down 1.2 or 1.8 can't remember which it was and don't care, just so grateful
to be losing again, have a great week, Lee
Douglas - 27 Jan 2008 10:11 GMT
>down 1.2 or 1.8 can't remember which it was and don't care, just so grateful
>to be losing again, have a great week, Lee
Glad to see you losing again.
Douglas
Stormmee - 27 Jan 2008 11:50 GMT
thanks, it was 1.8 I went and looked after I wrote my post, Lee
> >down 1.2 or 1.8 can't remember which it was and don't care, just so grateful
> >to be losing again, have a great week, Lee
>
> Glad to see you losing again.
>
> Douglas
Willow Herself - 28 Jan 2008 03:13 GMT
That's actually a big loss for you isn't it? didn't you say at some point
that you were a "slow loser"?
Will~
> thanks, it was 1.8 I went and looked after I wrote my post, Lee
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>
>> Douglas
Stormmee - 28 Jan 2008 05:05 GMT
its a totally huge loss for me, I seem to lose very little when I do lose,
usually around .2 or .4 anything over a pound is very major, Lee
> That's actually a big loss for you isn't it? didn't you say at some point
> that you were a "slow loser"?
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> >>
> >> Douglas
Willow Herself - 28 Jan 2008 15:32 GMT
;o) Makes it even sweeter!
> its a totally huge loss for me, I seem to lose very little when I do lose,
> usually around .2 or .4 anything over a pound is very major, Lee
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>> >>
>> >> Douglas
Stormmee - 28 Jan 2008 17:00 GMT
that is so true, Lee
> ;o) Makes it even sweeter!
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> >> >>
> >> >> Douglas
Willow Herself - 28 Jan 2008 03:12 GMT
Good Job Lee,
I know how frustrating to struggle and feel like it's just not working,
finaly you get results!
Keep on keeping on!
Will~
> down 1.2 or 1.8 can't remember which it was and don't care, just so
> grateful
> to be losing again, have a great week, Lee
Stormmee - 28 Jan 2008 05:04 GMT
thanks, Lee
> Good Job Lee,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> > grateful
> > to be losing again, have a great week, Lee