lends itself to that
problem.
The Queen of Cans and Jars - 28 Jan 2004 22:22 GMT
> > > >I guess then you have an option - Don't eat it.
> > > >Great to live in a free country, isn't it?
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> the food is placed just right before snapping any pics.  I've NEVER gotten
> anything from any restaurant that resembled anything I saw in an ad.

nope, and you never will.  the food that's in ads barely qualifies as
food, as Sue points out in a following post.  it's dressed up six ways
from sunday to look good for hours under hot lights.  ain't no way it's
fit for consumption, and ain't no way the folks making minimum wage at
the fast food emporiums are going to create anything that even vaguely
resembles it.
Sue Larkin - 29 Jan 2004 00:35 GMT
:nope, and you never will.  the food that's in ads barely qualifies as
:food, as Sue points out in a following post.  it's dressed up six ways
:from sunday to look good for hours under hot lights.  ain't no way it's
:fit for consumption, and ain't no way the folks making minimum wage at
:the fast food emporiums are going to create anything that even vaguely
:resembles it.

For the most part, the hero food (the item used on camera...there's
also stand-in food used for lighting) is rendered inedible due to
various products used in the various techniques that make the food look
great for the product shots. There are usually several hero food items
waiting in the wings because the hot lights take their toll quickly.
Film and print crews tend to have lots of food available on the set to
keep them fueled but none of us will touch the hero food after the
camera stops rolling! Food shots are laborious and the stylist is under
tremendous pressure. It's an art form unto itself! The primary
ingredients used in the ad must match the ingredients used in the
product that is sold to the consumer. IOW, if a fast food burger
doesn't have a slice of onion on it when sold, it can't show one in the
ad. There's just a heckuva lot more time and TLC put into the
appearance of the photographed items. That's the nature of advertising.
There's no way a fast food restaurant can replicate the product prepped
by a food stylist.

Aloha...Sue
Doug Freyburger - 28 Jan 2004 20:35 GMT
> In the Ads it VERY CLEARLY shows
> the patty wrapped in a type of leaf lettuce, when in reality it's wrapped in
> cheap Iceburg lettuce.

The Southern California chain In-n-Out has been serving them that why
for very many years, so they are arguably the original source for the
practice (no matter Carl/Hardee's claim to be the first).  In-n-Out
has always used iceberg lettuce, so Carl/Hardee just copied the
original.

Yup, better lettuce does taste better.  Iceberg is pretty close to
chewy water flavor-wise.
Kerri Ratliff - 29 Jan 2004 20:36 GMT
BG,
I agree with what you said to a point.  I have gone to several Hardee's in
my area.  I think it depends on if they are out of the leaf lettuce.
Yesterday I went to the Hardee's down the street, and it was wrapped in the
iceburg lettuce.  Today I went to the same hardee's and it was wrapped in
that nice, green, leaf lettuce.
Odd, huh?
:)
So try it again:)

Kerri

6/10/03
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.