Weight Loss Forum / Low Carb / March 2004
OT? Warehouse clubs
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Chakolate - 05 Mar 2004 19:33 GMT It seems to me that a lot of people who read this ng belong to a warehouse club like Sam's club, and I was wondering which club is best, whether anybody did a head-to-head comparison or just settled for the closest one, or what.
I'm on a *very* limited income, so costs are very important to me. I'm particularly interested in getting a better price for eyeglasses, but that I can cost-compare myself.
Any insights or suggestions will be much appreciated.
Chakolate
 Signature Not to be absolutely certain is, I think, one of the essential things in rationality. --Bertrand Russell
Bob in CT - 05 Mar 2004 20:00 GMT > It seems to me that a lot of people who read this ng belong to a > warehouse [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Chakolate I used to belong to both Sam's Club and Costco/Price Club. They are incredibly similar. Most times, they have the exact same stuff. However, there were differences that made it worthwhile to keep both memberships if one is free. I think they're both fungible.
 Signature Bob in CT Remove ".x" to reply
Chakolate - 05 Mar 2004 20:07 GMT > I used to belong to both Sam's Club and Costco/Price Club. They are > incredibly similar. Most times, they have the exact same stuff. > However, there were differences that made it worthwhile to keep both > memberships if one is free. I think they're both fungible. Thank you! Not only a recommendation, but a new word as well. You've made my day.
Chakolate
 Signature Not to be absolutely certain is, I think, one of the essential things in rationality. --Bertrand Russell
Jean M. - 05 Mar 2004 20:51 GMT >> I used to belong to both Sam's Club and Costco/Price Club. They are >> incredibly similar. Most times, they have the exact same stuff. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >Chakolate Sam's has membership requirements. We got our membership through DH's work. I don't know if Costco has the same or not.
martymkm@webtv.net - 06 Mar 2004 00:21 GMT Sam's has membership requirements. We got our membership through DH's work. I don't know if Costco has the same or not.
--------------------------------------
I joined Sam's Club a year ago last Feb. I scoped it out on one of their "free" days first, to see if it was worth the $35 fee per year they charge you for shopping there. All I did was walk in and told the greeter I wanted to join and she directed me to the service desk. My money was the only requirement they were interested in. LOL Marty
Carmen - 05 Mar 2004 21:25 GMT Hi,
> I used to belong to both Sam's Club and Costco/Price Club. They are > > incredibly similar. Most times, they have the exact same stuff. > However, there were differences that made it worthwhile to keep both > memberships if one is free. I think they're both fungible. Fungible. Cool, a new word. :-) Thanks! From the definitions though I think "both" needs to be removed. ;-)
Take care, Carmen
Saffire - 06 Mar 2004 01:16 GMT > Hi, > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Fungible. Cool, a new word. :-) Thanks! From the definitions > though I think "both" needs to be removed. ;-) I shudder when I see that word because the first time I ever heard it was in Ann Rule's book, "Small Sacrifices" (later made into a movie starring Farrah Fawcett) about Diane Downs, who apparently thought children were "fungible". That is one SERIOUSLY f.cked up woman.
 Signature Saffire 205/168/125 - 5'2.5" Atkins since 6/14/03 Progress photo: http://photos.yahoo.com/saffire333
Carmen - 06 Mar 2004 04:31 GMT Hi, On 5-Mar-2004, Saffire <xsaffireslicethispart@internetcyberplace.com> wrote:
> > > I used to belong to both Sam's Club and Costco/Price Club. They > > > are incredibly similar. Most times, they have the exact same [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > were "fungible". > That is one SERIOUSLY f.cked up woman. I've read a number of Ann Rule's books. These people really *do* exist, and they do not feel the normal gamut of emotions that you or I do. They feel anger and satisfaction when they get what they want. I've met one person like that in my life. She played the game extremely well, was highly intelligent and knew what emotion to fake to get people to do what she wanted. The horrible thing was it looks as if she destroyed a biology professor's marriage for him (his wife worked at the same university) by planting rumors of an affair between he and she (she used vociferous denial to plant them) so that she *could* have that affair with him to get an effortless "A" in several classes plus recommendations from him. To this day I don't think he's got a clue. Poor bastard. She hated my guts, because we had some classes together and although she could have given me a run for the class high grade she never did the work. She skipped all the time, used stolen test materials and got those by stealing test materials from the professor's office to trade for the tests she wanted. How do I know all this sort of thing? I made the mistake of mentioning in front of her my views on certain ethical issues. She made sure I'd realize what was happening and yet still be unable to stop it or help the guy. She wasn't really even evil. She was defective. She was missing that part of the personality that allows people to feel empathy and love. That's the sort of person Ann Rule writes about. It wouldn't surprise me to someday see T. end up in one of those scenarios either. She's got a well-to-do older husband and a prediliction for big, dumb and brawny playmates. Every class she was in she had a male to play with. Someday husband might get in the way.
Take care, Carmen
marengo - 06 Mar 2004 06:26 GMT || I shudder when I see that word because the first time I ever heard it was | in Ann Rule's book, "Small Sacrifices" (later made into a movie starring | Farrah Fawcett) about Diane Downs, who apparently thought children were | "fungible". In a legal sense they're fungible. One will bring the same tax credit as another ... <g>
 Signature Peter website: http://users.thelink.net/marengo
DJ Delorie - 05 Mar 2004 20:08 GMT > It seems to me that a lot of people who read this ng belong to a > warehouse club like Sam's club, and I was wondering which club is > best, whether anybody did a head-to-head comparison or just settled > for the closest one, or what. Get a one-day pass for each of them, or find a friend to bring you. Different warehouses have different items in stock, so it depends on what you want to buy there. For example, I get my canned chicken from Sams, but Pat gets her canned turkey from BJs.
Ignoramus15020 - 05 Mar 2004 21:04 GMT > It seems to me that a lot of people who read this ng belong to a warehouse > club like Sam's club, and I was wondering which club is best, whether [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Any insights or suggestions will be much appreciated. Due to competition, they are very similar. Costco caters to a more upscale crowd, in some subtle ways, whereas Sams gravitates to the more affluent but still Walmart oriented crowd. Their prices are similar, as well as most of their stuff.
I used to own costco stock and made good money on it. I still follow it and will rebuy if it gets closer to $30 per share.
I am a Sams club member, because Sams club is in a better [for me] location.
Both Costco and Sams are highly honest and very competitive businesses.
i
Robyn Rosenthal - 05 Mar 2004 21:37 GMT >From: Chakolate > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > >Chakolate Sam's Club is more convenient, but I shop at Costco for several reasons.
First, most (if not all) of the meat at Sam's is "enhanced" with salt/sugar water and I am extremely picky about what foods I will eat (mainly because of food alloergies/intolerances).
Second, at Costco you can sniff the produce, at Sam's everything is sealed in plastic.
Third, I don't like Wal-Mart.
As for the membership being a good value, we would save that much just on milk, half and half and olive oil even if we didn't buy anything else there.
Robyn
Bob (this one) - 06 Mar 2004 00:51 GMT >>From: Chakolate >> [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > water and I am extremely picky about what foods I will eat (mainly because of > food alloergies/intolerances). Meats in the Wal-mart distribution chain are usually lower quality than Costco's. Costco's beef is Angus at better prices than I can find even at the discount grocers for trash.
I spend a fair amount of money there and essentially make back my membership fee every month.
Pastorio
> Second, at Costco you can sniff the produce, at Sam's everything is sealed in > plastic. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > As for the membership being a good value, we would save that much just on milk, > half and half and olive oil even if we didn't buy anything else there. Evelyn Ruut - 06 Mar 2004 01:02 GMT > >>From: Chakolate > >> [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > > Pastorio Hi Bob,
That is interesting, and especially since I am sure your opinion is based on some pretty good experience. I wonder if there is a big variation in areas of the country perhaps? Because in my general area of NY state I had a membership in both clubs, and found Costco's meat not to be as good as Sam's was. Admittedly this was some time ago. Maybe I will check it out again!
 Signature Evelyn
(To reply to me personally, remove sox)
Jean M. - 06 Mar 2004 02:41 GMT >First, most (if not all) of the meat at Sam's is "enhanced" with salt/sugar >water How would one know if this was the case at Walmart, Costco, or anywhere?
Bob (this one) - 06 Mar 2004 06:17 GMT >>First, most (if not all) of the meat at Sam's is "enhanced" with salt/sugar >>water > > How would one know if this was the case at Walmart, Costco, or > anywhere? It has to be so labeled. You likely won't find it to be the case if the meat is cut on premises. It's the packaged stuff that's "plumped."
Pastorio
Alice Faber - 06 Mar 2004 16:35 GMT > >>First, most (if not all) of the meat at Sam's is "enhanced" with salt/sugar > >>water [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > It has to be so labeled. You likely won't find it to be the case if > the meat is cut on premises. It's the packaged stuff that's "plumped." Even in my regular supermarkets, some of the packaged meat is "enhanced" in this way. It's not just the warehouse stores. On the pork in Shaws, the labeling is fairly subtle. The big label says something like "Armour Tender", and there's small print referring to the fluid composition.
 Signature AF "Non Sequitur U has a really, really lousy debate team." --artyw raises the bar on rec.sport.baseball
Evelyn Ruut - 05 Mar 2004 23:10 GMT > It seems to me that a lot of people who read this ng belong to a warehouse > club like Sam's club, and I was wondering which club is best, whether [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Chakolate Hi Chakolate,
I swear by my Sam's club membership. Savings on butter, milk, olive oil, cream, eggs, produce, meats, paper goods, cat and dog food, and many other items are worth the membership price alone.
I have gotten some unbelievable deals there on just about everything you can name. You have to go regularly since they change their stock often on other than food items, and the only way to know is to check what is on sale there regularly.
Here is the tricky part; you may have to buy in bulk and be able to repackage or store in usable sizes for your family. We are a small family so it makes sense for me to make use of my freezer a lot. For instance, I will buy a whole package of maybe 10 lbs of chopped meat, then repackage it into 2 lb size ziplocs for future use.
Some items it is just not worth stocking such a big quantity, but if you have storage space and the items don't go bad, it is well worth it. Paper towels and toilet paper, canned goods and things that don't go bad, it is no problem buying a larger quantity as long as you have a place to put it.
I have to admit I am totally spoiled by Sam's club meats as they are very good quality. A big tip; If you go in the store first thing in the morning, they mark the previous day's meats down considerably with a big red sticker. These are not bad, or stale or anything, and you can get great deals if you are a creative cook and know what to do with cuts that didn't sell so quickly the day before.
 Signature Evelyn
(To reply to me personally, remove sox)
LCer09 - 06 Mar 2004 01:48 GMT >It seems to me that a lot of people who read this ng belong to a warehouse >club like Sam's club, and I was wondering which club is best, whether >anybody did a head-to-head comparison or just settled for the closest one, >or what. I LOVE Costco. They have a strict markup policy (17% I think?) and carry some really nice high-end things. And you can return anything, at any time, for any reason, no questions asked. (except computers, but even then you have six months!) And I can get my digital pictures developed while I shop for $0.17/ea! As far as basics go (meat, veggies, etc), I've seen the same stuff at the same prices at Sams.
LCing since 12/01/03- Me- 265/223/140 & hubby- 310/244/180
Chakolate - 06 Mar 2004 04:11 GMT > It seems to me that a lot of people who read this ng belong to a > warehouse club like Sam's club, and I was wondering which club is [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Any insights or suggestions will be much appreciated. Thanks to everyone who responded, especially for the idea about the day pass.
Chakolate
 Signature Not to be absolutely certain is, I think, one of the essential things in rationality. --Bertrand Russell
marengo - 06 Mar 2004 06:14 GMT | It seems to me that a lot of people who read this ng belong to a warehouse | club like Sam's club, and I was wondering which club is best, whether [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] | | Chakolate If there is a Super WalMart near you, you can get an eye exam and prescription glasses for around $69 at their vision center!
BTW, I love Sam's Club. And I can use my Sam's Club credit card at WalMart also. ;-)
 Signature Peter website: http://users.thelink.net/marengo
Chakolate - 06 Mar 2004 17:19 GMT > If there is a Super WalMart near you, you can get an eye exam and > prescription glasses for around $69 at their vision center! > > BTW, I love Sam's Club. And I can use my Sam's Club credit card at > WalMart also. ;-) Whoa - are you meaning what you're saying? Eye exam *and* glasses, both lenses and frames, for $69?
Hell, if that's the case, the Super WalMart doesn't have to be near me - I'd travel for that.
Chakolate
 Signature Not to be absolutely certain is, I think, one of the essential things in rationality. --Bertrand Russell
martymkm@webtv.net - 07 Mar 2004 00:33 GMT Whoa - are you meaning what you're saying? Eye exam *and* glasses, both lenses and frames, for $69?
------------------------------------
When I was there last Tuesday (getting my glasses adjusted) I noticed they had quite a selection of frames for only $17 each. Plus the cost of your lenses. Which for regular bi-focals is only $50 (with no extra's like scratch coating, tinting, etc). Good Luck; Marty
Chakolate - 07 Mar 2004 18:03 GMT martymkm@webtv.net wrote in news:2856-404A6DD9-74@storefull- 3111.bay.webtv.net:
> Whoa - are you meaning what you're saying? Eye exam *and* glasses, both > lenses and frames, for $69? [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > like scratch coating, tinting, etc). > Good Luck; Marty Sorry, no time to talk now, gotta go find a super walmart. :-)
Chakolate
 Signature Not to be absolutely certain is, I think, one of the essential things in rationality. --Bertrand Russell
marengo - 07 Mar 2004 18:57 GMT | martymkm@webtv.net wrote in news:2856-404A6DD9-74@storefull- | 3111.bay.webtv.net: | | Sorry, no time to talk now, gotta go find a super walmart. :-) | | Chakolate Let us know how you make out!
 Signature Peter website: http://users.thelink.net/marengo
ronit - 07 Mar 2004 12:17 GMT Chakolate <chakolateDeathToSpammers@allvantage.com> wrote in message
> Whoa - are you meaning what you're saying? Eye exam *and* glasses, both > lenses and frames, for $69? [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Chakolate I wouldn't get glasses at Walmart. I checked out their frames and I could swear they were leftovers from the 80's. Older styles for sure. Costco has modern styles and great selection.
Another point for Costco. They have wonderful nuts sold under their Kirkland brand name. When you get to maintenace, you'll want to buy these.
emkay - 07 Mar 2004 18:27 GMT >I wouldn't get glasses at Walmart. I checked out their frames and I >could swear they were leftovers from the 80's. Older styles for sure. It had never occurred to me to buy glasses at WalMart, but reading this makes me start to consider it. Mostly because I dislike the "modern" tiny-little-lens style. Apparently they are what most people currently consider cool-looking; I just find them irritating because I can _see_ the frames, and it's very distracting. (They remind me of the Opti-Grab thing from "The Jerk".) I had to buy new glasses recently, and every single pair at Lenscrafters was that style. I ended up going for rimless ones, hoping they'd be less visible, but I could still see the edges of the lenses. It really bothered me, but the guy assured me "I'd get used to it." Well, I haven't. I hate these glasses, and I stupidly let the 30-day return period elapse.
There was a period (maybe in the 80's) where the lenses had the opposite problem -- they were so huge that they made me look like a race-car driver or some sort of alien spaceship pilot. If that's what WalMart has, then I'd skip it -- but if they've got something in between, something "normal" sized, I'd go there in a heartbeat.
Thanks for the (inadvertent) tip. 8-)
Em
Evelyn Ruut - 07 Mar 2004 19:20 GMT > >I wouldn't get glasses at Walmart. I checked out their frames and I > >could swear they were leftovers from the 80's. Older styles for sure. [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > Em Hi Em,
I agree with every word you said. I hate those tiny little frames where everyone looks so beady eyed! But the super huge goggle eyed look wasn't so nice either. Right now I have some rimless ones, but the price for them was astronomical considering that there is nothing to them but a couple of pieces of metal and some glue holding the lenses.
 Signature Evelyn
(To reply to me personally, remove sox)
emkay - 07 Mar 2004 19:38 GMT >Hi Em, > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >them was astronomical considering that there is nothing to them but a couple >of pieces of metal and some glue holding the lenses. Yeah, my rimless ones were outrageously priced as well. Apparently they price glasses like they do bathing suits -- the less there is to them, the more they cost.
Em
Chakolate - 08 Mar 2004 05:26 GMT > I agree with every word you said. I hate those tiny little frames > where everyone looks so beady eyed! But the super huge goggle eyed > look wasn't so nice either. Right now I have some rimless ones, but > the price for them was astronomical considering that there is nothing > to them but a couple of pieces of metal and some glue holding the > lenses. Those tiny frames are a godsend to those of us with extremely thick lenses. Lenses get thicker toward the edges, so if you use tiny frames, you're less likely to look like you're wearing coke-bottle-bottoms, and the distortion you get in the periphery is much reduced.
However, I toadally agree about the rimless ones. Twice the cost for no frame at all? Jeez!
Chakolate
 Signature Not to be absolutely certain is, I think, one of the essential things in rationality. --Bertrand Russell
FOB - 09 Mar 2004 00:50 GMT Oh, but they're so comfortable. They are light as a feather, I love mine.
In news:Xns94A5EE882816chakolatehotmailcom@130.133.1.4, Chakolate <chakolateDeathToSpammers@allvantage.com> stated
| However, I toadally agree about the rimless ones. Twice the cost for | no frame at all? Jeez! [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] | in rationality. | --Bertrand Russell emkay - 10 Mar 2004 01:36 GMT >Oh, but they're so comfortable. They are light as a feather, I love mine. Yeah, I'll probably appreciate that aspect of them in the summer. Heavy glasses in too-hot weather was always a nuisance.
Em
Evelyn Ruut - 10 Mar 2004 13:05 GMT > >Oh, but they're so comfortable. They are light as a feather, I love mine. > > Yeah, I'll probably appreciate that aspect of them in the summer. Heavy > glasses in too-hot weather was always a nuisance. > > Em Hi Em, Yes, the thing I most appreciate about the new rimless ones is the lightness.... but there is another "extra" I also really love. I got the new Crizal lenses, and my night vision is SO much better! It is just unbelievable. I always got no-glare coating, but this is a real improvement. When I went for my recent exam they also have some even newer form of it. It really is worth the extra money.
 Signature Evelyn
(To reply to me personally, remove sox)
Cailleachschilde - 09 Mar 2004 02:55 GMT >Mostly because I dislike the "modern" >tiny-little-lens style. Apparently they are what most people currently >consider cool-looking; I just find them irritating because I can _see_ the >frames, and it's very distracting. I love the smaller frames. My prescription is well over 700 and with the small frames and lightweight plastic lenses, they look like a normal pair of glasses instead of the coke bottles I wore as a child.
Yvonne
Evelyn Ruut - 09 Mar 2004 15:09 GMT > >Mostly because I dislike the "modern" > >tiny-little-lens style. Apparently they are what most people currently [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Yvonne Hi Yvonne,
For my husband it is the same. But the tiny lenses just look awful on me for some reason. I have tried so many of them and they are unflattering on my face.
 Signature Evelyn
(To reply to me personally, remove sox)
Cailleachschilde - 11 Mar 2004 04:09 GMT >For my husband it is the same. But the tiny lenses just look awful on me >for some reason. I have tried so many of them and they are unflattering on >my face. I know what you mean. I tried on every pair there and finally picked one from the teen section.
Yvonne
emkay - 10 Mar 2004 01:35 GMT >I love the smaller frames. My prescription is well over 700 and with the small >frames and lightweight plastic lenses, they look like a normal pair of glasses >instead of the coke bottles I wore as a child. Mine aren't nearly as strong as yours (the weaker one is about 20/400), and I got the thinnest, lightest (and most expensive, unfortunately) polycarbonate lenses they had. But these lenses still seem pretty thick to me -- about 6 mm at the thickest part of the edge. My previous lenses were glass, and were thinner at the thickest edge (5 mm), even though they were larger than these small plastic lenses. They won't put glass in the rimless frames, though. And since the lenses are smaller, the thick edge is now visible to me, where it didn't used to be visible with my older, larger lenses.
Em
martymkm@webtv.net - 07 Mar 2004 18:31 GMT I wouldn't get glasses at Walmart. I checked out their frames and I could swear they were leftovers from the 80's. Older styles for sure. Costco has modern styles and great selection.
--------------------------------
Oh I didn't get that impression. The one in my area had a lot of the newer styles. I was able to get a pair of Bill Blass at a very reasonable price. And according to the fashion mags the retro look is supposed to be cutting edge..... But I guess if you are on a tight budget, it wouldn't matter so much if their frames are stylish or not. I can't comment on Costco because I don't have one nearby, so that isn't an option for me, personally. Best Wishes; Marty
LCer09 - 07 Mar 2004 18:47 GMT >Whoa - are you meaning what you're saying? Eye exam *and* glasses, both >lenses and frames, for $69? > >Hell, if that's the case, the Super WalMart doesn't have to be near me - >I'd travel for that. It's about that price, but from a small selection of ugly frames, and basic lenses only. (no frille!) For myself, without the upgrade to thinner lenses, my prescription resembles the glass used in observation submarines. LCing since 12/01/03- Me- 265/223/140 & hubby- 310/244/180
ronit - 06 Mar 2004 14:18 GMT If money is tight, maybe you can find someone who would like to split a membership fee with you.
I would lean towards joining the club that's most convenient for you.
Chakolate - 06 Mar 2004 17:21 GMT > If money is tight, maybe you can find someone who would like to split > a membership fee with you. They'll let you do that?
> I would lean towards joining the club that's most convenient for you. They're pretty much equidistant, but it's good to know that it really doesn't matter too much which one I choose.
Chak
 Signature Not to be absolutely certain is, I think, one of the essential things in rationality. --Bertrand Russell
results not typical - 07 Mar 2004 14:03 GMT I usually just lurk here, but want to add my 2 cents to the warehouse shopping thread.
We have only shopped at Sams in the Minneapolis area, but I think this could be true of all Sams Clubs and many other warehouse clubs.
When you compare prices with other grocery stores, compare price per sheet or unit. Everyone always talks about the great bargains on the giant packages of paper towels, toilet paper and the like. BUT.... do the math, you might be getting 8 rolls of something for around the same price as you would get 6 rolls of that same thing at another store, however each individual roll will have fewer sheets per roll, making the cost per sheet higher than the same brand if you buy it in a "regular" store.
A local tv station did a comparison on warehouse pricing and discovered this "warehouse packaging". Manufacturers make different sized products especially for warehouse outlets. So you need to do the math on each item to see if you really are getting a deal, checking the price per sheet count. Also many of the items at Sam's are packaged in 2's, which may or may not be cheaper by the per ounce price, but you have to "invest" a whole lot more of your shopping dollar to purchase 2 of something, which could be a problem with limited funds.
That is not to say there are not some good buys at Sams, but there are far fewer than most people think.
Sam's club does not let you use coupons and it you are on a tight budget coupons could come in handy for staples, since you can use them at "regular" stores with sales and get deals that way.
Here in MN the liqour store part of Sam's has to have a seperate entrance from the outside. (must be some state law requirement) I found that the liquor prices were a good bargain and here in MN you don't have to be a Sam's member to purchase booze.... another weird liquor law, I suppose!
So, as they say, Buyer beware!
Back to Lurking, happy Low Carbing everyone!
Karen
Bob M - 07 Mar 2004 17:17 GMT > I usually just lurk here, but want to add my 2 cents to the warehouse > shopping thread. [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > > Karen Even if what you say is true, I hate to go shopping in the grocery store. As Sam's/Costco, I can buy all the papers towels I need for 6 months in one fell swoop and they are built to handle quantity. At the supermarket, the carts are small, I have to fill them with 8 packs of papers, etc. At Costco, I can buy huge quantities of food, which means that I can shop fewer times.
 Signature Bob M in CT remove 'x.' to reply
Chakolate - 07 Mar 2004 18:06 GMT weavenow@webtv.net (results not typical) wrote in news:26501-404B2BC4- 29@storefull-3171.bay.webtv.net:
> I usually just lurk here, but want to add my 2 cents to the warehouse > shopping thread. [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > > Back to Lurking, happy Low Carbing everyone! Thanks, Karen, this is very good information. I always shop with a calculator, but I don't think it would have occurred to me to check the number of sheets and such.
We have Aldi here, and Food4Less, both of which have excellent prices, so I'm not as interested in a club for food as I am for things like optical and photo development. But your advice is good for anything one buys, I think.
Chakolate
 Signature Not to be absolutely certain is, I think, one of the essential things in rationality. --Bertrand Russell
LCer09 - 07 Mar 2004 18:49 GMT >Here in MN the liqour store part of Sam's has to have a seperate >entrance from the outside. (must be some state law requirement) I found >that the liquor prices were a good bargain and here in MN you don't have >to be a Sam's member to purchase booze.... another weird liquor law, I >suppose! Here in TX Costco cannot require a membership to buy alcohol or prescriptions. They don't have a separate entrance, but anybody can go in and shop for those items there. (they don't exactly advertise this fact though)
LCing since 12/01/03- Me- 265/223/140 & hubby- 310/244/180
marengo - 07 Mar 2004 18:55 GMT | I usually just lurk here, but want to add my 2 cents to the warehouse | shopping thread.
| A local tv station did a comparison on warehouse pricing and discovered | this "warehouse packaging". Manufacturers make different sized products | especially for warehouse outlets. So you need to do the math on each | item to see if you really are getting a deal, checking the price per | sheet count. It wouldnt surprise me if this were true in some cases. The items that you get the best deal on, though, re things like electronic where everthing is right out there in the open. I've bought my last two computers at Sam's Club; after extensive price and feature shopping; the value simply could not be beat. I'm very happy with it.
Although someone will now say that my computer was made by a blind five year old who was stolen from his parents, paid 10 cents a week, chained in a dark basement in China, deprived of food and beaten every hour whether he needed to be or not -- and that a family in Hoboken, NJ is starving to death because the breadwinner in the family has no income because the evil company that manufactures the computer had it made by the blind five year old in China. And that I'm a terrible person for shopping for the best value, because in doing so I enable the evil company to send the job to China that starves the Hoboken family and enslaves the blind 5-year-old ... ;-)
 Signature Peter website: http://users.thelink.net/marengo
FOB - 07 Mar 2004 21:51 GMT All major brand computers are made in Asia as well as most components that a local shop would build one out of.
In news:40a0fe815ca0ff1b5244bb5025742482@news.teranews.com, marengo <marengo@thelink.net> stated
| It wouldnt surprise me if this were true in some cases. The items | that you get the best deal on, though, re things like electronic [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] | Peter | website: http://users.thelink.net/marengo jane - 07 Mar 2004 19:00 GMT I would go with Costco--their products are top quality, but equally important, they're well-known for treating their employees (and, I believe, their suppliers) VERY well. In other words, they're nothing like Walmart.
Chakolate - 08 Mar 2004 05:30 GMT > I would go with Costco--their products are top quality, but equally > important, they're well-known for treating their employees (and, I > believe, their suppliers) VERY well. In other words, they're nothing > like Walmart. Thanks to everyone who replied to this thread.
Chakolate
 Signature Not to be absolutely certain is, I think, one of the essential things in rationality. --Bertrand Russell
emkay - 07 Mar 2004 18:39 GMT >I'm on a *very* limited income, so costs are very important to me. I'm >particularly interested in getting a better price for eyeglasses, but that >I can cost-compare myself. This may not be of any help to you, but if you have a AAA membership, you can get 30% off any pair of glasses at Lenscrafters.
Em
|
|
|