 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers WeightAdviser.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Weight Loss Forum / WeightWatchers / December 2006New WW program
Has anyone gone to a meeting this week to get the new materials? I'll be at one tomorrow and I am ready for a fresh start! Audrey Well...I went yesterday...Really seems like a whole lot of hype for very little...Maybe I'm just jaded...I expected some big changes...But really WW worked fine for me as it was...Nice new point lookup card...Pretty pictures...But really not much new in my humble opinion...I'm interested in what others thinks...GG > Has anyone gone to a meeting this week to get the new materials? I'll be > at one tomorrow and I am ready for a fresh start! > > Audrey They did make a lot out of simple changes, but I think they ARE changes for the best.. personal daily point target makes so much more sense, as do the new snack list for Core.. As for the material, it's more people friendly, more meaningful visuals, better organized. The new starter kit is so much better than the old one... you actually can find stuff in it!!!! As a leader, I'm happy to find material that the members will understand. We can spend less time of program details and more on really what's going on since members can read and understand the program better by themselves. And... the new complete food companion is organized by categories, not just alphabetical order !! FINALLY ! It is simple changes but I think it's significant ones.. Will~ > Well...I went yesterday...Really seems like a whole lot of hype for very > little...Maybe I'm just jaded...I expected some big changes...But really [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >> >> Audrey Very well said...I thought you might get offended but no your right on...Glad your around Willow...GG > They did make a lot out of simple changes, but I think they ARE changes > for the best.. personal daily point target makes so much more sense, as do [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] >>> >>> Audrey Naaww a lot of people (member AND staff) have a hard time with changes.. I don't like changes for changes.. and it has happened in the past. This time they looked at the US program, at the UK program and saw that it works better in the UK and adjusted.. WIll~ > Very well said...I thought you might get offended but no your right > on...Glad your around Willow...GG [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] >>>> >>>> Audrey I generally don't like change even when warranted. This time I am looking forward to it. Guess am getting better. Lee > Naaww a lot of people (member AND staff) have a hard time with changes.. > [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > >>>> > >>>> Audrey My point total has decreased by one point to 21. That will be tough as I generally average 23. This past week though I lost 2.6 and didn't track. I just knew I was eating the right amount of food and not snacking on bad stuff. I may save the new tracker for after Christmas and try to maintain these next two weeks. I like the new materials. They are easier to read. I am going to SF tomorrow and will read them on the trip. Audrey interested in what you think of them, Lee > My point total has decreased by one point to 21. That will be tough as > I generally average 23. This past week though I lost 2.6 and didn't [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Audrey Thanks for your insight into the changes. I don't get to hear the live version until Saturday morning. I know what the changes are but I am interested in how she presents them. There's lots of negative reaction to the core changes over on the WW message board. As I indicated before, I recalculated my Flex target points and I should be eating 19-21 points instead of the 22 points based on the old flex point ranges. I know that I need to increase my activity level if I am ever going to get the scale moving again. That and get my dang eating under control. With the new lower target points did you get any members suddenly realise that Core might be an easier program for them? I can't see being able to survive on less than 20 points per day. 22 seems to be more my norm. > They did make a lot out of simple changes, but I think they ARE changes > for the best.. personal daily point target makes so much more sense, as do [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] >>> >>> Audrey I did mine on the WW site and am still at 22. Lee > Thanks for your insight into the changes. I don't get to hear the live > version until Saturday morning. I know what the changes are but I am [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > >>> > >>> Audrey What activity level did you select? That seems to play a major determination in the points. I am currently at 155 so I am approaching the lower limit of the 22 points per day range. That may have been part of it too. I don't know if they have changed the ranges since I also have not made it to a meeting yet. >I did mine on the WW site and am still at 22. Lee >> Thanks for your insight into the changes. I don't get to hear the live [quoted text clipped - 49 lines] >> >>> >> >>> Audrey I took mostly sitting at work, which is not exactly true its more like mostly standing. I did it then went to work so I am going to get input from DH. I didn't want to change because my work has been the same all the time I have been on WW so I figured my body was used to it but I am considering changing it as I do move pretty steadily while at work, if not walking, I am bending stretching and similar, Lee > What activity level did you select? That seems to play a major determination > in the points. [quoted text clipped - 56 lines] > >> >>> > >> >>> Audrey Keep in mind that by "activity level" they mean day to day stuff, not your work outs, walks ect. It's about what do you do during the day? Will~ > What activity level did you select? That seems to play a major > determination in the points. [quoted text clipped - 61 lines] >>> >>> >>> >>> Audrey That's what I figured. I basically alternate from very busy days running errands to light days sitting at the computer. Which level should I pick? I ran both sitting and standing which resulted in 19 or 21 points. How are we supposed to handle our varying lifestyles with this new formula? > Keep in mind that by "activity level" they mean day to day stuff, not your > work outs, walks ect. It's about what do you do during the day? [quoted text clipped - 71 lines] >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Audrey maybe average it at 20 or know on the not busy days you eat 2 points less,? Lee guessing > That's what I figured. I basically alternate from very busy days running > errands to light days sitting at the computer. Which level should I pick? I [quoted text clipped - 76 lines] > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> Audrey I've set my tracker down to 21 for now. Let's see how I do with 21. I would be going down to 20 soon anyway so maybe one point at a time is good idea. I'm guessing too. I'll ask my leader on Saturday what she thinks. Maybe when I see the materials it will be more obvious what to do. > maybe average it at 20 or know on the not busy days you eat 2 points > less,? [quoted text clipped - 92 lines] >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> Audrey will be interesting what she says, and the logic the two of you use to get the number, Lee > I've set my tracker down to 21 for now. Let's see how I do with 21. I would > be going down to 20 soon anyway so maybe one point at a time is good idea. [quoted text clipped - 97 lines] > >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> >>> Audrey That's what your 35 weekly point allowance is for.. Will~ > Thanks for your insight into the changes. I don't get to hear the live > version until Saturday morning. I know what the changes are but I am [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] >>>> >>>> Audrey thank you for this, Lee > They did make a lot out of simple changes, but I think they ARE changes for > the best.. personal daily point target makes so much more sense, as do the [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > >> > >> Audrey > They did make a lot out of simple changes, but I think they ARE changes for > the best.. personal daily point target makes so much more sense, as do the > new snack list for Core.. Willow is this right? Male 8 points 277 lbs 27 points 57 1 point Sitting 0 points 5'11" 2 points --------------------- total 38 points > As for the material, it's more people friendly, more meaningful visuals, > better organized. The new starter kit is so much better than the old one... [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > can spend less time of program details and more on really what's going on > since members can read and understand the program better by themselves. It explains all of the odd questions like counting decaf/sf soda as up to half the water count. > And... the new complete food companion is organized by categories, not just > alphabetical order !! FINALLY ! Its usable finally. > It is simple changes but I think it's significant ones.. > Will~ So far the only thing I not real keen on is the periwinkle starter kit. Mongo like. - R > > Well...I went yesterday...Really seems like a whole lot of hype for very > > little...Maybe I'm just jaded...I expected some big changes...But really [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >> > >> Audrey >> They did make a lot out of simple changes, but I think they ARE changes >> for [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > --------------------- > total 38 points Looks right to me >> As for the material, it's more people friendly, more meaningful visuals, >> better organized. The new starter kit is so much better than the old [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > - R My only beef with it is the new point finder/ point booster slider... hate it... Organizer is a lot cheaper.. but.. Will~ >> > Well...I went yesterday...Really seems like a whole lot of hype for >> > very [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >> >> >> >> Audrey DH says the points finder sucks, Lee, who just happened to get new replacements for the old ones a couple of weeks ago, THANK YOU!!! > >> They did make a lot out of simple changes, but I think they ARE changes > >> for [quoted text clipped - 61 lines] > >> >> > >> >> Audrey ;op > DH says the points finder sucks, Lee, who just happened to get new > replacements for the old ones a couple of weeks ago, THANK YOU!!! [quoted text clipped - 72 lines] >> >> >> >> >> >> Audrey I like I get two more points, Lee > > They did make a lot out of simple changes, but I think they ARE changes for > > the best.. personal daily point target makes so much more sense, as do the [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] > > >> > > >> Audrey our leader said last wee think of this as a refresh/refinement NOT a whole new program, Lee oddly less stressed this time, > Well...I went yesterday...Really seems like a whole lot of hype for very > little...Maybe I'm just jaded...I expected some big changes...But really WW [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > > > Audrey The program is the same, just more refined ! Will~ > Has anyone gone to a meeting this week to get the new materials? I'll be > at one tomorrow and I am ready for a fresh start! > > Audrey was going to go today so I could go a second time if need be, but I ate at maverick last night, NO weighing in today for me, let us know if you liked it, Lee > Has anyone gone to a meeting this week to get the new materials? I'll > be at one tomorrow and I am ready for a fresh start! > > Audrey One of my friends went today (I'm going Saturday) but she showed me the materials...My point total doesn't change (for another 3 lbs. :-) ), and it calculates out at the same place the old number gave me. BUT, it does seem to me that it's more intuitive (not to mention easier!) to lose one point at a time as you are losing weight, as opposed to losing two points at once. AND, the differences for men and women I think are a big thing...JMHO. Louise > Has anyone gone to a meeting this week to get the new materials? I'll > be at one tomorrow and I am ready for a fresh start! > > Audrey I think I am liking what I am hearing, Lee > One of my friends went today (I'm going Saturday) but she showed me the > materials...My point total doesn't change (for another 3 lbs. :-) ), and [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > > > Audrey >Has anyone gone to a meeting this week to get the new materials? I got an extra point out of the change. Amy williamson@shaklee.net Puppies for sale http://tubedog.tripod.com Nature and Science in Harmony http://www.shaklee.net/williamson/ that is so weird to me, I got 2, Lee > >Has anyone gone to a meeting this week to get the new materials? > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Nature and Science in Harmony > http://www.shaklee.net/williamson/ I lost a point. Audrey > that is so weird to me, I got 2, Lee >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >> Nature and Science in Harmony >> http://www.shaklee.net/williamson/ MAJOR bummer, Lee > I lost a point. > Audrey [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > >> Nature and Science in Harmony > >> http://www.shaklee.net/williamson/ |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.