[Posting from misc.health.diabetes.]
In misc.health.diabetes q <q@q.com> wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> wrote in news:hl8bi6$1jp1$1
> @colin2.muc.de:
>> In misc.health.diabetes ARTF <ARTF@prodigy.net> wrote:
>>> Warning, this vendor is problematical when it comes to
>>> vitamins/supplements:
>> With all due respect, ALL vendors of "vitamins/supplements" are
>> dodgy. Unless you are suffering seriously malnutrition, or have some
>> specific illness, you just don't need them. Spend your money on fresh
>> fruit and vegetables instead!
>> [ .... tiny URL snipped ]
>>> or for you paranoids who like struggling with long urls:
>> [ .... gross URL snipped ]
>>> Pay particular attention to all the bad customer reviews at
>>> resellerratings.com - see the contained url in the addresses above
>>> or search google: site:resellerratings.com + puritan's pride
>>> One of the lowest ratings of satisfaction at that site.
>> Wondering why this post came to m.h.diabetes ....
> Sometimes I agree with you, sometimes not. The problem is that there
> is no independent tester of these companies products to insure they
> aren't just selling you pills with flour in them or worse toxic
> contaminants.
Or even worse, sugar.
> But there are too many studies to deny that these supplements can and
> often do have beneficial effects. Example is Alpha-lipoic acid for
> which there is more than one study showing it reduces peripheral
> neuropathy associated with diabetes
Hmm, OK. But in that case, you'd be talking about buying alpha-lipoic
acid, not "vitamins/supplements". Just because one (or several) specific
useful drug(s) is sometimes present in these things doesn't justify the
worthiness of the category.
What is alpha-lipoic acid, by the way? What sort of food does it occur
in? ;-)

Signature
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).