
Signature
Bob in CT
Remove ".x" to reply
>>> This morning I was sitting down to a little unusual breakfast or steak
>>> and
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> Well, I never restrict my intake of meat and have raised my HDL and
> decreased my total cholesterol/HDL ratio.
Well, it is, first, a question of just how much meat you are eating,
whether you exercise, how old are you, and finally, that cholesterol
is only part of the story.
> The problem with studies that look at meat consumption is that the
> participants also eat high carb content. Here are some studies
> indicating low carb plus meat consupmtion aren't bad:
>
> http://www.lowcarbresearch.org/lcr/results.asp?catid=200
I looked at some of the numerous studies mentioned on that page, and
have not found one that would look at long term overeating of meat.
I am not, by any means, suggesting that "meat is bad". I love meat and
eat it almost every day. Meat, liver, eggs, all of that is a staple of
my diet.
What I object to is a notion that there is no such thing as too much
meat. I do not believe it and I would want anyone claiming that to
meet a high burden of proof. Meaning, take a few people on a high meat
diet (where a very high % of calories comes from meat and animal fat),
long term, and compare their health closely, and hot just cholesterol.
I do realize that such a study would be expensive, but until I see it,
I will not believe that eating too much meat has no ill consequences.
> And Atkins has no burden of proof -- the burden lies with those who have
> told us that low fat is great, in the rise of evidence to the contrary,
> including multiple studies and waistlines. All low fat did for me was
> create and exacerbate my insulin resistance. Now I'm borderline diabetic
> to a diet that's based on psuedoscience.
I do not believe neither low fatter now meat overeating advocates.
>> Get your blood work done, but remember that effects of diet affect
>> more than just a single cholesterol number.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> http://www.westonaprice.org/know_your_fats/know_your_fats.html
High cholesterol is not the only consideration wrt meat eating. Too
much protein has a bad effect on bone calcium retention.
Again, I am not anti meat etc. I am simply objecting to radical and
extreme diets such as meat overeating. So far, stating that long term
meat overeating is healthy is based, at best, on various suppositions
and hypotheses, rather than well tested data.
i
Roger Zoul - 04 Mar 2004 16:22 GMT
:: In article <opr4cet9h2rjctj4@news.snet.sbcglobal.net>, Bob in CT
:: wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 70 lines]
:: animal fat), long term, and compare their health closely, and hot
:: just cholesterol.
Yeah, but you're the only one talking about meat overeating. Thus, you are
accusing someone on LC of overeating meat. LC is not a meat diet.
:: I do realize that such a study would be expensive, but until I see
:: it, I will not believe that eating too much meat has no ill
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
::
:: I do not believe neither low fatter now meat overeating advocates.
What?
:::: Get your blood work done, but remember that effects of diet affect
:::: more than just a single cholesterol number.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
::: I personally think that the "meat is bad" hypothesis is 100%
::: bullshit. See:
http://www.self-help-hub.com/The_Cholesterol_Myths__Exposing_the_Fallacy_that_Sa
turated_Fat_and_Cholesterol_Cause_Heart_Disease_0967089700.html
::: http://www.westonaprice.org/know_your_fats/know_your_fats.html
::
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
:: meat overeating is healthy is based, at best, on various suppositions
:: and hypotheses, rather than well tested data.
You should start your own thread on this. IMO, overeating meat is very hard
to do over the long term. It just gets boring as well.
JC Der Koenig - 05 Mar 2004 02:56 GMT
Your body must have cholesterol to function. On the other hand you can get
by just fine without plants. Start your logic from there.

Signature
Most of us probably aren't in danger of eating too little. :)
Becky P.
> >>> This morning I was sitting down to a little unusual breakfast or steak
> >>> and
[quoted text clipped - 84 lines]
> > I personally think that the "meat is bad" hypothesis is 100% bullshit.
> > See:
http://www.self-help-hub.com/The_Cholesterol_Myths__Exposing_the_Fallacy_that_Sa
turated_Fat_and_Cholesterol_Cause_Heart_Disease_0967089700.html
> > http://www.westonaprice.org/know_your_fats/know_your_fats.html
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> i
marengo - 05 Mar 2004 04:11 GMT
|||| I agree that eating too much meat and eggs does sound over the top and
||| unbalanced and unreasonable. There is no reason to abuse meat so much
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
||| I never believed Atkins' bullshit that eating too much meat is
||| harmless.
Please read DANDR -- this is misinformation; Dr. Atkins is not the one
spreading "bullshit." "Abusing meat and eggs" is not part of the Atkins
controlled carbohydrate approach.
Atkins has always been a high-fat/moderate-protein/low-carb way of eating,
and the description of it as a "high-protein" all-meat diet is the big
misconception that his detractors have tried to use for years. I find that
I eat less meat on my Atkins plan than I did before, when I used to
constantly pig out on fast food. Now that I cook each meal, I have a much
more nutritionally balanced daily menu than pre-Atkins.

Signature
Peter
website: http://users.thelink.net/marengo