Weight Loss Forum / Low Carb / March 2004
Quitting smoking stuff
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Luna - 16 Mar 2004 06:08 GMT Ok, there are a quazillion good reasons to quit smoking, but the withdrawal process kinda sucks. I caved last night and smoked again, but today I started the Nicorette gum which is helping a lot. I did not feel sick and tired today like I did when trying to go cold turkey. I was able to run around and play soccer with the kids at work for a whole hour! And I didn't start coughing and run out of breath! I'm hoping the joy at being able to exercise without coughing and choking will help offset any potential weight gain from a lowered metabolism. So far, the gum is also helping me to not replace smoking with eating more. One really cool thing is, after dinner instead of chewing the Nicorette, I chewed a regular stick of sugarless gum, and as the nicotine leaves my system I am getting groggy and ready to go to sleep, and I'm so zonked now I'm not even considering late-night snacking. Oh, for those of you who may be concerned, I'm not planning to just get addicted to the gum and chew it forever. I only chewed 5 pieces today, even though the directions said to chew at least 9. I'm all, whatever, I'm only going to chew what I need.
 Signature Michelle Levin http://www.mindspring.com/~lunachick
I have only 3 flaws. My first flaw is thinking that I only have 3 flaws.
Chrono-Z - 16 Mar 2004 09:05 GMT Hah not bad! I'm up to about 3 packs of 5 piece chewing gum a day!
> Ok, there are a quazillion good reasons to quit smoking, but the withdrawal > process kinda sucks. I caved last night and smoked again, but today I [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > 5 pieces today, even though the directions said to chew at least 9. I'm > all, whatever, I'm only going to chew what I need. carla - 16 Mar 2004 13:21 GMT > I was able to run > around and play soccer with the kids at work for a whole hour! And I > didn't start coughing and run out of breath! I'm hoping the joy at being > able to exercise without coughing and choking will help offset any > potential weight gain from a lowered metabolism. I think it's a truly remarkable thing about quitting smoking that the lungs begin to heal so quickly. It is really true that (barring extreme damage such as emphysema or cancer) even a few days away from cigarettes noticeably improves one's breathing. I am glad you are enjoying it. Good luck Luna, I'm pulling for you!
carla
JC Der Koenig - 16 Mar 2004 14:51 GMT Weak, weak, weak.
 Signature Most of us probably aren't in danger of smoking too little.
> Ok, there are a quazillion good reasons to quit smoking, but the withdrawal > process kinda sucks. I caved last night and smoked again, but today I [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > 5 pieces today, even though the directions said to chew at least 9. I'm > all, whatever, I'm only going to chew what I need. Luna - 16 Mar 2004 16:36 GMT Don't care, don't care, don't care. I just want to stop smoking. I don't care whether I go about it in a "macho" way. I AM too weak to handle the physical withdrawal symptoms at the same time as the pyschological withdrawal. I still constantly have the urge to smoke, so I still have to be strong enough to fight that, I just don't have to feel like I have the flu at the same time.
> Weak, weak, weak. > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > 5 pieces today, even though the directions said to chew at least 9. I'm > > all, whatever, I'm only going to chew what I need.
 Signature Michelle Levin http://www.mindspring.com/~lunachick
I have only 3 flaws. My first flaw is thinking that I only have 3 flaws.
Susan - 16 Mar 2004 16:46 GMT lunachik wrote:
>Don't care, don't care, don't care. I just want to stop smoking. I don't >care whether I go about it in a "macho" way. I AM too weak to handle the >physical withdrawal symptoms at the same time as the pyschological >withdrawal. I still constantly have the urge to smoke, so I still have to >be strong enough to fight that, I just don't have to feel like I have the >flu at the same time. My SIL, after years of failure to quit, has gotten control of withdrawal using acupuncture. I think you only need a couple of treatments.
For my DH, Zyban, lozenges and gum and/or patches do it. He thought the Zyban made a big difference. The lozenges and gum get rid of the brain fog, so he can function mentally.
Susan
Luna - 16 Mar 2004 17:04 GMT > x-no-archive: yes > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > Susan I was prescribed Zyban (Wellbutrin, same drug, different name) for depression once, but I had a bad reaction to it.
 Signature Michelle Levin http://www.mindspring.com/~lunachick
I have only 3 flaws. My first flaw is thinking that I only have 3 flaws.
JC Der Koenig - 16 Mar 2004 16:50 GMT Just say no.
 Signature Most of us probably aren't in danger of eating too little. :)
Becky P.
> Don't care, don't care, don't care. I just want to stop smoking. I don't > care whether I go about it in a "macho" way. I AM too weak to handle the [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > > 5 pieces today, even though the directions said to chew at least 9. I'm > > > all, whatever, I'm only going to chew what I need. Luna - 16 Mar 2004 17:05 GMT Ok, no. No, I'm not going to stop using the gum just because you think I'm weak. ;o)
> Just say no. > [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > I'm > > > > all, whatever, I'm only going to chew what I need.
 Signature Michelle Levin http://www.mindspring.com/~lunachick
I have only 3 flaws. My first flaw is thinking that I only have 3 flaws.
JC Der Koenig - 16 Mar 2004 17:08 GMT I wrote that you were weak because you gave in and smoked a cigarette.
The gum is a whole 'nother issue.
 Signature Most of us probably aren't in danger of smoking too little.
> Ok, no. No, I'm not going to stop using the gum just because you think I'm > weak. ;o) [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > > I'm > > > > > all, whatever, I'm only going to chew what I need. Luna - 16 Mar 2004 17:15 GMT Oh, yeah. That was a weak thing to do. Am I weak person because I have a weak moment? Is a weak person one who never fails, never messes up? Thanks, you're really making me think. You're making me think of all the times in the past when I tried to accomplish something, had a setback, and let that be an excuse to give up completely. I think I'm different now. I have weak moments, I have setbacks, I let myself down sometimes. But I don't just give up because of it, I get right back on the horse and try again.
> I wrote that you were weak because you gave in and smoked a cigarette. > > The gum is a whole 'nother issue.
 Signature Michelle Levin http://www.mindspring.com/~lunachick
I have only 3 flaws. My first flaw is thinking that I only have 3 flaws.
DG511 - 16 Mar 2004 18:46 GMT Luna, JC is viciously trying to undermine your confidence. Why don't you killfile him, at least for a while? You're doing great, and anyone who tells you otherwise is a jerk.
Daria 166/148/140 sugar-free since 2/1/04 low-carb since 2/17/04
JC Der Koenig - 16 Mar 2004 19:23 GMT Go lose some weight fatty, she knows what she's doing.
 Signature Most of us probably aren't in danger of eating too little. :)
Becky P.
> Luna, JC is viciously trying to undermine your confidence. Why don't you > killfile him, at least for a while? You're doing great, and anyone who tells [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > sugar-free since 2/1/04 > low-carb since 2/17/04 Luna - 17 Mar 2004 00:51 GMT > Luna, JC is viciously trying to undermine your confidence. Why don't you > killfile him, at least for a while? You're doing great, and anyone who tells > you otherwise is a jerk. Whatever. Maybe he was trying to undermine my confidence, maybe not. I doubt it. Either way, he can't do much to me at all if I don't take it personally, and instead use his comments as a springboard for a more philosophical discussion.
 Signature Michelle Levin http://www.mindspring.com/~lunachick
I have only 3 flaws. My first flaw is thinking that I only have 3 flaws.
JC Der Koenig - 17 Mar 2004 00:54 GMT > > Luna, JC is viciously trying to undermine your confidence. Why don't you > > killfile him, at least for a while? You're doing great, and anyone who tells [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > personally, and instead use his comments as a springboard for a more > philosophical discussion. Do you see "Twilight of the Idols" as a self-empowerment manual?
Luna - 17 Mar 2004 01:23 GMT > > > Luna, JC is viciously trying to undermine your confidence. Why don't > you [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Do you see "Twilight of the Idols" as a self-empowerment manual? I have no idea what you're even talking about. Is that anything like "American Idol?" Because that show sucks.
 Signature Michelle Levin http://www.mindspring.com/~lunachick
I have only 3 flaws. My first flaw is thinking that I only have 3 flaws.
JC Der Koenig - 17 Mar 2004 02:15 GMT > > > > Luna, JC is viciously trying to undermine your confidence. Why don't > > you [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > I have no idea what you're even talking about. Is that anything like > "American Idol?" Because that show sucks. Philosophy.
Nietzsche.
Nevermind.
CarbAddict - 17 Mar 2004 14:14 GMT > From: JC Der Koenig (Wed, 17 Mar 2004 01:15:30 GMT) > MsgId: <SEN5c.10331$111.6207@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Nevermind. Nice try, though. :)
Marsha - 17 Mar 2004 02:40 GMT >>Do you see "Twilight of the Idols" as a self-empowerment manual?
> I have no idea what you're even talking about. Is that anything like > "American Idol?" Because that show sucks. Hmmm...type "Twilight of the Idols" in Google. Interesting.
Marsha/Ohio
bidkev - 17 Mar 2004 03:20 GMT <snip>
> I have no idea what you're even talking about. Is that anything like > "American Idol?" Because that show sucks. It's baiting you.
tcmedara - 17 Mar 2004 02:38 GMT (snip)
> Either way, he can't do much to me at all if I don't > take it personally, and instead use his comments as a springboard for > a more philosophical discussion. Hahahahaha, that's good! Using JC as a springboard for a more philosophical discussion is like using a banana to build bridge! Nothing says you can't do it, but it's gonna be awfully hard to get started!
Seeing a reference to that dolt and the term philosophical in the same sentence just cracks me up!
Thanks....and keep focused on quitting. The hard part is almost over. Another week and you won't want to give in.
Tom
Marsha - 17 Mar 2004 03:06 GMT > (snip) > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Tom You don't get it, either, huh? : )
Marsha/Ohio
tcmedara - 17 Mar 2004 03:52 GMT > You don't get it, either, huh? : ) > > Marsha/Ohio No, I get it, I just don't buy it. JC makes an obscure reference to Nietzsche and that makes him some sort of intellectual? Unfortunately the body of evidence demonstrates otherwise. He's consistently shown an inability to rise to the occasion, and would rather exist in the intellectual kiddie pool and amuse himself paddling in the urine-warmed shallows of his own self-indulgence than subject himself to the more challenging and often chillier currents of real intellectual intercourse.
That's why I thought any reference to JC as a philosophical springboard was funny. Sorta like bouncing on a bed of mud. Get it?
Tom (prefers more Enlightenment thinkers)
JC Der Koenig - 17 Mar 2004 04:07 GMT Learned how to do pushups yet?
 Signature Most of us probably aren't in danger of butching up in the Air Force.
> > You don't get it, either, huh? : ) > > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Tom (prefers more Enlightenment thinkers) tcmedara - 17 Mar 2004 04:15 GMT > Learned how to do pushups yet? See what I mean?
Thanks
Tom
Carmen - 17 Mar 2004 04:34 GMT Hi,
> Learned how to do pushups yet? Hey, airmen are invaluable to the United States military. They make the Coasties look tough. ;-)
Take care, Carmen
JC Der Koenig - 17 Mar 2004 04:39 GMT > Hi, > > > Learned how to do pushups yet? > > Hey, airmen are invaluable to the United States military. They make > the Coasties look tough. ;-) Good to see you haven't lost your sense of humor.
Btw, coasties see more front line action than airmen. Smugglers don't always give up right away.
Carmen - 17 Mar 2004 14:17 GMT Hi, JC wrote <to TCMedara>
> > > Learned how to do pushups yet? Carmen wrote:
> > Hey, airmen are invaluable to the United States military. They > > make the Coasties look tough. ;-) JC wrote:
> Good to see you haven't lost your sense of humor. > > Btw, coasties see more front line action than airmen. Smugglers > don't always give up right away. Carmen wrote: Need that sense of humor, otherwise I'd end up going bonkers and taking the local Chuck E Cheese mouse hostage or something. <G>
You're right about the Coast Guard. I'd forgotten about smuggling interdiction. I guess the airmen pretty much make every other branch look better. If it were up to me I'd say the AF should be disbanded and the slots and planes divided between the Navy and the Army. The entire plushy lifestyle the airmen are taught to expect makes for lousy discipline, soft personnel and rotten inter-branch cooperation when needed. It's sad to think how many potentially good military folks get ruined by going AF.
Take care, Carmen
JC Der Koenig - 17 Mar 2004 14:24 GMT > Hi, > JC wrote <to TCMedara> [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > when needed. It's sad to think how many potentially good military > folks get ruined by going AF. Very well stated.
revek - 17 Mar 2004 23:26 GMT If it were up to me I'd say the AF should be disbanded
> and the slots and planes divided between the Navy and the Army. Kind of like it was in the begining, eh? -- revek The structure of the university was such that, to become a member of the faculty, you merely found some obscure subject that nobody else claimed to teach, set up an office, and showed up at meal times. If you were unlucky, you may attract students. - Terry Pratchett, The Last Continent
Carmen - 18 Mar 2004 01:24 GMT Hi,
> If it were up to me I'd say the AF should be disbanded > > and the slots and planes divided between the Navy and the Army. > > Kind of like it was in the begining, eh? If people like Tom are indicative of what happens when there's a separate AF then having an AF is counter-productive. The pilots around here are not afflicted with the poisonous sort of dissociation from the ground troops that AF pilots have, nor are the air support crews or the mechanics or etc. They live among their fellow soldiers. The aircraft exist to support and protect the ground troops, not the other way 'round. A separate AF allows airmen to forget that. Unfortunately, the troops realize that the AF has become more about how cushy the airmen's surroundings are, and less about the mission. That doesn't breed respect for them as fellow warriors.
Take care, Carmen
revek - 19 Mar 2004 21:47 GMT > Hi, > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > from the ground troops that AF pilots have, nor are the air support > crews or the mechanics or etc. I wouldn't know. My brother didn't talk to me about his service (I was too young). I was commenting on the fact that when the newfangled flying things came out, each branch had it's own air component, and it was only after WW2 that the AF was separated out as it's own branch.
They live among their fellow soldiers.
> The aircraft exist to support and protect the ground troops, not the > other way 'round. I would agree to that.
A separate AF allows airmen to forget that.
> Unfortunately, the troops realize that the AF has become more about > how cushy the airmen's surroundings are, and less about the mission. > That doesn't breed respect for them as fellow warriors. Well stuff like Catch 22 never helped the image-- isn't that where the legend 'the army builds the stuff it needs and *then* builds an officer's club with the leftover, but the AF does it the other way around, which is why they've got the best, since they still need the other stuff, it's easier getting it if you can prove you can't build your latrines on what you have" was first printed?
Dad. L. Colonel, Army Air Force WW2 Brother, Captian, Air Force, 1960s Brother, (rank jammed in my frontal lobe and wont' come out) Navy, late 50s Uncle, Sargeant, Army, Vietnam Uncle, (ditto on the jamming) Marines, WW2
I came within a micron of going Navy myself. The recruiter wanted me keenly, even mentioning officer school and intelligence, as if that was an inducement. Silly man. I thought about, the pros certainly looked good on paper, but ultimately it sounded too much like home for me. ;) -- revek The whole of life is just like watching a film. Only it's as though you always get in ten minutes after the big picture has started, and no-one will tell you the plot, so you have to work it out all yourself from the clues. - Terry Pratchett, Moving Pictures.
Carmen - 21 Mar 2004 21:57 GMT Hi Revek,
> > Unfortunately, the troops realize that the AF has become more > > about how cushy the airmen's surroundings are, and less about the [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > other stuff, it's easier getting it if you can prove you can't build > your latrines on what you have" was first printed? Believe it or not I haven't read Catch 22 so I don't know. That would explain why Air Force bases have so many luxuries though compared to other branch's installations.
Take care, Carmen
tcmedara - 18 Mar 2004 00:41 GMT > You're right about the Coast Guard. I'd forgotten about smuggling > interdiction. I guess the airmen pretty much make every other branch [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Take care, > Carmen LOL You two are a howl! An anti-social dolt who couldn't hack it in the military and an NCO's wife have figured out how to restructure our military for the new millenium. Wow, its all clear to me now. Maybe we should book you both as visiting professors at the National Defense University (where joint - or "inter-branch" as you so quaintly put it -- operations are routinely studied) Quick email Rumsfeld, I'm sure he'd love to know the results of your exhaustive research!
Seriously Carmen, JC's just an idiot so I have fun watching his brain shrink, but I took you for someone smart enough to avoid topics you're ill equipped to discuss. It's funny to read, but disappointing in a way. JC's too stupid to move out of the realm of repetition and juvenile insult, he's got a limited toolkit when it comes to original thought. You've demonstrated an actual working intellect, why resort to silliness now? Repeating lame platitudes for the sake of a cheap jab is beneath you, really. I can play the same game, but it's just not as much fun as real intelligent discourse, is it? Stick to low carb.
Tom
JC Der Koenig - 18 Mar 2004 00:46 GMT Are you even in the real AF, or do you just play at it on the weekends?
 Signature Most of us probably aren't in danger of eating too little. :)
Becky P.
> > You're right about the Coast Guard. I'd forgotten about smuggling > > interdiction. I guess the airmen pretty much make every other branch [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > Tom Carmen - 18 Mar 2004 01:06 GMT > LOL You two are a howl! An anti-social dolt who couldn't hack it in > the military and an NCO's wife have figured out how to restructure > our > military for the new millenium. Wow, its all clear to me now. Ah, now the picture gets clearer on this end as well. You're an officer, aren't you? Most likely a junior one. If so, I do hope there's a competent non comm to keep you straight. If he or she is good you won't even know they're doing it. It takes a long time to develop a good non comm (Sarge has been doing this for 21 years in June) so if you are an officer, and your evals are good you'd be wise to thank whoever it is that's gotten you there. They're worth their weight in gold.
Carmen
tcmedara - 18 Mar 2004 03:07 GMT >> LOL You two are a howl! An anti-social dolt who couldn't hack it in >> the military and an NCO's wife have figured out how to restructure [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Carmen Again, off the mark and out of your league. Put your hubby on and we might be able to have an intelligent conversation on the subject. Nothing personal, but any advice you have to give me on the value of NCOs in an organizaiton is worth about what I'm paying for it. Seriously Carment, why do you feel the need to pursue this line of discussion? It's like me offering my opinion at a brain surgeons' convention, I'd be out of my league. Like I said before, go for the cheap jab if you feel like it. I find it kinda funny to watch people stray boldly into the vast expanse of their own ignorance. I expect it from JC 'cause it's all he's got. You strike me as smarter than that. I've heard more inter-service sniping in a single week than you've probably heard in your life -- and I've given my fair share as well. There's not much you can spout that I haven't heard and laughed about years ago. It cuts both ways, too. I won't bother to go down that road because it would be wasted effort in this audience. Stick to the LC discussion, or at least one's where you're not in over your head. Leave the NG fool role for JC, he's pretty much got it covered.
Go Air Force!.....I'll leave it at that.
Here, address these topics if you must: Smoking is bad, Low carb is a great means to control one's eating habits, calories matter, it's okay to splurge once in a while as long as you don't use it as an excuse to stuff your hole, no matter what or how you eat exercise needs to be a part of your lifestyle.
Tom
Carmen - 18 Mar 2004 03:45 GMT Tom:
> >> LOL You two are a howl! An anti-social dolt who couldn't hack it > >> in the military and an NCO's wife have figured out how to > >> restructure our military for the new millenium. Wow, its all > >> clear to me now. Carmen:
> > Ah, now the picture gets clearer on this end as well. You're an > > officer, aren't you? Most likely a junior one. If so, I do hope [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > worth > > their weight in gold. Tom:
> Again, off the mark and out of your league. Put your hubby on and > we might be able to have an intelligent conversation on the subject. > Nothing > personal, but any advice you have to give me on the value of NCOs in > an organizaiton is worth about what I'm paying for it. Seriously > Carment, why do you feel the need to pursue this line of discussion? Carmen: In our marriage the wife is allowed to have her own opinions. The discussion is relevant and that's why you're tap-dancing now. If you want to end the discussion do so honestly. The tactic of offering to fight the husband for something the wife said is passe. If you'll recall it was you who got into the earlier discussion in the first place by intimating that JC wasn't as patriotic as you because you did some time in Iraq and he didn't. That was *way* out of line, especially since your deployment was AF, meaning it was short and a far cry from the deployments done by the majority of the other service members who went. Who did your perimeter guard Tom? Marines or Army? Did you even make it to Iraq or did you sit in Kuwait?
Tom:
> It's like me offering my opinion at a brain surgeons' convention, > I'd be out of [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > he's got. > You strike me as smarter than that. Carmen: And yet you do not counter points, you merely continue to proclaim that I'm ignorant. I'm not stupid Tom. I've made valid points and you've failed to address them.
Tom:
> I've heard more inter-service > sniping in a single week than you've probably heard in your life -- [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > go down that road because it would be wasted effort in this > audience. Carmen: Since it would have to be based upon falsities I dare say it would be wasted.
Tom:
> Stick to the LC discussion, or at least one's where you're not in > over your head. > Leave the NG fool role for JC, he's pretty much got it covered. Carmen: Evade discussing facts all you wish. I'll continue to say what needs to be said when it needs to be said. I do not take direction from the likes of you.
Tom:
> Go Air Force!.....I'll leave it at that. Carmen: That's a meaningless mantra, requiring no thought. But I'm the one who isn't engaging in intelligent coversation. Sure.
Tom:
> Here, address these topics if you must: Smoking is bad, Low carb is > a great means to control one's eating habits, calories matter, it's [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > of your > lifestyle. Carmen: Those are good subjects for you to discuss - after you've been low carbing for a while. *I'll* discuss what I please.
Carmen
JC Der Koenig - 18 Mar 2004 04:33 GMT > If you'll recall it was you who got into the earlier discussion in the > first place by intimating that JC wasn't as patriotic as you because > you did some time in Iraq and he didn't. That was *way* out of line, Btw, I never wrote that I didn't spend time in Iraq. Although it has nothing to do with my patriotism, I was there back in 91/92. Also spent some time with the AF at Khobar Towers. I was well impressed with their accomodations, if not their military discipline.
Carmen - 18 Mar 2004 16:53 GMT Hi,
> > If you'll recall it was you who got into the earlier discussion in > > the first place by intimating that JC wasn't as patriotic as you [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > time with the AF at Khobar Towers. I was well impressed with their > accomodations, if not their military discipline. It's been a while since I thought about Khobar Towers. I remember the pictures on the news of the open scar on the place. Ugly. The sad thing is to this day AF security doesn't impress me. About six months ago some friends and I were doing some geocaching at night on an AF base a couple of hours south of here. We were doing virtuals (consists of following the GPSr to the coordinates then gathering information from the source site) with flashlights around the display aircraft in full view of the gate guards (about 300 feet or so from them). It wasn't until approximately 20 minutes later that one of them finally got in his truck, drove over to us and then asked what we were doing. Since we'd been discussing how pathetic they were for some time already (one guy was former Army and one guy was retired Navy) we just said "Research" and kept doing what we were doing. Know what? The guy just said "Okay" and drove back to the gate. Didn't ask for ID - *nothing*. We could have been terrorists, and we were hanging around what is a visitor's center during the day and it's right by a gate. What if we had been terrorists and we planted an explosive device set to detonate during peak influx hours at the gate? Just sad.
Take care, Carmen
JC Der Koenig - 18 Mar 2004 16:59 GMT > Hi, > [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > explosive device set to detonate during peak influx hours at the gate? > Just sad. For as smart as they're supposed to be, they sure don't seem to learn from their mistakes. I believe it's mostly an attitude problem.
Carmen - 19 Mar 2004 15:39 GMT Hi,
> > Hi, > > [quoted text clipped - 48 lines] > learn from their mistakes. I believe it's mostly an attitude > problem. We (Sarge and I and our ham radio buddies) are going to be in that area again on Saturday. If there are other caches on base maybe we'll arrange to see if they're still on their backsides. They are a well educated branch by and large, but common sense-wise there's room for improvement.
Take care, Carmen
JC Der Koenig - 19 Mar 2004 16:50 GMT > They are a well educated branch by and large, but common sense-wise > there's room for improvement. I concur.
tcmedara - 18 Mar 2004 05:11 GMT ?
> Carmen: > In our marriage the wife is allowed to have her own opinions. The [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > members who went. Who did your perimeter guard Tom? Marines or Army? > Did you even make it to Iraq or did you sit in Kuwait? Have all the opinions you like. However, just because you hold an opinion on a topic doesn't mean it's well informed. Your comments show your knowledge comes from anecdotes and association, not actual experience -- particularly regarding the AF. I'm not tap dancing, I just don't value your opinion. Don't take it personally. I have no desire to argue, or "fight" with you or your husband. My comment about your husband was merely to say that, in a military discussion, I have more respect for his opinion as a military member than that of someone who is obviously not. Your opinion is your own, value it. Just don't mistake it for more than it is.
I do recall the earlier discussion with the JC very well, but I don't think you do. For the record, JC brought up the subject of miltary service when he called me a REMF -- a Vietnam era term for Rear Echelon Mother f.cker -- my reply was that unless he was posting from downtown Baghdad, he's got nothing on me. Patriotic or not, some idiot sitting on his a.s in Texas is in no place to say anything negative. Particularly since he has no clue what I do or where I have been. I explained that to you before. Google on it if you don't believe me, or look here: http://tinyurl.com/29hqx. I agree, questioning someone's patriotism is out of line. For you to now imply the AF some how "easier" is just as much out of line. What the hell do you know about what I did or how I lived? Consider your own double standard. Are *you* questioning my patriotism now? (not that it matters, btw). Repeating platitudes you overheard about how "easy" the AF has it doesn't mean they're true (back to that opinion thing). To rate who has it harder is a pointless endevour and real military people don't take it seriously. We joke about it a lot, but there's usually an underlying mutual respect. If you haven't lived it, don't pretend to understand.
> Tom: >> It's like me offering my opinion at a brain surgeons' convention, [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > that I'm ignorant. I'm not stupid Tom. I've made valid points and > you've failed to address them. I'm not sure you've made a point. You've made a few humorous jabs at the Air Force, but little in the way of substantiated points. I never said you were stupid -- just the opposite -- I gave you credit for your demonstrated intelligence, just not on this topic. I'm questioning why you are going down this road to begin with. Unfortunately, you've wandered into an area where your knowledge level obvioulsy is far different from my own. What I know is based on over 20 years of training, education, and near daily experience in the military. Not bragging about it, it's just fact. Whatever points you've made appear to be based on hearsay and gossip. I've chosen not to address your points because it would be a either fruitless exercise or one requiring more effort than I care to expend. I don't read ADSL-C to discuss military doctrine or policy.
> Tom: >> I've heard more inter-service [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Since it would have to be based upon falsities I dare say it would be > wasted. Are you calling me a liar pre-emptively? Are you saying know what I'm going to say will be false even before I say it? Are you saying that no other service is open to any sort of criticism? That's just naive. You might want to reword that.
> Tom: >> Stick to the LC discussion, or at least one's where you're not in [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > to be said when it needs to be said. I do not take direction from the > likes of you. I'm not sure what "facts" your referring too? Was it when you said:
"The entire plushy lifestyle the airmen are taught to expect makes for lousy discipline, soft personnel and rotten inter-branch cooperation when needed. It's sad to think how many potentially good military folks get ruined by going AF."
Or was it your silly little generalization about "disassociation with ground troops"? Or when you said " The aircraft exist to support and protect the ground troops, not the other way 'round." That's a lot of ill- informed assertion, and awfully shy of facts. Not much to respond to except it's obvious you know little about the military and less about the Air Force.
> Tom: >> Go Air Force!.....I'll leave it at that. > > Carmen: > That's a meaningless mantra, requiring no thought. But I'm the one > who isn't engaging in intelligent coversation. Sure. Meaningless mantra was the whole point. As were your comment abouts about the AF. This conversation has been lacking in intelligence since JaCkass made the lame push-up jab and you threw in the silly comment about the Coasties. Not a whole lot of intelligence from the outset in my book. That's why I'm wondering why you chose to engage in it. Am I giving you to much credit?
> Tom: >> Here, address these topics if you must: Smoking is bad, Low carb is [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Those are good subjects for you to discuss - after you've been low > carbing for a while. *I'll* discuss what I please. I'm not stopping you from discussing anything. I too will discuss what I please. That's the beauty of usenet, aint it :) I also try to stick to topics I know about, differentiate fact from opinion, and avoid subjects I know nothing about. I'm merely suggesting that you stick to your strengths. Trying to debate the relative merits of specific services is not something I find productive in real life with other military members, let alone with civilians on usenet. For now, you're showing up with a knife to a gunfight. I just choose not to play.
Oh yeah. I've already stated that I'm an active duty member in the AF with over 20 years in uniform. I'm not gonna tell you what I do or where I work. It's neither relevent nor appropriate for usenet. Leave it at that.
Tom
JC Der Koenig - 18 Mar 2004 05:28 GMT These AF types sure are sensitive. They probably have training for that.
 Signature Most of the Air Force probably isn't in danger of butching up too much.
> ? > > Carmen: [quoted text clipped - 152 lines] > > Tom Carmen - 18 Mar 2004 16:35 GMT Tom,
> For the record, JC brought up the subject of miltary service when > he called me a REMF -- a Vietnam era term for Rear Echelon Mother [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > he has no > clue what I do or where I have been.
> Oh yeah. I've already stated that I'm an active duty member in the > AF with over 20 years in uniform. I'm not gonna tell you what I do > or where > I work. It's neither relevent nor appropriate for usenet. Leave it > at that. You must think me quite stupid. No wonder you didn't mention what you do. I know full well what a REMF is, and TPOC stuff is hardly front line troop-care sort of slotting - now is it? No. You sit on your backside in VA and just deal in paperwork abstractions while others do the work that matters. Any interactions you've had with other branch reps vis-a-vis DoDIIS was nothing more than a meeting of other pogues like yourself - branch immaterial. The big comfort for me turns out to be that even though you're a major, you haven't been placed in a position where you can make too many decisions that affect troops. I do hope you recover from the three *grueling* months you spent in Iraq (fall in Iraq with its 80 degree temps). Since it turns out you're mostly a poseur you really aren't worth my time. Bugger off pogue.
Carmen
JC Der Koenig - 18 Mar 2004 16:39 GMT > Tom, > [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > you're mostly a poseur you really aren't worth my time. Bugger off > pogue. Now that's a "bad a.s bitch".
tcmedara - 19 Mar 2004 02:13 GMT > Tom, > > You must think me quite stupid. I didn't up to this point, but now I think I gave you too much credit.
>No wonder you didn't mention what you > do. I know full well what a REMF is, and TPOC stuff is hardly front [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > reps vis-a-vis DoDIIS was nothing more than a meeting of other pogues > like yourself - branch immaterial. Passing off Google derived tidbits like you know what you're talking about is as laughable as it is sad. Unfortunately your attempted use of those little tidbits just serves to proves how little you really know. As far as where I am now and what I do, you still don't have a clue, and frankly it's immaterial. We all have to pull some ocassional staff time, but that hardly defines a person or the entire service. Frankly it's not very fun, but it's all part of the process. Last I checked, there were staff jobs in every service. Perhaps you try and actually understand something before you spout off about it. Trying to discuss this with you is like a discussion of particle physics with 1st graders. Not sure why I'm doing it.
The big comfort for me turns out
> to be that even though you're a major, you haven't been placed in a > position where you can make too many decisions that affect troops. Wrong again on several counts
> I do hope you recover from the three *grueling* months you spent in > Iraq (fall in Iraq with its 80 degree temps). Since it turns out > you're mostly a poseur you really aren't worth my time. Still wrong. Obviously you're confusing assertion with fact. Think what you want, but you still don't have a clue what I do or where I've been. As I said before, it's not appropriate information for usenet. Guess all you want, but don't confuse it with reality. Your judgement of what constitutes a "worthwhile" military deployment is irrelevent. Unless you've done it, you won't understand. To comment on it just demonstrates how little you really know. Confusing duration and living conditions with the relative worth of one's actions demonstrates how idiotic your understanding really is. Continuing to cling to unsubstantiated impressions to substantiate your shallow conclusions demonstrates what an intellectual lightweight you really are. Try verifying what you know rather than asserting what you may have heard. Yes, I do now think you're stupid. At least you called that part of it right.
>Bugger off > pogue. Resort to vulgar insult. Nice. The last bastion of the ignorant. If you can't make your point, then throw the verbal bomb and run away, right? I expect as much from JaCkass, but now I see you're in the same class. Too bad. I'd been enjoying the debate up until this point. I'll just take that as a concession. Now go out and learn something.
> Carmen Luna - 17 Mar 2004 04:47 GMT > > You don't get it, either, huh? : ) > > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Tom (prefers more Enlightenment thinkers) Um, I didn't mean philosophical as in discussing philosophers. I meant like, he calls me weak, so instead of being all "Am not! Neener neener neener I'm killfiling you!" I considered what he was saying on a philosophical level, as in: is a person who has a weak moment by definition a weak person? That's what I meant by philosophical as opposed to personal.
 Signature Michelle Levin http://www.mindspring.com/~lunachick
I have only 3 flaws. My first flaw is thinking that I only have 3 flaws.
tcmedara - 17 Mar 2004 04:58 GMT > Um, I didn't mean philosophical as in discussing philosophers. I > meant like, he calls me weak, so instead of being all "Am not! > Neener neener neener I'm killfiling you!" I considered what he was > saying on a philosophical level, as in: is a person who has a weak > moment by definition a weak person? That's what I meant by > philosophical as opposed to personal. I just thought the irony was funny. And BTW, I think it's great your kicking the nicotine monkey. I know that bastard can turn into a gorilla pretty quickly and work you over pretty well. Support helps. Keep it up and stay focused.
Tom
JC Der Koenig - 17 Mar 2004 04:59 GMT > Um, I didn't mean philosophical as in discussing philosophers. I meant > like, he calls me weak, so instead of being all "Am not! Neener neener > neener I'm killfiling you!" I considered what he was saying on a > philosophical level, as in: is a person who has a weak moment by definition > a weak person? That's what I meant by philosophical as opposed to > personal. A person who has a weak moment is human, all too human.
Luna - 17 Mar 2004 05:04 GMT > > Um, I didn't mean philosophical as in discussing philosophers. I meant > > like, he calls me weak, so instead of being all "Am not! Neener neener [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > A person who has a weak moment is human, all too human. word
 Signature Michelle Levin http://www.mindspring.com/~lunachick
I have only 3 flaws. My first flaw is thinking that I only have 3 flaws.
bidkev - 17 Mar 2004 07:59 GMT <snip>
> A person who has a weak moment is human, all too human. You're pretty tough then?
JC Der Koenig - 17 Mar 2004 14:20 GMT > <snip> > > > A person who has a weak moment is human, all too human. > > You're pretty tough then? It was an oblique reference to Nietzsche, idiot.
bidkev - 17 Mar 2004 23:29 GMT >> <snip> >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > It was an oblique reference to Nietzsche, I'd never have guessed
> idiot. Bugger! You've got my number!
revek - 16 Mar 2004 23:17 GMT I think I'm different now. I have weak moments, I have
> setbacks, I let myself down sometimes. But I don't just give up > because of it, I get right back on the horse and try again. Recognizing your weak moments and not letting them stop you is the hallmark of a grownup. And in my opinion, is the number one marker for success in anything, including getting control of your weight.
-- revek The thing I want to know is, if you tell your brain not to do stuff like that and it keeps doing it anyway, does that mean your mind has a mind of its own? And if it does, then who's in charge here, anyway? -Jed, Armageddon Summer (Yolen)
FOB - 16 Mar 2004 23:35 GMT There you go, just say no to JC. Most physical addictions should be withdrawn from gradually rather than cold turkey and the gum will let you do that while you are dealing with changing the mental habit.
In news:lunachick-20180E.11050316032004@news03.east.earthlink.net, Luna <lunachick@NOSPAMmindspring.com> stated
| Ok, no. No, I'm not going to stop using the gum just because you | think I'm weak. ;o) [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] | I have only 3 flaws. My first flaw is thinking that I only have 3 | flaws. JC Der Koenig - 16 Mar 2004 23:58 GMT Funny how it's always the WFFIDs that rationalize bad habits and weak will.
 Signature Most of us probably aren't in danger of butching up too much.
> There you go, just say no to JC. Most physical addictions should be > withdrawn from gradually rather than cold turkey and the gum will let you do [quoted text clipped - 50 lines] > | I have only 3 flaws. My first flaw is thinking that I only have 3 > | flaws. Luna - 17 Mar 2004 01:05 GMT sh.t, man. Accept it. Humans are weak. We are all weak to some extent or another, even you. Recognizing weaknesses and developing strategies for dealing with them is much more likely to lead to success than trying to pretend you're some sort of superhuman who never needs any help.
I am like you in some ways, in that I have no patience for people who whine about their problems without taking steps to solve them. But, unlike you, once someone IS taking steps, is making an effort to succeed, I do have patience and respect for them even if they make mistakes or have weak moments along the way, as long as they don't let those moments be an excuse to give up completely.
You seem to hold people up to perfectionist standards, and view any moment of weakness as a harbinger of absolute final failure. I like you as a person and I worry that if you are that hard on _yourself_ that you could be setting yourself up for a hard fall. So if you have a weak moment, if you ever cave into temptation to do something that isn't good for you, please don't label yourself as "weak willed" and tear yourself down. That kind of labeling can lead to hating yourself and feeling like you're not worth the effort it takes to be healthy. I don't want to see that happen to you.
> Funny how it's always the WFFIDs that rationalize bad habits and weak will.
 Signature Michelle Levin http://www.mindspring.com/~lunachick
I have only 3 flaws. My first flaw is thinking that I only have 3 flaws.
JC Der Koenig - 17 Mar 2004 01:18 GMT "The secret to my happiness:
A yes, a no, a straight line, a goal."
 Signature Most of us probably aren't in danger of philosophizing too little.
> sh.t, man. Accept it. Humans are weak. We are all weak to some extent or > another, even you. Recognizing weaknesses and developing strategies for [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > > Funny how it's always the WFFIDs that rationalize bad habits and weak will. revek - 17 Mar 2004 23:24 GMT > There you go, just say no to JC. Most physical addictions should be > withdrawn from gradually rather than cold turkey and the gum will let > you do that while you are dealing with changing the mental habit. Really? Because I found that the mental compulsion to light up was far far stronger than the physical component. That lasted about a week or so after I removed the patch. Which I only removed after I had conquered the need to light up every time I sat at the computer, read a book, had a cup of coffee, cleaned house, blah blah blah fishcakes, and that itself took about 2 months to 'fix'.
I agree that you should only work on one aspect of addiction at a time.
Some tips that helped a lot for me: 1. breathe deep and hold as if you're dragging on the cig when you get a craving. I've found what I thought was a craving for a cig was often my lungs desiring more air and excercise (maybe it was a 'healing itch"-- but it worked). 2. remove all nicotine and residue from your home. It's not enough to throw out the pack and wash the ashtray (or it wasn't for me). The whole living area has to be de-oderized-- carpets, furniture, curtains, walls. Breathing clean air removes one of the worst craving triggers.
Smoke free for almost 5 years now.
-- revek Frequent lock ups are a symptom of not enough memory but only in the way that nosebleeds are a symptom of gunshot wounds to the head.
FOB - 17 Mar 2004 23:38 GMT I think the degree of physical addiction is definitely a YMMV thing.
In news:c3ajch$25qdar$1@ID-190183.news.uni-berlin.de, revek <tanirevek@yahoo.com> stated
| Really? Because I found that the mental compulsion to light up was | far far stronger than the physical component. That lasted about a [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] | Frequent lock ups are a symptom of not enough memory but only in the | way that nosebleeds are a symptom of gunshot wounds to the head. martymkm@webtv.net - 16 Mar 2004 17:30 GMT Don't care, don't care, don't care. I just want to stop smoking. I don't care whether I go about it in a "macho" way. I AM too weak to handle the physical withdrawal symptoms at the same time as the pyschological withdrawal. I still constantly have the urge to smoke, so I still have to be strong enough to fight that, I just don't have to feel like I have the flu at the same time.
--------------------------------
Luna, have you heard about the nicotine nasal sprays they have out now? They are supposedly better for you overall than the patches or gum, and satisfy you quicker.
HTH; Marty
Irv Finkleman - 16 Mar 2004 21:43 GMT > Ok, there are a quazillion good reasons to quit smoking, but the withdrawal > process kinda sucks. I caved last night and smoked again, but today I > started the Nicorette gum .... Hi Michelle, If you recall, when you first started I mentioned that you should carry the Nicorette gum as a backup. Now you know! Don't worry about what they say you should consume -- just take one whenever you need one. After you think you've quit, still carry some with you for a full year -- that's what I did, and I've been off for ten years come Easter weekend!
Good Luck and keep it up!
Irv
 Signature -------------------------------------- Diagnosed Type II Diabetes March 5 2001 Beating it with diet and exercise! 297/215/210 (to be revised lower) 58"/43"(!)/44" (already lower too!) -------------------------------------- Visit my HomePage at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv/ Visit my very special website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv4/ Visit my CFSRS/CFIOG ONLINE OLDTIMERS website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv5/ -------------------- Irv Finkleman, Grampa/Ex-Navy/Old Fart/Ham Radio VE6BP Calgary, Alberta, Canada
|
|
|