Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / WeightWatchers / November 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

NYNY update - Joyce

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Joyce - 21 Nov 2003 21:59 GMT
Here ya go, <drumroll please> .......................  officially broke into a new
decade at 129.5!!!  It's a small loss of .5 from last week, but I've been flirting
with this number for a few weeks now.  Sure was nice to see it hold firm this
week. <grin>  Probably won't last long, but I don't care ... I'm enjoying the
moment!  LOL

And before you ask, Fred ... NO!  I am not shooting for that 100 pounds total.
<grin>

Joyce
WW starting weight: 228.8 - 2/5/02
current weight:  129.5
total loss: 99.3
Lifetime: 4/4/03
Elaine Kirkham - 21 Nov 2003 23:40 GMT
Wow, that is superb, Joyce!! Congratulations on dropping that 1/2 pound I getting
under the 130's ;-D I know you will be dancing in the clouds for some time to come.
Elaine K
331.4/215.6/179

> Here ya go, <drumroll please> .......................  officially broke into a new
> decade at 129.5!!!  It's a small loss of .5 from last week, but I've been flirting
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> total loss: 99.3
> Lifetime: 4/4/03
Joyce - 23 Nov 2003 16:54 GMT
hehehe, I better stop dancing now - swear I've eaten my way through the week-end.
Hub decided he wanted to go out last night, to one of those places that cooks the
food at your table ... rice, veggies, etc., asian style (I think).  We both chose
Salmon and Chicken - but everything was cooked with loads of fat/oil and soy
sauce.  It was yummy and I haven't done it for well over a year, sure enjoyed
myself ... but am going to have to get my butt back in gear from now until
Thanksgiving.

Joyce

>Wow, that is superb, Joyce!! Congratulations on dropping that 1/2 pound I getting
>under the 130's ;-D I know you will be dancing in the clouds for some time to come.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>> total loss: 99.3
>> Lifetime: 4/4/03
Miss Violette - 25 Nov 2003 14:04 GMT
I love those steak places, try not to think about them though,  Lee,
drooling and checking flex points...
> hehehe, I better stop dancing now - swear I've eaten my way through the week-end.
> Hub decided he wanted to go out last night, to one of those places that cooks the
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> >> total loss: 99.3
> >> Lifetime: 4/4/03
Fred - 22 Nov 2003 00:41 GMT
Cut off in mid-sentence.  You sure are close - unconscious effort
perhaps - but, if so, you cannot answer anyway (g)

Congrats on that 1/2 pound.  New Decade, also


>Here ya go, <drumroll please> .......................  officially broke into a new
>decade at 129.5!!!  It's a small loss of .5 from last week, but I've been flirting
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>total loss: 99.3
>Lifetime: 4/4/03
Lesanne - 22 Nov 2003 01:08 GMT
I somehow missed the meat of this message the first time.  Congrats on the
half, it was a biggie.  And hey, shooting or not, 100?  Wow.

> >Here ya go, <drumroll please> .......................  officially broke into a new
> >decade at 129.5!!!  It's a small loss of .5 from last week, but I've been flirting
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> >total loss: 99.3
> >Lifetime: 4/4/03
Joyce - 23 Nov 2003 17:50 GMT
Thanks Lesanne.  I have wondered ... am I close enough to the 100 mark that when
people ask the inevevitable *how much weight have you lost* ... that my answer
could be 100?  Or do I stick with the *just under 100 pounds* answer?  <g>  

Joyce

>I somehow missed the meat of this message the first time.  Congrats on the
>half, it was a biggie.  And hey, shooting or not, 100?  Wow.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>> >total loss: 99.3
>> >Lifetime: 4/4/03
Lesanne - 23 Nov 2003 19:37 GMT
heck, I would say 100!

> Thanks Lesanne.  I have wondered ... am I close enough to the 100 mark that when
> people ask the inevevitable *how much weight have you lost* ... that my answer
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> >> >total loss: 99.3
> >> >Lifetime: 4/4/03
Prairie Roots - 23 Nov 2003 20:26 GMT
Your answer could be, and SHOULD be, 100. Absolutely.

Just a few days ago, a friend asked how much I've lost. When I
answered with the truth ("fifty-seven point two"), the response was
"Wow! Sixty pounds!" I realized in that brief exchange that the only
people who care about precision are your doctor, your WW weight
tracker, and you. The rest of the world wants nice, round numbers. So
give'em what they want!

Prairie Roots
232/173.6/WW goal 145
joined WW Online 22-Feb-2003

>Thanks Lesanne.  I have wondered ... am I close enough to the 100 mark that when
>people ask the inevevitable *how much weight have you lost* ... that my answer
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>>> >total loss: 99.3
>>> >Lifetime: 4/4/03
Amber - 23 Nov 2003 22:54 GMT
Very good point!!!

Amber

> Your answer could be, and SHOULD be, 100. Absolutely.
>
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>>>>>total loss: 99.3
>>>>>Lifetime: 4/4/03
Joyce - 27 Nov 2003 08:54 GMT
>Your answer could be, and SHOULD be, 100. Absolutely.

Well maybe I'll just go with the nice even 100.  Not this week though, have a
feeling that Friday is NOT gonna be kind to me. <G>

>Just a few days ago, a friend asked how much I've lost. When I
>answered with the truth ("fifty-seven point two"), the response was
>"Wow! Sixty pounds!" I realized in that brief exchange that the only
>people who care about precision are your doctor, your WW weight
>tracker, and you. The rest of the world wants nice, round numbers. So
>give'em what they want!

You probably are right.  I didn't tell people the exact number as in tenths, but
would always go down to the even number ... then they would come back with the
higher *ten*.  Go figure!  

Joyce

>Prairie Roots
>232/173.6/WW goal 145
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>>>> >total loss: 99.3
>>>> >Lifetime: 4/4/03
Fred - 22 Nov 2003 00:45 GMT
I'm back.... (g)

But seriously, I was way down the group when I thought about what a
difficult position - there is something magical or tantilizing about
those decade numbers and I have to guess like me with 160, you will
not be happy going above it and to safely stay there, you will
probably force the issue and hit that 100 in any event????   Of
course, I'm more interesting in clothing and not paying which makes
staying below 160 a bit more attractive so maybe you won't have an
issue.

Whatever (G)


>Here ya go, <drumroll please> .......................  officially broke into a new
>decade at 129.5!!!  It's a small loss of .5 from last week, but I've been flirting
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>total loss: 99.3
>Lifetime: 4/4/03
Joyce - 23 Nov 2003 17:06 GMT
It's not quite an issue, but you did hit the nail on the head.  The *decade*
number is now ingrained in my brain.  It's going to be rather tough staying here
without hitting that 100 pound reduction.  While the payment option isn't an issue
with me, the clothing still is ... another valid reason to stay where I am.  

Joyce

>I'm back.... (g)
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>>total loss: 99.3
>>Lifetime: 4/4/03
Linda J. - 23 Nov 2003 17:25 GMT
Wonderful news, Joyce, congrats.

Linda
252/188.8/140
NYNY 182.8/188.8/165
Joyce - 23 Nov 2003 19:35 GMT
Thanks Linda.

Joyce

>Wonderful news, Joyce, congrats.
>
>Linda
>252/188.8/140
>NYNY 182.8/188.8/165
Erin Marsh - 22 Nov 2003 01:01 GMT
>Here ya go, <drumroll please> .......................  officially broke into a new
>decade at 129.5!!!  It's a small loss of .5 from last week, but I've been flirting
>with this number for a few weeks now.  Sure was nice to see it hold firm this
>week. <grin>  Probably won't last long, but I don't care ... I'm enjoying the
>moment!  LOL

Woohoo, way to go Joyce. How exciting :-)

Signature

Erin in NZ
125/88.5/75 kgs
275.3/194.9/165 lbs

NYNY goal 180.6lbs (82 kilos)

"It is not the mountain we conquer, it is ourselves"
   Sir Edmund Hilary

Joyce - 23 Nov 2003 17:38 GMT
Thanks Erin!  It certainly was exciting, the prospect still is. <g>

Joyce

>>Here ya go, <drumroll please> .......................  officially broke into a new
>>decade at 129.5!!!  It's a small loss of .5 from last week, but I've been flirting
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Woohoo, way to go Joyce. How exciting :-)
Brenda Hammond - 22 Nov 2003 15:03 GMT
Congratulations Joyce!

> Here ya go, <drumroll please> .......................  officially broke into a new
> decade at 129.5!!!  It's a small loss of .5 from last week, but I've been flirting
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> total loss: 99.3
> Lifetime: 4/4/03
Joyce - 23 Nov 2003 18:57 GMT
Thanks Brenda!

Joyce

>Congratulations Joyce!
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>> total loss: 99.3
>> Lifetime: 4/4/03
Kristin - 22 Nov 2003 18:34 GMT
WOW, Joyce!  Congrats you!!!

Signature

~Kristin O~
272/238/172

Here's our FAQ: http://www.didian.com/asdww/ and welcome notice:
http://www.geocities.com/welcomenotice/index.html

> Here ya go, <drumroll please> .......................  officially broke into a new
> decade at 129.5!!!  It's a small loss of .5 from last week, but I've been flirting
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> total loss: 99.3
> Lifetime: 4/4/03
Joyce - 23 Nov 2003 19:18 GMT
Thanks so much Kristin!

Joyce

>WOW, Joyce!  Congrats you!!!
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>> total loss: 99.3
>> Lifetime: 4/4/03
Prairie Roots - 23 Nov 2003 17:14 GMT
Wow Joyce, I'm impressed. I keep looking at what you've done and how
you've gotten there, and tell myself I can do it too. Thanks for
posting and sharing your experience. It truly helps people like me who
are following...

Prairie Roots
232/173.6/WW goal 145
joined WW Online 22-Feb-2003

>Here ya go, <drumroll please> .......................  officially broke into a new
>decade at 129.5!!!  It's a small loss of .5 from last week, but I've been flirting
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>total loss: 99.3
>Lifetime: 4/4/03
Joyce - 23 Nov 2003 19:34 GMT
Thanks PR.  I'm glad posting my experiences helps others, but I have to admit that
staying active on this newsgroup still helps me... and I need/want the help!  It
might be an accountability thing, don't know.  But sharing with others, talking,
reading others successes and trials - all help to keep me focused where I want to
be.  I do fear that if I wander off, I'm going to sink right back into the old
problems.

Joyce

>Wow Joyce, I'm impressed. I keep looking at what you've done and how
>you've gotten there, and tell myself I can do it too. Thanks for
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>>total loss: 99.3
>>Lifetime: 4/4/03
Prairie Roots - 23 Nov 2003 20:30 GMT
What you said. That's why I'm here too. You inspire me, I hope what I
say helps someone else, and so on.

By the way, I neglected to offer extra congratulations about that new
decade you're seeing on the scale. Congratulations.
From what I know about you through your posts, I expect that now that
you've seen it, you'll never again be satisfied with anything higher.
<G>

Prairie Roots
232/173.6/WW goal 145
joined WW Online 22-Feb-2003

>Thanks PR.  I'm glad posting my experiences helps others, but I have to admit that
>staying active on this newsgroup still helps me... and I need/want the help!  It
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>>>total loss: 99.3
>>>Lifetime: 4/4/03
Joyce - 27 Nov 2003 08:56 GMT
<heavy sigh>  I am afraid that you are 100% correct.  Monday and Tuesday saw me
lower in the decade ... today I was totally depressed to go back up into that old
decade.  Silly me!  I know the scale swings, I know the routine - I did not handle
it well today.  No amount of reasoning or logic would stick into this thick skull
of mine.  

Joyce

>What you said. That's why I'm here too. You inspire me, I hope what I
>say helps someone else, and so on.
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
>>>>total loss: 99.3
>>>>Lifetime: 4/4/03
Prairie Roots - 28 Nov 2003 05:39 GMT
What is it about weight that makes normally rational people like us
lose our reasoning abilities? I can get so down on myself over .2 lb,
even though I know there are all kinds of reasons the scale moves up
or down that have little or nothing to do with eating. I'm beginning
to suspect that becoming comfortable with the fluctuations-- and
knowing the difference between them and real weight gain-- is probably
a big part of long term maintenance.

Prairie Roots

><heavy sigh>  I am afraid that you are 100% correct.  Monday and Tuesday saw me
>lower in the decade ... today I was totally depressed to go back up into that old
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>>>>>total loss: 99.3
>>>>>Lifetime: 4/4/03
Miss Violette - 28 Nov 2003 18:23 GMT
PR I think you are correct, Lee
> What is it about weight that makes normally rational people like us
> lose our reasoning abilities? I can get so down on myself over .2 lb,
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
> >>>>>total loss: 99.3
> >>>>>Lifetime: 4/4/03
Fred - 28 Nov 2003 23:46 GMT
Excellent points but for us neuortic types, if we can't eat our way
out of whatever then we can sweat the small stuff just as well (G)

You are right and I'm trying to adopt your info to my situation.
Weekly I am getting the scale feedback and I probably do know that one
piece of chocolate cake as bad as it might be should not reflect a LOT
on the scale and so any upward movement is probably the fact that
there was too much broccoli or other bulk or salt and water and not a
real substantial gain.  So unless I totally blow away an entire week
or more, there should not be any permanent harm and a bit up should
not be bad.  Now - keep repeating to self - FRED!!!!


>What is it about weight that makes normally rational people like us
>lose our reasoning abilities? I can get so down on myself over .2 lb,
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
>>>>>>total loss: 99.3
>>>>>>Lifetime: 4/4/03
Joyce - 29 Nov 2003 18:40 GMT
I don't know, and it was only a one day swing for me ... just somehow got the best
of me. Maybe I was overdue as I've handled these swings so well in the past?
Swings are definitely a part of maintanence, and we do need to learn how to keep
from letting them destroy us.  They make sense!  I know of no one that can stay
the exact same weight each and every day, it has to be impossible.  We are no
longer trying to lose weight, so how can we expect the scale not to tip up and
down?

I know this, my brain knows this ... but still is sometimes hard to accept.

Joyce

>What is it about weight that makes normally rational people like us
>lose our reasoning abilities? I can get so down on myself over .2 lb,
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
>>>>>>total loss: 99.3
>>>>>>Lifetime: 4/4/03
Fred - 30 Nov 2003 02:58 GMT

>I don't know, and it was only a one day swing for me ... just somehow got the best
>of me. Maybe I was overdue as I've handled these swings so well in the past?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>I know this, my brain knows this ... but still is sometimes hard to accept.

We all must share that same brain experience!

>Joyce
>
[quoted text clipped - 61 lines]
>>>>>>>total loss: 99.3
>>>>>>>Lifetime: 4/4/03
Miss Violette - 25 Nov 2003 14:44 GMT
I think this group lets us know we are not alone, and it is posters like you
and Elaine that keep me reading.  I go to meetings and sometimes I want to
go a second time because I am having a rough day.  to ask DH to drive me 35
miles, which he would do is a little hard for me to ask so before I ask him
to do it I come here and read and that usually works.  Lee
> Thanks PR.  I'm glad posting my experiences helps others, but I have to admit that
> staying active on this newsgroup still helps me... and I need/want the help!  It
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> >>total loss: 99.3
> >>Lifetime: 4/4/03
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.