Hello,
I have all the manuals and training stuff from Weight Watchers. I was
told that a "rule of thumb" is to count 1 point for every 100 calories
of exercise. So, 2100 calories would be 21 points. So, if I'm
supposed to eat 29 points each day, Does this mean I should eat 50
points for the day I do all this running in order to eat my weight
watchers points for the day? Could I carry the 21 points over to the
next day instead?
Thanks.
> Do you got o meetings? Are you a member online? You just count it as any
> activity points..
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> >
> > Thanks
Stormmee - 27 Nov 2006 20:29 GMT
no carrying it over but you need to figure the points on the points finder
to be really accurate, Lee
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> > >
> > > Thanks
Willow Herself - 27 Nov 2006 21:23 GMT
Youc an carry your points over if you want to..
I don't recommand it.. but since we rolled core.. you can use them later..
Will~
> no carrying it over but you need to figure the points on the points finder
> to be really accurate, Lee
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
Stormmee - 27 Nov 2006 22:47 GMT
I wondered why even on the website, they carried over on core but not flex,
Lee
> Youc an carry your points over if you want to..
>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks
Willow Herself - 27 Nov 2006 23:34 GMT
It's not a good idea to do it.. because the metabolic boost is gone by the
time you eat the pts.
BUT if you've been working your behind off all week, and the one day you
didn't move, you've got this surprise party.. you've burned them..
It's all in how active you are. I carry mine over, because I earn a lot of
them everyday (and rarely eat them)..
Will~
>I wondered why even on the website, they carried over on core but not flex,
> Lee
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Thanks
Stormmee - 28 Nov 2006 07:03 GMT
makes sense
> It's not a good idea to do it.. because the metabolic boost is gone by the
> time you eat the pts.
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Thanks
Willow Herself - 27 Nov 2006 21:29 GMT
That "rule of thumb" is far from accurate... use your tools and count your
activity points accurately..
At 135 lbs, moderate activity for 150 minutes (2.5 hours) would be 7 pts..
high intensity would be 16 pts.. at 175 lbs moderate intensity would be 9
pts, high 21.
I don't believe anybody can maintain a high intensity for 2.5 hours.. but
hey.. what do I know..
You better under-estimate than over-estimate when it comes to activity pts.
Will~
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>> >
>> > Thanks
samadams_2006@yahoo.ca - 27 Nov 2006 22:02 GMT
I know I've heard this before but I'm still having problems classifying
low, medium and high intensity. How is this in terms of jogging? For
example, 3 miles per hour (low)? 4 miles per hour (medium)? 5 miles
per hour (high)?
> That "rule of thumb" is far from accurate... use your tools and count your
> activity points accurately..
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
Stormmee - 27 Nov 2006 22:49 GMT
5 miles per hour would be dead for me, Lee, seriously the descriptions are
in the book, Lee
> I know I've heard this before but I'm still having problems classifying
> low, medium and high intensity. How is this in terms of jogging? For
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks