Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / General Topics / May 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Successful bariatric surgery

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Susan Serrill - 17 May 2004 06:19 GMT
I had to go thru hell for this surgery.  First, my insurance company
refused to cover it because I didn't meet the minimum weight guidelines ( >
100 lbs over)  I spent weeks trying to gain 40 lbs so I would make the cut.
Then, I couldn't find a psych consult which would be covered by my
insurance.  The doctor (Dr. Sweet of the SWLC in Reading, PA) was very nice
and waived it.  Ta-da!  I'm now thin, and didn't have to spend a single day
at the gym.  Although I do drive by there to laugh at all the fatties
sweating their a.ses off....

Susan :)
Dally - 17 May 2004 08:03 GMT
> I had to go thru hell for this surgery.  First, my insurance company
> refused to cover it because I didn't meet the minimum weight guidelines ( >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Susan :)

You sound like a lovely person.  I particularly liked the part about
scamming unnecessary expensive medical procedures through insurance
fraud.  I pay $13,000/year for family medical insurance.  Easy to see why.

Dally, who went to the gym today and sweated her fat a.s off
VirtualGuy - 23 May 2004 17:58 GMT
> I pay $13,000/year for family medical insurance.

Holy crap, Batman!

I had no idea that what medical insurance cost in the US.

I'm now even more glad to be a Canadian after learning this.

Cheers!

       Alex

Signature

*******************************************************
VirtualGuy - Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
VirtualGuy.at.shaw.dot.ca
Website: http://members.shaw.ca/virtualguy
*******************************************************

Heywood Mogroot - 23 May 2004 23:42 GMT
> > I pay $13,000/year for family medical insurance.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> I'm now even more glad to be a Canadian after learning this.

A firtst-rate group-rate PPO plan costs $350/mo for a single
30-something guy.

Catastropic-only coverage costs approx $150/mo, but they won't even
start coverage if you have an existing condition, however minor.

The health insurance issue in the US is well and truly f.cked, and
neither party has really done much to address it, and yes, I'm
counting back to 1993...
Beverly - 17 May 2004 13:56 GMT
> I had to go thru hell for this surgery.  First, my insurance company
> refused to cover it because I didn't meet the minimum weight guidelines ( >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Susan :)

How sweet of you to tell us about this.  Now come back in a few years when
you've regained the weight or are experiencing other problems and we'll
give you the information you need to live a long and healthy life!  It's
called proper diet and exercise.

How much muscle did you lose along with the pounds?

BTW.....I personally know two people who had the WLS and 10 years later
they're both experiencing health problems and have gained every lost ounce
back.
Ignoramus4854 - 17 May 2004 14:14 GMT
> I had to go thru hell for this surgery.  First, my insurance company
> refused to cover it because I didn't meet the minimum weight guidelines ( >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> at the gym.  Although I do drive by there to laugh at all the fatties
> sweating their a.ses off....

It sounds to me that you are kidding (trolling). In case you are not...

If not, then the wisdom of gaining 40 lbs and getting a stomach
surgery, to lose only 60 lbs, and losing 100 lbs on a forced crash
diet, is rather questionable health wise.

Not only you somewhat scammed your health insurance company, but you
also scammed yourself, and the only benefactor that I see is your
weight loss surgeon.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
char*p="char*p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
        "It's never too late to have a happy childhood."
Susan Serrill - 17 May 2004 16:18 GMT
>> I had to go thru hell for this surgery.  First, my insurance company
>> refused to cover it because I didn't meet the minimum weight guidelines ( >
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>also scammed yourself, and the only benefactor that I see is your
>weight loss surgeon.

Wrong, there were other benefits as well.  I have caesarian scars which I
would have had forever....however now that I have had the bariatric
surgery, my insurance company will fully cover a tummy tuck.  I am going to
look like I did when I was in high school.  

There is no scam about it.  What I do with my body is my business.  Why
should anyone else put me down for having this surgery, it has nothing to
do with them.
Ignoramus4854 - 17 May 2004 16:26 GMT
>>> I had to go thru hell for this surgery.  First, my insurance company
>>> refused to cover it because I didn't meet the minimum weight guidelines ( >
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> surgery, my insurance company will fully cover a tummy tuck.  I am going to
> look like I did when I was in high school.  

That's good! Can you post your photos somewhere?

How do you feel with a stapled stomach? Are you hungry all the time?

> There is no scam about it.  What I do with my body is my business.  Why
> should anyone else put me down for having this surgery, it has nothing to
> do with them.

Well, you did post a message, which invited comments. Why be surprised
that you hear positive and negative comments?

What would be very interesting is if you could post updates on your
condition once in a while.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
char*p="char*p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
        "It's never too late to have a happy childhood."
That T Woman - 17 May 2004 18:07 GMT
> >> I had to go thru hell for this surgery.  First, my insurance company
> >> refused to cover it because I didn't meet the minimum weight guidelines ( >
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> should anyone else put me down for having this surgery, it has nothing to
> do with them.

If it has nothing to do with us, wtf did you bother posting here?  You
obviously didn't want our opinions.
Perple Gyrl - 18 May 2004 01:24 GMT
I am happy to know that you are in better shape then my best friend who had
this done about 1.5 yrs ago.  She has been in and out of the hospital a
dozen times with various health issues, including gastritis, hernias,
pancreatitis and anemia.  She is currently going to a hemotologist 3x a week
for iron transfusions because her body can't absorb enough from food or
suppliments. Unfortunately, The 2 blood transfusions didn't give her enough
iron so she had to resort to this.   She will most likely have to do this
regularly for the rest of her life.  She also complains that she never feels
good and the extra iron makes her feel nauseated all of the time.

Her skin all over is saggy, from her face, neck, belly,  thighs to boobs to
arms, etc.  She also had 2 c-sections so her tummy is messed up as well from
scars.  She lost about 115 - 120 lbs but appears to be gaining some of it
back now.  She refuses to exercise with me.  Her doctors keep telling her to
exercise because it helps improve the oxygen level in her blood.  She plans
on having a tummy tuck too.  However, she can't afford the thigh lift, boob
job, arm lift, neck lift, etc.  Not only that, but all of that surgery is
painful and has a lot of down time.  If she exercised and improved her tone
a bit, the skin would look much better.  Funny, she never laughs at me for
exercising.  I am a little heavier then her now but I look so much healthier
and "vital".

It is heart breaking seeing my friend go through so much and know that it
isn't over for her.  One of my best friends that is a nurse tells me about
all of the people she knows that has had this done... health issues can
happen at any time.  She has this one friend who can only drink ensure now
and can eat nothing else w/out throwing up.  This person had the surgery
done about 3 yrs ago and was fine the first 2 years.  She looks great, but
at what cost??

"Susan Serrill" <soosynn@yahoo.com> wrote in message

> Wrong, there were other benefits as well.  I have caesarian scars which I
> would have had forever....however now that I have had the bariatric
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> should anyone else put me down for having this surgery, it has nothing to
> do with them.
Dally - 18 May 2004 02:17 GMT
> I am happy to know that you are in better shape then my best friend who had
> this done about 1.5 yrs ago.  She has been in and out of the hospital a
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> done about 3 yrs ago and was fine the first 2 years.  She looks great, but
> at what cost??

I really like that this will get googled by someone considering this.

My big problem with it isn't the puritanical one (that they should
"suffer" the way we had to suffer) but that it isn't really a cure.

We got fat because we didn't do the basic maintenance required by owners
of human bodies.  Maybe we didn't know how, or maybe we chose not to,
but for whatever reason, we need to fix our impediments and start doing
it.  I just think this is best done WHILE you lose the weight, in fits
and starts, not all at once after you lose the weight.  There are too
many skills to pick up along the way.

I mean, you STILL have to do the same exact work in changing your
lifestyle.  Why put yourself through surgery and force yourself to know
everyting about being thin all at once?

Dally
Perple Gyrl - 18 May 2004 03:56 GMT
"Dally" <dally@myself.com> wrote in message

> I really like that this will get googled by someone considering this.

I think I may have posted about my friend's mounting difficulties in past
posts as well.

> My big problem with it isn't the puritanical one (that they should
> "suffer" the way we had to suffer) but that it isn't really a cure.

My problem with it is that you risk your health for what?!?  To lose weight
quickly but unless you change your WOL, you won't keep it off!  Tummies
stretch out again... I've heard of people getting 2 bypass surgeries due to
a tummy that stretched out again.

I forgot to mention that I have 2 other male friends that had the surgery
done.  The first one is 6'6" and weighed about 400 lbs before the surgery.
He lost about 100 of it and was working on losing more when I saw him 6
months ago.  I saw him for the first time in months recently.  He looked
like he was back to his start weight.  He came for dinner and he ate more
then I did!  He also proceeded to drink an entire bottle of wine.  Due to a
faulty cathater during the procedure, he also became impotent for the rest
of his life.  He can still function, but in a limp noodle type of way.  He
is exploring suing the hospital.

The 2nd friend is about 6'5 and weighed 450 lbs.  He just had the banding
procedure done about 3 mos ago.  He's already lost about 60 lbs.  IMO, the
banding is much less invasive then the bypass.  However, when I am over for
poker night... I watch him eat.  He still eats very poorly and too much.
*sigh*

> We got fat because we didn't do the basic maintenance required by owners
> of human bodies.  Maybe we didn't know how, or maybe we chose not to,
> but for whatever reason, we need to fix our impediments and start doing
> it.  I just think this is best done WHILE you lose the weight, in fits
> and starts, not all at once after you lose the weight.  There are too
> many skills to pick up along the way.

I agree.

> I mean, you STILL have to do the same exact work in changing your
> lifestyle.  Why put yourself through surgery and force yourself to know
> everyting about being thin all at once?

I guess the surgery forces you to change.  However, if you don't work on
yourself you can change back.

> Dally
Angie - 18 May 2004 17:00 GMT
taking it one day at a time is the best way to go. But some people are
looking for the quick fix. My best friends sister. always thought she was
too big. she is skinny and can wear whatever she wants and has been in and
out of the hospital because of her illness. ( wanting to be skinny) she used
to exercise constently. she worked at a gym in the day care and got a
memebership for free.
  used the treadmill and stair climber and bike for hours without effort.
Now she is at least healthy looking but there are things that she won't eat
because she refuses to and because they are bad for her. she still sometimes
hides her body for fear that she is not  skinny enough or pretty enough.
 work at losing weight and becoming healthy one day at a time.
Angie
P.s risking your health isn't worth it

> > I am happy to know that you are in better shape then my best friend who had
> > this done about 1.5 yrs ago.  She has been in and out of the hospital a
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>
> Dally
Nancy 8 03 - 23 May 2004 23:05 GMT
I watched at news show on Fox about gastric bypass. There was one woman
that had the surgery she could keep food down. She kept losing weight
went way below her goal. She had to go to the hospital several times and
be put on IVs. The doctors couldn't do anything for her so they reversed
the surgery.
That T Woman - 18 May 2004 02:43 GMT
The woman on the tv show I mentioned in the other post will spend ~$125,000
for all her surgeries.  But for her at 525 pounds, it was do or die to lose
the weight.  She lost the weight on a diet similar to Atkins they said but
w/o stomach stapling or other bariatic surgery.

Tonia

> I am happy to know that you are in better shape then my best friend who had
> this done about 1.5 yrs ago.  She has been in and out of the hospital a
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> > should anyone else put me down for having this surgery, it has nothing to
> > do with them.
Perple Gyrl - 18 May 2004 03:58 GMT
I am watching that show now... all of that skin showing in that bathing
suit... OMG.. I have to look away when they show the surgery segments.  I
have a weak stomach for that.  I am surprised discovery health isn't
covering the costs since they are doing this show.

> The woman on the tv show I mentioned in the other post will spend ~$125,000
> for all her surgeries.  But for her at 525 pounds, it was do or die to lose
> the weight.  She lost the weight on a diet similar to Atkins they said but
> w/o stomach stapling or other bariatic surgery.
>
> Tonia
Ignoramus4854 - 18 May 2004 04:42 GMT
Here's why I thing a radical stomach surgery is a bad idea.

It forces people to go on a very low calorie, low volume, crash
diet. Low calorie diets are inherently dangerous. The only safe way to
do it is to watch intake of nutrients and optimise food intake a-la
CRON diet, to make sure that the body receives all vitamins, minerals,
fats protein etc.

Such a low calorie diet requires eating a large volume of low valorie
food (lots of vegetables). GB patients cannot eat that much. Hence
their anemia, nutrient deficiencies etc.

That said, being supermorbidly obese is no fun either. It is not clear
which is worse -- but surely, good dieting beats both GB and obesity.

www.calorierestriction.org

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
char*p="char*p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
        "It's never too late to have a happy childhood."
Steve - 18 May 2004 02:48 GMT
> Her skin all over is saggy, from her face, neck, belly,  thighs to boobs to
> arms, etc.  She also had 2 c-sections so her tummy is messed up as well from
> scars.  She lost about 115 - 120 lbs but appears to be gaining some of it
> back now.  She refuses to exercise with me.

That is about the 3rd time I read something like this.

Do you think your friend's refusal to exericise is just a matter of her
tastes or do you think it is a lack of energy as a result of her
depleted condition?

Its hard to fathom someone being willing to go through surgery, those
kind of after effects and not being willing to go to a gym a few times a
week.

Steve
Steve - 18 May 2004 03:13 GMT
The descriptions of post bariatric life seem to require more sacrafice,
denial, and discipline then making small lifestyle changes consistently
over time.

Steve
Ignoramus4854 - 18 May 2004 04:43 GMT
> The descriptions of post bariatric life seem to require more sacrafice,
> denial, and discipline then making small lifestyle changes consistently
> over time.

Hey, simply being obese requires a lot of sacrifice, compared to
moderate dieting.

Signature

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
char*p="char*p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
        "It's never too late to have a happy childhood."

Perple Gyrl - 18 May 2004 04:00 GMT
"Steve" <nospam@please.reply.to.group.thanks.com> wrote in message
> That is about the 3rd time I read something like this.

Yes, I've posted about this a few times.  She hasn't changed.

> Do you think your friend's refusal to exericise is just a matter of her
> tastes or do you think it is a lack of energy as a result of her
> depleted condition?

She has energy... but hates exercise.  It is a matter of her tastes.  She
claims that she is now making an effort to walk at night after work a few
times a week.  I guess it is a start, but I am sure it isn't an aerobic
walk.

> Its hard to fathom someone being willing to go through surgery, those
> kind of after effects and not being willing to go to a gym a few times a
> week.

No kidding!!

> Steve
Steve - 18 May 2004 11:43 GMT
>>Its hard to fathom someone being willing to go through surgery, those
>>kind of after effects and not being willing to go to a gym a few times a
>>week.
>
> No kidding!!

I've been reading that these things started off as extrememe measures
but are starting to get over prescribed.   If that is the case then some
of the patients are not in life threatening situations.

Given the kind of accounts you have given I am surprised no one is
forcing these people to get some kind counseling to make sure these
people are ready to make the needed sacrafices before permitting the
surgery to be done.

Steve
Beverly - 18 May 2004 13:40 GMT
> > Her skin all over is saggy, from her face, neck, belly,  thighs to boobs to
> > arms, etc.  She also had 2 c-sections so her tummy is messed up as well from
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Steve

The two women I know who had surgery didn't exercise before or afterward.
They've both managed to gain back the weight over the years - they had the
surgery 5-10 years ago.  They didn't learn a thing about healthy eating or
exercise.....

Beverly
Steve - 18 May 2004 14:02 GMT
> The two women I know who had surgery didn't exercise before or afterward.
> They've both managed to gain back the weight over the years - they had the
> surgery 5-10 years ago.  They didn't learn a thing about healthy eating or
> exercise.....

There should definately be a law requiring counseling before surgery to
make sure the patients are prepared for the lifestyle changes needed to
make surgery worthwhile.

Steve

Signature

Steve
http://www.geocities.com/beforewisdom/

"The great American thought trap:  It is not real unless it can be seen
on television or bought in a shopping mall"

Heywood Mogroot - 18 May 2004 21:00 GMT
> > The two women I know who had surgery didn't exercise before or afterward.
> > They've both managed to gain back the weight over the years - they had the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> make sure the patients are prepared for the lifestyle changes needed to
> make surgery worthwhile.

I'm tempted to argue the surgery isn't worthwhile to anyone, though I
reserve total judgement since I haven't been in that situation.

People can lose 100lbs/yr relatively safely, without invasive surgery,
and perhaps without requiring skin reduction surgery, either (not sure
about the last part, since I've read really stretched skin loses
elasticity).

I had a friend who was 5'10", 270, borderline candidate for the
surgery. He had it, nearly died from complications, lost all the
weight (and his physical strength) while in a coma.

Now he can only eat small portions slowly, and not drink anything
before, with, or after meals. This is normal for the surgery.

I think most anyone can lose weight in a controlled environment (eg
fat camp), provided underlying medical conditions are treated. Whether
or not this loss is kept to in the real world  becomes a daily mental
battle. I've been there done that to some small (30lb) extent, but
I've got to give props to Atkins for showing me that dieting doesn't
mean no-fat cottage cheese and rabbit food (I don't do ketogenic, but
I do avoid isolated processed carbs).

Heywood
232/203/182
Nancy 8 03 - 23 May 2004 23:19 GMT
I know 3 people who have had gastric bypass surgery. The first had
surgery about 7 years ago I didn't know her before the surgery but she
weighs about 400 pounds now. The second one had surgery March 2003 she's
lost 100 pounds. She joined a gym as soon as the doctors gave her the
ok. She looks good and says she feels good. The third a man at my church
he's lost 200 pounds. But it was a year before he could eat solid food.
He looks bad pale and haggard. This man might have brought not being
able to eat solid food for a year on himself. When he was released from
the hospital he made his wife stop at Hardee's and he got gravy biscuits
not something he should have eaten right after surgery or probably at
all after surgery.
jmk - 24 May 2004 13:33 GMT
> I know 3 people who have had gastric bypass surgery. The first had
> surgery about 7 years ago I didn't know her before the surgery but she
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> not something he should have eaten right after surgery or probably at
> all after surgery.

I read something recently that these surgeries have a 25% failure rate :-(

Signature

jmk in NC

Beverly - 18 May 2004 13:19 GMT
> I am happy to know that you are in better shape then my best friend who had
> this done about 1.5 yrs ago.  She has been in and out of the hospital a
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> done about 3 yrs ago and was fine the first 2 years.  She looks great, but
> at what cost??

I know two women who had WLS a few years ago.  Both were able to lose the
weight in the beginning but neither started an exercise program.  Both have
gained back all their weight and suffer from health problems associated
with the surgery.  For me personally, WLS would never be an option - I'm a
big chicken when it comes to any type of surgery.
I had surgery on a finger about 20 years ago and the doctor told me I would
probably require additional surgery sometime in the future to remove scar
tissue if it developed.  Well, I have this nice little bump of scar tissue
on the finger and I'm still debating about getting it removed<g>
Someday........maybe.

Beverly
Perple Gyrl - 17 May 2004 13:28 GMT
"Beverly"
> I know two women who had WLS a few years ago.  Both were able to lose the
> weight in the beginning but neither started an exercise program.  Both have
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Beverly

How much weight will you lose if you remove the bump?  Seriously, I am a
chicken about surgery too.  However, I know I'll need some someday.  I'm
psyching myself up for it.
Beverly - 18 May 2004 13:47 GMT
> "Beverly"
> > I know two women who had WLS a few years ago.  Both were able to lose the
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> How much weight will you lose if you remove the bump?

LOL......an ounce at the most.  It doesn't seem worth it!  It's beginning
to interfere with the bending of the finger as it's located on the knuckle
joint.  They gave me valium (sp?) for the original surgery and the doctor
told me to *never* take it again.  I laughed until I had tears running down
my face all during the surgery.  He and his nurse had to stop a few times
during the procedure because they started laughing, too. He said it was the
happiest surgery he ever performed.

Beverly

Seriously, I am a
> chicken about surgery too.  However, I know I'll need some someday.  I'm
> psyching myself up for it.
Susan Serrill - 17 May 2004 16:24 GMT
>> I had to go thru hell for this surgery.  First, my insurance company
>> refused to cover it because I didn't meet the minimum weight guidelines ( >
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>also scammed yourself, and the only benefactor that I see is your
>weight loss surgeon.

Wrong, there were other benefits as well.  I have caesarian scars which I
would have had forever....however now that I have had the bariatric
surgery, my insurance company will fully cover a tummy tuck.  I am going to
look like I did when I was in high school.  

There is no scam about it.  What I do with my body is my business.  Why
should anyone else put me down for having this surgery, it has nothing to
do with them.
Chris Braun - 18 May 2004 02:21 GMT
>There is no scam about it.  What I do with my body is my business.  Why
>should anyone else put me down for having this surgery, it has nothing to
>do with them.

Why be surprised to get a negative reaction when you post something
mean-spirited like, "I'm now thin, and didn't have to spend a single
day at the gym.  Although I do drive by there to laugh at all the
fatties sweating their a.ses off...."?  Isn't that what you were going
for?

Chris (who has lost 110 lbs. the old-fashioned way, and who thinks the
value of exercise is so much more than mere weight loss)
262/152/ (145-150)
Anti_stalker - 22 May 2004 11:02 GMT
Dave Moore of Bollingbrook IL posted these messages in Susan's name. She
had no such surgery and has never made such silly posts. Dave is stalking
susan because he can't handle rejection. Sorry to all who were pulled into
his stupid scheme. This man needs to get a job and support his 5 kids!
"Linda" - 22 May 2004 18:26 GMT
>Dave Moore of Bollingbrook IL posted these messages in Susan's name. She
>had no such surgery and has never made such silly posts. Dave is stalking
>susan because he can't handle rejection. Sorry to all who were pulled into
>his stupid scheme. This man needs to get a job and support his 5 kids!

I wonder who you are, and why your return e-mail address is "protected",
and what governs you to speak for this "Susan"?  

Googling "Susan Serrill" the original poster in the thread shows several
hits for the "obesityhelp.com" domain.  It looks as if information has been
removed, but is still available through the "cached pages" function of
Google.  This turns up the following:

"I was nervous about getting approved because when I called the customer
service number on the back of my card, I was told that Personal Choice only
pays for this surgery if you are 3x your ideal weight! (I wouldn't meet
that criteria) I was also told that you have to have a psyche evaluation
done prior to approval. In my case, neither were true. I did a lot of
legwork for nothing, in trying to find a psychologist who would do the
consult and be covered under my policy. Dr. Sweet's office got the approval
just a few days after submitting it. My BMI was just 40.0 and I am 100 lbs
overweight, so I did not meet the 3x ideal body weight criteria they quoted
me. It just goes to show, you shouldn't give up. I don't have the
co-morbidities ... YET. But I'm 32 and I have 3 children. I don't want to
wait til I have more problems before I get the surgery, because then I feel
my risks would be greater going into the surgery. I'm VERY happy to be
approved and set to go on my surgery date! "

Which pretty much is right in line with the original poster who was
bragging about bilking the insurance company out of the surgery, and in
finding a way around both the weight requirement and the psych exam (both
rules which exist for a REASON.)  

The information cached from the ObesityHelp.com web site seems to indicate
that Susan Serrill did, indeed, have this surgery, although she obviously
tried to remove this information later.  (If I were insecure enough to have
half my stomach cut out just so people would like me, I would probably not
want people to know about it either.)  So I guess the question is, again
who are you?  And why have you appeared here to tell us that this person
"had no such surgery" when she clearly did, and then going on to blame
someone else for "stalking"?  I see two possibilities, either you are Susan
and are trying to detract from your original post now that you see how
unpopular it is, or you are someone unrelated with an axe to grind against
"Dave Moore of Bollingbrook IL".  Either way I don't think you have much
credibility.
Dally - 22 May 2004 19:06 GMT
Linda wrote:

> Googling "Susan Serrill" the original poster in the thread shows several
> hits for the "obesityhelp.com" domain.  It looks as if information has been
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> my risks would be greater going into the surgery. I'm VERY happy to be
> approved and set to go on my surgery date! "

I think this makes her even a worse candidate for the surgery: she has
time to relearn how to treat her body, and she needs to set an example
for her three children on how to eat and exercise.  The surgery makes
sense when you MUST lose weight IMMEDIATELY for health reasons, or if
you are just so incapable of functioning as a human being that you need
to be spoon fed (literally) rather than feed yourself, but it just makes
no sense for a healthy 32 year old who is responsible for passing along
these life-skills to other people.

I've lost over 65 pounds now and am almost at goal.   (It turns out I
didn't have to lose 100 pounds, just 75, since I kept my muscle.)  Along
the way my husband has lost a lot of fat, my pudgy son has lost (most
of) his pudge, my entire family have taken up new sports, and my
daughter thinks it's normal to go out running before dinner.

Thank God I didn't insist on surgery.

Dally
244/177/169
"Linda" - 22 May 2004 20:33 GMT
>Linda wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>no sense for a healthy 32 year old who is responsible for passing along
>these life-skills to other people.

Not to mention that she originally said that she was even less overweight,
but had to GAIN weight on purpose to qualify.  This would almost qualify as
an eating disorder, how different is it from someone who hurts themself by
throwing up after eating or starving oneself?

But my goodness, are they just passing out this surgery like candy?  We're
talking about a rather dangerous procedure, and in this case at least it
looks as if it was just handed to someone who really didn't need it.
Aren't these doctors bound to some sort of laws, if not ethical standards?
susanjoneslewis - 23 May 2004 00:39 GMT
Someone named "Dave" emailed me directly shortly after I posted my
original response to Susan Sherrill that I got alot of feedback from
folks in ASD about. It seemed sincere and was lengthy about his
relationship with Susan and her nutso-isms/surgery. I am in the camp
that believes the original spiteful post was indeed from Susan Sherrill
herself.

Dave if you're out there, good luck and cut your losses dude. She
obviously ain't worth your time.

Susan(the real one lol)
260/193/140

> >Dave Moore of Bollingbrook IL posted these messages in Susan's name. She
> >had no such surgery and has never made such silly posts. Dave is stalking
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> "Dave Moore of Bollingbrook IL".  Either way I don't think you have much
> credibility.
"Linda" - 23 May 2004 17:03 GMT
>Someone named "Dave" emailed me directly shortly after I posted my
>original response to Susan Sherrill that I got alot of feedback from
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>Susan(the real one lol)
>260/193/140

Hear hear.  I'm in the same camp, after reading that obesity site most of
the people I read were people who had bona fide need for bariatric surgery.
This person on the other hand seemed to be scamming and conniving to get
what she wanted. People wonder why health insurance premiums are so costly,
it's because we're paying for frivolous scams like this.  Susan Sherrill,
get on a damned treadmill like the rest of us.

FWIW the site seems to be put together by the dr or group of drs who
performs the surgery. So either this person did have the surgery, or this
Dave went to great length to impersonate her and post to a members only
site to fabricate this all.  I'd wager the former, and would bet the house
and lot also that she's now discovered that perhaps it wasn't all its
cracked up to be, and doesn't want people to know.

I echo that I hope this person is out of the said relationship, there are
much better people out there.
dave829 - 26 May 2004 16:03 GMT
>"susanjoneslewis" <susanjoneslewis@[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
> May 22, 2004 at 11:39 PM

>Someone named "Dave" emailed me directly shortly after I posted my
>original response to Susan Sherrill that I got alot of feedback from
>folks in ASD about. It seemed sincere and was lengthy about his
>relationship with Susan and her nutso-isms/surgery. I am in the camp
>that believes the original spiteful post was indeed from Susan Sherrill
>herself.

>Dave if you're out there, good luck and cut your losses dude. She
>obviously ain't worth your time.

>Susan(the real one lol)
>260/193/140

That would be me.  And yes, I do realize that now, although it took me
quite a while.  Your post really woke me up ... when you mentioned the
friend whom you watched turn into a complete stranger before your eyes, we
could be talking about the same person.  For all intents and purposes,
it's as if the person I knew died on the operating table.  The only
difference is, at least then I would have had the fond memories.  As it
stands, all I have now are the memories of the two-faced stranger who did
everything imaginable to try to hurt me.

To the others in the thread, yes, the person in question indeed had the
surgery.  And she was not obese...she simply gained weight until she met
the bare minimum for her insurance company to cover the surgery, just as
was said here.  The doctor knew this was what she was doing, and also I
suspect knew that it was being done out of vanity and not for any
legitimate health need.  He did waive a (much needed, in this case)
psychiatric exam just as was said here.  But hey, I guess that fancy car
doesn't pay for itself unless you get your quota of people on that table.
(With so many people in our country unable to find adequate health care,
it's so nice to see how it's being exercised by the people who are
fortunate enough to have it.)

To people who have friends or SO's considering the surgery, my advice
would be to cut yourself loose right now.  This surgery changes who you
are, and from what I've both heard and personally experienced it's not a
change for the better.  The person who you get back from the hospital will
be a stranger.  Then you'll cling to the hope that the person you knew is
still in there somewhere, but trust me, they are gone.

To people considering this surgery, my advice is don't.  Unless you have
absolutely no other shot at a normal and healthy life.  If it's just
because you're unhappy about yourself, then do like someone else said and
go to the gym, start an exercise program, a diet etc. and set goals for
yourself.  And take it from me, most guys don't really go for the "swizzle
stick" look anyway, contrary to what gets thrown at you by magazine
models.  Take example from "the Real Susan" posting here, in her sig line
are numbers which I assume reflect her progress and her goals...someone
who felt like she wanted to improve something about herself, set goals to
that end and then WORKED to achieve them.  To me, that's much more
honorable than someone checking into a hospital for a quick fix.

Dave
--who lost a loved one to bariatric surgery
Anti_stalker - 22 May 2004 11:03 GMT
Dave Moore of Bollingbrook IL posted these messages in Susan's name. She
had no such surgery and has never made such silly posts. Dave is stalking
susan because he can't handle rejection. Sorry to all who were pulled into
his stupid scheme. This man needs to get a job and support his 5 kids!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.