Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / General Topics / May 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Mini progress report

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Heywood Mogroot - 20 May 2004 23:11 GMT
Group is getting kind of cross-post flamey, so thought I'd make an
on-topic post...

Today the scale said 200.5, bringing my daily average down to 202.0,
meaning 30lbs down, 20 to go...

Tale of the tape still says 39", but now I can
just-almost-but-not-quite comfortably wear my old 34" dockers that
started getting too tight 5 years ago (so basically I've nuked ~4
years of fat in just 3 months).

Yesterday I used fitday for the first time, very useful, since it
confirms what my excel spreadsheet is telling me about my weight loss
(too fast again). For yesterday it said I consumed 1450 kcal and
burned 1466 in exercise (2 1/2 hrs of cycling), leaving a daily
deficit of about 2000 kcal (the BMR burn), twice my target deficit.
This corresponds to anecdotal tales of losing 1lb of body weight per
50miles of bike riding (from a National Geographic article on some
30-something guy cycling around Australia).

I've mentioned that on May 1 I went to a bbq and basically nuked the
next 4 days of progress. But as of today I'm again 2 days ahead of
schedule. I think holding oneself to a schedule is a useful dieting
mechanism -- it puts cheats in the category of just delaying progress,
and while the numbers drop slowly, seeing steady day-by-day progress
is indeed very motivating.

After I get down into the low 190's I plan on joining a gym, reduce
the aerobic cycling, and work more on muscle growth on my upper-body.
I've always been lame about going to the gym, but seeing how every
little bit of effort will pay off over a not-so-long period of time
has been motivating to apply this to getting 'buff', too (even though
I'm probably a bit old, 36, to see big growth now).

Heywood

232/202/182
Ignoramus32087 - 20 May 2004 23:30 GMT
Heywood, great progress and it is wonderful that you have a schedule.

i
J.J. Marie - 21 May 2004 01:42 GMT
Hark! I heard imouttahere@mac.com (Heywood Mogroot) say:

> Group is getting kind of cross-post flamey, so thought I'd make an
> on-topic post...

Too true.

> Today the scale said 200.5, bringing my daily average down to 202.0,
> meaning 30lbs down, 20 to go...
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> started getting too tight 5 years ago (so basically I've nuked ~4
> years of fat in just 3 months).

Congratulations! And thanks for sharing - hearing this kind of update
makes it easier to stick to my own plan...

Signature

J.J. in WA State - 251/235/150
(Change COLD to HOT for e-mail)

Beverly - 21 May 2004 02:07 GMT
> Group is getting kind of cross-post flamey, so thought I'd make an
> on-topic post...

You have that right!  I'll be glad when they go away.

Congratulations!  Your progress is fantastic.

Beverly

> Today the scale said 200.5, bringing my daily average down to 202.0,
> meaning 30lbs down, 20 to go...
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> 232/202/182
Michelle Guy - 21 May 2004 09:32 GMT
Congrats on the loss, slow and steady is the best way to lose weight
as you really change habits along the way. BTW 36 is not too old  i am
36 too ;-)
Michelle : Ozzie in Switzerland
69.8/59.6/61kg

>Group is getting kind of cross-post flamey, so thought I'd make an
>on-topic post...
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
>232/202/182
Doug Lerner - 21 May 2004 10:26 GMT
And I will be 48 in a couple of weeks. We were all born in the Year of the
Monkey (saru doshi), which is this year. So's my dog. He's going to be 12 in
August.

This should be a good year for all of us.

doug

On 5/21/04 5:32 PM, in article iifra05kbnb2bqakkmnk6q3tij8bvrtqj7@4ax.com,

> Congrats on the loss, slow and steady is the best way to lose weight
> as you really change habits along the way. BTW 36 is not too old  i am
> 36 too ;-)
Chris Braun - 21 May 2004 11:44 GMT
Well, guys, I'm 56.  I never set foot in a gym until I was over 50,
and I've made huge strength gains and -- now that it's not covered up
by fat -- have put on lots of visible muscle.  And I've lost 112 lbs.
over the last 22 months.

So, it's definitely not too late for you youngsters :-).

Chris
262/150/ (145-150)

>And I will be 48 in a couple of weeks. We were all born in the Year of the
>Monkey (saru doshi), which is this year. So's my dog. He's going to be 12 in
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>> as you really change habits along the way. BTW 36 is not too old  i am
>> 36 too ;-)
Perple Gyrl - 21 May 2004 13:25 GMT
I am a monkey too... but in the next generation after you, since I am 35!

> And I will be 48 in a couple of weeks. We were all born in the Year of the
> Monkey (saru doshi), which is this year. So's my dog. He's going to be 12 in
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> doug
Ignoramus29346 - 21 May 2004 14:31 GMT
> I am a monkey too... but in the next generation after you, since I am 35!

I am, guess what, a pig.

i

>> And I will be 48 in a couple of weeks. We were all born in the Year of the
>> Monkey (saru doshi), which is this year. So's my dog. He's going to be 12
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>>
>> doug
Chris Braun - 22 May 2004 04:11 GMT
>> I am a monkey too... but in the next generation after you, since I am 35!
>
>I am, guess what, a pig.

And I am a rat :-).  I wish they'd have at least picked a more
agreeable set of animals!  I'd like to be a cat.

Chris
Ignoramus29346 - 22 May 2004 04:31 GMT
>>> I am a monkey too... but in the next generation after you, since I am 35!
>>
>>I am, guess what, a pig.
>
> And I am a rat :-).  I wish they'd have at least picked a more
> agreeable set of animals!  I'd like to be a cat.

I am sort of resigned to my classification as a pig.

i
JMA - 22 May 2004 04:50 GMT
> >>> I am a monkey too... but in the next generation after you, since I am 35!
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> i

It's just too easy...
Perple Gyrl - 22 May 2004 15:01 GMT
"Chris Braun" <braun_chris@mindspring.com> wrote in
> And I am a rat :-).  I wish they'd have at least picked a more
> agreeable set of animals!  I'd like to be a cat.
>
> Chris

My sister is a rat too.  Rats and monkeys are supposed to get along.
Whoever wrote that didn't live with my sister for 2 years.
Chris Braun - 22 May 2004 15:34 GMT
>"Chris Braun" <braun_chris@mindspring.com> wrote in
>> And I am a rat :-).  I wish they'd have at least picked a more
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>My sister is a rat too.  Rats and monkeys are supposed to get along.
>Whoever wrote that didn't live with my sister for 2 years.

Well, I'd hope you and I might get along if we knew each other :-).

Chris
Perple Gyrl - 22 May 2004 15:06 GMT
If we didn't live togther and you weren't a slob like she is, I bet we
could.

"Chris Braun" <braun_chris@mindspring.com> wrote in

> >My sister is a rat too.  Rats and monkeys are supposed to get along.
> >Whoever wrote that didn't live with my sister for 2 years.
> >
> Well, I'd hope you and I might get along if we knew each other :-).
>
> Chris
J.J. Marie - 22 May 2004 18:39 GMT
Hark! I heard Chris Braun <braun_chris@mindspring.com> say:

> >> I am a monkey too... but in the next generation after you, since I am 35!
> >
> >I am, guess what, a pig.

My local Chinese restaurant placemat uses the term "boar". I'm not
sure if that's better or worse. ;-)

> And I am a rat :-).  I wish they'd have at least picked a more
> agreeable set of animals!  I'd like to be a cat.

I'm a dragon, which means that I'm your favorable sign, Chris.
I've always liked dragons (before I even know about "Year of")
and I collect them; my little boy got me a terrific dragon's
head for Mother's Day this year...

Signature

J.J. in WA State - 251/234/150
(Change COLD to HOT for e-mail)

Perple Gyrl - 22 May 2004 18:08 GMT
Dragons and monkeys get along too!

"J.J. Marie" <jjmarie40@COLDmail.com> wrote in
> I'm a dragon, which means that I'm your favorable sign, Chris.
> I've always liked dragons (before I even know about "Year of")
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> J.J. in WA State - 251/234/150
> (Change COLD to HOT for e-mail)
Beverly - 22 May 2004 20:34 GMT
> Dragons and monkeys get along too!

Well, I'm a horse but I prefer the term 'thoroughbred' <g>  Looks like I get
along with the dog or tiger.

Beverly

> "J.J. Marie" <jjmarie40@COLDmail.com> wrote in
> > I'm a dragon, which means that I'm your favorable sign, Chris.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> > J.J. in WA State - 251/234/150
> > (Change COLD to HOT for e-mail)
JMA - 22 May 2004 20:47 GMT
I'm also a horse, though people who know me best would think maybe a mule.

> > Dragons and monkeys get along too!
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> > > J.J. in WA State - 251/234/150
> > > (Change COLD to HOT for e-mail)
Beverly - 22 May 2004 21:24 GMT
> I'm also a horse, though people who know me best would think maybe a mule.

Hmmmm....  I believe that's the word or something close to it that I heard
from my ex occasionally<g>

> > > Dragons and monkeys get along too!
> >
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> > > > J.J. in WA State - 251/234/150
> > > > (Change COLD to HOT for e-mail)
That T Woman - 23 May 2004 06:56 GMT
The year I was born in was the year of the Fire Monkey.

Tonia

> Hark! I heard Chris Braun <braun_chris@mindspring.com> say:
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> and I collect them; my little boy got me a terrific dragon's
> head for Mother's Day this year...
Perple Gyrl - 23 May 2004 13:30 GMT
You must be a lot of fun and a bit wild.  I am an earth monkey and I am
supposedly calmer then you.....

> The year I was born in was the year of the Fire Monkey.
>
> Tonia
janice - 30 May 2004 23:56 GMT
>You must be a lot of fun and a bit wild.  I am an earth monkey and I am
>supposedly calmer then you.....
>
>> The year I was born in was the year of the Fire Monkey.
>>
>> Tonia

I'm a rooster, but I seem to be the only one around here judging by
the other posts.

janice
jmk - 21 May 2004 13:16 GMT
> For yesterday it said I consumed 1450 kcal and
> burned 1466 in exercise (2 1/2 hrs of cycling), leaving a daily
> deficit of about 2000 kcal (the BMR burn),

I know about that sort of deficit on paper but does it translate into
weight loss for you in real life?  For me it did but not to the tune
that it "should have" on paper.

Signature

jmk in NC

Heywood Mogroot - 21 May 2004 21:13 GMT
> > For yesterday it said I consumed 1450 kcal and
> > burned 1466 in exercise (2 1/2 hrs of cycling), leaving a daily
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> weight loss for you in real life?  For me it did but not to the tune
> that it "should have" on paper.

Pretty much. The scale says I'm 1.5 lbs lighter today than 2 days ago.
I'm no physiology expert, but if the metabolism is more or less
normal, ie not in "starvation mode" (whatever that is), a 1500 kcal
expenditure will come out of the body, not counting the higher
metabolism the body maintains for a while after the exercise, too.

Running these caloric large deficits under the BMR, coupled with
strenuous (over) exercise will cause the body to start conserving
energy and holding onto fat, though. I believe what I've read about
the importance of mixing up your exercise regimen, to keep energy
levels and metabolism up.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.