Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / General Topics / June 2009

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

No time to go soft on obesity-plagued Scots

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Angus - 01 Jun 2009 11:49 GMT
http://www.sundayherald.com/oped/opinion/display.var.2511436.0.no_time_to_g
o_soft_on_obesityplagued_scots.php

No time to go soft on obesity-plagued Scots
Joanna Blythman

A POSTER CAN be found on the walls of GPs' waiting rooms showing a line-up
of bottoms, in all shapes and sizes, with the words: "Your doctors have
seen it all before." It is aimed at people who worry about presenting
themselves for medical treatment because they fear that their particular
ailment or condition makes them perfect subjects for Channel 4's
voyeuristic freak show Embarrassing Bodies.

We can all relate to this. Who hasn't had something on a part of their
anatomy that they would rather not expose to strangers, professional or
otherwise? Who hasn't felt mild anxiety, around this time of year, at the
prospect of finding a swimming costume for the holidays? Let's face it,
there are few experiences less calculated to make you feel good about
yourself than the annual, post-winter try-on session with swim gear. And we
can all swap gory stories about suppurating cysts and disintegrating
toenails.

But if you are fat, very fat indeed, and the prospect of baring all, or
bits of yourself, to a doctor is so unpalatable that you avoid it like root
canal treatment with the dentist, then you might be a victim of "obesity
bias".

Last week, Dr Pat Croskerry, professor of emergency medicine at Dalhousie
University in Canada, was in Edinburgh to warn medics that obese people may
be avoiding or delaying asking for potentially life-saving stomach surgery
because they fear the judgmental attitudes and disapproval of doctors. His
findings chime with other studies which have shown that obese people
postpone important medical checks, such as cervical screening or
blood-pressure testing, because they don't relish being given a dressing
down about their weight.

It certainly can't be very comfortable, can it? There you are, seeking
treatment for your painful knees, your breathing difficulties, your
insomnia or your gout, and you know that you are in for a sanctimonious pep
talk from your GP, who will tell you to "lose some weight and come back and
see me" then send you out the door with some useless NHS diet sheet.

But what else are they meant to do? Just because we are the second-fattest
country on the planet, that doesn't mean that fat people have to be
mollycoddled and sheltered from a truth that they don't want to hear.
Sometimes, you have to be cruel to be kind. Facts are facts. If you are
life-threateningly overweight, you can't expect responsible professionals
to spare your blushes and re-invent reality to ignore the humungous weight
of scientific evidence that shows that being fat is seriously bad for your
health.

There is a school of thought in medical circles that instead of being
viewed as the last resort, radical, invasive operations like gastric-band
surgery should be performed more readily, expanded if you like, to fit the
growing demand. They argue that this would cut deaths from heart disease,
diet-related cancer, stroke and the like, so saving the health service
money in the long term.

Apparently, there are 24,000 severely obese Scots who might, arguably,
benefit from such surgery, but only around 300 have such operations each
year - just half of them on the NHS. Medics who favour magic-bullet
solutions to obesity see this low uptake as yet another symptom of a health
system, and a society, that draws a queasy, moralistic distinction between
the deserving and undeserving sick when allocating NHS resources.

There is another possibility, though. Maybe it sticks in the throat of
thinking doctors to sign up patients for drastic stomach-constriction
surgery or abdominal reshaping with staples when a much more benign
alternative is to ask them to change their eating and living habits.

"Have you any idea how hard it is to lose weight when you are immensely
fat?" I hear you say. I'll admit, I can only imagine and sympathise. But
surely there is a limit to how much we allow our world to be reshaped and
scaled up to accommodate our ballooning phenotype? We now live in the era
of militant fatties; those people who think that the problem isn't obesity
as such, just thin/normal people's attitudes towards it. This supersize
movement demands bigger car, bus, cinema and plane seats. It wants clothes
in ever-expanding sizes. It lambasts fashion retailers for failing to
recalibrate their ranges so that obese sizes, instead of being labelled
XXXL, are normalised. The bigger people become, the more that state is
presented as "normal".

Supersizists castigate fashion designers for encouraging the cult of
thinness, conveniently ignoring the fact that anorexia and bulimia are
Lilliputian concerns monumentally overshadowed by the burgeoning problem of
obesity.

Let's be honest here. Our country's ballooning weight is a shocker and
there is no way we should be accepting of it or view it as inevitable. All
but a few poor souls have it in their power to control their weight and in
the long run, societal disapproval may prove more effective in controlling
fatness than any calorie-controlled diet.
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax - 01 Jun 2009 12:23 GMT
> http://www.sundayherald.com/oped/opinion/display.var.2511436.0.no_time_to_g
> o_soft_on_obesityplagued_scots.php
[quoted text clipped - 88 lines]
> the long run, societal disapproval may prove more effective in controlling
> fatness than any calorie-controlled diet.

I decided I was over weight and lost 15kg over 4 months.
The trick was to cut my calorie intake by 30%, and keep it there. After
a week or two the body gets used to it and you don't feel hungry.

Signature

Dirk

http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK
http://www.theconsensus.org/ - A UK political party
http://www.onetribe.me.uk/wordpress/?cat=5 - Our podcasts on weird stuff

Maria - 01 Jun 2009 13:25 GMT
>> http://www.sundayherald.com/oped/opinion/display.var.2511436.0.no_time_to_g 
>>
[quoted text clipped - 113 lines]
> The trick was to cut my calorie intake by 30%, and keep it there. After
> a week or two the body gets used to it and you don't feel hungry.

I cut my calorie intake, got more and more tired, and gained weight.
Evelyn - 01 Jun 2009 13:47 GMT
>>> http://www.sundayherald.com/oped/opinion/display.var.2511436.0.no_time_to_g
>>> o_soft_on_obesityplagued_scots.php
[quoted text clipped - 121 lines]
>
> I cut my calorie intake, got more and more tired, and gained weight.

That happened to me too.   I was lowering caloric intake yet eating the
wrong foods.... like whole grains etc.    Consider that you may be
borderline diabetic.   Instead try to cut CARB intake.... watch and see, you
will feel more energetic and lose weight.   It can't hurt and can only help
to eat like a diabetic (even if you haven't been diagnosed as one)  by
lowering carbohydrate intake.

Signature

Evelyn

"Even as a mother protects with her life her only child, So with a boundless
heart let one cherish all living beings." --Sutta Nipata 1.8

Maria - 01 Jun 2009 13:57 GMT
>>>> http://www.sundayherald.com/oped/opinion/display.var.2511436.0.no_time_to_g 
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 130 lines]
> That happened to me too.   I was lowering caloric intake yet eating the
> wrong foods.... like whole grains etc.

I think it's a common problem for women - the doc explained...women
engineered to have babies...weight loss is indication of famine
situation...woman in famine situation metabolism changes to store more
fat for potential pregnancy...which might explain why men can seem to
just lose weight by eating less :)

>   Consider that you may be
> borderline diabetic.   Instead try to cut CARB intake.... watch and see,
> you will feel more energetic and lose weight.   It can't hurt and can
> only help to eat like a diabetic (even if you haven't been diagnosed as
> one)  by lowering carbohydrate intake.

I have tried it and found it hard to stick to - I have bread cravings
etc (I don't eat sweets or puddings). I will try again soon - I have
been weening myself off the bread by using yeast-free wraps instead.
Doug Freyburger - 01 Jun 2009 16:07 GMT
> I have tried it and found it hard to stick to - I have bread cravings
> etc (I don't eat sweets or puddings). I will try again soon - I have
> been weening myself off the bread by using yeast-free wraps instead.

Cravings are a part of a pattern of addictive behavior.  If
there is a specific food you're eating that triggers cravings,
the only way you'll ever get out of the craving loop is to
decide that particular food is a poison to you personally
and avoid it from there on.

For an alcoholic to drop alcohol forever, they know that
falling off the wagon can kill them.  It increases the
motivation.  For a specific-food-alohic, we learn that
falling off the wagon by eating that specific food sets us
on a regain path that leads us all the way back to our
top weight.  It doesn't kill us though it does lead to long
term medical issues.  The motivation isn't as clear.

What's worse is the confusion about "food addiction"
and the idea that you can't live without food.  While that's
true in general it isn't true about any one type of food in
particular.  If you get cravings from bread then it's either
of two most likely issues -

1) Insulin spike from the high starch content of the bread.
If this is true then eating similar quantites of any type of
starchy food will trigger the same cravings.  Weigh the
amount of bread that triggers the cravings, then have
that much potato.  If it gives the same cravings, double
check with some other starchy food like the same starch
amount of white rice.  If it also gives cravings then you
know you need to avoid foods above some level of starch.
Time to eat more root veggies like carrots, turnips,
swedes/rutabagas and so on and less grains and spuds.

2) Intolerance reaction to wheat in specific or to gluten in
general.  Do the weighing experiment above.  If the
potatoes do not trigger cravings also try it with rice or
corn/maize.  If neither of those triggers cravings then it
is something specific to the grain in the bread.  Start
trying other grain products - Most pasta is from wheat so
it should also trigger cravings (sauces are intended to
smooth out the insulin from starch but they don't stop
cravings from intolerances).  Rice or corn/maize are
gluten free grains.  The gluten bearing grains in order of
amount are wheat, rye, barley, oats so they next step
is to find German/Danish bread that's 100% rye and see
how you react.

When I followed this process I discovered my own
reaction is very specific to wheat.  I get cravings from
wheat, spelt (a nearly wild wheat relative common in
Italy) and Kamut (an ancient domesticated wheat variety
from Egypt).  I don't get cravings from rye so I can eat
the German/Danish heavy bread, or barley so I can
handle good beers that aren't wheat beers, or oats so I
can have oat porridge at breakfast.

You're a Scot?  How about this for an attitude adjustment
about wheat - Wheat's a sothron conspiracy to weaken
the north.  Grown in the south, fed to the northerners to
make us more hungry.  Real northerners eat oats, or
barley (Eire, UK south of Scotland), buckwheat or corn
(US).  Or we just feed the grain to the cattle and have
beef.  Beef's low carb don't ya know.  Better way to have
grain anyways.  Give it to the critters evolved to eat it
then we eat them.  Or right, northerners - I mean the
reindeer not the cattle ... ;^)
Evelyn - 01 Jun 2009 18:43 GMT
>>>>> http://www.sundayherald.com/oped/opinion/display.var.2511436.0.no_time_to_g
>>>>> o_soft_on_obesityplagued_scots.php
[quoted text clipped - 152 lines]
> (I don't eat sweets or puddings). I will try again soon - I have been
> weening myself off the bread by using yeast-free wraps instead.

Bread cravings are a well known symptom of the metabolic disorder that leads
to diabetes.

Try eating no bread for breakfast one morning, or just a small piece, and
see how you are less hungry by lunch.   Then try eating a big salad for
lunch with everything in it, excepting croutons or other bread, and see how
you snack less all day.

Even if you don't give up the carbohydrates, limit them and count the grams
of carbs per day.   I am not saying to go carb free, but limit them
severely.

About the wraps, the problem isn't the yeast, it is the carbohydrates.   Our
bodies sometimes just don't handle them well anymore.   You are not alone in
that, I assure you.

Signature

Evelyn

"Even as a mother protects with her life her only child, So with a boundless
heart let one cherish all living beings." --Sutta Nipata 1.8

Kaz Kylheku - 02 Jun 2009 00:01 GMT
> "Maria" <oldwoman@theshoe.ac.uk> wrote in message
>>> I decided I was over weight and lost 15kg over 4 months.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> That happened to me too.   I was lowering caloric intake yet eating the
> wrong foods.... like whole grains etc.    Consider that you may be

There are billions of thin people in the world. Some eat carby diets, some more
fatty ones. Some more protein, some less.

In Japan, people eat rice for breakfast, lunch and dinner. Yet, fat people are
rare.  Nearly everyone you encounter in that country is thin.

In my travels there, I saw only a handful of chubby people, and nobody who was
fat enough to be /ugly/ because of it, like what we see in America frequently.

Sure, there are Sumo wrestlers, but they are freaks by choice, and they are
not a large percentage of the population. Sumo wrestlers maintain their size
by stuffing themselves with large meals several times a day. They eat the
same Japanese food as millions of their thin countrymen, like nabe (hotpot).
Only, a lot more of it.

> borderline diabetic.   Instead try to cut CARB intake.... watch and see, you
> will feel more energetic and lose weight.

> It can't hurt and can only help
> to eat like a diabetic (even if you haven't been diagnosed as one)  by
> lowering carbohydrate intake.

If you eat the proper quantity of food, the macronutrient distribution doesn't
matter, except for some constraints: you need enough protein, and a tiny amount
of essential fat. How you adjust your diet around these constraints is up to
you.

There is no way you could eat possibly eat enough carbs for carbs to be a
problem, if you are not consuming excess calories, if enough of your calories
come from protein, and if you don't eat all your daily food in one sitting.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.