"John S." <john.spann...@gmail.com> quoted:
> The Health Benefits of Fasting
> by Will Carroll
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> is a significant community of alternative healers who believe that
> fasting can do wonders for the human body.
The problem I see is diet support groups get enough visitors
with eating disorders that discussing fasting is very problematic.
it is a very bad idea to point out benefits of fasting to anyone
with an eating disorder who should work at developing regular
eating habits not get tempted to take extreme actions. While
properly done fasting isn't extreme, folks with eating disorders
(and many without) don't know when a fast becomes starvation.
Consider that "hunger strikes" are sometimes called fasting.
> Fasting technically commences within the first twelve to twenty-four
> hours of the fast. A fast does not chemically begin until the
> carbohydrate stores in the body begin to be used as an energy source.
And not even then - That's going into ketosis. Eating the diet
of a successful predator will put you into ketosis.
Which brings up the question - If there are benefits to fasting,
how many are actually from being in ketosis, and vice versa?
> The fast will continue as long as fat and carbohydrate stores are used
> for energy, as opposed to protein stores. Once protein stores begin to
> be depleted for energy (resulting in loss of muscle mass) a person is
> technically starving.
But how to tell, and how to take into account the fact that the
body will tend to drop lean mass before fat in order to reduce
its current energy consumption? Folks who yoyo diet can end
up "skinny fat" from dropping lean mass like this.
> A second prescribed benefit of fasting is the healing process that
> begins in the body during a fast. During a fast energy is diverted
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> within the body, tumors and the like, do not have the full support of
> the body's supplies and therefore are more susceptible to autolysis.
Again I wonder how much of this happens while in ketosis as a
result of a successful predator diet compared to fasting. Except
the digestion part.
> In addition, there is a reduction in core body temperature. This is a
> direct result of the slower metabolic rate and general bodily
> functions. Following a drop in blood sugar level and using the
> reserves of glucose found in liver glycogen, the basal metabolic rate
> (BMR) is reduced in order to conserve as much energy within the body
> as can be provided.
Various studies of VLCD show T3 output starting to drop in two
weeks in, but as I read them and consider what I've read over the
years about loss rates it appears to me that the less you have to
lose the sooner it happens the more you have to lose the later it
happens and at some point (maybe 100+ pounds to lose) it
doesn't happen at all until you're below that weight.
But those studies are with eating protein and fat. That BMR
reduction should happen sooner in a fast makes sense.
> Growth hormones are also released during a fast,
> due to the greater efficiency in hormone production.
Among breeds of dogs, the small breeds live longer the
larger breeds live shorter lives. I don't know if there have
ever been studies of smaller people living longer, but the
90+ year old folks I can remember have been small. So
maybe keeping growth hormone low helps longevity?
> Finally, the most scientifically proven advantage to fasting is the
> feeling of rejuvenation and extended life expectancy.
An edition of Discover magazine about 6 months ago
covered caloric reduction and longevity increase. One
suggestion is the biggest contributor was lower insulin.
This too suggests an advantage to low carb.
> Part of this
> phenomenon is caused by a number of the benefits mentioned above. A
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> extend the lifespan of a mammal is under-nutrition without
> malnutrition."
Under nutrition without malnutrition - Doesn't that sound like
any good low carb or low fat plan? Or any low calorie plan
that carefully controls what is eaten to make sure nutrients
are plentiful?
> In conclusion, it seems that there are many reasons to consider
> fasting as a benefit to one's health.
But if anyone ever in your life has asked you about an eating
disorder, run away!
John S. - 23 Aug 2007 14:22 GMT
Much thanks for your comments on the article. I was in such a hurry
to contribute to the group that I forgot to make comment on why I was
posting it. I'm not necessarily in favor of fasting or trying to
promote it and I didn't take the time to check the data in the article
for accuracy. Moreover, I also didn't consider the influence it might
have on people who might have a tendency to starve or undereat.
The reason I posted it was because conceptually the idea of keeping
careful watch on caloric intake and noting the benefits that might
result from lower caloric intake rather than higher caloric intake
seemed important to discuss.
John S.