Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / General Topics / March 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Basic question about 5K races

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ignoramus10668 - 08 Mar 2004 14:50 GMT
I would like to participate in a upcoming April 25 5K run/walk in our
community park (Western suburbs of Chicago). I never participated in a
race before and have some basic question.

The ad says that the race begins at 8am.

Is it realistic to expect to be done by, say, 8:55am. I need to take
my son to a playgroup at 10am. If it says the race begins at 8am, I
have to be there at 7:45 or so, to register etc?

Do people finish around where they started?

How does it work, normally?

i
Dally - 08 Mar 2004 15:01 GMT
> I would like to participate in a upcoming April 25 5K run/walk in our
> community park (Western suburbs of Chicago). I never participated in a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Is it realistic to expect to be done by, say, 8:55am.

In my vast experience the race starts when they say it will start.  How
long it takes you to finish is someone situational, don't you think?

> If it says the race begins at 8am, I
> have to be there at 7:45 or so, to register etc?

Earlier than that: the registration ENDED 15 minutes before the race
started.  It was nearby but not actually AT the starting line.  I'd say
to get there by 7:15.  You might want to do a warm-up run, too.

> Do people finish around where they started?

Nearby, anyway, at least in the races I know about.

> How does it work, normally?

You show up in running gear and move your feet over and over again.

Dally
Ignoramus10668 - 08 Mar 2004 15:18 GMT
>> I would like to participate in a upcoming April 25 5K run/walk in our
>> community park (Western suburbs of Chicago). I never participated in a
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> In my vast experience the race starts when they say it will start.  How
> long it takes you to finish is someone situational, don't you think?

Yea, but I figure, 5K is close to my regular jogging distance
(4.5k). So if I simply run at my jogging speed (I am a very slow
runner), it will take me about 40 minutes.

I agree that my question was poorly worded. Here's a better worded
question:is it realistic to expect to leave 10 minutes after I finish?
Or do I need to hang around for final determinations of running time,
etc?

>> If it says the race begins at 8am, I
>> have to be there at 7:45 or so, to register etc?
>
> Earlier than that: the registration ENDED 15 minutes before the race
> started.  It was nearby but not actually AT the starting line.  I'd say
> to get there by 7:15.  You might want to do a warm-up run, too.

Thanks. I will probably simply run there, as it is about 15 minutes
running from my home. It depends on when I can finish, maybe I will
have to drive or take a bicycle to be on time for the playgroup.

>> Do people finish around where they started?
>
> Nearby, anyway, at least in the races I know about.

That's nice.

>> How does it work, normally?
>
> You show up in running gear and move your feet over and over again.

do they give any sort of paperwork etc? Do they give certificates of
some sort?

i
Donovan Rebbechi - 08 Mar 2004 15:28 GMT
> I would like to participate in a upcoming April 25 5K run/walk in our
> community park (Western suburbs of Chicago). I never participated in a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Is it realistic to expect to be done by, say, 8:55am.

Depends on how quickly you finish (-; Yes, it's realistic. Once you finish,
you can just go. Most races will post the results on the internet nowadays.

> I need to take
> my son to a playgroup at 10am. If it says the race begins at 8am, I
> have to be there at 7:45 or so, to register etc?

I'd recommend getting there earlier if you need to register, more like
7:30 (even for a small race). It rapidly gets more crowded as it gets closer to
starting time. Never hurts to be early.

> Do people finish around where they started?

Most races of this length use a loop course (or an approximate loop).

Cheers,
Signature

Donovan Rebbechi
http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/

Ignoramus10668 - 08 Mar 2004 15:35 GMT
>> I would like to participate in a upcoming April 25 5K run/walk in our
>> community park (Western suburbs of Chicago). I never participated in a
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Depends on how quickly you finish (-; Yes, it's realistic. Once you finish,
> you can just go. Most races will post the results on the internet nowadays.

Okay, thanks. They would tell me my time right away though, right?
I obviously have a stopwatch as well.

>> I need to take
>> my son to a playgroup at 10am. If it says the race begins at 8am, I
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> 7:30 (even for a small race). It rapidly gets more crowded as it gets closer to
> starting time. Never hurts to be early.

thanks.

>> Do people finish around where they started?
>
> Most races of this length use a loop course (or an approximate loop).

Alright, sounds good. Do you know of a website with running time
distribution curves for various ages?

i
Donovan Rebbechi - 08 Mar 2004 19:43 GMT
>>> I would like to participate in a upcoming April 25 5K run/walk in our
>>> community park (Western suburbs of Chicago). I never participated in a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Okay, thanks. They would tell me my time right away though, right?

Usually, they have a nice big clock at the finish line, so you can check your time.

So if you only care up to plus/minus a second or two, then you can just check the
clock as you finish.

It's a good idea to bring your stopwatch to keep an eye on your mile splits.

One hint: if the race is chip-timed, make sure you run past *BOTH* of the mats
at the finish line. A lot of people get recorded out-of-place, because they decide
that they don't have to run any more after they've run under the clock. Not the
case -- run through the finish line, not to the finish line (apart from anything else,
this also helps prevent other finishers getting obstructed)

>>> Do people finish around where they started?
>>
>> Most races of this length use a loop course (or an approximate loop).
>
> Alright, sounds good. Do you know of a website with running time
> distribution curves for various ages?

Many races record your WAVA "age graded percentage" rating. For a runner aged 20-35, this
is calculated by dividing the time for a world record performance (at least, world record
at the time the system was devised) by your time. For example, a 3hr marathon for a 25 year
old would be 2:06:50 / 3hrs = 126.8/180 = 70.4%.

The ratings are graded to take age into account, so there are scale factors for different
ages and different distances. So for example, a 38 year old male runner who runs a 4 miler
in 23:10 will have a performance rating of about 75%, whereas the same pace is only worth
73% for a 30 year old.

Generally, anything above 60% is considered a reasonably respectable performance, and is
the entry-level standard for some competitive clubs. Serious competitive runners are usually
over 70%, and the ones who win age group awards around here are typically in the high 70s or
low 80s.

Cheers,
Signature

Donovan Rebbechi
http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/

Ignoramus27290 - 08 Mar 2004 23:17 GMT
... snipped other useful suggestions...

> Generally, anything above 60% is considered a reasonably respectable performance, and is
> the entry-level standard for some competitive clubs. Serious competitive runners are usually
> over 70%, and the ones who win age group awards around here are typically in the high 70s or
> low 80s.

Thanks. And how fast should I run a 5K run to become "barely respectable"?

i
Donovan Rebbechi - 08 Mar 2004 23:37 GMT
> ... snipped other useful suggestions...
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Thanks. And how fast should I run a 5K run to become "barely respectable"?

If you're referring to a the 60% AG% rating .. ?

It's about 21:36 for a male under 35. If you're older than that, you get a time
bonus -- add maybe about 9 seconds per year or so.

Cheers,
Signature

Donovan Rebbechi
http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/

Ignoramus27290 - 09 Mar 2004 01:03 GMT
>> ... snipped other useful suggestions...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> It's about 21:36 for a male under 35. If you're older than that, you get a time
> bonus -- add maybe about 9 seconds per year or so.

Doubtful I could run that fast... but thanks.

i
Donovan Rebbechi - 09 Mar 2004 01:17 GMT

>> If you're referring to a the 60% AG% rating .. ?
>>
>> It's about 21:36 for a male under 35. If you're older than that, you get a
>> time bonus -- add maybe about 9 seconds per year or so.
>
> Doubtful I could run that fast... but thanks.

For your first race -- just run it and have a good time. You will probably
exceed your expectations. Running alongside a bunch of other people who are
running fairly fast not only reduces any inhibitions that would prevent you
from running fast, the fact that you're not alone and the excitement of the
occasion also boosts pain tolerance or even suppresses pain.

Whatever happens, you'll probably do better than you expect. So have a good
race, and be sure to post a report.

Cheers,
Signature

Donovan Rebbechi
http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/

Dot - 09 Mar 2004 02:07 GMT
> Doubtful I could run that fast... but thanks.
>
> i

If this is your first race, don't worry about time. Just have fun. Also,
what you actually have for your race may differ from what any of us here
indicate. Donovan and I run at opposite extremes. He does big city road
races in NYC while I do comparatively small trail runs (max 200 runners,
sometimes < 30) in Alaska. Somewhere in between is what you might find
for experiences on race day :)

Seriously, though for a run in a local community park, don't be
surprised if there's no big clock, no mile markers, etc. There may very
well be, but I've yet to see any in any of my races (except for clock in
orienteering where start times are variable). "Dual timing" at my last
race consisted of 2 hand timers.

Also for those age-graded thingies, keep in mind that many world records
(the standards for these numbers) are set on accurately measured courses
designed to be fast. Many local races may be approximate distances, more
hills, wind, snow, or any number of other things to slow a person down.
It's an ideal that people that are into numbers enjoy comparing
themselves to. And trail runners use the slowness of a course to judge
the amount of challenge in a race (hills, mud, snow, and other course
challenges) :)

But if you want to find out about your local race, you really should
talk to somebody local, esp. if associated with the race. That's the
only reliable information for *your* race.   I know I got a shock for my
first race when I found out a few days before that things were so
different from what I had expected based on what I had read. (I'd been
trying to contact organizers and hadn't gotten any responses.)

Dot

Signature

"Success is different things to different people"
-Bernd Heinrich in Racing the Antelope

Donovan Rebbechi - 09 Mar 2004 02:31 GMT
>> Doubtful I could run that fast... but thanks.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> what you actually have for your race may differ from what any of us here
> indicate. Donovan and I run at opposite extremes.

Yeah, it was interesting reading your response in this thread. Hopefully,
between us we can "bracket" his experience ...

Cheers,
Signature

Donovan Rebbechi
http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/

Dally - 09 Mar 2004 04:12 GMT
> But if you want to find out about your local race, you really should
> talk to somebody local, esp. if associated with the race. That's the
> only reliable information for *your* race.   I know I got a shock for my
> first race when I found out a few days before that things were so
> different from what I had expected based on what I had read. (I'd been
> trying to contact organizers and hadn't gotten any responses.)

Same here.  I thought the race I was entering was a 5K "Fun Run" in a
park known for its trails.  Turns out it was a four mile road race that
ran PAST the park (but not on the trails) and there were NO walkers.  I
finished last with my poky 12 minute mile jog.  It was significantly
different than I expected.  But don't interpret that to mean it was bad.
 It was just fine.

I'm still looking for a 5K "Fun Run" that fits my ideal.

Dally
DrLith - 09 Mar 2004 04:25 GMT
> > But if you want to find out about your local race, you really should
> > talk to somebody local, esp. if associated with the race. That's the
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> I'm still looking for a 5K "Fun Run" that fits my ideal.

'Tis (almost) the season for spring charity 5Ks. Unless you live on Neptune
(like Dot, har har har), there should be more coming up in April and May
than you can shake a stick at. In my vast racing experience, the best
back-of-the-pack experiences come in "medium-sized" races: a few hundred
runners, but not a few thousand. For most races you can research past
finishing times and turnouts on the web.
Donovan Rebbechi - 09 Mar 2004 13:17 GMT
>> But if you want to find out about your local race, you really should
>> talk to somebody local, esp. if associated with the race. That's the
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> I'm still looking for a 5K "Fun Run" that fits my ideal.

I think you did great, and would encourage you to keep looking for that perfect
"fun run".  Some events are better organised than others. Usually, the big city
races are quite large, well organised, and have a diverse pool of runners, from
very fast to very slow, to walking (you wouldn't finish last in a NY city race,
even at your 12min/mile pace) I don't know how the Boston races compare, but I
would guess they'd be similar.

Cheers,
Signature

Donovan Rebbechi
http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/

Dot - 08 Mar 2004 17:49 GMT
> I would like to participate in a upcoming April 25 5K run/walk in our
> community park (Western suburbs of Chicago). I never participated in a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Is it realistic to expect to be done by, say, 8:55am.

Assuming they start on time and you run 5k in less than 55 min, then you
should be done by then :)

I need to take
> my son to a playgroup at 10am. If it says the race begins at 8am, I
> have to be there at 7:45 or so, to register etc?

Most races I've done suggest arriving 1 hr before race, esp. if you
haven't pre-registered, which may take 5-10 min. Small races (<30
people) may suggest 30 min lead time. There may be pre-race meetings
about 30 min before. The registration may not be at the start line.
Parking most likely isn't at start line. And if everybody else waited
until race day to register, there may be long lines at registration.
Don't forget time for warmup, potty lines, etc. Some races will start
without you; others may wait (to the annoyance of some runners that
arrived on time).

> Do people finish around where they started?

Depends on the route. Check with the RD, the web page, or someone whose
done the race before. I've only done a few short races so far but half
have been loops returning to start and half have been point to point and
you're on your own to find a way back to your vehicle (many just run
back). Other races do provide a shuttle if point to point. Sometimes
parking is at start; sometimes at finish.

Regarding the time question in your other post, this would depend on
race. My races generally don't have web pages, but many have times
posted in the paper the next day. Assuming it's not too crowded, you may
be able to get the time when you finish or someone may call out the time
as you cross. My very first race expected us to come to the visitor
center after 5pm to get results (manual recording) - also parade time so
I think there was some ulterior motive there. They've changed that
procedure in recent years.

Enjoy! and post a race report!

Dot

Signature

"Success is different things to different people"
-Bernd Heinrich in Racing the Antelope

bj - 08 Mar 2004 21:09 GMT
Is there a contact phone number listed anywhere? If so, call & ask about all
these things. It's what I did the first time I did a local community race. I
even asked "will there be some slow people running?" (I'm slow, I wanted to
know I'd have company!).
bj

> I would like to participate in a upcoming April 25 5K run/walk in our
> community park (Western suburbs of Chicago). I never participated in a
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> i
Dot - 08 Mar 2004 21:24 GMT
> Is there a contact phone number listed anywhere? If so, call & ask about all
> these things. It's what I did the first time I did a local community race. I
> even asked "will there be some slow people running?" (I'm slow, I wanted to
> know I'd have company!).

heck, I asked how long they kept the course open! I had read the case of
someone doing a winter tri that he had so many problems that they were
about ready to close the pool when he showed up for the swim portion
(swim is usually last in winter tris). No, I wasn't that slow as it
turned out.

contacting locals is also how I found out that we (Alaska) do things
very differently up here than down south (or at least r.r postings). I
basically ignored everything I'd heard here or read in books regarding
races.

Dot

Signature

"Success is different things to different people"
-Bernd Heinrich in Racing the Antelope

Sam - 09 Mar 2004 03:22 GMT
> I would like to participate in a upcoming April 25 5K run/walk in our
> community park (Western suburbs of Chicago). I never participated in a
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> i

Have you run that far in training?  If so, figure you will run faster than
that during a race.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.