Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / WeightWatchers / July 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

I'm under 200! will it slow up now?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
windy - 19 Jul 2006 03:42 GMT
Yep, I started WW 11 days ago at 210 and today I am 197....  Question;  I
know that when you first start any diet, you lose water and pounds quickly
for a couple of weeks and then it slows down.  When it slows down, how slow
will it be?   maybe just a couple of pounds a week or less?....

I like to know whats waiting for me around the corner...I always build
bridges for the 100 year flood; and it just came last year!
..........Windy
Kate Dicey - 19 Jul 2006 08:57 GMT
> Yep, I started WW 11 days ago at 210 and today I am 197....  Question;  I
> know that when you first start any diet, you lose water and pounds quickly
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> bridges for the 100 year flood; and it just came last year!
> ...........Windy

You should aim to lose an average of one to two pounds per week from now
on.  I know it sounds slow, but slow is the best way for many reasons,
not the least of which is psychological: you have time to get used to
the changes!

Signature

Kate  XXXXXX  R.C.T.Q Madame Chef des Trolls
Lady Catherine, Wardrobe Mistress of the Chocolate Buttons
http://www.katedicey.co.uk
Click on Kate's Pages and explore!

Stormmee - 24 Jul 2006 09:09 GMT
I forgot to welcome you, and some of us are fast losers, I am a slow loser,
Lee

> > Yep, I started WW 11 days ago at 210 and today I am 197....  Question;  I
> > know that when you first start any diet, you lose water and pounds quickly
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> http://www.katedicey.co.uk
> Click on Kate's Pages and explore!
Lá~ká~ Wáná - 19 Jul 2006 21:17 GMT
> Yep, I started WW 11 days ago at 210 and today I am 197....  Question;  I
> know that when you first start any diet, you lose water and pounds quickly
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> bridges for the 100 year flood; and it just came last year!
> ..........Windy

When it slows down INCREASE your exercise.  If that doesn't work EAT LESS.

LW
Start - 7/5 - 170lbs
Today - 162½ lbs
Goal - 130lbs
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Willow Herself - 19 Jul 2006 22:47 GMT
>> Yep, I started WW 11 days ago at 210 and today I am 197....  Question;  I
>> know that when you first start any diet, you lose water and pounds
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Goal - 130lbs
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Actually exercise has very limited effect on weight loss.. it is extremely
important for your health, but weight loss-wise your food makes more an
effect than exercise..

Will~
Nunya B. - 20 Jul 2006 00:03 GMT
>>> Yep, I started WW 11 days ago at 210 and today I am 197....  Question;
>>> I know that when you first start any diet, you lose water and pounds
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Will~

I think that is true in some ways, but more specific to the individual in
others.  I know that when I exercise regularly I can eat my points, my AP's,
and my WAP's and still lose regularly.  If I'm sidelined for any reason then
it's daily points only if I want to see a loss.

Exercise makes maintenance a bit easier too.  Muscle is more metabolically
active than fat so building muscle lets you burn more calories doing
nothing.
Signature

the volleyballchick

Lesanne - 20 Jul 2006 00:20 GMT
exercise has played a major part in my loss and my maintenance. Major. Those
few times when I could not for some reason or other would cause a stall in
my weight loss every time.

Signature

Lesanne

>
>>>> Yep, I started WW 11 days ago at 210 and today I am 197....  Question;
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> active than fat so building muscle lets you burn more calories doing
> nothing.
Willow Herself - 20 Jul 2006 00:28 GMT
I'll go and tell the scientist they are full of it then.. ;op

I know that for myself, I'm controling the food easier when I work out than
when I don't.. but half an hour of working out at moderate intensity barely
burns an apple.. .

Will~

> exercise has played a major part in my loss and my maintenance. Major.
> Those few times when I could not for some reason or other would cause a
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>> metabolically active than fat so building muscle lets you burn more
>> calories doing nothing.
Lesanne - 20 Jul 2006 01:55 GMT
Actually the largest and most comprehensive weight research has been done by
the National Weight Control registry, and the majority of the participants
who maintain their lost weight exercise. NAASO also has many scholarly
articles by the top "scientists" in the obesity field that describe benefits
of exercise on body weight and composition. Don't know what scientists you
are speaking of? Send us a link ;).

I certainly can send some if you would like to do a little reading....
Signature

Lesanne

> I'll go and tell the scientist they are full of it then.. ;op
>
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
>>> metabolically active than fat so building muscle lets you burn more
>>> calories doing nothing.
Willow Herself - 20 Jul 2006 02:24 GMT
On maintaining, absolutely.. regular exercise boost up the metabolism which
makes it easier to maintain without having to be overly strict on foods.

As for my infos, they are mainly form the WW science center.. which I think
you can access if you use e-tools.. since I have the "staff pass" I can
access the whole thing, I dont' know how much is available to members. Also
from the PSRM (which is the leader manual at WW) which isn't available to
members.. and from here and there online.. Mostly research made by Sante
Bien etre Canada.. and the "departement de la Sante" in Quebec... which of
course.. doesn't have any value since it's not American.. (sorry...  I'm
still grumpy from another conversation about "refferences").

I'm not saying one doesn't need to exercise, I'm saying it's overrated when
it comes to actual lbs lost.. a lot of members will come in saying things
like "I don't have to watch what I eat, I work out 2h a day"...

You can lose weight by eating right alone... without exercise... but try to
eat anything and exercise a lot and see what happens.. Same way as no matter
how much I exercise, if my food isn't on track... ain't going anywhere..

WW works closely with the National Weight Control Registry, and multiple
other organizations, and the studies have been going back and forth (thanks
heavens, the more the better).

I've been working for 3 years now and have read continually on the subject,
I don't have the time or the need to look up all my refference... I'm
working more than enough as it is... There is more to health and weight loss
than the National Weight Control registry...

Will~

> Actually the largest and most comprehensive weight research has been done
> by the National Weight Control registry, and the majority of the
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>>>> metabolically active than fat so building muscle lets you burn more
>>>> calories doing nothing.
Lesanne - 20 Jul 2006 02:14 GMT
Copyright International Life Sciences Institute Feb 2006 [Headnote]
     The increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity highlight the need
for improved intervention strategies to counteract this significant public
health problem. To this end, it appears that increases in energy expenditure
through exercise and other forms of physical activity may be an important
component of effective interventions to enhance initial weight loss and the
prevention of weight regain. However, to achieve these outcomes, adequate
levels of exercise and physical activity appear to be necessary, with 60 to
90 min/d currently being recommended. While this appears to be a significant
amount of activity, overweight and obese adults should be counseled to
progressively increase to these levels of exercise and physical activity.
Moreover, there is significant evidence that even if an overweight or obese
adult is unable to achieve this level of activity, that significant health
benefits can be realized by participating in at least 30 minutes of daily
activity that is at least moderate in intensity. Therefore, it is important
to have interventions that target these levels of physical activity to
improve health-related outcomes and to facilitate long-term weight control.

Signature

Lesanne

> I'll go and tell the scientist they are full of it then.. ;op
>
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
>>> metabolically active than fat so building muscle lets you burn more
>>> calories doing nothing.
Willow Herself - 20 Jul 2006 02:34 GMT
This doesn't disprove what I said in any way..

It is important to exercise, I never denied that, I work out 2h a day
myself, but working out 30 minutes burns about 200 calories... so the
deficit in calorie intake VS calories burned will be much higher if you
control the foods than it would be by exercising alone. Cutting down let say
a 600 calories piece of cake... creates the same deficit as working out
what? 90 minutes non stop..

Throw all the studies you want at me.. *grin*.

will~

> Copyright International Life Sciences Institute Feb 2006 [Headnote]
>      The increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity highlight the
[quoted text clipped - 60 lines]
>>>> metabolically active than fat so building muscle lets you burn more
>>>> calories doing nothing.
Lesanne - 20 Jul 2006 02:26 GMT
Another excerpt from the abstract of an article in a medical journal

The article examines what behavioral interventions are safe and effective
for treating obesity. A study shows that 30 percent of US adults and 16
percent of children are obese. A systematic review of 99 weight loss studies
reveals that long-term behavior techniques, dietary changes with specific
instructions to assist adherence, exercise, relapse prevention training and
social support were optimal for promoting weight loss.

Signature

Lesanne

> I'll go and tell the scientist they are full of it then.. ;op
>
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
>>> metabolically active than fat so building muscle lets you burn more
>>> calories doing nothing.
Willow Herself - 20 Jul 2006 02:35 GMT
Again.. nothing disproves my point..
Will~

> Another excerpt from the abstract of an article in a medical journal
>
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
>>>> metabolically active than fat so building muscle lets you burn more
>>>> calories doing nothing.
lesanne - 20 Jul 2006 11:20 GMT
Your point being that exercise has a limited effect? Or that food is more important? If you take that to the extreme, certainly a very low calorie diet will cause a person to drop more body weight than exercise alone. I do not see anyone suggesting exercise alone. The whole subject of this post was if exercise would help with weight loss when added to the WW program. My own research area for my project starting next summer when I begin working on my PhD will be obesity, probably slanted in the direction of prevention at puberty more than adult obesity.

The problem with diet alone, is that most people who do not exercise will end up at or near a normal body weight with a seriously slow metabolic rate if they do not exercise. If they get to normal at all. This equates to living in a constant state of hunger. I would have to almost agree with George that this is a bad way to go for a human, and good for the $ condition of WW. The reason that I can live a normal food life today is because of the fact that I exercised enough during weight loss to maintain a decent muscle mass (necessary for a normal metabolic rate). Cutting calories alone encourages a person to cut them a little more here and there if they hit a plateau. The body after some months of this will slow it's metabolic rate, and then the person either has to fight that survival mechanism off by eating more and exercising more until it speeds back up, or cutting back some more.

I have seen countless people in my own WW group go down this slippery path. There they are, having to maintain their weight loss on a depressingly low amount of daily calories, or they stall and begin the regain process. Almost everyone regains. My own weight loss, enhanced by exercise and Slow and steady has left me strong, healthy, and able to maintain easily on 2000 average calories a day.

My point is not that exercise lets you eat anything you want.

My point is that if you don't exercise while you are losing, and eat well while you are losing, your body will be damaged at least some by it's own attempts to conserve itself. You will create a situation where it is really difficult to maintain.

You can repair the damage after the fact, but you have to eat more to do it. And work out. It is not an easy transition. Better to work out from day one.

Signature

Leslie Arnim
larnim48@email.uophx.edu

 Again.. nothing disproves my point..
 Will~

 "Lesanne" <larnim48@nothotmail.com> wrote in message
 news:9ZAvg.1349$YO6.1269@tornado.texas.rr.com...
 > Another excerpt from the abstract of an article in a medical journal
 >
 > The article examines what behavioral interventions are safe and effective
 > for treating obesity. A study shows that 30 percent of US adults and 16
 > percent of children are obese. A systematic review of 99 weight loss
 > studies reveals that long-term behavior techniques, dietary changes with
 > specific instructions to assist adherence, exercise, relapse prevention
 > training and social support were optimal for promoting weight loss.
 >
 > --
 > Lesanne
 > "Willow Herself" <willowkinda@somethingkikeseamountains.net> wrote in
 > message news:Sezvg.69887$Lm5.3314@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
 >> I'll go and tell the scientist they are full of it then.. ;op
 >>
 >> I know that for myself, I'm controling the food easier when I work out
 >> than when I don't.. but half an hour of working out at moderate intensity
 >> barely burns an apple.. .
 >>
 >> Will~
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> "Lesanne" <larnim48@nothotmail.com> wrote in message
 >> news:J6zvg.1325$YO6.938@tornado.texas.rr.com...
 >>> exercise has played a major part in my loss and my maintenance. Major.
 >>> Those few times when I could not for some reason or other would cause a
 >>> stall in my weight loss every time.
 >>>
 >>> --
 >>> Lesanne
 >>> "Nunya B." <nunyadayumbidnez@gmail.com> wrote in message
 >>> news:4i7s1gF2igo3U1@individual.net...
 >>>>
 >>>> "Willow Herself" <willowkinda@somethingkikeseamountains.net> wrote in
 >>>> message news:HLxvg.174495$F_3.77152@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
 >>>>>
 >>>>> "Lá~ká~ Wáná" <none@no-one.net> wrote in message
 >>>>> news:44be94eb$0$1345$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>> "windy" <hedding@earthlink.net> wrote in message
 >>>>>> news:o_gvg.1817$157.188@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
 >>>>>>> Yep, I started WW 11 days ago at 210 and today I am 197....
 >>>>>>> Question; I know that when you first start any diet, you lose water
 >>>>>>> and pounds quickly for a couple of weeks and then it slows down.
 >>>>>>> When it slows down, how slow will it be?   maybe just a couple of
 >>>>>>> pounds a week or less?....
 >>>>>>>
 >>>>>>> I like to know whats waiting for me around the corner...I always
 >>>>>>> build bridges for the 100 year flood; and it just came last year!
 >>>>>>> ..........Windy
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>> When it slows down INCREASE your exercise.  If that doesn't work EAT
 >>>>>> LESS.
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>> LW
 >>>>>> Start - 7/5 - 170lbs
 >>>>>> Today - 162½ lbs
 >>>>>> Goal - 130lbs
 >>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 >>>>>
 >>>>> Actually exercise has very limited effect on weight loss.. it is
 >>>>> extremely important for your health, but weight loss-wise your food
 >>>>> makes more an effect than exercise..
 >>>>>
 >>>>> Will~
 >>>>
 >>>> I think that is true in some ways, but more specific to the individual
 >>>> in others.  I know that when I exercise regularly I can eat my points,
 >>>> my AP's, and my WAP's and still lose regularly.  If I'm sidelined for
 >>>> any reason then it's daily points only if I want to see a loss.
 >>>>
 >>>> Exercise makes maintenance a bit easier too.  Muscle is more
 >>>> metabolically active than fat so building muscle lets you burn more
 >>>> calories doing nothing.
 >>>> --
 >>>> the volleyballchick
 >>>>
 >>>
 >>>
 >>
 >>
 >
 >
Lá~ká~ Wáná - 26 Jul 2006 02:46 GMT
> I think that is true in some ways, but more specific to the individual in
> others.  I know that when I exercise regularly I can eat my points, my
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> active than fat so building muscle lets you burn more calories doing
> nothing.

I also think exercise is healthy for us whether we want to lose weight or
not.  Even when I reach my goal, should that day ever come, I plan to
continue walking at least a mile 5 to 6 days a week.  Use it or lose it.

LW
Start - 7/5/06 - 170lbs
Today - 162 lbs
Goal - 130lbs
Height 5'6"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Gary G - 20 Jul 2006 02:46 GMT
Will where do you get this information?...I find just the opposite when I
research the question...In addition it has had a tremendous effect on
myself...Again I'm speaking about anaerobic exercise...GG

>>> Yep, I started WW 11 days ago at 210 and today I am 197....  Question;
>>> I know that when you first start any diet, you lose water and pounds
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Will~
Willow Herself - 21 Jul 2006 16:39 GMT
Guess I expressed my idea wrong..

My point is... again... that if you make a comparison of how much calories
you burn when you work out, for exemple, just to have a number to work with,
400 calories in an hour... does that make sense? Let say 500 to be safe..

Now if you cut the cr@p you eat, for exemple, I used to have 3 cans of coke
everyday (420 cal), about 5 serving (800 cal) of cheetos everyday That's
about 1220 cals, not counting hefty meals, and all the other asides...

Soooo.. I'd have to work out 2.5 hours a day and then some to make up for
just my casual snacking.. not counting the heavy meals and the muffin I
grabbed cause I was on the run, and the starbuck etc.

Soooooooooo my point isn't that exercise isn't important, I personaly work
out 2 hours a day, my point is, that if you want to lose weight, figure out
the food first, learn what eating right is all about, and add exercise to
complement your weight loss. Because it's a lot easier to make a calorie
deficit by cutting down the junk, than by exercising. Of course it's a lot
easier to create a deficit if you're active, because then you're burning
more, but the food, at least at the begining, has a more significant effect
on said deficit.

That's what I was trying to say.. guess I said it wrong, strike me dead for
it.. but that's what I've learned, both from personal experience, from my
reading and from the members I try to help every week.

Will~ soooooooooo done with this conversation.

> Will where do you get this information?...I find just the opposite when I
> research the question...In addition it has had a tremendous effect on
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>>
>> Will~
Stormmee - 24 Jul 2006 09:10 GMT
but don't go under your points, Lee

> > Yep, I started WW 11 days ago at 210 and today I am 197....  Question;  I
> > know that when you first start any diet, you lose water and pounds quickly
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Goal - 130lbs
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Eddie-Type2 - 20 Jul 2006 02:21 GMT
Hi Windy......to be realistic, you should only plan to lose approx. 1 to 2
lbs max. per week.......as you get closer to goal, you may lose less because
it gets a little harder to lose.

Eddie
Weight June05-359lbs
Current Weight-282.2lbs
Loss to date=76.8lbs
Goal Weight-180lbs

Yep, I started WW 11 days ago at 210 and today I am 197....  Question;  I
know that when you first start any diet, you lose water and pounds quickly
for a couple of weeks and then it slows down.  When it slows down, how slow
will it be?   maybe just a couple of pounds a week or less?....

I like to know whats waiting for me around the corner...I always build
bridges for the 100 year flood; and it just came last year!
..........Windy
Lá~ká~ Wáná - 20 Jul 2006 17:23 GMT
> Hi Windy......to be realistic, you should only plan to lose approx. 1 to 2
> lbs max. per week.......as you get closer to goal, you may lose less
> because
> it gets a little harder to lose.

As it gets harder to lose I would think *LESS FOOD* and MORE EXERCISE would
keep the lbs coming off.  At least that's what I observed with a few of my
friends.

LW
Start - 7/5 - 170lbs
Today - 162 lbs
Goal - 130lbs
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stormmee - 24 Jul 2006 09:22 GMT
you can eat too little, that is part of my problem, between vlc and
medications I have the world's most efficient metabolism, I have to eat all
my points or I go into starvation mode and don't lose at all, Lee

> > Hi Windy......to be realistic, you should only plan to lose approx. 1 to 2
> > lbs max. per week.......as you get closer to goal, you may lose less
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Goal - 130lbs
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lá~ká~ Wáná - 25 Jul 2006 20:01 GMT
> you can eat too little, that is part of my problem, between vlc and
> medications I have the world's most efficient metabolism, I have to eat
> all
> my points or I go into starvation mode and don't lose at all, Lee

I do eat all my points. I believe most of us do.  In fact it seems a lot of
folks tend to go over their points from what I've read here.  :o)

LW
Start - 7/5/06 - 170lbs
Today - 162 lbs
Goal - 130lbs
Height 5'6"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stormmee - 25 Jul 2006 21:16 GMT
let me clarify, I mean when I am doing flex, I eat the daily points, every
Activity point and all the WPA... keep in mind that this varies for people,
others can't eat all I do or they gain, Lee

> > you can eat too little, that is part of my problem, between vlc and
> > medications I have the world's most efficient metabolism, I have to eat
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Height 5'6"
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stormmee - 24 Jul 2006 09:07 GMT
depends on you, your body and how strict you are, WW says 1 to 2 pounds a
week is healthy, I figure NOT gaining is healthy, there is a worker at our
center that lost all 40 hounds .2 pounds at a time, Lee
> Yep, I started WW 11 days ago at 210 and today I am 197....  Question;  I
> know that when you first start any diet, you lose water and pounds quickly
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> bridges for the 100 year flood; and it just came last year!
> ..........Windy
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.