Weight Loss Forum / General Topics / May 2004
Successful bariatric surgery
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Susan Serrill - 17 May 2004 06:19 GMT I had to go thru hell for this surgery. First, my insurance company refused to cover it because I didn't meet the minimum weight guidelines ( > 100 lbs over) I spent weeks trying to gain 40 lbs so I would make the cut. Then, I couldn't find a psych consult which would be covered by my insurance. The doctor (Dr. Sweet of the SWLC in Reading, PA) was very nice and waived it. Ta-da! I'm now thin, and didn't have to spend a single day at the gym. Although I do drive by there to laugh at all the fatties sweating their a.ses off....
Susan :)
Dally - 17 May 2004 08:03 GMT > I had to go thru hell for this surgery. First, my insurance company > refused to cover it because I didn't meet the minimum weight guidelines ( > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Susan :) You sound like a lovely person. I particularly liked the part about scamming unnecessary expensive medical procedures through insurance fraud. I pay $13,000/year for family medical insurance. Easy to see why.
Dally, who went to the gym today and sweated her fat a.s off
VirtualGuy - 23 May 2004 17:58 GMT > I pay $13,000/year for family medical insurance. Holy crap, Batman!
I had no idea that what medical insurance cost in the US.
I'm now even more glad to be a Canadian after learning this.
Cheers!
Alex
 Signature ******************************************************* VirtualGuy - Edmonton, Alberta, Canada VirtualGuy.at.shaw.dot.ca Website: http://members.shaw.ca/virtualguy *******************************************************
Heywood Mogroot - 23 May 2004 23:42 GMT > > I pay $13,000/year for family medical insurance. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > I'm now even more glad to be a Canadian after learning this. A firtst-rate group-rate PPO plan costs $350/mo for a single 30-something guy.
Catastropic-only coverage costs approx $150/mo, but they won't even start coverage if you have an existing condition, however minor.
The health insurance issue in the US is well and truly f.cked, and neither party has really done much to address it, and yes, I'm counting back to 1993...
Beverly - 17 May 2004 13:56 GMT > I had to go thru hell for this surgery. First, my insurance company > refused to cover it because I didn't meet the minimum weight guidelines ( > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Susan :) How sweet of you to tell us about this. Now come back in a few years when you've regained the weight or are experiencing other problems and we'll give you the information you need to live a long and healthy life! It's called proper diet and exercise.
How much muscle did you lose along with the pounds?
BTW.....I personally know two people who had the WLS and 10 years later they're both experiencing health problems and have gained every lost ounce back.
Ignoramus4854 - 17 May 2004 14:14 GMT > I had to go thru hell for this surgery. First, my insurance company > refused to cover it because I didn't meet the minimum weight guidelines ( > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > at the gym. Although I do drive by there to laugh at all the fatties > sweating their a.ses off.... It sounds to me that you are kidding (trolling). In case you are not...
If not, then the wisdom of gaining 40 lbs and getting a stomach surgery, to lose only 60 lbs, and losing 100 lbs on a forced crash diet, is rather questionable health wise.
Not only you somewhat scammed your health insurance company, but you also scammed yourself, and the only benefactor that I see is your weight loss surgeon.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- char*p="char*p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);} "It's never too late to have a happy childhood."
Susan Serrill - 17 May 2004 16:18 GMT >> I had to go thru hell for this surgery. First, my insurance company >> refused to cover it because I didn't meet the minimum weight guidelines ( > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >also scammed yourself, and the only benefactor that I see is your >weight loss surgeon. Wrong, there were other benefits as well. I have caesarian scars which I would have had forever....however now that I have had the bariatric surgery, my insurance company will fully cover a tummy tuck. I am going to look like I did when I was in high school.
There is no scam about it. What I do with my body is my business. Why should anyone else put me down for having this surgery, it has nothing to do with them.
Ignoramus4854 - 17 May 2004 16:26 GMT >>> I had to go thru hell for this surgery. First, my insurance company >>> refused to cover it because I didn't meet the minimum weight guidelines ( > [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > surgery, my insurance company will fully cover a tummy tuck. I am going to > look like I did when I was in high school. That's good! Can you post your photos somewhere?
How do you feel with a stapled stomach? Are you hungry all the time?
> There is no scam about it. What I do with my body is my business. Why > should anyone else put me down for having this surgery, it has nothing to > do with them. Well, you did post a message, which invited comments. Why be surprised that you hear positive and negative comments?
What would be very interesting is if you could post updates on your condition once in a while.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- char*p="char*p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);} "It's never too late to have a happy childhood."
That T Woman - 17 May 2004 18:07 GMT > >> I had to go thru hell for this surgery. First, my insurance company > >> refused to cover it because I didn't meet the minimum weight guidelines ( > [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > should anyone else put me down for having this surgery, it has nothing to > do with them. If it has nothing to do with us, wtf did you bother posting here? You obviously didn't want our opinions.
Perple Gyrl - 18 May 2004 01:24 GMT I am happy to know that you are in better shape then my best friend who had this done about 1.5 yrs ago. She has been in and out of the hospital a dozen times with various health issues, including gastritis, hernias, pancreatitis and anemia. She is currently going to a hemotologist 3x a week for iron transfusions because her body can't absorb enough from food or suppliments. Unfortunately, The 2 blood transfusions didn't give her enough iron so she had to resort to this. She will most likely have to do this regularly for the rest of her life. She also complains that she never feels good and the extra iron makes her feel nauseated all of the time.
Her skin all over is saggy, from her face, neck, belly, thighs to boobs to arms, etc. She also had 2 c-sections so her tummy is messed up as well from scars. She lost about 115 - 120 lbs but appears to be gaining some of it back now. She refuses to exercise with me. Her doctors keep telling her to exercise because it helps improve the oxygen level in her blood. She plans on having a tummy tuck too. However, she can't afford the thigh lift, boob job, arm lift, neck lift, etc. Not only that, but all of that surgery is painful and has a lot of down time. If she exercised and improved her tone a bit, the skin would look much better. Funny, she never laughs at me for exercising. I am a little heavier then her now but I look so much healthier and "vital".
It is heart breaking seeing my friend go through so much and know that it isn't over for her. One of my best friends that is a nurse tells me about all of the people she knows that has had this done... health issues can happen at any time. She has this one friend who can only drink ensure now and can eat nothing else w/out throwing up. This person had the surgery done about 3 yrs ago and was fine the first 2 years. She looks great, but at what cost??
"Susan Serrill" <soosynn@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> Wrong, there were other benefits as well. I have caesarian scars which I > would have had forever....however now that I have had the bariatric [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > should anyone else put me down for having this surgery, it has nothing to > do with them. Dally - 18 May 2004 02:17 GMT > I am happy to know that you are in better shape then my best friend who had > this done about 1.5 yrs ago. She has been in and out of the hospital a [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > done about 3 yrs ago and was fine the first 2 years. She looks great, but > at what cost?? I really like that this will get googled by someone considering this.
My big problem with it isn't the puritanical one (that they should "suffer" the way we had to suffer) but that it isn't really a cure.
We got fat because we didn't do the basic maintenance required by owners of human bodies. Maybe we didn't know how, or maybe we chose not to, but for whatever reason, we need to fix our impediments and start doing it. I just think this is best done WHILE you lose the weight, in fits and starts, not all at once after you lose the weight. There are too many skills to pick up along the way.
I mean, you STILL have to do the same exact work in changing your lifestyle. Why put yourself through surgery and force yourself to know everyting about being thin all at once?
Dally
Perple Gyrl - 18 May 2004 03:56 GMT "Dally" <dally@myself.com> wrote in message
> I really like that this will get googled by someone considering this. I think I may have posted about my friend's mounting difficulties in past posts as well.
> My big problem with it isn't the puritanical one (that they should > "suffer" the way we had to suffer) but that it isn't really a cure. My problem with it is that you risk your health for what?!? To lose weight quickly but unless you change your WOL, you won't keep it off! Tummies stretch out again... I've heard of people getting 2 bypass surgeries due to a tummy that stretched out again.
I forgot to mention that I have 2 other male friends that had the surgery done. The first one is 6'6" and weighed about 400 lbs before the surgery. He lost about 100 of it and was working on losing more when I saw him 6 months ago. I saw him for the first time in months recently. He looked like he was back to his start weight. He came for dinner and he ate more then I did! He also proceeded to drink an entire bottle of wine. Due to a faulty cathater during the procedure, he also became impotent for the rest of his life. He can still function, but in a limp noodle type of way. He is exploring suing the hospital.
The 2nd friend is about 6'5 and weighed 450 lbs. He just had the banding procedure done about 3 mos ago. He's already lost about 60 lbs. IMO, the banding is much less invasive then the bypass. However, when I am over for poker night... I watch him eat. He still eats very poorly and too much. *sigh*
> We got fat because we didn't do the basic maintenance required by owners > of human bodies. Maybe we didn't know how, or maybe we chose not to, > but for whatever reason, we need to fix our impediments and start doing > it. I just think this is best done WHILE you lose the weight, in fits > and starts, not all at once after you lose the weight. There are too > many skills to pick up along the way. I agree.
> I mean, you STILL have to do the same exact work in changing your > lifestyle. Why put yourself through surgery and force yourself to know > everyting about being thin all at once? I guess the surgery forces you to change. However, if you don't work on yourself you can change back.
> Dally Angie - 18 May 2004 17:00 GMT taking it one day at a time is the best way to go. But some people are looking for the quick fix. My best friends sister. always thought she was too big. she is skinny and can wear whatever she wants and has been in and out of the hospital because of her illness. ( wanting to be skinny) she used to exercise constently. she worked at a gym in the day care and got a memebership for free. used the treadmill and stair climber and bike for hours without effort. Now she is at least healthy looking but there are things that she won't eat because she refuses to and because they are bad for her. she still sometimes hides her body for fear that she is not skinny enough or pretty enough. work at losing weight and becoming healthy one day at a time. Angie P.s risking your health isn't worth it
> > I am happy to know that you are in better shape then my best friend who had > > this done about 1.5 yrs ago. She has been in and out of the hospital a [quoted text clipped - 43 lines] > > Dally Nancy 8 03 - 23 May 2004 23:05 GMT I watched at news show on Fox about gastric bypass. There was one woman that had the surgery she could keep food down. She kept losing weight went way below her goal. She had to go to the hospital several times and be put on IVs. The doctors couldn't do anything for her so they reversed the surgery.
That T Woman - 18 May 2004 02:43 GMT The woman on the tv show I mentioned in the other post will spend ~$125,000 for all her surgeries. But for her at 525 pounds, it was do or die to lose the weight. She lost the weight on a diet similar to Atkins they said but w/o stomach stapling or other bariatic surgery.
Tonia
> I am happy to know that you are in better shape then my best friend who had > this done about 1.5 yrs ago. She has been in and out of the hospital a [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > > should anyone else put me down for having this surgery, it has nothing to > > do with them. Perple Gyrl - 18 May 2004 03:58 GMT I am watching that show now... all of that skin showing in that bathing suit... OMG.. I have to look away when they show the surgery segments. I have a weak stomach for that. I am surprised discovery health isn't covering the costs since they are doing this show.
> The woman on the tv show I mentioned in the other post will spend ~$125,000 > for all her surgeries. But for her at 525 pounds, it was do or die to lose > the weight. She lost the weight on a diet similar to Atkins they said but > w/o stomach stapling or other bariatic surgery. > > Tonia Ignoramus4854 - 18 May 2004 04:42 GMT Here's why I thing a radical stomach surgery is a bad idea.
It forces people to go on a very low calorie, low volume, crash diet. Low calorie diets are inherently dangerous. The only safe way to do it is to watch intake of nutrients and optimise food intake a-la CRON diet, to make sure that the body receives all vitamins, minerals, fats protein etc.
Such a low calorie diet requires eating a large volume of low valorie food (lots of vegetables). GB patients cannot eat that much. Hence their anemia, nutrient deficiencies etc.
That said, being supermorbidly obese is no fun either. It is not clear which is worse -- but surely, good dieting beats both GB and obesity.
www.calorierestriction.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- char*p="char*p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);} "It's never too late to have a happy childhood."
Steve - 18 May 2004 02:48 GMT > Her skin all over is saggy, from her face, neck, belly, thighs to boobs to > arms, etc. She also had 2 c-sections so her tummy is messed up as well from > scars. She lost about 115 - 120 lbs but appears to be gaining some of it > back now. She refuses to exercise with me. That is about the 3rd time I read something like this.
Do you think your friend's refusal to exericise is just a matter of her tastes or do you think it is a lack of energy as a result of her depleted condition?
Its hard to fathom someone being willing to go through surgery, those kind of after effects and not being willing to go to a gym a few times a week.
Steve
Steve - 18 May 2004 03:13 GMT The descriptions of post bariatric life seem to require more sacrafice, denial, and discipline then making small lifestyle changes consistently over time.
Steve
Ignoramus4854 - 18 May 2004 04:43 GMT > The descriptions of post bariatric life seem to require more sacrafice, > denial, and discipline then making small lifestyle changes consistently > over time. Hey, simply being obese requires a lot of sacrifice, compared to moderate dieting.
 Signature ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- char*p="char*p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);} "It's never too late to have a happy childhood."
Perple Gyrl - 18 May 2004 04:00 GMT "Steve" <nospam@please.reply.to.group.thanks.com> wrote in message
> That is about the 3rd time I read something like this. Yes, I've posted about this a few times. She hasn't changed.
> Do you think your friend's refusal to exericise is just a matter of her > tastes or do you think it is a lack of energy as a result of her > depleted condition? She has energy... but hates exercise. It is a matter of her tastes. She claims that she is now making an effort to walk at night after work a few times a week. I guess it is a start, but I am sure it isn't an aerobic walk.
> Its hard to fathom someone being willing to go through surgery, those > kind of after effects and not being willing to go to a gym a few times a > week. No kidding!!
> Steve Steve - 18 May 2004 11:43 GMT >>Its hard to fathom someone being willing to go through surgery, those >>kind of after effects and not being willing to go to a gym a few times a >>week. > > No kidding!! I've been reading that these things started off as extrememe measures but are starting to get over prescribed. If that is the case then some of the patients are not in life threatening situations.
Given the kind of accounts you have given I am surprised no one is forcing these people to get some kind counseling to make sure these people are ready to make the needed sacrafices before permitting the surgery to be done.
Steve
Beverly - 18 May 2004 13:40 GMT > > Her skin all over is saggy, from her face, neck, belly, thighs to boobs to > > arms, etc. She also had 2 c-sections so her tummy is messed up as well from [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Steve The two women I know who had surgery didn't exercise before or afterward. They've both managed to gain back the weight over the years - they had the surgery 5-10 years ago. They didn't learn a thing about healthy eating or exercise.....
Beverly
Steve - 18 May 2004 14:02 GMT > The two women I know who had surgery didn't exercise before or afterward. > They've both managed to gain back the weight over the years - they had the > surgery 5-10 years ago. They didn't learn a thing about healthy eating or > exercise..... There should definately be a law requiring counseling before surgery to make sure the patients are prepared for the lifestyle changes needed to make surgery worthwhile.
Steve
 Signature Steve http://www.geocities.com/beforewisdom/
"The great American thought trap: It is not real unless it can be seen on television or bought in a shopping mall"
Heywood Mogroot - 18 May 2004 21:00 GMT > > The two women I know who had surgery didn't exercise before or afterward. > > They've both managed to gain back the weight over the years - they had the [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > make sure the patients are prepared for the lifestyle changes needed to > make surgery worthwhile. I'm tempted to argue the surgery isn't worthwhile to anyone, though I reserve total judgement since I haven't been in that situation.
People can lose 100lbs/yr relatively safely, without invasive surgery, and perhaps without requiring skin reduction surgery, either (not sure about the last part, since I've read really stretched skin loses elasticity).
I had a friend who was 5'10", 270, borderline candidate for the surgery. He had it, nearly died from complications, lost all the weight (and his physical strength) while in a coma.
Now he can only eat small portions slowly, and not drink anything before, with, or after meals. This is normal for the surgery.
I think most anyone can lose weight in a controlled environment (eg fat camp), provided underlying medical conditions are treated. Whether or not this loss is kept to in the real world becomes a daily mental battle. I've been there done that to some small (30lb) extent, but I've got to give props to Atkins for showing me that dieting doesn't mean no-fat cottage cheese and rabbit food (I don't do ketogenic, but I do avoid isolated processed carbs).
Heywood 232/203/182
Nancy 8 03 - 23 May 2004 23:19 GMT I know 3 people who have had gastric bypass surgery. The first had surgery about 7 years ago I didn't know her before the surgery but she weighs about 400 pounds now. The second one had surgery March 2003 she's lost 100 pounds. She joined a gym as soon as the doctors gave her the ok. She looks good and says she feels good. The third a man at my church he's lost 200 pounds. But it was a year before he could eat solid food. He looks bad pale and haggard. This man might have brought not being able to eat solid food for a year on himself. When he was released from the hospital he made his wife stop at Hardee's and he got gravy biscuits not something he should have eaten right after surgery or probably at all after surgery.
jmk - 24 May 2004 13:33 GMT > I know 3 people who have had gastric bypass surgery. The first had > surgery about 7 years ago I didn't know her before the surgery but she [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > not something he should have eaten right after surgery or probably at > all after surgery. I read something recently that these surgeries have a 25% failure rate :-(
 Signature jmk in NC
Beverly - 18 May 2004 13:19 GMT > I am happy to know that you are in better shape then my best friend who had > this done about 1.5 yrs ago. She has been in and out of the hospital a [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > done about 3 yrs ago and was fine the first 2 years. She looks great, but > at what cost?? I know two women who had WLS a few years ago. Both were able to lose the weight in the beginning but neither started an exercise program. Both have gained back all their weight and suffer from health problems associated with the surgery. For me personally, WLS would never be an option - I'm a big chicken when it comes to any type of surgery. I had surgery on a finger about 20 years ago and the doctor told me I would probably require additional surgery sometime in the future to remove scar tissue if it developed. Well, I have this nice little bump of scar tissue on the finger and I'm still debating about getting it removed<g> Someday........maybe.
Beverly
Perple Gyrl - 17 May 2004 13:28 GMT "Beverly"
> I know two women who had WLS a few years ago. Both were able to lose the > weight in the beginning but neither started an exercise program. Both have [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Beverly How much weight will you lose if you remove the bump? Seriously, I am a chicken about surgery too. However, I know I'll need some someday. I'm psyching myself up for it.
Beverly - 18 May 2004 13:47 GMT > "Beverly" > > I know two women who had WLS a few years ago. Both were able to lose the [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > How much weight will you lose if you remove the bump? LOL......an ounce at the most. It doesn't seem worth it! It's beginning to interfere with the bending of the finger as it's located on the knuckle joint. They gave me valium (sp?) for the original surgery and the doctor told me to *never* take it again. I laughed until I had tears running down my face all during the surgery. He and his nurse had to stop a few times during the procedure because they started laughing, too. He said it was the happiest surgery he ever performed.
Beverly
Seriously, I am a
> chicken about surgery too. However, I know I'll need some someday. I'm > psyching myself up for it. Susan Serrill - 17 May 2004 16:24 GMT >> I had to go thru hell for this surgery. First, my insurance company >> refused to cover it because I didn't meet the minimum weight guidelines ( > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >also scammed yourself, and the only benefactor that I see is your >weight loss surgeon. Wrong, there were other benefits as well. I have caesarian scars which I would have had forever....however now that I have had the bariatric surgery, my insurance company will fully cover a tummy tuck. I am going to look like I did when I was in high school.
There is no scam about it. What I do with my body is my business. Why should anyone else put me down for having this surgery, it has nothing to do with them.
Chris Braun - 18 May 2004 02:21 GMT >There is no scam about it. What I do with my body is my business. Why >should anyone else put me down for having this surgery, it has nothing to >do with them. Why be surprised to get a negative reaction when you post something mean-spirited like, "I'm now thin, and didn't have to spend a single day at the gym. Although I do drive by there to laugh at all the fatties sweating their a.ses off...."? Isn't that what you were going for?
Chris (who has lost 110 lbs. the old-fashioned way, and who thinks the value of exercise is so much more than mere weight loss) 262/152/ (145-150)
Anti_stalker - 22 May 2004 11:02 GMT Dave Moore of Bollingbrook IL posted these messages in Susan's name. She had no such surgery and has never made such silly posts. Dave is stalking susan because he can't handle rejection. Sorry to all who were pulled into his stupid scheme. This man needs to get a job and support his 5 kids!
"Linda" - 22 May 2004 18:26 GMT >Dave Moore of Bollingbrook IL posted these messages in Susan's name. She >had no such surgery and has never made such silly posts. Dave is stalking >susan because he can't handle rejection. Sorry to all who were pulled into >his stupid scheme. This man needs to get a job and support his 5 kids! I wonder who you are, and why your return e-mail address is "protected", and what governs you to speak for this "Susan"?
Googling "Susan Serrill" the original poster in the thread shows several hits for the "obesityhelp.com" domain. It looks as if information has been removed, but is still available through the "cached pages" function of Google. This turns up the following:
"I was nervous about getting approved because when I called the customer service number on the back of my card, I was told that Personal Choice only pays for this surgery if you are 3x your ideal weight! (I wouldn't meet that criteria) I was also told that you have to have a psyche evaluation done prior to approval. In my case, neither were true. I did a lot of legwork for nothing, in trying to find a psychologist who would do the consult and be covered under my policy. Dr. Sweet's office got the approval just a few days after submitting it. My BMI was just 40.0 and I am 100 lbs overweight, so I did not meet the 3x ideal body weight criteria they quoted me. It just goes to show, you shouldn't give up. I don't have the co-morbidities ... YET. But I'm 32 and I have 3 children. I don't want to wait til I have more problems before I get the surgery, because then I feel my risks would be greater going into the surgery. I'm VERY happy to be approved and set to go on my surgery date! "
Which pretty much is right in line with the original poster who was bragging about bilking the insurance company out of the surgery, and in finding a way around both the weight requirement and the psych exam (both rules which exist for a REASON.)
The information cached from the ObesityHelp.com web site seems to indicate that Susan Serrill did, indeed, have this surgery, although she obviously tried to remove this information later. (If I were insecure enough to have half my stomach cut out just so people would like me, I would probably not want people to know about it either.) So I guess the question is, again who are you? And why have you appeared here to tell us that this person "had no such surgery" when she clearly did, and then going on to blame someone else for "stalking"? I see two possibilities, either you are Susan and are trying to detract from your original post now that you see how unpopular it is, or you are someone unrelated with an axe to grind against "Dave Moore of Bollingbrook IL". Either way I don't think you have much credibility.
Dally - 22 May 2004 19:06 GMT Linda wrote:
> Googling "Susan Serrill" the original poster in the thread shows several > hits for the "obesityhelp.com" domain. It looks as if information has been [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > my risks would be greater going into the surgery. I'm VERY happy to be > approved and set to go on my surgery date! " I think this makes her even a worse candidate for the surgery: she has time to relearn how to treat her body, and she needs to set an example for her three children on how to eat and exercise. The surgery makes sense when you MUST lose weight IMMEDIATELY for health reasons, or if you are just so incapable of functioning as a human being that you need to be spoon fed (literally) rather than feed yourself, but it just makes no sense for a healthy 32 year old who is responsible for passing along these life-skills to other people.
I've lost over 65 pounds now and am almost at goal. (It turns out I didn't have to lose 100 pounds, just 75, since I kept my muscle.) Along the way my husband has lost a lot of fat, my pudgy son has lost (most of) his pudge, my entire family have taken up new sports, and my daughter thinks it's normal to go out running before dinner.
Thank God I didn't insist on surgery.
Dally 244/177/169
"Linda" - 22 May 2004 20:33 GMT >Linda wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] >no sense for a healthy 32 year old who is responsible for passing along >these life-skills to other people. Not to mention that she originally said that she was even less overweight, but had to GAIN weight on purpose to qualify. This would almost qualify as an eating disorder, how different is it from someone who hurts themself by throwing up after eating or starving oneself?
But my goodness, are they just passing out this surgery like candy? We're talking about a rather dangerous procedure, and in this case at least it looks as if it was just handed to someone who really didn't need it. Aren't these doctors bound to some sort of laws, if not ethical standards?
susanjoneslewis - 23 May 2004 00:39 GMT Someone named "Dave" emailed me directly shortly after I posted my original response to Susan Sherrill that I got alot of feedback from folks in ASD about. It seemed sincere and was lengthy about his relationship with Susan and her nutso-isms/surgery. I am in the camp that believes the original spiteful post was indeed from Susan Sherrill herself.
Dave if you're out there, good luck and cut your losses dude. She obviously ain't worth your time.
Susan(the real one lol) 260/193/140
> >Dave Moore of Bollingbrook IL posted these messages in Susan's name. She > >had no such surgery and has never made such silly posts. Dave is stalking [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > "Dave Moore of Bollingbrook IL". Either way I don't think you have much > credibility. "Linda" - 23 May 2004 17:03 GMT >Someone named "Dave" emailed me directly shortly after I posted my >original response to Susan Sherrill that I got alot of feedback from [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >Susan(the real one lol) >260/193/140 Hear hear. I'm in the same camp, after reading that obesity site most of the people I read were people who had bona fide need for bariatric surgery. This person on the other hand seemed to be scamming and conniving to get what she wanted. People wonder why health insurance premiums are so costly, it's because we're paying for frivolous scams like this. Susan Sherrill, get on a damned treadmill like the rest of us.
FWIW the site seems to be put together by the dr or group of drs who performs the surgery. So either this person did have the surgery, or this Dave went to great length to impersonate her and post to a members only site to fabricate this all. I'd wager the former, and would bet the house and lot also that she's now discovered that perhaps it wasn't all its cracked up to be, and doesn't want people to know.
I echo that I hope this person is out of the said relationship, there are much better people out there.
dave829 - 26 May 2004 16:03 GMT >"susanjoneslewis" <susanjoneslewis@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > May 22, 2004 at 11:39 PM
>Someone named "Dave" emailed me directly shortly after I posted my >original response to Susan Sherrill that I got alot of feedback from >folks in ASD about. It seemed sincere and was lengthy about his >relationship with Susan and her nutso-isms/surgery. I am in the camp >that believes the original spiteful post was indeed from Susan Sherrill >herself.
>Dave if you're out there, good luck and cut your losses dude. She >obviously ain't worth your time.
>Susan(the real one lol) >260/193/140 That would be me. And yes, I do realize that now, although it took me quite a while. Your post really woke me up ... when you mentioned the friend whom you watched turn into a complete stranger before your eyes, we could be talking about the same person. For all intents and purposes, it's as if the person I knew died on the operating table. The only difference is, at least then I would have had the fond memories. As it stands, all I have now are the memories of the two-faced stranger who did everything imaginable to try to hurt me.
To the others in the thread, yes, the person in question indeed had the surgery. And she was not obese...she simply gained weight until she met the bare minimum for her insurance company to cover the surgery, just as was said here. The doctor knew this was what she was doing, and also I suspect knew that it was being done out of vanity and not for any legitimate health need. He did waive a (much needed, in this case) psychiatric exam just as was said here. But hey, I guess that fancy car doesn't pay for itself unless you get your quota of people on that table. (With so many people in our country unable to find adequate health care, it's so nice to see how it's being exercised by the people who are fortunate enough to have it.)
To people who have friends or SO's considering the surgery, my advice would be to cut yourself loose right now. This surgery changes who you are, and from what I've both heard and personally experienced it's not a change for the better. The person who you get back from the hospital will be a stranger. Then you'll cling to the hope that the person you knew is still in there somewhere, but trust me, they are gone.
To people considering this surgery, my advice is don't. Unless you have absolutely no other shot at a normal and healthy life. If it's just because you're unhappy about yourself, then do like someone else said and go to the gym, start an exercise program, a diet etc. and set goals for yourself. And take it from me, most guys don't really go for the "swizzle stick" look anyway, contrary to what gets thrown at you by magazine models. Take example from "the Real Susan" posting here, in her sig line are numbers which I assume reflect her progress and her goals...someone who felt like she wanted to improve something about herself, set goals to that end and then WORKED to achieve them. To me, that's much more honorable than someone checking into a hospital for a quick fix.
Dave --who lost a loved one to bariatric surgery
Anti_stalker - 22 May 2004 11:03 GMT Dave Moore of Bollingbrook IL posted these messages in Susan's name. She had no such surgery and has never made such silly posts. Dave is stalking susan because he can't handle rejection. Sorry to all who were pulled into his stupid scheme. This man needs to get a job and support his 5 kids!
|
|
|