> Just found this site.
> http://www.carbcanada.com/
> Not sure if it is a good thing or not.

Signature
"Things that try to look like things often do look more
like things than things. Well known fact."
Esmerelda Weatherwax (Pratchett 1988)
>> Just found this site.
>> http://www.carbcanada.com/
>> Not sure if it is a good thing or not.
>
> Well, the prices seem good, but the focus on candy, cookies,
> and chips is unfortunate.
It's the happenin' thing. "Low carb" is the new "low fat", they
just switched the end word to make the sellin' easier. I wonder
when the fad will be "low crap" and the fad will be to sell only
food with real ingredients in it LOL. (Hey it has zero crap grams
I can lose weight on it!)
In the meantime, the produce section of my grocery store has
plenty enough low-carbohydrate goodies for me.
CM
Beemie - 08 Mar 2004 17:58 GMT
THink almonds instead, real food is better.
A. Brown - 09 Mar 2004 02:30 GMT
Crafting Mom <CraftingMom@fakeaddress.com> wrote in news:9UD2c.2308
$kc2.44389@nnrp1.uunet.ca:
> It's the happenin' thing. "Low carb" is the new "low fat", they
> just switched the end word to make the sellin' easier. I wonder
> when the fad will be "low crap" and the fad will be to sell only
> food with real ingredients in it LOL. (Hey it has zero crap grams
> I can lose weight on it!)
LOL... can't be too soon for me! Why don't you start your own brand -
"Crafting Mom's Low Crap" foods. You'll make a fortune, and we'll all get
healthy and lose weight!
'Course, it'll never happen. There's not enough profit in it when you put
in real food instead of chemicals and "crap".

Signature
A. Brown
remove the junk to email
jpatti - 09 Mar 2004 12:47 GMT
> Crafting Mom <CraftingMom@fakeaddress.com> wrote in news:9UD2c.2308
> $kc2.44389@nnrp1.uunet.ca:
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> 'Course, it'll never happen. There's not enough profit in it when you put
> in real food instead of chemicals and "crap".
Real food doesn't cost more than crap, that's not the problem. The
problem is the FDA would come down on your labelling because
"low-crap" hasn't been legally defined. ;)
gary - 09 Mar 2004 13:35 GMT
>>Crafting Mom <CraftingMom@fakeaddress.com> wrote in news:9UD2c.2308
>>$kc2.44389@nnrp1.uunet.ca:
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> problem is the FDA would come down on your labelling because
> "low-crap" hasn't been legally defined. ;)
Yeah, if the feds ever defined "low crap" what would the politicians do
during the election season. Or for that matter whenever they are dealing
with the public?