Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / Low Carb / March 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

OT? Warehouse clubs

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Chakolate - 05 Mar 2004 19:33 GMT
It seems to me that a lot of people who read this ng belong to a warehouse
club like Sam's club, and I was wondering which club is best, whether
anybody did a head-to-head comparison or just settled for the closest one,
or what.  

I'm on a *very* limited income, so costs are very important to me.  I'm
particularly interested in getting a better price for eyeglasses, but that
I can cost-compare myself.  

Any insights or suggestions will be much appreciated.

Chakolate

Signature

Not to be absolutely certain is, I think, one of the essential things in
rationality.
 --Bertrand Russell

Bob in CT - 05 Mar 2004 20:00 GMT
> It seems to me that a lot of people who read this ng belong to a
> warehouse
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Chakolate

I used to belong to both Sam's Club and Costco/Price Club.  They are
incredibly similar.  Most times, they have the exact same stuff.  However,
there were differences that made it worthwhile to keep both memberships if
one is free.  I think they're both fungible.

Signature

Bob in CT
Remove ".x" to reply

Chakolate - 05 Mar 2004 20:07 GMT
> I used to belong to both Sam's Club and Costco/Price Club.  They are
> incredibly similar.  Most times, they have the exact same stuff.
> However, there were differences that made it worthwhile to keep both
> memberships if one is free.  I think they're both fungible.

Thank you!  Not only a recommendation, but a new word as well.  You've made
my day.  

Chakolate

Signature

Not to be absolutely certain is, I think, one of the essential things in
rationality.
 --Bertrand Russell

Jean M. - 05 Mar 2004 20:51 GMT
>> I used to belong to both Sam's Club and Costco/Price Club.  They are
>> incredibly similar.  Most times, they have the exact same stuff.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Chakolate

Sam's has membership requirements. We got our membership through DH's
work. I don't know if Costco has the same or not.
martymkm@webtv.net - 06 Mar 2004 00:21 GMT
Sam's has membership requirements. We got our membership through DH's
work. I don't know if Costco has the same or not.

--------------------------------------

I joined Sam's Club a year ago last Feb. I scoped it out on one of their
"free" days first, to see if it was worth the $35 fee per year they
charge you for shopping there. All I did was walk in and told the
greeter I wanted to join and she directed me to the service desk. My
money was the only requirement they were interested in. LOL
Marty
Carmen - 05 Mar 2004 21:25 GMT
Hi,

> I used to belong to both Sam's Club and Costco/Price Club.  They are
>
> incredibly similar.  Most times, they have the exact same stuff.
> However, there were differences that made it worthwhile to keep both
> memberships if one is free.  I think they're both fungible.

Fungible.  Cool, a new word.  :-)  Thanks!  From the definitions
though I think "both" needs to be removed.  ;-)

Take care,
Carmen
Saffire - 06 Mar 2004 01:16 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Fungible.  Cool, a new word.  :-)  Thanks!  From the definitions
> though I think "both" needs to be removed.  ;-)

I shudder when I see that word because the first time I ever heard it was in Ann
Rule's book, "Small Sacrifices" (later made into a movie starring Farrah Fawcett)
about Diane Downs, who apparently thought children were "fungible".  That is one
SERIOUSLY f.cked up woman.

Signature

Saffire
205/168/125  -  5'2.5"
Atkins since 6/14/03
Progress photo:  http://photos.yahoo.com/saffire333

Carmen - 06 Mar 2004 04:31 GMT
Hi,
On  5-Mar-2004, Saffire <xsaffireslicethispart@internetcyberplace.com>
wrote:

> > > I used to belong to both Sam's Club and Costco/Price Club.  They
> > > are incredibly similar.  Most times, they have the exact same
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> were "fungible".
> That is one SERIOUSLY f.cked up woman.

I've read a number of Ann Rule's books.  These people really *do*
exist, and they do not feel the normal gamut of emotions that you or I
do.  They feel anger and satisfaction when they get what they want.
I've met one person like that in my life.  She played the game
extremely well, was highly intelligent and knew what emotion to fake
to get people to do what she wanted.  The horrible thing was it looks
as if she destroyed a biology professor's marriage for him (his wife
worked at the same university) by planting rumors of an affair between
he and she (she used vociferous denial to plant them) so that she
*could* have that affair with him to get an effortless "A" in several
classes plus recommendations from him.  To this day I don't think he's
got a clue.  Poor bastard.  She hated my guts, because we had some
classes together and although she could have given me a run for the
class high grade she never did the work.  She skipped all the time,
used stolen test materials and got those by stealing test materials
from the professor's office to trade for the tests she wanted.   How
do I know all this sort of thing?  I made the mistake of mentioning in
front of her my views on certain ethical issues.  She made sure I'd
realize what was happening and yet still be unable to stop it or help
the guy.  She wasn't really even evil.  She was defective.  She was
missing that part of the personality that allows people to feel
empathy and love.  That's the sort of person Ann Rule writes about.
It wouldn't surprise me to someday see T. end up in one of those
scenarios either.  She's got a well-to-do older husband and a
prediliction for big, dumb and brawny playmates.  Every class she was
in she had a male to play with.   Someday husband might get in the
way.

Take care,
Carmen
marengo - 06 Mar 2004 06:26 GMT
|| I shudder when I see that word because the first time I ever heard it was
| in Ann Rule's book, "Small Sacrifices" (later made into a movie starring
| Farrah Fawcett) about Diane Downs, who apparently thought children were
| "fungible".

In a legal sense they're fungible.  One will bring the same tax credit as
another ...   <g>
Signature

Peter
website:  http://users.thelink.net/marengo

DJ Delorie - 05 Mar 2004 20:08 GMT
> It seems to me that a lot of people who read this ng belong to a
> warehouse club like Sam's club, and I was wondering which club is
> best, whether anybody did a head-to-head comparison or just settled
> for the closest one, or what.

Get a one-day pass for each of them, or find a friend to bring you.
Different warehouses have different items in stock, so it depends on
what you want to buy there.  For example, I get my canned chicken from
Sams, but Pat gets her canned turkey from BJs.
Ignoramus15020 - 05 Mar 2004 21:04 GMT
> It seems to me that a lot of people who read this ng belong to a warehouse
> club like Sam's club, and I was wondering which club is best, whether
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Any insights or suggestions will be much appreciated.

Due to competition, they are very similar. Costco caters to a more
upscale crowd, in some subtle ways, whereas Sams gravitates to the
more affluent but still Walmart oriented crowd. Their prices are
similar, as well as most of their stuff.

I used to own costco stock and made good money on it. I still follow it
and will rebuy if it gets closer to $30 per share.

I am a Sams club member, because Sams club is in a better [for me]
location.

Both Costco and Sams are highly honest and very competitive
businesses.

i
Robyn Rosenthal - 05 Mar 2004 21:37 GMT
>From: Chakolate
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Chakolate

Sam's Club is more convenient, but I shop at Costco for several reasons.

First, most (if not all) of the meat at Sam's is "enhanced" with salt/sugar
water and I am extremely picky about what foods I will eat (mainly because of
food alloergies/intolerances).

Second, at Costco you can sniff the produce, at Sam's everything is sealed in
plastic.

Third, I don't like Wal-Mart.

As for the membership being a good value, we would save that much just on milk,
half and half and olive oil  even if we didn't buy anything else there.

Robyn
Bob (this one) - 06 Mar 2004 00:51 GMT
>>From: Chakolate
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> water and I am extremely picky about what foods I will eat (mainly because of
> food alloergies/intolerances).

Meats in the Wal-mart distribution chain are usually lower quality
than Costco's. Costco's beef is Angus at better prices than I can find
even at the discount grocers for trash.

I spend a fair amount of money there and essentially make back my
membership fee every month.

Pastorio

> Second, at Costco you can sniff the produce, at Sam's everything is sealed in
> plastic.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> As for the membership being a good value, we would save that much just on milk,
> half and half and olive oil  even if we didn't buy anything else there.
Evelyn Ruut - 06 Mar 2004 01:02 GMT
> >>From: Chakolate
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> Pastorio

Hi Bob,

That is interesting, and especially since I am sure your opinion is based on
some pretty good experience.  I wonder if there is a big variation in areas
of the country perhaps?  Because in my general area of NY state I had a
membership in both clubs, and found Costco's meat not to be as good as Sam's
was.   Admittedly this was some time ago.   Maybe I will check it out again!
Signature

Evelyn

(To reply to me personally, remove sox)

Jean M. - 06 Mar 2004 02:41 GMT
>First, most (if not all) of the meat at Sam's is "enhanced" with salt/sugar
>water

How would one know if this was the case at Walmart, Costco, or
anywhere?
Bob (this one) - 06 Mar 2004 06:17 GMT
>>First, most (if not all) of the meat at Sam's is "enhanced" with salt/sugar
>>water
>
> How would one know if this was the case at Walmart, Costco, or
> anywhere?

It has to be so labeled. You likely won't find it to be the case if
the meat is cut on premises. It's the packaged stuff that's "plumped."

Pastorio
Alice Faber - 06 Mar 2004 16:35 GMT
> >>First, most (if not all) of the meat at Sam's is "enhanced" with salt/sugar
> >>water
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> It has to be so labeled. You likely won't find it to be the case if
> the meat is cut on premises. It's the packaged stuff that's "plumped."

Even in my regular supermarkets, some of the packaged meat is "enhanced"
in this way. It's not just the warehouse stores. On the pork in Shaws,
the labeling is fairly subtle. The big label says something like "Armour
Tender", and there's small print referring to the fluid composition.

Signature

AF
"Non Sequitur U has a really, really lousy debate team."
             --artyw raises the bar on rec.sport.baseball

Evelyn Ruut - 05 Mar 2004 23:10 GMT
> It seems to me that a lot of people who read this ng belong to a warehouse
> club like Sam's club, and I was wondering which club is best, whether
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Chakolate

Hi Chakolate,

I swear by my Sam's club membership.   Savings on butter, milk, olive oil,
cream, eggs, produce, meats, paper goods, cat and dog food, and many other
items are worth the membership price alone.

I have gotten some unbelievable deals there on just about everything you can
name.   You have to go regularly since they change their stock often on
other than food items, and the only way to know is to check what is on sale
there regularly.

Here is the tricky part;  you may have to buy in bulk and be able to
repackage or store in usable sizes for your family.   We are a small family
so it makes sense for me to make use of my freezer a lot.    For instance, I
will buy a whole package of maybe 10 lbs of chopped meat, then repackage it
into 2 lb size ziplocs for future use.

Some items it is just not worth stocking such a big quantity, but if you
have storage space and the items don't go bad, it is well worth it.   Paper
towels and toilet paper, canned goods and things that don't go bad, it is no
problem buying a larger quantity as long as you have a place to put it.

I have to admit I am totally spoiled by Sam's club meats as they are very
good quality.   A big tip;  If you go in the store first thing in the
morning, they mark the previous day's meats down considerably with a big red
sticker.   These are not bad, or stale or anything, and you can get great
deals if you are a creative cook and know what to do with cuts that didn't
sell so quickly the day before.
Signature

Evelyn

(To reply to me personally, remove sox)

LCer09 - 06 Mar 2004 01:48 GMT
>It seems to me that a lot of people who read this ng belong to a warehouse
>club like Sam's club, and I was wondering which club is best, whether
>anybody did a head-to-head comparison or just settled for the closest one,
>or what.  

I LOVE Costco. They have a strict markup policy (17% I think?) and carry some
really nice high-end things. And you can return anything, at any time, for any
reason, no questions asked. (except computers, but even then you have six
months!) And I can get my digital pictures developed while I shop for $0.17/ea!
As far as basics go (meat, veggies, etc), I've seen the same stuff at the same
prices at Sams.

LCing since 12/01/03-
Me- 265/223/140
& hubby- 310/244/180
Chakolate - 06 Mar 2004 04:11 GMT
> It seems to me that a lot of people who read this ng belong to a
> warehouse club like Sam's club, and I was wondering which club is
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Any insights or suggestions will be much appreciated.

Thanks to everyone who responded, especially for the idea about the day
pass.  

Chakolate

Signature

Not to be absolutely certain is, I think, one of the essential things in
rationality.
 --Bertrand Russell

marengo - 06 Mar 2004 06:14 GMT
| It seems to me that a lot of people who read this ng belong to a warehouse
| club like Sam's club, and I was wondering which club is best, whether
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
|
| Chakolate

If there is a Super WalMart near you, you can get an eye exam and
prescription glasses for around $69 at their vision center!

BTW, I love Sam's Club.  And I can use my Sam's Club credit card at WalMart
also.   ;-)
Signature

Peter
website:  http://users.thelink.net/marengo

Chakolate - 06 Mar 2004 17:19 GMT
> If there is a Super WalMart near you, you can get an eye exam and
> prescription glasses for around $69 at their vision center!
>
> BTW, I love Sam's Club.  And I can use my Sam's Club credit card at
> WalMart also.   ;-)

Whoa - are you meaning what you're saying?  Eye exam *and* glasses, both
lenses and frames, for $69?  

Hell, if that's the case, the Super WalMart doesn't have to be near me -
I'd travel for that.  

Chakolate

Signature

Not to be absolutely certain is, I think, one of the essential things in
rationality.
 --Bertrand Russell

martymkm@webtv.net - 07 Mar 2004 00:33 GMT
Whoa - are you meaning what you're saying? Eye exam *and* glasses, both
lenses and frames, for $69?

------------------------------------

When I was there last Tuesday (getting my glasses adjusted) I noticed
they had quite a selection of frames for only $17 each. Plus the cost of
your lenses. Which for regular bi-focals is only $50 (with no extra's
like scratch coating, tinting, etc).
Good Luck; Marty
Chakolate - 07 Mar 2004 18:03 GMT
martymkm@webtv.net wrote in news:2856-404A6DD9-74@storefull-
3111.bay.webtv.net:

> Whoa - are you meaning what you're saying? Eye exam *and* glasses, both
> lenses and frames, for $69?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> like scratch coating, tinting, etc).
> Good Luck; Marty

Sorry, no time to talk now, gotta go find a super walmart.  :-)

Chakolate

Signature

Not to be absolutely certain is, I think, one of the essential things in
rationality.
 --Bertrand Russell

marengo - 07 Mar 2004 18:57 GMT
| martymkm@webtv.net wrote in news:2856-404A6DD9-74@storefull-
| 3111.bay.webtv.net:
|
| Sorry, no time to talk now, gotta go find a super walmart.  :-)
|
| Chakolate

Let us know how you make out!
Signature

Peter
website:  http://users.thelink.net/marengo

ronit - 07 Mar 2004 12:17 GMT
Chakolate <chakolateDeathToSpammers@allvantage.com> wrote in message  
> Whoa - are you meaning what you're saying?  Eye exam *and* glasses, both
> lenses and frames, for $69?  
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Chakolate

I wouldn't get glasses at Walmart. I checked out their frames and I
could swear they were leftovers from the 80's. Older styles for sure.
Costco has modern styles and great selection.

Another point for Costco. They have wonderful nuts sold under their
Kirkland brand name. When you get to maintenace, you'll want to buy
these.
emkay - 07 Mar 2004 18:27 GMT
>I wouldn't get glasses at Walmart. I checked out their frames and I
>could swear they were leftovers from the 80's. Older styles for sure.

It had never occurred to me to buy glasses at WalMart, but reading this
makes me start to consider it.  Mostly because I dislike the "modern"
tiny-little-lens style.  Apparently they are what most people currently
consider cool-looking; I just find them irritating because I can _see_ the
frames, and it's very distracting.  (They remind me of the Opti-Grab thing
from "The Jerk".)   I had to buy new glasses recently, and every single
pair at Lenscrafters was that style.  I ended up going for rimless ones,
hoping they'd be less visible, but I could still see the edges of the
lenses.  It really bothered me, but the guy assured me "I'd get used to
it."  Well, I haven't.  I hate these glasses, and I stupidly let the 30-day
return period elapse.

There was a period (maybe in the 80's) where the lenses had the opposite
problem -- they were so huge that they made me look like a race-car driver
or some sort of alien spaceship pilot.  If that's what WalMart has, then
I'd skip it -- but if they've got something in between, something "normal"
sized, I'd go there in a heartbeat.

Thanks for the (inadvertent) tip.  8-)

Em
Evelyn Ruut - 07 Mar 2004 19:20 GMT
> >I wouldn't get glasses at Walmart. I checked out their frames and I
> >could swear they were leftovers from the 80's. Older styles for sure.
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Em

Hi Em,

I agree with every word you said.   I hate those tiny little frames where
everyone looks so beady eyed!    But the super huge goggle eyed look wasn't
so nice either.    Right now I have some rimless ones, but the price for
them was astronomical considering that there is nothing to them but a couple
of pieces of metal and some glue holding the lenses.

Signature

Evelyn

(To reply to me personally, remove sox)

emkay - 07 Mar 2004 19:38 GMT
>Hi Em,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>them was astronomical considering that there is nothing to them but a couple
>of pieces of metal and some glue holding the lenses.

Yeah, my rimless ones were outrageously priced as well.  Apparently they
price glasses like they do bathing suits -- the less there is to them, the
more they cost.

Em
Chakolate - 08 Mar 2004 05:26 GMT
> I agree with every word you said.   I hate those tiny little frames
> where everyone looks so beady eyed!    But the super huge goggle eyed
> look wasn't so nice either.    Right now I have some rimless ones, but
> the price for them was astronomical considering that there is nothing
> to them but a couple of pieces of metal and some glue holding the
> lenses.

Those tiny frames are a godsend to those of us with extremely thick lenses.  
Lenses get thicker toward the edges, so if you use tiny frames, you're less
likely to look like you're wearing coke-bottle-bottoms, and the distortion
you get in the periphery is much reduced.  

However, I toadally agree about the rimless ones.  Twice the cost for no
frame at all?  Jeez!

Chakolate

Signature

Not to be absolutely certain is, I think, one of the essential things in
rationality.
 --Bertrand Russell

FOB - 09 Mar 2004 00:50 GMT
Oh, but they're so comfortable.  They are light as a feather, I love mine.

In news:Xns94A5EE882816chakolatehotmailcom@130.133.1.4,
Chakolate <chakolateDeathToSpammers@allvantage.com> stated
| However, I toadally agree about the rimless ones.  Twice the cost for
| no frame at all?  Jeez!
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
| in rationality.
|   --Bertrand Russell
emkay - 10 Mar 2004 01:36 GMT
>Oh, but they're so comfortable.  They are light as a feather, I love mine.

Yeah, I'll probably appreciate that aspect of them in the summer.  Heavy
glasses in too-hot weather was always a nuisance.

Em
Evelyn Ruut - 10 Mar 2004 13:05 GMT
> >Oh, but they're so comfortable.  They are light as a feather, I love mine.
>
> Yeah, I'll probably appreciate that aspect of them in the summer.  Heavy
> glasses in too-hot weather was always a nuisance.
>
> Em

Hi Em,  Yes, the thing I most appreciate about the new rimless ones is the
lightness.... but there is another "extra" I also really love.   I got the
new Crizal lenses, and my night vision is SO much better!  It is just
unbelievable.  I always got no-glare coating, but this is a real
improvement.   When I went for my recent exam they also have some even newer
form of it.   It really is worth the extra money.
Signature

Evelyn

(To reply to me personally, remove sox)

Cailleachschilde - 09 Mar 2004 02:55 GMT
>Mostly because I dislike the "modern"
>tiny-little-lens style.  Apparently they are what most people currently
>consider cool-looking; I just find them irritating because I can _see_ the
>frames, and it's very distracting.

I love the smaller frames.  My prescription is well over 700 and with the small
frames and lightweight plastic lenses, they look like a normal pair of glasses
instead of the coke bottles I wore as a child.

Yvonne
Evelyn Ruut - 09 Mar 2004 15:09 GMT
> >Mostly because I dislike the "modern"
> >tiny-little-lens style.  Apparently they are what most people currently
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Yvonne

Hi Yvonne,

For my husband it is the same.   But the tiny lenses just look awful on me
for some reason.   I have tried so many of them and they are unflattering on
my face.
Signature

Evelyn

(To reply to me personally, remove sox)

Cailleachschilde - 11 Mar 2004 04:09 GMT
>For my husband it is the same.   But the tiny lenses just look awful on me
>for some reason.   I have tried so many of them and they are unflattering on
>my face.

I know what you mean.  I tried on every pair there and finally picked one from
the teen section.

Yvonne
emkay - 10 Mar 2004 01:35 GMT
>I love the smaller frames.  My prescription is well over 700 and with the small
>frames and lightweight plastic lenses, they look like a normal pair of glasses
>instead of the coke bottles I wore as a child.

Mine aren't nearly as strong as yours (the weaker one is about 20/400), and
I got the thinnest, lightest (and most expensive, unfortunately)
polycarbonate lenses they had.  But these lenses still seem pretty thick to
me -- about 6 mm at the thickest part of the edge.  My previous lenses were
glass, and were thinner at the thickest edge (5 mm), even though they were
larger than these small plastic lenses.  They won't put glass in the
rimless frames, though.  And since the lenses are smaller, the thick edge
is now visible to me, where it didn't used to be visible with my older,
larger lenses.

Em
martymkm@webtv.net - 07 Mar 2004 18:31 GMT
I wouldn't get glasses at Walmart. I checked out their frames and I
could swear they were leftovers from the 80's. Older styles for sure.
Costco has modern styles and great selection.

--------------------------------

Oh I didn't get that impression. The one in my area had a lot of the
newer styles. I was able to get a pair of Bill Blass at a very
reasonable price. And according to the fashion mags the retro look is
supposed to be cutting edge..... But I guess if you are on a tight
budget, it wouldn't  matter so much if their frames are stylish or not.
I can't comment on Costco because I don't have one nearby, so that isn't
an option for me, personally.
Best Wishes; Marty
LCer09 - 07 Mar 2004 18:47 GMT
>Whoa - are you meaning what you're saying?  Eye exam *and* glasses, both
>lenses and frames, for $69?  
>
>Hell, if that's the case, the Super WalMart doesn't have to be near me -
>I'd travel for that.  

It's about that price, but from a small selection of ugly frames, and basic
lenses only. (no frille!) For myself, without the upgrade to thinner lenses, my
prescription resembles the glass used in observation submarines.
LCing since 12/01/03-
Me- 265/223/140
& hubby- 310/244/180
ronit - 06 Mar 2004 14:18 GMT
If money is tight, maybe you can find someone who would like to split
a membership fee with you.

I would lean towards joining the club that's most convenient for you.
Chakolate - 06 Mar 2004 17:21 GMT
> If money is tight, maybe you can find someone who would like to split
> a membership fee with you.

They'll let you do that?

> I would lean towards joining the club that's most convenient for you.

They're pretty much equidistant, but it's good to know that it really
doesn't matter too much which one I choose.  

Chak

Signature

Not to be absolutely certain is, I think, one of the essential things in
rationality.
 --Bertrand Russell

results not typical - 07 Mar 2004 14:03 GMT
I usually just lurk here, but want to add my 2 cents to the warehouse
shopping thread.

We have only shopped at Sams in the Minneapolis area, but I think this
could be true of all Sams Clubs and many other warehouse clubs.

When you compare prices with other grocery stores, compare price per
sheet or unit.  Everyone always talks about the great bargains on the
giant packages of paper towels, toilet paper and the like.
BUT.... do the math, you might be getting 8 rolls of something for
around the same price as you would get 6 rolls of that same thing at
another store, however each individual roll will have fewer sheets per
roll, making the cost per sheet higher than the same brand if you buy it
in a "regular" store.

A local tv station did a comparison on warehouse pricing and discovered
this "warehouse packaging".  Manufacturers make different sized products
especially for warehouse outlets.  So you need to do the math on each
item to see if you really are getting a deal, checking the price per
sheet count.  Also many of the items at Sam's are packaged in 2's, which
may or may not be cheaper by the per ounce price, but you have to
"invest" a whole lot more of your shopping dollar to purchase 2 of
something, which could be a problem with limited funds.

That is not to say there are not some good buys at Sams, but there are
far fewer than most people think.

Sam's club does not let you use coupons and it you are on a tight budget
coupons could come in handy for staples, since you can use them at
"regular" stores with sales and get deals that way.

Here in MN the liqour store part of Sam's has to have a seperate
entrance from the outside. (must be some state law requirement)  I found
that the liquor prices were a good bargain and here in MN you don't have
to be a Sam's  member to purchase booze.... another weird liquor law, I
suppose!

So, as they say, Buyer beware!

Back to Lurking,  happy Low Carbing everyone!

Karen
Bob M - 07 Mar 2004 17:17 GMT
> I usually just lurk here, but want to add my 2 cents to the warehouse
> shopping thread.
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
> Karen

Even if what you say is true, I hate to go shopping in the grocery store.  
As Sam's/Costco, I can buy all the papers towels I need for 6 months in
one fell swoop and they are built to handle quantity.  At the supermarket,
the carts are small, I have to fill them with 8 packs of papers, etc.  At
Costco, I can buy huge quantities of food, which means that I can shop
fewer times.

Signature

Bob M in CT remove 'x.' to reply

Chakolate - 07 Mar 2004 18:06 GMT
weavenow@webtv.net (results not typical) wrote in news:26501-404B2BC4-
29@storefull-3171.bay.webtv.net:

> I usually just lurk here, but want to add my 2 cents to the warehouse
> shopping thread.
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> Back to Lurking,  happy Low Carbing everyone!

Thanks, Karen, this is very good information.  I always shop with a
calculator, but I don't think it would have occurred to me to check the
number of sheets and such.  

We have Aldi here, and Food4Less, both of which have excellent prices, so
I'm not as interested in a club for food as I am for things like optical
and photo development.  But your advice is good for anything one buys, I
think.

Chakolate

Signature

Not to be absolutely certain is, I think, one of the essential things in
rationality.
 --Bertrand Russell

LCer09 - 07 Mar 2004 18:49 GMT
>Here in MN the liqour store part of Sam's has to have a seperate
>entrance from the outside. (must be some state law requirement)  I found
>that the liquor prices were a good bargain and here in MN you don't have
>to be a Sam's  member to purchase booze.... another weird liquor law, I
>suppose!

Here in TX Costco cannot require a membership to buy alcohol or prescriptions.
They don't have a separate entrance, but anybody can go in and shop for those
items there. (they don't exactly advertise this fact though)

LCing since 12/01/03-
Me- 265/223/140
& hubby- 310/244/180
marengo - 07 Mar 2004 18:55 GMT
| I usually just lurk here, but want to add my 2 cents to the warehouse
| shopping thread.

| A local tv station did a comparison on warehouse pricing and discovered
| this "warehouse packaging".  Manufacturers make different sized products
| especially for warehouse outlets.  So you need to do the math on each
| item to see if you really are getting a deal, checking the price per
| sheet count.

It wouldnt surprise me if this were true in some cases. The items that you
get the best deal on, though, re things like electronic where everthing is
right out there in the open.  I've bought my last two computers at Sam's
Club; after extensive price and feature shopping; the value simply could not
be beat. I'm very happy with it.

Although someone will now say that my computer was made by a blind five year
old who was stolen from his parents, paid 10 cents a week, chained in a dark
basement in China, deprived of food and beaten every hour whether he needed
to be or not -- and  that a family in Hoboken, NJ is starving to death
because the breadwinner in the family has no income because the evil company
that manufactures the computer had it made by the blind five year old in
China.  And that I'm a terrible person for shopping for the best value,
because in doing so I enable the evil company to send the job to China that
starves the Hoboken family and enslaves the blind 5-year-old ...     ;-)
Signature

Peter
website:  http://users.thelink.net/marengo

FOB - 07 Mar 2004 21:51 GMT
All major brand computers are made in Asia as well as most components that a
local shop would build one out of.

In news:40a0fe815ca0ff1b5244bb5025742482@news.teranews.com,
marengo <marengo@thelink.net> stated
| It wouldnt surprise me if this were true in some cases. The items
| that you get the best deal on, though, re things like electronic
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
| Peter
| website:  http://users.thelink.net/marengo
jane - 07 Mar 2004 19:00 GMT
I would go with Costco--their products are top quality, but equally
important, they're well-known for treating their employees (and, I
believe, their suppliers) VERY well. In other words, they're nothing
like Walmart.
Chakolate - 08 Mar 2004 05:30 GMT
> I would go with Costco--their products are top quality, but equally
> important, they're well-known for treating their employees (and, I
> believe, their suppliers) VERY well. In other words, they're nothing
> like Walmart.

Thanks to everyone who replied to this thread.  

Chakolate

Signature

Not to be absolutely certain is, I think, one of the essential things in
rationality.
 --Bertrand Russell

emkay - 07 Mar 2004 18:39 GMT
>I'm on a *very* limited income, so costs are very important to me.  I'm
>particularly interested in getting a better price for eyeglasses, but that
>I can cost-compare myself.  

This may not be of any help to you, but if you have a AAA membership, you
can get 30% off any pair of glasses at Lenscrafters.

Em
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.