Week two.
A bit disappointing cause only lost .2kilos don't even think that registers
in ounces. But i did have a good week exercising again and am really
starting to enjoy swimming.NSV pants not as snug :)
Staring wt 81.2kgs(180)
current wt 79.8kgs (177)
goal wt 70kgs (154)
wt loss to date 1.4kg (3lb 9ozs)
Elaine Kirkham - 16 Feb 2005 00:06 GMT
I know you're disappointed, but a loss is a loss is a loss! So
congratulations, Kim.
Elaine
>Week two.
>A bit disappointing cause only lost .2kilos don't even think that registers
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>
cynlyn - 19 Feb 2005 19:28 GMT
You're doing great, Kim... don't lose sight of the big picture, and congrats
on the NSV!
>I know you're disappointed, but a loss is a loss is a loss! So
>congratulations, Kim.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>>goal wt 70kgs (154)
>>wt loss to date 1.4kg (3lb 9ozs)
Fred - 16 Feb 2005 02:15 GMT
Start with (G)
You are not allowed to use ONLY in a LOSS sentence! You did fine.
>Week two.
>A bit disappointing cause only lost .2kilos don't even think that registers
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>goal wt 70kgs (154)
>wt loss to date 1.4kg (3lb 9ozs)
Ophidium - 16 Feb 2005 10:23 GMT
> Week two.
> A bit disappointing cause only lost .2kilos don't even think that
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> goal wt 70kgs (154)
> wt loss to date 1.4kg (3lb 9ozs)
Well done :)
Laura - 16 Feb 2005 17:53 GMT
3 lbs in 2 weeks is well within the WW acceptable range. Remember ww
recommends losing between .5 & 2 lbs per week as being safe. You are doing
great.
> Week two.
> A bit disappointing cause only lost .2kilos don't even think that registers
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> goal wt 70kgs (154)
> wt loss to date 1.4kg (3lb 9ozs)