Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / Low Carb / March 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Sugar Substitutes

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
\ - 29 Mar 2004 08:09 GMT
I've been looking for a safe sugar substitute but for every article I find
promoting a product, I find two that show the negative affects of that
product.

Is there such a thing as a safe sugar substitute?

thx
Gary - 29 Mar 2004 10:02 GMT
I've never seen anything negative for Stevia, which I use and like
very much.

>I've been looking for a safe sugar substitute but for every article I find
>promoting a product, I find two that show the negative affects of that
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>thx
Carmen - 29 Mar 2004 13:21 GMT
Hello Gary,

> >I've been looking for a safe sugar substitute but for every article
> >I find promoting a product, I find two that show the negative
> >affects of
> >that product.
> >Is there such a thing as a safe sugar substitute?

> I've never seen anything negative for Stevia, which I use and like
> very much.

You missed the shrunken rat testicle study then I guess, and the fact
that the EU, the US and Canada all rejected stevia as a food
additive....
Not saying stevia is unsafe, just saying nothing is completely safe.

Take care,
Carmen
pavane - 29 Mar 2004 19:11 GMT
> ........
> You missed the shrunken rat testicle study then I guess
> ........

Is THAT what they make stevia from???

pavane
Carmen - 29 Mar 2004 20:32 GMT
Hi,

> > ........
> > You missed the shrunken rat testicle study then I guess
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> pavane

<G>  According to my taste buds it's possible.  Other people seem to
like it just fine though.  ;-)

Take care,
Carmen
LCer09 - 29 Mar 2004 14:45 GMT
>I've never seen anything negative for Stevia, which I use and like
>very much.

I've seen more negative press about Stevia than anything! Plus it tastes nasty,
another drawback.

LCing since 12/01/03-
Me- 5'7" 265/218/140
& hubby- 6' 310/234/180
tintinet - 29 Mar 2004 20:05 GMT
> >I've never seen anything negative for Stevia, which I use and like
> >very much.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Me- 5'7" 265/218/140
> & hubby- 6' 310/234/180

There's negative press about everything....

I agree- some Stevia products are awful! But some are pretty good...
Crafting Mom - 29 Mar 2004 11:59 GMT
>Is there such a thing as a safe sugar substitute?

Mine is this neat invention called "blueberries".  Many people have
claimed to invent them, but on the container of frozen blueberries I
have, it says they grew wild.

I sometimes mix 1/4 cup of berries with 1/4 cup of full fat plain
yogurt, for a delicious, dessert like mix.

HTH
CM
Debbie Cusick - 30 Mar 2004 03:54 GMT
> Mine is this neat invention called "blueberries".  Many people have
> claimed to invent them, but on the container of frozen blueberries I
> have, it says they grew wild.

My folks grow blueberries on their farm up in Canada. They keep hoping all
this great press for blueberries will cause the prices to skyrocket! But so
far they still can't break even. Alas. :-)

Debbie (blueberry lover from way back)
Jeri - 29 Mar 2004 12:07 GMT
> I've been looking for a safe sugar substitute but for every article I
> find promoting a product, I find two that show the negative affects
> of that product.
>
> Is there such a thing as a safe sugar substitute?

I use Splenda. As far as I'm concerned it's safe.
The internet is a valuable tool. You can find information, pro and con, on
just about anything. The problem lies in deciding what is credible.
wossoyi - 30 Mar 2004 02:51 GMT
> > I've been looking for a safe sugar substitute but for every article I
> > find promoting a product, I find two that show the negative affects
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> The internet is a valuable tool. You can find information, pro and con, on
> just about anything. The problem lies in deciding what is credible.

Splenda gives me massive stomach cramps.  The side-effects seem to be
quite rare though and not acknowledged by the splenda people.

-i
Bear - 29 Mar 2004 13:48 GMT
Splenda seems a lot safer than sugar. IMHO.
Signature

Bear-
Grrrrrrrrrrrr  :o)
297/257/210
"She lives on prison grub...it consists of starches instead of proteins.
She gets fat. Her tissues become water-logged."
Perry Mason - The Glamous Ghost

> I've been looking for a safe sugar substitute but for every article I find
> promoting a product, I find two that show the negative affects of that
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> thx
rosie - 29 Mar 2004 14:45 GMT
great point bear!

Signature

rosie

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or
that
we are to stand by the president right or wrong, is not only
unpatriotic
and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."
........................................T.Roosevelt

: Splenda seems a lot safer than sugar. IMHO.
Ignoramus14879 - 29 Mar 2004 14:56 GMT
> I've been looking for a safe sugar substitute but for every article I find
> promoting a product, I find two that show the negative affects of that
> product.
>
> Is there such a thing as a safe sugar substitute?

I have not found a safe sugar substitute that also does not increase
appetite.

Hence, I eat nothing sweetened. Works great for me.

i
223/173/180
carla - 30 Mar 2004 03:18 GMT
>> I've been looking for a safe sugar substitute but for every article
>> I find promoting a product, I find two that show the negative
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Hence, I eat nothing sweetened. Works great for me.

You eat plenty of fruit, right ig?  Do you find that fruit doesn't increase
your appetite, while refined sugar does?

I ask because I've added a couple of fruits (grapefruit and apples) back
into my diet and I am curious whether it will make appetite control harder
for me.

Signature

carla
http://geekofalltrades.typepad.com/geek

Ignoramus14879 - 30 Mar 2004 03:56 GMT
>>> I've been looking for a safe sugar substitute but for every article
>>> I find promoting a product, I find two that show the negative
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> You eat plenty of fruit, right ig?  Do you find that fruit doesn't increase
> your appetite, while refined sugar does?

I eat some fruits and not others. Of fruits, I eat apples -- one a day
-- and very little else. The really sweet stuff I eat very rarely or
in extremely small quantity, just to be on the safe side.

> I ask because I've added a couple of fruits (grapefruit and apples) back
> into my diet and I am curious whether it will make appetite control harder
> for me.

My guess is that it is an individual thing. Grapefruit and apples seem
like a wise choice.

i
Doug Freyburger - 30 Mar 2004 00:41 GMT
> Is there such a thing as a safe sugar substitute?

Realistically none are safe.  No matter which one you can find
problems.  So the *real* question is which ones are more
dangerous and which ones are less dangerous.

Aspartame and ace-k are on the more dangerous end of the scale,
and striknine and other fatal poisons are at the far end of
the dangerous scale.  I'm sure some fatal poison is very sweet.

Splenda and saccharine are on the less dangerous end of of
the scale and water is at the extreme safe end of the scale.
Water is only sweet ehn you're very thirsty, though.  Chuckle.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.