Jenn, it may not surprise you to know that I already have this book.
I agree it's an excellent book. The thing that shone through for me
most is that it's written by someone who really does seem to
understand the issues, which I think is a rare thing even among
medical professionals. Several things he says describe my behaviour
very closely. The only area in the first part of the book where I
would take issue with him is the way he passes off the physiological
effects of binge eating as farily minor - perhaps he hasn't studied
anyone who's been at it as long as I have!
However, I don't think I will ever be able to commit myself to the
recovery programme that he suggests. I think trying to deal with the
issue in this way would be something I would be prepared to try if I
was much closer to the weight I want to be - until then I find myself
totally unable to follow any sort of programme whose first aim isn't
to deliver a good weight loss. Of course, I realise I'm trapped in a
vicious circle, but understanding that doesn't make it any easier to
turn my back on dieting. I'm glad he makes such a strong link between
dieting and binge eating, though, as this has been my experience
absolutely although I've had people tell me I'm wrong about this.
janice
> Jenn, it may not surprise you to know that I already have this book.
It doesn't surprise me in the least. The book has been around since '94 or
'95 and you appear by your posts to be a very self-aware kinda gal.
> I agree it's an excellent book. The thing that shone through for me
> most is that it's written by someone who really does seem to
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> effects of binge eating as farily minor - perhaps he hasn't studied
> anyone who's been at it as long as I have!
I agree that he probably hasn't studied the old broads like us who have 20+
years of this behavior under our belts. I don't agree with you that he
passes off the effects as minor at all since he goes on at length to discuss
the ensuing depression, mood disorders, and general obsession which are all
psychological. He does explain that "finding the origin" is really not
important in most cases since what triggered you at 15 yrs old is probably
not what's keeping it going at 25 (or 35, etc). However, that's my take on
the book and I am not saying you're wrong, only that I saw it differently.
> However, I don't think I will ever be able to commit myself to the
> recovery programme that he suggests. I think trying to deal with the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> dieting and binge eating, though, as this has been my experience
> absolutely although I've had people tell me I'm wrong about this.
And you will continue to have people tell you that you're wrong because
everybody knows everything about everybody else. It was very validating to
see the research about the links between dieting and binge behavior. In the
appendix 2 he does discuss the need to choose between doing a weight loss
program or the recovery program, and he does make some really good points.
When I was 300 lbs, my priority was to lose weight. Now at my current
weight where it's not putting me at high risk anymore and the fact that I
did have the full blown bulimia return for a while, I need to shift my
priority because that is a bigger health risk than the 20 lbs I want to
lose. Fairburn swears that it is highly unlikely that a person will gain
any weight on the recovery program and his arguments made enough sense to me
that I'm convincing myself to try it.
While the recovery program does require giving up on "dieting," his eating
recommendations are very similar to those in the Body for Life program. I'm
still finishing the BFL book to see if the two programs would be compatible.
I'm seriously considering doing a BFL challenge in about 2 weeks if I truly
feel that it won't jeopardize the recovery program.
I can totally relate to the difficulty of giving up on dieting - hence the
BFL challenge. I'm not 100% sure I'll succeed in that area either - though
I think I can eventually adjust to giving up strict or extreme dieting like
the author describes especially if I really don't gain any weight on the
recovery program. I've been dieting for the last 27 years on and off and
even when off I would think about it and plan the next one. You can't just
turn your back on that.
As always, we need to do what is best for our own selves.
Jenn
janice - 13 May 2004 09:13 GMT
>I agree that he probably hasn't studied the old broads like us who have 20+
>years of this behavior under our belts. I don't agree with you that he
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>not what's keeping it going at 25 (or 35, etc). However, that's my take on
>the book and I am not saying you're wrong, only that I saw it differently.
I probably didn't express myself very clearly on this. I was thinking
more of the actual physical effects on the body, particularly the
effects of abusing my body with overeating has had on my entire
digestive system - I'll spare you all the details:) I was very
interested in the "finding the origin bit" - he describes something
I've often thought to myself and have tried to explore in group and 1
to 1 sessions in the past but never solved - that the reasons which
cause the behaviour to continue are not (necessarily) what caused it
to start in the first place. I'm sure this is true for me, but I
can't really get any closer to understanding the reasons.
>. Fairburn swears that it is highly unlikely that a person will gain
>any weight on the recovery program and his arguments made enough sense to me
>that I'm convincing myself to try it.
Yes, but for me I don't want to be told I won't gain, I want to be
told I'll lose. It's very hard to let go of that, it's the main thing
that keeps me going!
>While the recovery program does require giving up on "dieting," his eating
>recommendations are very similar to those in the Body for Life program. I'm
>still finishing the BFL book to see if the two programs would be compatible.
>I'm seriously considering doing a BFL challenge in about 2 weeks if I truly
>feel that it won't jeopardize the recovery program.
Perhaps I should read BFL - I'm not someone to try out everything
that's going (and I'm not suggesting you are either, Jenn, I hope
that's not how this sounds), but I'm curious about BFL as others have
done so well with it and it certainly is a bit different.
>As always, we need to do what is best for our own selves.
Amen to that. The best people here on asd, IMO, are those who like a
healthy discussion, who share their trials and errors and thoughts and
ideas, but never forget that we're all different and their way isn't
necessarily the right one for others.
I'm glad you're going to stay with us, and I look forward to hearing
how you get on if you do the BFL challenge.
janice
janice - 13 May 2004 10:54 GMT
>>I agree that he probably hasn't studied the old broads like us
LOL - I forgot to mention that I'm a lot older and broader than you
Jenn:(
janice
JMA - 13 May 2004 23:15 GMT
> I probably didn't express myself very clearly on this. I was thinking
> more of the actual physical effects on the body, particularly the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> to start in the first place. I'm sure this is true for me, but I
> can't really get any closer to understanding the reasons.
Whoops, you were clear when you wrote physiological. My fatigue and general
brain death saw it as psychological. I agree, I was a little surprised that
Fairburn felt there was little physical damage from the overeating itself,
but I'd imagine the studies bear that out.
Jenn