Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / WeightWatchers / December 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

salads at restaurants

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
NCK - 09 Dec 2006 18:14 GMT
why, in the name of common sense, have restaurants ALL started bumping a
handfull of grated cheese on top of perfectly good salads?  Last time I
checked, cheese was NOT a crispy fresh veggie.
Aside from that, I'm starting to carry around my own salad dressing.
I'm putting oil, vinegar and "Jane's Krazy mixed-up salt" in a little
Tupperware "midget."  Half the time the restaurants forget I asked for
my dressing "on the side" and their idea of vinaigrette seems to involve
a lot of sugar.  Any other suggestions?
I'm not on WWers...I do something called "DASH" which is to control
hypertension but, the guidelines pretty much match wwers and this is the
only diet newsgroup I've found where there aren't a lot of fad ideas
being discussed.
Laura - 09 Dec 2006 18:41 GMT
I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.

I like your idea of taking the midgets full of DIY dressing. What's your
recipe? We love the Jane's salt.

> why, in the name of common sense, have restaurants ALL started bumping a
> handfull of grated cheese on top of perfectly good salads?  Last time I
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> only diet newsgroup I've found where there aren't a lot of fad ideas being
> discussed.
NCK - 09 Dec 2006 22:35 GMT
Lordy, do those "bowls" they advertise from KFC actually KILL your
appetite, or what?
No recipe, just oil and vinaigre and a little container of "Jane's."
This is in the spice row at your supermarket if somebody is reading this
who doesn't know about it.  It's a mix of seasalt, coarse pepper and
some other herbs they don't name, but I think there is some garlic salt
in there.  I "oil," then "vinaigre," then sprinkle on a little "Jane."

> I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>> the only diet newsgroup I've found where there aren't a lot of fad
>> ideas being discussed.
Laura - 09 Dec 2006 23:46 GMT
Yes, those KFC commercials turn my stomach. KFC turns my stomach these days!
I was returning from visting my mother at the hospital one day this summer.
It was past dinner and i was hungry. I stopped at a KFC/AMW restaurant on my
way home hoping that they still had their grilled chicken. I walked in and
{fortunatel} could not find anything on the menu worth spending the money
for. I went home and had cereal. So much healthier.

> Lordy, do those "bowls" they advertise from KFC actually KILL your
> appetite, or what?
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>>> only diet newsgroup I've found where there aren't a lot of fad ideas
>>> being discussed.
NCK - 11 Dec 2006 01:34 GMT
It's interesting how one's tastes change.  We had our annual parish
meeting today with the usual potluck goodies.  I went over to the
dessert table and was not particularly attracted to anything except the
cookies.   I had a couple of those and was perfectly happy to skip the
pecan pie, chocolate mousse etc.   I found it equally easy to skip the
richer casseroles etc and stuck to the fruit salads and other veggies
that were not cooked with a lot of salt and fat.
I recently got braces off my teeth and am enjoying being able to dig
into a big, crunchy salad again after over two years.  I might turn
green any day now! (-;  I missed those SO much. (Maybe that's why I am
on a tear about this cheese thing!) It's one of those really difficult
things to eat when you have braces since so much gets caught in them.
that and popcorn.  I treated myself to a popcorn popper so I don't have
to eat the stuff in the microwave bags with the accompanying salt and
chemical load!  Man, I missed popcorn!   I ate it a couple of times,
anyway, but it was so much trouble afterwards.

> Yes, those KFC commercials turn my stomach. KFC turns my stomach these
> days! I was returning from visting my mother at the hospital one day
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>>
>>> I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
Stormmee - 11 Dec 2006 11:36 GMT
good progress on lifestyle, I recently ordered a cob salad and said,
everything but the greens on the side.  They only had to make it twice...
everything includes the bacon bit fella, Lee
> It's interesting how one's tastes change.  We had our annual parish
> meeting today with the usual potluck goodies.  I went over to the
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> >>
> >>> I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
NCK - 14 Dec 2006 16:20 GMT
You really have to watch these folks like a HAWK.  THere is ONE
restaurant in town where they don't fall apart when I tweak my
order...they will do me a plain broiled burger patty (they use pretty
lean meat), leave the cheese off the salad and their sides include a
nice, FRESH fruit cup, (no "stuff" dumped on it) so it's a great option.
 NOw, if only they would ban the smoking!!!! (sigh!  Fortunately, not
too many people smoke now, so, most days, it's at a barely-noticeable
level.)

> good progress on lifestyle, I recently ordered a cob salad and said,
> everything but the greens on the side.  They only had to make it twice...
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>>>>
>>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
Stormmee - 14 Dec 2006 16:25 GMT
I think smoking or not is up to the restaurant owner and those of us who
have a preference should vote with our dollars, I won't eat in a restaurant
where its all non smoking unless there is no other option, Lee
> You really have to watch these folks like a HAWK.  THere is ONE
> restaurant in town where they don't fall apart when I tweak my
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> >>>>
> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
Laura - 14 Dec 2006 23:49 GMT
Many states are moving towards total non smoking in any public building or
at least requiring separate rooms for smokers in restuarants. NJ passed the
complete no smoking rule did last year. The only exception are the casinos
in Atlantic City. But no smoking is allowed in restaurants, office
buildings, stores and hospitals. Yeah! they did try and pass a law that
prohibited smoking within some distance of all buildings to eliminate the
need to walk through smoke when entering a building. That never got anywhere
but most people are glad the regular passed.

>I think smoking or not is up to the restaurant owner and those of us who
> have a preference should vote with our dollars, I won't eat in a
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
Stormmee - 15 Dec 2006 00:20 GMT
this is a YMMV, I see both sides but as long as I do smoke, I will patronize
places that cater to me, I no longer eat in Springfield proper unless we are
in an extreme hurry and getting drive through, otherwise I go the four miles
south and patronize the same chain/or independent where I can/ that allows
it, but if you are a non smoker, I totally encourage you to keep your
dollars away from any establishment that does allow smoking, Lee
> Many states are moving towards total non smoking in any public building or
> at least requiring separate rooms for smokers in restuarants. NJ passed the
[quoted text clipped - 60 lines]
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
Gary G - 15 Dec 2006 02:31 GMT
I wouldn't eat in any restaurant that allows smoking...All studies show that
second hand smoke is dangerous...I don't care what someone does to
themselves but why should I be at risk...In addition why should employees be
forced to be around smoke...Smoking in public is going fast...Although some
remain opposed it's a losing battle...GG
>I think smoking or not is up to the restaurant owner and those of us who
> have a preference should vote with our dollars, I won't eat in a
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
Stormmee - 15 Dec 2006 04:20 GMT
I am not going to argue the merits of smoking, it is a killer plain and
simple and I am an addict.  the restaurant owner still has the right to
allow it and if the employee wants the money then they will work in it.  if
you are smart enough to not smoke, good for you, if you don't want the money
or have employment elsewhere even better.  Lee
> I wouldn't eat in any restaurant that allows smoking...All studies show that
> second hand smoke is dangerous...I don't care what someone does to
[quoted text clipped - 56 lines]
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
Deb in Northern California - 18 Dec 2006 00:57 GMT
You would be put off in California then, as all restaurants are smoke-free
environments, along with all business establishments too.  I think the only
place you can smoke inside is your home and I think they allow it in the
Indian Casinos.  Even the bars are smoke-free, unless you are in a smoking
lounge/cigar bar.  Everyone has to go out side to smoke.

Debbie

>I think smoking or not is up to the restaurant owner and those of us who
> have a preference should vote with our dollars, I won't eat in a
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
Laura - 18 Dec 2006 01:07 GMT
That's the new rules here in NJ. Casinos are the only exception but I have
heard that they are looking to modify that part of the rule.

> You would be put off in California then, as all restaurants are smoke-free
> environments, along with all business establishments too.  I think the
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
Stormmee - 18 Dec 2006 01:42 GMT
I was put off, and would either go to a casino or not eat out, the point is
that anyone with any sense knows its harmful, but that is a separate issue
from over controlling a legal substance, and overcontrolling a business.  If
we really wanted to get rid of the health hazards and not be hypocrites as a
society we would outlaw it and give smokers the same consideration that
heroine addicts now get.  We would also quit taking tobacco tax money it is
after all tainted like drug money given to the church as it is killing
people who pay the tax, Lee
> You would be put off in California then, as all restaurants are smoke-free
> environments, along with all business establishments too.  I think the only
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
Deb in Northern California - 18 Dec 2006 03:44 GMT
There is a city call Belmont in the San Francisco Bay area that is proposing
a smoking ban in the entire city.  Even in your are or on the street.  If
you live in an apartment or multiple home dwelling you would be banned from
smoking in your home.  The only place you would be able to smoke within the
city limits would be in a single family home.  You could not even smoke in
your own backyard with this ban.  Even as a non smoker I think they are
taking things too far with this one.

Debbie

Here is the article if you are interested in reading it.
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=66988
>I was put off, and would either go to a casino or not eat out, the point is
> that anyone with any sense knows its harmful, but that is a separate issue
[quoted text clipped - 91 lines]
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
Laura - 18 Dec 2006 04:00 GMT
Wow, that does sound extreme.

> There is a city call Belmont in the San Francisco Bay area that is
> proposing a smoking ban in the entire city.  Even in your are or on the
[quoted text clipped - 111 lines]
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
ahmward - 18 Dec 2006 04:09 GMT
It isn't extreme if it will save the lives of future generations.

> Wow, that does sound extreme.
>
[quoted text clipped - 136 lines]
>>>> >> >>>>
>>>> >> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
Stormmee - 18 Dec 2006 04:31 GMT
are we saving lives or only controlling people, wouldn't you think if they
were really interested in saving lives they would make them illegal, and
what is the point of saving that life if every behavior is going to be
monitored and controlled... and to bring us back to topic... look at the
trans fat ban in new York city.  what if the big brother police decided your
favorite food was no longer healthy and removed it? its just too scary. Lee
> It isn't extreme if it will save the lives of future generations.
>
[quoted text clipped - 138 lines]
> >>>> >> >>>>
> >>>> >> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
ahmward - 18 Dec 2006 06:09 GMT
I personally think the trans fat ban is great.  If my favorite food was
unhealthy, I would live longer without it.
Back to the topic, I wish restaurants would know more about 0 point
vegetables and make salads appealing without the additonal calories.  If
I can do that at home, they should be able to as well.

Audrey

> are we saving lives or only controlling people, wouldn't you think if
> they
[quoted text clipped - 185 lines]
>> >>>> >> >>>>
>> >>>> >> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
Stormmee - 18 Dec 2006 12:35 GMT
the real topic here is choice, you are correct if you can do it at home a
restaurant can do it but will it sell.  being in this industry I can tell
you for the most part it seems to be the consensus that it doesn't.
Education of the public does so much more than bans and restrictions.. I do
eat at soup plantation/sweet tomatoes and they are non smoking because the
health of the food makes it worth my while to go out if I want a smoke.
This chain however is in the minority...  The only other place we seem to
get decent vegetables is Chinese buffets with a Mongolian grill, then you
give cooking instructions.  This one of the best concepts ever for a weight
watcher to use when eating out, Lee
> I personally think the trans fat ban is great.  If my favorite food was
> unhealthy, I would live longer without it.
[quoted text clipped - 193 lines]
> >> >>>> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> >> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
ahmward - 18 Dec 2006 16:13 GMT
Do you have Whole Foods Markets?  They have the most amazing salad bar
with perhaps twenty  0-1 point vegetables.  There are lots of higher
point things too.  They shave celery paper thin.  There are shredded
carrots, jicama, and butternut squash, mushrooms, spinach, romaine,
mixed baby greens, thin green beans, radishes, tofu, green peas, corn,
unmarianted baby artichokes, baby corn, crumbled hard boiled egg, chick
peas, tomatoes, edaname etc.  There are the higher calorie nuts, seeds,
cheese, marinated beans and veggies too.

I think the more studies there are on obesity, the greater chance we all
have for restaurants to serve healthier foods.

Audrey

> the real topic here is choice, you are correct if you can do it at
> home a
[quoted text clipped - 252 lines]
>> >> >>>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> >> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
Stormmee - 18 Dec 2006 22:08 GMT
we don't have one close, but I thought it was a grocery store, so this means
you buy it by the weight?  Lee
> Do you have Whole Foods Markets?  They have the most amazing salad bar
> with perhaps twenty  0-1 point vegetables.  There are lots of higher
[quoted text clipped - 266 lines]
> >> >> >>>> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
ahmward - 18 Dec 2006 23:53 GMT
Yes, it is a grocery store with the most amazing food section. There are
lots of take home entrees.  I think the salad is $6.99 or $7.99 a pound
but so worth it for the freshness and variety.
Audrey
> we don't have one close, but I thought it was a grocery store, so this
> means
[quoted text clipped - 318 lines]
>> >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried
>> >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>chicken.
Stormmee - 19 Dec 2006 00:23 GMT
I will look at this if I ever get near one, Lee
> Yes, it is a grocery store with the most amazing food section. There are
> lots of take home entrees.  I think the salad is $6.99 or $7.99 a pound
[quoted text clipped - 322 lines]
> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried
> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>chicken.
Laura - 18 Dec 2006 23:56 GMT
Yes, it is a super market. Similar to Trader Joes but more expensive. It is
a salad bar where you pay by the pound.

I love salad bars at the supermarket. Our shoprite has a good one but the
salads are way too large for one person. I wish they had a smaller container
available. I usually stop at ours once a week on my way home from the pool
to grab a salad for lunch and pick up odds and end groceries.

> we don't have one close, but I thought it was a grocery store, so this
> means
[quoted text clipped - 269 lines]
>> >> >> >>>> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
Stormmee - 19 Dec 2006 00:24 GMT
I am definitely going to check this out, Lee
> Yes, it is a super market. Similar to Trader Joes but more expensive. It is
> a salad bar where you pay by the pound.
[quoted text clipped - 277 lines]
> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
ahmward - 19 Dec 2006 00:52 GMT
At Whole Foods they have different sized containers.  It is my absolute
favorite lunch away from home.
Audrey

>I am definitely going to check this out, Lee
>> Yes, it is a super market. Similar to Trader Joes but more expensive.
[quoted text clipped - 373 lines]
>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried
>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>chicken.
Stormmee - 19 Dec 2006 01:31 GMT
am really interested now, Lee
> At Whole Foods they have different sized containers.  It is my absolute
> favorite lunch away from home.
[quoted text clipped - 106 lines]
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> "Laura" <invalid@sample.invalid> wrote in message

news:Coohh.516745$QZ1.3203@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> >> >> >> >> > Wow, that does sound extreme.
> >> >> >> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 268 lines]
> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried
> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>chicken.
Laura - 18 Dec 2006 19:29 GMT
I agree. Its very frustrating to see steamed veggies on the menu yet they
come with butter on top. Or worse, they pile on the salt in the name of
"seasonings". I went to applebees a while ago and the seasonings on the
brocolli were so over powering that I could not eat them. Next time I will
ask for no butter and no seasonings. Too much sodium is just as bad for you.

>I personally think the trans fat ban is great.  If my favorite food was
>unhealthy, I would live longer without it.
[quoted text clipped - 155 lines]
>>> >>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>>> >> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
ahmward - 18 Dec 2006 23:54 GMT
At home I cook broccoli and eat it with just pepper and garlic on top.
I'll make a lemon butter garlic topping for my husband and son. I hate
those steamed tasteless vegetables.
Audrey
>I agree. Its very frustrating to see steamed veggies on the menu yet
>they come with butter on top. Or worse, they pile on the salt in the
[quoted text clipped - 215 lines]
>>>> >>>> >> >>>>
>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
Stormmee - 19 Dec 2006 00:26 GMT
when you steam them the next time if you use an electric steamer, cut an
apple and steam it along with the vegetables, the apple is excellent and it
flavors any vegetable very nicely.  Lee
> At home I cook broccoli and eat it with just pepper and garlic on top.
> I'll make a lemon butter garlic topping for my husband and son. I hate
[quoted text clipped - 219 lines]
> >>>> >>>> >> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> >> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
Raquel.Pinheiro@gmail.com - 19 Dec 2006 18:39 GMT
That's exactly what happenning to me today at lunch. Lovely vegetables,
but too much butter. Sure, that's in my little corner of the world, but
why do people think butter mix with some kind of beggies? It does not!

Audrey, it's totally off topic, but what happened to alt.fashion? It's
a mess there, where are all the "normal posters"?

R

> I agree. Its very frustrating to see steamed veggies on the menu yet they
> come with butter on top. Or worse, they pile on the salt in the name of
[quoted text clipped - 161 lines]
> >>> >>>> >> >>>>
> >>> >>>> >> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
ahmward - 20 Dec 2006 00:17 GMT
Rachel

We've all gone to a yahoo group.  If you are interested please e mail me
at ahmward@gmail.com and I will send you an invitation.

I agree with Willow that the diner must be assertive.  If they bring me
a salad tossed with dressing or something I know will pile on lots of
calories, I send it back.  I rarely send things back to the kitchen but
can justify the times I do.

Audrey

> That's exactly what happenning to me today at lunch. Lovely
> vegetables,
[quoted text clipped - 241 lines]
>> >>> >>>> >> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> >> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
Stormmee - 18 Dec 2006 04:26 GMT
that is a little extreme, privately owned dwellings and business regardless
of how much public comes should be under the control of the owner, but
privately held property that doesn't commonly include/invite the public
really is a little too far, Lee
> There is a city call Belmont in the San Francisco Bay area that is proposing
> a smoking ban in the entire city.  Even in your are or on the street.  If
[quoted text clipped - 103 lines]
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
Willow Herself - 19 Dec 2006 05:44 GMT
No in most places you can't smoke outside by the door either..

Will~ Not smoking anymore in California

> You would be put off in California then, as all restaurants are smoke-free
> environments, along with all business establishments too.  I think the
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>>I've noticed the same thing. That and fried chicken.
ahmward - 09 Dec 2006 23:37 GMT
> why, in the name of common sense, have restaurants ALL started bumping
> a handfull of grated cheese on top of perfectly good salads?  Last
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> the only diet newsgroup I've found where there aren't a lot of fad
> ideas being discussed.

Return the salad if the dressing is not on the side.
Audrey
Catherine White - 10 Dec 2006 01:43 GMT
I thought I was the only one bothered by the cheese deal.  It surprised me
when I brought a salad at a fast food place and it had cheese.  I brought it
back to the counter and was told that all the salads come that way.  I
returned
the salad and asked for my money back.
Hugs,
Catherine
> why, in the name of common sense, have restaurants ALL started bumping a
> handfull of grated cheese on top of perfectly good salads?  Last time I
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> only diet newsgroup I've found where there aren't a lot of fad ideas being
> discussed.
Stormmee - 10 Dec 2006 05:45 GMT
welcome if you are a regular and keep sending it back they will get it,
especially if you tip good when they get it right the first time.  other
than that you are doing it right, Lee
> why, in the name of common sense, have restaurants ALL started bumping a
> handfull of grated cheese on top of perfectly good salads?  Last time I
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> only diet newsgroup I've found where there aren't a lot of fad ideas
> being discussed.
Willow Herself - 19 Dec 2006 05:44 GMT
The trick in restaurant is to ask a lot of questions, and to be assertive.
If they don't bring what I asked for, it's going back to the kitchen... I'll
be darned if I pay for food that I don't want.

Will~

> why, in the name of common sense, have restaurants ALL started bumping a
> handfull of grated cheese on top of perfectly good salads?  Last time I
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> only diet newsgroup I've found where there aren't a lot of fad ideas being
> discussed.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.