Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / Low Carb / March 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Low Glycemic Cornstarch - Atkins' reply

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Dale Baker - 11 Mar 2004 16:45 GMT
Well, I got a reply from Atkins this morning.  It sounds pretty lame to me.
What do y'all think?

Dale

ATKINS REPLY ABOUT LOW GLYCEMIC CORNSTARCH

"The low glycemic cornstarch that is used in our products are specially
designed for Atkins that is higher in protein therefore able to keep the low
glycemic statement."
DJ Delorie - 11 Mar 2004 17:24 GMT
Protein does indeed lower the glycemic index of food, and thus reduces
the effect a given amount of carbs has on blood glucose levels.  Since
controlling blood glucose swings (and thus blood insulin swings) is a
key part of a low carb diet, it's understandable that adding protein
to corn starch would be beneficial.  Assuming you want the corn starch
in the first place, of course.
Ignoramus16578 - 11 Mar 2004 17:35 GMT
> Protein does indeed lower the glycemic index of food, and thus reduces
> the effect a given amount of carbs has on blood glucose levels.  Since
> controlling blood glucose swings (and thus blood insulin swings) is a
> key part of a low carb diet, it's understandable that adding protein
> to corn starch would be beneficial.  Assuming you want the corn starch
> in the first place, of course.

Does low glycemic mean that it should not count towards "net carbs"?

i
Bob in CT - 11 Mar 2004 17:40 GMT
>> Protein does indeed lower the glycemic index of food, and thus reduces
>> the effect a given amount of carbs has on blood glucose levels.  Since
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> i

Now, it's only one way of determining how a carb (or protein or fat for
that matter) affects your blood sugar.  I've eaten a ton of pasta in my
life, and one reason I'm on low carb is that a meal of pasta would have me
sitting down because of the blood sugar rush, and pasta cooked al dente is
relatively low on the glycemic index.

Signature

Bob in CT
Remove ".x" to reply

DJ Delorie - 11 Mar 2004 18:00 GMT
> Does low glycemic mean that it should not count towards "net carbs"?

No.  Net carbs are total dietary input, not some average effect over
time.  If you want to stay in ketosis, for example, it doesn't matter
how fast the carbs hit the blood as long as the liver sees enough of
them over time to surpass it's depletion rate.

Low glycemic does mean that you can clump your carbs together more
without as much of an insulin swing - i.e. less hungry two hours
later.  Also, some folks are only concerned with insulin levels; a
more moderate change means lower peaks.
Sleepyman - 12 Mar 2004 23:53 GMT
>Well, I got a reply from Atkins this morning.  It sounds pretty lame to me.
>What do y'all think?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>designed for Atkins that is higher in protein therefore able to keep the low
>glycemic statement."

You expected anything other than *lame* from Atkins?

Sleepy

---------------------------------
    The True Axis of Evil
Bush - Cheney - Ashcroft - Rumsfeld
---------------------------------
Jean B. - 13 Mar 2004 17:45 GMT
> Well, I got a reply from Atkins this morning.  It sounds pretty lame to me.
> What do y'all think?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> designed for Atkins that is higher in protein therefore able to keep the low
> glycemic statement."

Very poor English, for one thing.  

Signature

Jean B.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.