
Signature
Peter
website: http://users.thelink.net/marengo
marengo burbled across the ether:
> Thanks for this helpful response, Revek! It was more of an answer
> than I had expected.
The anti-SA bot tends to post early in the morning. ;)
> BTW, I go back to the Doctor on March 9th (next tuesday) to have my
> blood lipids as well as fasting BG nand HBA1c (this is my 90-day
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> specifically that I can continue to control my diabetes (as well as
> cholesterol and triglycerides) without meds.
I bet you will impress the doctor.
> Thanks again for the post; your advice is wise -- and kind of the way
> I was leaning. I don't like taking chances when I don't know how
> something will affect me.
Once you are comfortable with your new routine and food restrictions,
and you are positive you can ride herd on your blood sugar (i.e. get it
back to where it belongs fairly quickly) would be the best time to start
experimenting-- carefully.
> How are you doing? All recovered from your hospitalization?
Nope. I'm going to have to break down and take some painkiller. Blech.
(I hate taking pills). My choices are darvocet, vioxx, ibuprophen,
tylenol or aspirin. I'm still on IV thru Friday and I see the doc on
Monday. I am really missing work, so I hope I make a dramatic
improvement over the weekend. Night sweats are reduced to "night damps"
though, and still no fever (yay), although every little gas pocket gets
my undivided attention these days--boy I have a lot of gas I didn't
notice before.
One thing of note: I definitely am going to have to get a meter myself.
I know that even healthy people tend to get higher blood sugar while
they are sick, but I was pretty much fasting for 36 hours between the
time the doc hauled me into a hospital bed the second time and when I
finally got allowed some food, and my reading was 109. You'd think it
would have begun to drop after that long. They tested me again a couple
days later when I expressed some worry three hours after a probably 200g
carb meal and it was 131. That finally got their concern going-- sort
of. I was supposed to be on a diatetic meal plan, but it didn't seem
any different than the regular one, in fact it seemed to me to have more
carbs and even less protien. And get this, it was only for one day, and
they never tested me again. Maybe it was elevated by the illness, or
the antibiotics, but then again....

Signature
revek www.geocities.com/tanirevek/LowCarb.html lowcarbing since June
2002 5'2" 41 F 165+/too much/size seven petite please
Every now and then when your life gets complicated and the weasels
start closing in, the only cure is to load up on heinous chemicals and
then drive like a bastard from Hollywood to Las Vegas ... with the
music at top volume and at least a pint of ether." - Hunter S.
Thompson, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas
Peter,
When you test glycerine or any sugar alcohol, check a bit later than you
might usually check as I have seen that that spike sometimes shows up to an
hour later than usual.
It is also worth noting that if you test pasta you may see no change in your
blood sugar for 2 hours either. I did this and almost bought into the idea
that pasta is "good for diabetics" because of its low glycemic index which
you see in all the nutrition info for diabetics.
I didn't see a spike at 1 or 2 hours and thought, "Oh goodie." Come to find
out that the spike shows up at 4 or 5 hours!
A carb is a carb no matter how low glycemic. And glycerine turns into carb
in my body, fer sure.
-- Jenny - Low Carbing for 4 years. At goal for weight. Type 2 diabetes,
hba1c 5.2.
Cut the carbs to respond to my email address!
Low carb facts and figures, my weight-loss photos, tips, recipes,
strategies for dealing with diabetes and more at
http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/
Looking for help controlling your blood sugar?
Visit http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/Newly%20Diagnosed.htm
> X-No-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
> Peter
> website: http://users.thelink.net/marengo