Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / Low Carb / March 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Help!  The cravings are coming back!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Gary - 04 Mar 2004 12:16 GMT
I've been on South Beach since mid December.  Lost 30 pounds because
the low carbohydrates removed my appetite and I wasn't craving late
night snacks.

Now, in Phase II, the only things I've re-introduced have been
home-recipe meusli breakfast cereal and occasional whole wheat pasta.
In the last week the cravings for after-dinner snacks are returning.

I need to continue losing weight, and I'm at a loss for what to do
short of starting induction all over again.

I hope someone can suggest something!  Thanks in advance.
Jean Staffen - 04 Mar 2004 12:43 GMT
You might try backing up a little and un-re-introducing the breakfast cereal
and whole wheat pasta.  Sounds like the grains are kicking this off.

> I've been on South Beach since mid December.  Lost 30 pounds because
> the low carbohydrates removed my appetite and I wasn't craving late
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> I hope someone can suggest something!  Thanks in advance.
JC Der Koenig - 04 Mar 2004 13:02 GMT
Try being more strict on the low carb part of low carb diet.

Signature

Most of us probably aren't in danger of eating too little. :)

Becky P.

> I've been on South Beach since mid December.  Lost 30 pounds because
> the low carbohydrates removed my appetite and I wasn't craving late
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> I hope someone can suggest something!  Thanks in advance.
Roger Zoul - 04 Mar 2004 14:05 GMT
:: I've been on South Beach since mid December.  Lost 30 pounds because
:: the low carbohydrates removed my appetite and I wasn't craving late
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
:: home-recipe meusli breakfast cereal and occasional whole wheat pasta.
:: In the last week the cravings for after-dinner snacks are returning.

Get rid of the pasta....get more veggies. I'm not sure what meusli cereal
is, but if it is carby get rid of it too.  There are other things to eat....

:: I need to continue losing weight, and I'm at a loss for what to do
:: short of starting induction all over again.
::
:: I hope someone can suggest something!  Thanks in advance.

You didn't mention exercise.
Ignoramus9863 - 04 Mar 2004 14:36 GMT
>:: I've been on South Beach since mid December.  Lost 30 pounds because
>:: the low carbohydrates removed my appetite and I wasn't craving late
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Get rid of the pasta....get more veggies. I'm not sure what meusli cereal
> is, but if it is carby get rid of it too.  There are other things to eat....

Some mueslu stuff that I saw for sale had a lot of sugar in it.

Example:

http://www.dorset-cereals.co.uk/product.html

Luxury Muesli
- 40% fruit and nut content (including sweetened dried pineapple)
- 500g pack size.
Ingredients: Raisins, Toasted And Malted Wheat Flakes, Barley Flakes,
Oat Flakes, Wheat Flakes, Sweetened Dried Pineapple, Apricots, Toasted
and Malted Oat Flakes, Brazil Nuts, Dates, Almonds, Roasted Hazelnuts,
Preservative: Sulphur Dioxide (only in the Apricots and Pineapple).
No added salt (who would want to add salt to this??? ig)
High in Fibre
Low in Sodium (no kidding! ig)

If you read this list carefully, you will notice "sweetened"
pineapples (read sugar). Then you will notice "malted" flakes of oats
and wheat. Again, as far as I can tell, that is sugar.

So. This "muesli" is basically a bunch of grains, a bunch of dried
fruits, and some nuts, all mixed with sugar which "dorset products" is
not listing here to deceive the public. Hardly a prime example of low
carb food.

My suggestion regarding this muesli is the following. If you really
want to eat it, rinse it with water first to get rid of the
sugar. Then add milk. Don't just pour milk in this muesli if you do
not want the sugar.

A rule of thumb is: if it is packaged in a nice box and has a bunch of
things mixed, chances are overwhelming that they snuck in some diet
busting ingredient there to increase sales. Capitalists refer to such
products as "high value added products". Meaning that they take a
bunch of cheap grains and shred them, a bunch of cheap fruits that are
not sellable due to physical damage etc, and dry them, take a bit of
nuts, coat everything with sugar, and sell $1 worth of ingredients for
$4. They call it "high value added". But in reality, these products are
"value subtracted" products because their nutritional value goes down
due to this processing, and it was not high to begin with.

Some [mostly fat] dumbos will accuse me of being "anti capitalist", or
of being paranoid etc. The truth is, I simply recognize the reality of
capitalism for what it is, and am highly successful at keeping weight
off, due to being realistic about food. There is nothing paranoid in
reading a nutrition label and interpreting it correctly.

I personally find that oat bran, boiled in milk, is plenty sweet for
my taste, even with nothing more added. I often add a bit of dried
fruits to it though, being mindful of their high carb content.

i
Gary - 04 Mar 2004 15:45 GMT
My home-made recipe calls for

4 c oatmeal
1 c all-bran
1/2 c raisins
1/2 c dried apricots, chopped.

My portion is 1/2 c of the mixture.

>>:: I've been on South Beach since mid December.  Lost 30 pounds because
>>:: the low carbohydrates removed my appetite and I wasn't craving late
[quoted text clipped - 60 lines]
>
>i
Ignoramus9863 - 04 Mar 2004 15:51 GMT
> My home-made recipe calls for
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> My portion is 1/2 c of the mixture.

Looks like pretty good stuff, to me. What do you do with it, just add milk?

i

>>>:: I've been on South Beach since mid December.  Lost 30 pounds because
>>>:: the low carbohydrates removed my appetite and I wasn't craving late
[quoted text clipped - 60 lines]
>>
>>i
Gary - 04 Mar 2004 15:57 GMT
Yes.  And let it sit for 10 minutes with the milk to soften it up a
bit.

>> My home-made recipe calls for
>>
[quoted text clipped - 73 lines]
>>>
>>>i
Gary - 05 Mar 2004 02:35 GMT
Since you showed some interest in the Meusli, I'm going to accurately
put in the entire recipe.  It comes from Woodruff: The Good Carb
Cookbook, page 99.

Morning Meusli

4 c old fashioned oats
1 1/4 c All Bran or Bran Buds
3/4 c almonds, walnuts, hazelnuts, or pecans, chopped
1 c apricots or cherries, dried, chopped
1 c raisins

Mix well.
Store in airtight container (up to 1 month).
Serve 1/2 c with 3/4 c skim milk or lpwfat milk or plain or vanilla
yogurt.
Stir, let sit 5 minutes before serving.

Some of my notes:

24 half apricots = 1 cup.
16 whole pecans = 1/2 cup chopped.
I reduced the fruit to 1/2 c each, and reduce3d the nuts to 1/2 c.

>Yes.  And let it sit for 10 minutes with the milk to soften it up a
>bit.
[quoted text clipped - 76 lines]
>>>>
>>>>i
Ignoramus9863 - 05 Mar 2004 04:26 GMT
Sounds like an excellent recipe. Thanks.

i

> Since you showed some interest in the Meusli, I'm going to accurately
> put in the entire recipe.  It comes from Woodruff: The Good Carb
[quoted text clipped - 100 lines]
>>>>>
>>>>>i
A. Brown - 06 Mar 2004 00:37 GMT
> Since you showed some interest in the Meusli, I'm going to accurately
> put in the entire recipe.  It comes from Woodruff: The Good Carb
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> 16 whole pecans = 1/2 cup chopped.
> I reduced the fruit to 1/2 c each, and reduce3d the nuts to 1/2 c.

Thanks for posting the entire recipe! You've inspired me to do Meusli
again, although I just do oatmeal (no all-bran), and let it soak in the
milk overnight.

Unless you're getting other fat in your morning meal, I'd suggest
changing the amount of nuts back to the original 3/4 cup, and see if it
makes any difference in your cravings. You might just need a bit more
fat/protein to balance out the carbs.

Signature

A. Brown
remove the junk to email

Roger Zoul - 04 Mar 2004 16:35 GMT
:: My home-made recipe calls for
::
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
::
:: My portion is 1/2 c of the mixture.

Well, if it still causing your cravings, then you still  have a problem.
Either don't eat it, change your recipe, or try doing more exercise.
A. Brown - 05 Mar 2004 01:57 GMT
> My home-made recipe calls for
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> My portion is 1/2 c of the mixture.

I like home-made meusli too, but haven't had it for a long time - I was
just thinking last week that I should try it again.

But I do make oatmeal occasionally (long-cooking - I especially like steel-
cut oats). When I do have it, I've found that I do get pretty hungry much
sooner than if I have my usual breakfast of eggs. I've have much less
problem if I add a tablespoon of peanut butter to the oatmeal, or mix in
1/3 to 1/2 cup of whole-milk cottage cheese (or ricotta cheese). Sounds a
bit weird, but it's pretty good.

You might try adding something to your breakfast that includes more fat
and/or protein, and see if that helps. What kind of milk are you using when
you make the musesli?  If you're using skim, I'd switch to whole milk (or
at the very least, 2%), and/or maybe add some sliced or chopped almonds or
walnuts. Or have some (full-fat) cottage cheese or yogurt on the side.

Signature

A. Brown
remove the junk to email

Jean Staffen - 04 Mar 2004 22:24 GMT
Man, oh, man. Just looking at the website sets off my cravings.

> >:: I've been on South Beach since mid December.  Lost 30 pounds because
> >:: the low carbohydrates removed my appetite and I wasn't craving late
[quoted text clipped - 60 lines]
>
> i
DigitalVinyl - 04 Mar 2004 14:19 GMT
>I've been on South Beach since mid December.  Lost 30 pounds because
>the low carbohydrates removed my appetite and I wasn't craving late
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>I hope someone can suggest something!  Thanks in advance.

As I'm going through phase II(OWL) on atkins and I also noticed hungry
days. Last night I had spaghetti squash(25g for whole squash) with
Carbonara Sauce(5 g). I ate half of it and really wanted to eat the
rest(it was damn good!). I waited twenty minutes and ate a few
forkfuls more then saved te rest for another day. My cravings calmed
down in a bit but I also got hungry again later(not so unusual--but it
was a stomach growling hunger) and used pork rinds and onion dip to
lo-carb them away. I may have eaten too little yesterday. I was busy
and forgot to eat lunch.

Carb Addicts (Heller&Heller) suggest that your meal needs to mix lo
carb veggies, salad & protein in with carby stuff to give a balance
and avoid spiking hunger. Also carby meals should not last longer than
an hour because the insulin spike will be more pronounced. Maybe use
the pasta for pasta salads with meat, tuna, and some veggies mixed in,
toss in a fatty dressing. Or always eat a salad with a little protein
first and then eat a smaller amount of pasta.  If you can't find a way
to manage the cravings, you should remove them to a later time.
DiGiTAL_ViNYL (no email)
350/325/Mar-315/200
Atkins since 1/12/2004
DigitalVinyl - 04 Mar 2004 15:24 GMT
Actually I don't think yesterday was a carb craving (though I get them
after heavy carb meals (15g in one sitting, and sespected yesterday
cause of the squash-gonna be today's lunch!)

Yesterday I only ate 774 calories and woke up hungry this morning.
After brain started to engage I recall that after very low calorie
days I wake up hungry in the morning--very unusual for me. SO
yesterday was probably honest and reasonable hunger and not that
carb-inspired.

Heavy carb meals, especially old favorites like chili & meatloaf, make
me want to overeat. I have to be conscious of that.

DiGiTAL_ViNYL (no email)
350/323/Mar-315/200
Atkins since 1/12/2004
Ignoramus9863 - 04 Mar 2004 15:30 GMT
> Actually I don't think yesterday was a carb craving (though I get them
> after heavy carb meals (15g in one sitting, and sespected yesterday
> cause of the squash-gonna be today's lunch!)
>
> Yesterday I only ate 774 calories and woke up hungry this morning.

There is nothing wrong with waking up hungry in the morning.

I always wake up hungry in the morning, these days. That's what
breakfasts are for.

> After brain started to engage I recall that after very low calorie
> days I wake up hungry in the morning--very unusual for me. SO
> yesterday was probably honest and reasonable hunger and not that
> carb-inspired.

Sounds like a honest and reasonable and normal hunger after eating
only 774 calories.

i
Roger Zoul - 04 Mar 2004 16:38 GMT
:: Actually I don't think yesterday was a carb craving (though I get
:: them after heavy carb meals (15g in one sitting, and sespected
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
:: Heavy carb meals, especially old favorites like chili & meatloaf,
:: make me want to overeat. I have to be conscious of that.

You must be in a hurry.

:: DiGiTAL_ViNYL (no email)
:: 350/323/Mar-315/200
:: Atkins since 1/12/2004
Cubit - 04 Mar 2004 19:29 GMT
Replace the meusli breakfast cereal and whole wheat pasta with Breyers Carb
Smart Ice Cream or a couple of ounces of cheese.  That should make the
hunger go back down.

> I've been on South Beach since mid December.  Lost 30 pounds because
> the low carbohydrates removed my appetite and I wasn't craving late
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> I hope someone can suggest something!  Thanks in advance.
Doug Freyburger - 04 Mar 2004 22:44 GMT
> I've been on South Beach since mid December.  Lost 30 pounds because
> the low carbohydrates removed my appetite and I wasn't craving late
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> home-recipe meusli breakfast cereal and occasional whole wheat pasta.
> In the last week the cravings for after-dinner snacks are returning.

Classic Atkins lesson.  If you add in a food and it triggers cravings,
it is a problem food.  Take it back out and don't eat it any more.
Since you have added 2 new foods, you can't be sure which one is the
problem.  Remove both.  In a week add one back in and see.  Then a
week after that add the other back in and see.  Most likely it's only
one of them unless they both have an overlapping ingredient.

And that brings me to my bias.  Both have wheat.  I'm alergic to
wheat, and wheat is my biggest trigger.  If I were to add either of
those foods back in, I'd be in more trouble than just complaining
about cravings.  I'd be complaining about getting back on the wagon
to recover from a binge.

This is the main point where Atkins is stronger than SBD.  The
isolation feature.  SBD is simpler, less effort.  But when a food
trigger hits, the extra effort of Atkins has the answer.
Martha Gallagher - 04 Mar 2004 22:59 GMT
> > I've been on South Beach since mid December.  Lost 30 pounds because
> > the low carbohydrates removed my appetite and I wasn't craving late
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> week after that add the other back in and see.  Most likely it's only
> one of them unless they both have an overlapping ingredient.

This is true and it's an excellent point. But. . . sometimes it's not
true. Sometimes you just might go through phases when you're hungrier than
usual. Sometimes you'll go through times when you could skip food
altogether. While this is frequently correlated with what you've started
or stopped eating, sometimes it could be because of the weather or your
level of exercise or nothing in particular that you can pin down. It's
just the way it is.

I'd stop eating the foods and see if the cravings go away. If yes, then
either put them on your proscribed list and move on, or put them on the
list to try at a later date and see if they still give you problems. If
not, then try glutamine supplements, eating a big salad or a not too
exciting protein food whenever the cravings hit. If all else fails, just
tough it out for a while. It may well resolve itself.

> And that brings me to my bias.  Both have wheat.  I'm alergic to
> wheat, and wheat is my biggest trigger.  If I were to add either of
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> isolation feature.  SBD is simpler, less effort.  But when a food
> trigger hits, the extra effort of Atkins has the answer.

Absolutely.

Martha

Signature

Begin where you are - but don't end there.

Doug Freyburger - 05 Mar 2004 15:14 GMT
> > > I've been on South Beach since mid December.  Lost 30 pounds because
> > > the low carbohydrates removed my appetite and I wasn't craving late
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> either put them on your proscribed list and move on, or put them on the
> list to try at a later date and see if they still give you problems.

Good point.  There is a fair amount of lather-rinse-repeat in the
detective work to figure out what's *really* a trigger food and what
just happens to be a hungry day.  It's best to tentatively flag the
suspect food the first time and then try it again a couple of months
later.  If it doesn't cause problems the second time its level of
suspicion goes down.  If it does cause problems the second time its
level of suspicion goes up.  It can take three-strikes-and-you're-out
to be certain in many cases.  This is one of the reasons that Atkins
is more work than South Beach.  It includes two customization processes
that both involving puzzling through issues.  Then again this is also
one of the reasons why Atkins can work better for the folks that really
need the extra effort to figure oput what works for them.

Use the strengths of every plan, and dodge the weaknesses of every plan.
South Beach is easy.  It has simple guidelines.  If that works for
you woo-hoo.  If it doesn't the extra-effort plans come in.  Atkins is
good on carb levels and trigger foods but poor on amounts of fat and
protein.  Protein Power is poor on carb and fat levels and good on
protein amounts.  The harder you want to work the more greatest hits
you can pull in.  But once you have found a level of effort that works
for you there's no longer any point in pulling in extra effort.
Gary - 14 Mar 2004 13:42 GMT
I'd appreciate having a more specific reference to where Atkins
discusses "trigger" foods and cravings.  I read the SBD diet book
through and through, but haven't read Atkins.  The mention that Atkins
handles this subject particularly well motivated me to borrow the book
from the library, but I can't really find the discussion Doug
mentions.

BTW, I'm off meusli and WW pasta, and the weight loss has gone back to
1-2 lbs per wek.  My thanks to everyone for the recommendation.  

>> > > I've been on South Beach since mid December.  Lost 30 pounds because
>> > > the low carbohydrates removed my appetite and I wasn't craving late
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
>you can pull in.  But once you have found a level of effort that works
>for you there's no longer any point in pulling in extra effort.
DigitalVinyl - 14 Mar 2004 15:14 GMT
>I'd appreciate having a more specific reference to where Atkins
>discusses "trigger" foods and cravings.  I read the SBD diet book
>through and through, but haven't read Atkins.  The mention that Atkins
>handles this subject particularly well motivated me to borrow the book
>from the library, but I can't really find the discussion Doug
>mentions.

Gary, Atkins did not write well. He was so familiar with the subject
that he blathers on about favorite parts("luxorious diet") and forget
to explain basic notions well (like fiber is a deduction, not
mentioned until page 285). My experience is based upon the 1999 DANDR
book.

Much of the book is repetition of stuff that is less important and you
end up with short tidbits spread all over the frigging book that
contain, what I consider, critical info. Of course ererybody reads
into anything what they want. Based upon this and logic I felt I had
to develop some methodologies.

How To Diet For Life
page 163: Food Intolerances
paraphrased- You are often addicted to that which you have an allergic
reaction. If carbs are a health issue for you, you may be allergic
(react abnormally) to certain carbs.
page 248: Protect your Weight Losses
page 251: Dealing with Weight gain - recommends DAILY weighing, using
induction to fight regains
page 253: Don't reactivate Your Additictions - "If you go back on
sugar <snip> you suddenly discover that you must have these foods,
that no day or meal feels right without them. <snip> If thos carb
cravins return, you can cure them with several days of Induction"
page 285: "So if your proposed carb deviation involves something that
you're addicted to, I sadly must give you that never-never advice.
<...> So I guess I must allow you to try it and find out."

I put all these things together and approached Atkins with a "i know
nothing" start. When I add less common foods into the diet, I have to
approach them with caution. I don't know what will be a trigger food.
I could make some guesses but I've already found that I'm WAY off.

I do troubleshooting on a lot of advanced computer and network
systems. I know that most professionals don't properly investigate and
isolate issues to understand them. They generalize to the point of not
actually knowing what is wrong or what they did to solve/hide a
problem. I've put those same skills to work re-learning about how my
body handles food. That means tracking everything (I keep everything
in Excel) and daily weighing.

I DO believe in weighing daily and learning how the body behaves. If
you are gaining weight, there is a reason--and often not that you are
doing something wrong. But people want to only see losses and
disregard everything else. If I only weighed myself once a week I
would have made major misteps and gained weight instead of spotting it
after 2-3 days.

I don't believe is "NET" carbs that subtract sugar alcohols--I've
already seen my weight loss cut in half by Maltitol(sugar alcohol).
SOme people say they can eat this without issue. I wonder if they
really tracked it. Have you eaten enough maltitol to exceed your CCLL
and not seen weight loss decrease? Cause that's when it matters. At
20g a day I could eat 5-15g of maltitol no problem. But 20+g of
maltitol on top of 20g regular and my weight loss slowed by about 50%.
(I'm betting my CCLL is about 45, I'll know sometime in April)  The
only way to know is to introduce enough of a food to make it
noticeable. Eating a spoonful won't matter, but eating a muffin a day
loaded with Maltitol--that made it noticeable. Also Induction builds
in a significant buffer for most from their CCLL --which means even if
you regularly go over 20g you likely won't impact ketosis at all.
(Hence, it hides your reaction)

We can be allergic/addicted to anything. I reacted extremely to
Canteloupe while at Induction level. I was shocked. 4 oz of canteloupe
and I gained 38 oz. of weight.  I don't understand it, but canteloupe
was the source of the weight gain. Once I know my CCLL I will try
ereintroducing canteloupe and see if I react again. Even if i react
again, I will try again on maintenance. My theory it has something to
do with glycogen restock. On maintenance I should already have
restocked glycogen stores, so canteloupe may no longer cause that.

I also spotted that three days I had sauerkraut and all three days I
overate and exceeded my carb limit. Now sauerkraut is NOT a favorite
food and I probably had it about once a month before. It may have been
a three-times conincidence but I doubt it. Later on I will try and
reintroduce and see if I suffer consequences. It may have been a
combination of being on low induction level and still relearning
eating. Until I've proven it out, I can't assume that i "KNOW".  I
have had a single Hershey's kiss and not had wild cravings for
chocolate. that surprised. But maybe I simply need to eat more before
my cravings fire off.

Hood's Carb Countdown "Milk" is a current issue. I really enjoy it.
Allows me to have cereal for breakfast or just a cold glass of milk
for breakfast or as a late night "snack". I do *enjoy* it. This has me
watching my eating patterns right now. I am under-eating right now(I'm
busy) but I'm cautious about how much I enjoy the milk. Of course I
really enjoyed bacon and sausage often in the first weeks I had them
for breakfast. Then I got over it and haven't had bacon in weeks and
breakfast sausage only about once a week. I'm thinking reintroducing
something that tastes close to milk is like the bacon and suasage and
not an addiction that will make me overeat. I have to wait and see.

Hope that perspective helps.

>BTW, I'm off meusli and WW pasta, and the weight loss has gone back to
>1-2 lbs per wek.  My thanks to everyone for the recommendation.  
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>>you can pull in.  But once you have found a level of effort that works
>>for you there's no longer any point in pulling in extra effort.

DiGiTAL_ViNYL (no email)
350/318/Mar-315/200
Atkins since Jan 12, 2004
Sleepyman - 15 Mar 2004 00:19 GMT
>>I'd appreciate having a more specific reference to where Atkins
>>discusses "trigger" foods and cravings.  I read the SBD diet book
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>into anything what they want. Based upon this and logic I felt I had
>to develop some methodologies.

Gotta keep selling those books to the chumps. Even if it is the same
reworded BS.

Sleepy

---------------------------------
    The True Axis of Evil
Bush - Cheney - Ashcroft - Rumsfeld
---------------------------------
Gary - 15 Mar 2004 14:49 GMT
Excellent post!  Thank you.

>>I'd appreciate having a more specific reference to where Atkins
>>discusses "trigger" foods and cravings.  I read the SBD diet book
[quoted text clipped - 154 lines]
>350/318/Mar-315/200
>Atkins since Jan 12, 2004
Jean Staffen - 05 Mar 2004 00:10 GMT
Really good, sound advice, Doug.  I know when I lost all my weight back 30
years ago, I was going to Overeaters Anonymous meetings.  They use
"Abstinance" - which is simply abstaining altogether from trigger-inducing
foods.
Usually they are the foods we are allergic to. We always crave what we are
allergic too.  One of natures dirty little tricks.

Jean in Austin
190/170/160
Started 11/13/03

> > I've been on South Beach since mid December.  Lost 30 pounds because
> > the low carbohydrates removed my appetite and I wasn't craving late
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> isolation feature.  SBD is simpler, less effort.  But when a food
> trigger hits, the extra effort of Atkins has the answer.
Rich R - 05 Mar 2004 01:05 GMT
> I've been on South Beach since mid December.  Lost 30 pounds because
> the low carbohydrates removed my appetite and I wasn't craving late
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> I hope someone can suggest something!  Thanks in advance.

Get the book, "Eat, Drink, and be Healthy. It is all about low-glycmemic
carbs that won't raise your blood sugar, won't make you hungry, and won't
make you feel deprived. Been on the way of eating since 06/09/03. Went from
168 to 140 and kept it off. You will only lose 1.5-2lbs a week, but it stays
off. Oh yes, you must get your butt off the sofa and exercise. Other than
that it is a great long-term program.

Rich
Gary - 11 Mar 2004 15:19 GMT
Thank you all for your advice.  As you suggested, I un-introduced the
things I had introduced since induction.  It has had no effect on my
cravings.  My after-dinner cravings are still there.

I'm struggling with the cravings, and have partially given in to them
(but with good foods, e.g., a piece of low-fat cheese, etc.), but I'm
most certainly not where I was when I was on induction the first time,
even though my planned eating is identical to induction.

Any comments would be appreciated.

>I've been on South Beach since mid December.  Lost 30 pounds because
>the low carbohydrates removed my appetite and I wasn't craving late
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>I hope someone can suggest something!  Thanks in advance.
MereMale - 11 Mar 2004 16:05 GMT
--------------edited for flow--------------------------

>>I've been on South Beach since mid December.  Lost 30 pounds because
>>the low carbohydrates removed my appetite and I wasn't craving late
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
>Any comments would be appreciated.

your answer friend is in the first line of your first post.

get off the beach friend !

there is little report  <read=history> of people suffering
"cravings" on LCL......and I Mean,, LCL !
not some pussy footed upbeat yuppy driven gas producing
tangential version of LCL.

u will not do better than the real deal - get some in yer,,
Now.

cheers

MM

"The central problem with the concept of the 'Axis of Evil' is that it
involves an assumption that the US is the 'fulcrum of virtue'."
Bob Hawke
Dawn Taylor - 11 Mar 2004 19:35 GMT
>Thank you all for your advice.  As you suggested, I un-introduced the
>things I had introduced since induction.  It has had no effect on my
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Any comments would be appreciated.

When I read the word "cravings," I interpret that as you have a yen
for something specific, most likely something high-carb.

But maybe you're just plain ol' hungry. Perhaps you aren't eating
enough ... or your body's responding to losing weight by asking for
more food. I know that for myself, I usually have a reduced appetite
on LC but some days -- and some evenings -- I'm just freakin' hungry
every few hours.

If raising the fat level of your dinner meal doesn't work, try eating
it a little later. Or, maybe, just accept the fact that you want a
snack in the evening and build it into your plan.

Dawn
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.