Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsLow CarbWeightWatchers
WeightAdviser.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Weight Loss Forum / General Topics / June 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Obese children facing threat of chronic disorders

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Neutron - 01 Jun 2004 06:21 GMT
TARA WOMERSLEY
HEALTH CORRESPONDENT

THOUSANDS of children with rising levels of obesity could be living
undiagnosed with type two diabetes, leaving them at risk of entering
adulthood with chronic disorders such as kidney damage.

An expert in childhood obesity warned yesterday that type two diabetes
among children is far more common than paediatricians realise.

Dr Tim Lobstein, of the International Obesity Taskforce, said at least
1,400 obese UK children are likely to have type two diabetes, while more
than 20,000 will be living with impaired glucose tolerance.

To date, around 100 children have been diagnosed with type two diabetes,
with some still in primary school.

Type two diabetes is traditionally known as maturity onset diabetes because
it tends to occur in patients over the age of 40. However, it is becoming
increasingly prevalent in children.

More than a fifth of three-and-a-half-year-olds in Scotland are overweight,
with 8.8 per cent classed as obese and 4.5 per cent as severely obese.

Unlike type one diabetes, type two does not necessarily need to be treated
with insulin injections and in many cases can be managed with diet and
exercise.

Dr Lobstein, who has also had a letter published in the British Medical
Journal expressing his concerns, said: "Doctors need to be much more
sensitive to the possibility of children having type two diabetes. If the
incidence rate in the UK is anything like that in America, you would expect
several thousands carrying type two diabetes but remaining unaware of it.

"Type two diabetes can lead to kidney damage and the need for dialysis, and
retinal damage leading to blindness. It is also a high-risk disease for
heart attack and stroke.

"This is therefore a timebomb about to explode, as when children enter
adulthood they could have severe chronic diseases needing care throughout
their lifetime."

Next week an inquiry into obesity by Westminster’s health select committee
will report and make recommendations to the government.

Penny Williams, care adviser at Diabetes UK, said: "We already know the
number of children with type two diabetes is growing, despite the condition
traditionally affecting people over 40. At the moment there are around 100
reported cases in the UK but the numbers could be greater as the condition
is often undiagnosed for years.

"GPs need to be aware of the risk factors, if they are seeing very obese
children who have a family history of diabetes they should consider testing
for the condition. Unless we take action now to get our children eating a
healthier diet and doing more exercise, the prevalence of type two diabetes
in children will only increase
BJ in Texas - 01 Jun 2004 13:52 GMT
> TARA WOMERSLEY
> HEALTH CORRESPONDENT
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> risk of entering adulthood with chronic disorders such as
> kidney damage.

Maybe we just need to turn off their computers, video games,
and televisions and kick their little (big?) butts outside for some
exercise, The parents are just as bad as the kids and are
responsible for the kids getting adequate exercise and proper
nutrition.

BJ
Karen Larsen - 03 Jun 2004 04:18 GMT
> TARA WOMERSLEY
> HEALTH CORRESPONDENT
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
> healthier diet and doing more exercise, the prevalence of type two diabetes
> in children will only increase

Things are out of hand! Practically every child I see now
is overweight and moms and dads keep driving them to
McDonald's. It's nutz.

Karen
Ignoramus23878 - 03 Jun 2004 14:00 GMT
> Things are out of hand! Practically every child I see now
> is overweight and moms and dads keep driving them to
> McDonald's. It's nutz.

I am curious, don't you think that you could give a child a reasonable
meal at McDonalds?

i
Kate Dicey - 03 Jun 2004 14:12 GMT
>>Things are out of hand! Practically every child I see now
>>is overweight and moms and dads keep driving them to
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> i
Almost impossible: the stuff is so laden with fat, salt, and/or sugar,
and the vegetable content is minimal.  Not to mention that you could
feed the whole family for the price of a burger, fries, a McFlurry and a
coke, and they wouldn't be hungry again half an hour later!

Signature

Kate  XXXXXX
Lady Catherine, Wardrobe Mistress of the Chocolate Buttons
http://www.diceyhome.free-online.co.uk
Click on Kate's Pages and explore!

Ignoramus23878 - 03 Jun 2004 14:15 GMT
>>>Things are out of hand! Practically every child I see now
>>>is overweight and moms and dads keep driving them to
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> feed the whole family for the price of a burger, fries, a McFlurry and a
> coke, and they wouldn't be hungry again half an hour later!

Well, fat as such is not evil.

As for vegetables, they have salads.

An McD salad is not bad at all. Ahanburger is also not the worst meal
I can think of.

Surely, fries and milkshakes are not all that nutritious, but you are
not forced to eat those.

i
Kate Dicey - 03 Jun 2004 15:04 GMT
> Well, fat as such is not evil.

True, but foods from the group containing fats should not form more than
30% of your daily calorie intake, and pure fats in cooking oils, spreads
and the like should be used sparingly.

> As for vegetables, they have salads.

I have seen them.  What they call a salad contains less than a portion
of vegetable matter and cost a hell of a lot.  You can get far more
salad in a mixed bag from a supermarket for less!

> An McD salad is not bad at all.
See above.  And it's a lot less fresh than making your own!

> Ahanburger is also not the worst meal I can think of.

Nor me - but it's incredibly easy to think of a far better one on both
cost and nutrition!

> Surely, fries and milkshakes are not all that nutritious, but you are
> not forced to eat those.

No-one is forced to eat anything (and I never do eat MacDeadthings these
days), but we all need to eat to live.  I'm all for making healthy,
tasty, and cost effective choices.  And a shake made with skimmed milk
CAN be very nutritious, providing you with protein and much needed
calcium.  Shakes made of pseudo milk and consisting largely of ground
ice and flavourings are not nutritious at all.

It can be very hard to get over early conditioning, and if you are
conditioned to believe that 'fast food' is the only way to get a quick
meal on the table, it's hard to get your head round the ease with which
a more healthy and nutritious meal can be made at home.  I was brought
up in a household where fast food meant steak or salmon grilled, with
salad and potatoes from the garden.  With that sort of menu my mother
could get a meal for six on the table in less than 30 minutes.  I've
waited longer for a Macdeadthings burger that gave me killer
indigestion!  I can get a pasta meal with fresh home made sauce on the
table in 15 minutes.  Guess where I go for fast food?  Yup - the kitchen!
Signature

Kate  XXXXXX
Lady Catherine, Wardrobe Mistress of the Chocolate Buttons
http://www.diceyhome.free-online.co.uk
Click on Kate's Pages and explore!

Ignoramus23878 - 03 Jun 2004 15:23 GMT
>> Well, fat as such is not evil.
>
> True, but foods from the group containing fats should not form more than
> 30% of your daily calorie intake, and pure fats in cooking oils, spreads
> and the like should be used sparingly.

There are more ways to eat other than low fatting (under 30% of fat).

>> As for vegetables, they have salads.
>
> I have seen them.  What they call a salad contains less than a
> portion of vegetable matter and cost a hell of a lot.  You can get
> far more salad in a mixed bag from a supermarket for less!

Well, does not mean that they are bad salads -- only that you could
buy a cheaper salad elsewhere.

>> An McD salad is not bad at all.
> See above.  And it's a lot less fresh than making your own!

Come on now, it is made of the same stuff, mostly watery lettuce.

>> Ahanburger is also not the worst meal I can think of.
>
> Nor me - but it's incredibly easy to think of a far better one on both
> cost and nutrition!

Does not negate what I said.

>> Surely, fries and milkshakes are not all that nutritious, but you are
>> not forced to eat those.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> much needed calcium.  Shakes made of pseudo milk and consisting
> largely of ground ice and flavourings are not nutritious at all.

You see, you are going into a discussion about shakes, but I said that
one could eat a reasonable meal at McD that did not involve shakes. So
a prolonged discussion of shakes does not have much relevance.

> It can be very hard to get over early conditioning, and if you are
> conditioned to believe that 'fast food' is the only way to get a
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> made sauce on the table in 15 minutes.  Guess where I go for fast
> food?  Yup - the kitchen!

Good for you, but again, not very relevant. For your information, I do
not eat at fast food restaurants.

i
Banty - 03 Jun 2004 16:01 GMT
>> Well, fat as such is not evil.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>of vegetable matter and cost a hell of a lot.  You can get far more
>salad in a mixed bag from a supermarket for less!

So, did the subject line say "children being impovershed by expensive (??) meals
at McDonald's"?  I don't see the frugality newsgroup in any of the (too long)
list of x-posted 'groups, either.

OK, you can whip something up in your kitchen quickly.  So can I.  Oftentimes I
do.   My family isn't anchored to our kitchen though.  For meals out on the
road, I'm sure you can pack tuna fish sandwiches and run around with a cooler,
which would be fine, too (although my family doesn't - bleaaah ).

But - so what.

A sensible plan for eating allows for many kinds of eating, according to needs,
from a variety of sources.  There's no need for EVERY meal to be maximally
nutritious and minimally expensive.  It's the calories and nutrients in, over
time, balanced with energy needs, within budget, that counts.

Banty
dragonlady - 03 Jun 2004 16:36 GMT
> > Well, fat as such is not evil.
>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> indigestion!  I can get a pasta meal with fresh home made sauce on the
> table in 15 minutes.  Guess where I go for fast food?  Yup - the kitchen!

That's great -- if you're home.  And assuming all the ingredients are at
hand.

From my POV, the "fast food" places are for a quick meal when you are
out and don't have time to go home to eat, much less cook.  We don't do
it 'cause it's cheap;  eating out is always more expensive than eating
at home.  We do it 'cause it's convenient.

And, since it IS possible to do it in a healthy way (those grilled
chicken salads are actually pretty good), I don't see any particular
reason to act as though it's an evil choice.
Signature

Children won't care how much you know until they know how much you care

Kate Dicey - 03 Jun 2004 21:01 GMT
> From my POV, the "fast food" places are for a quick meal when you are
> out and don't have time to go home to eat, much less cook.  We don't do
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> chicken salads are actually pretty good), I don't see any particular
> reason to act as though it's an evil choice.

For me it *IS* an evil choice.  I have yet to find a McDeadthings meal that:

Did not give me violent and painful indigestion that lasted for days (up
to three!  UGH!)

Smelled like anything I wanted to eat - I have always hated the pong of
boiling fat!

Was not so salty or sweet or full of artificial flavours and colourings
that it tasted nasty (aspartame and saccharine both taste bitter and
chemically to me)

Had more nutritional value than a ham salad sandwich

I'd rather pop into the supermarket and pick up a French Loaf or some
bread rolls, some salad in a bag, and some cooked ham or cheese and make
something really edible and much better for me.

On journeys where I have to stop at motorway service places to eat, I
try to find a salad bar, or make a healthy choice from whatever is in
the pre-packed sandwiches.  I know it isn't always possible to make the
choices one would like, but I'd rather go hungry for half an hour longer
than eat at MacD's, Burger King, or anywhere like that.

We have to be very careful as a family to choose well, as DH is an
insulin defendant diabetic and I'm finding it very hard to cope with
fatty foods, or things that are overly sweet, as a result of gall
bladder disease.  The gall bladder is gone, but I have turned out to be
one of the unfortunate ones that cannot cope with much fat.  Wah!  No
more pork crackling with the Sunday roast!  No more eating the bacon
rind mum has crozzled to shattering hardness!  No more double cream on
me Christmas pud!  No more big chunks of Stilton with the Christmas
cake!  :(  There is also a hefty doze of Scots heart attack genes in my
family.  Despite always eating a healthy diet*, my father, his youngest
brother, and my paternal grandfather all died young of heart problems.
Whatever I can do to help to prevent that with my son by way of eating
healthily and teaching him to do so, I will, as I don't want another
member of my family dying before they are 65.  Dad was only 53!   For
us, healthy choices are not an option: they are a necessity, as is
eating reasonably regularly.

Most of the time we find it much easier to eat out healthily than pack
in the fats and chemicals at a fast food place.  I don't get religious
about it, I just do what I can to make the healthy option the regular
option for all of us.  Occasionally my son has opted for a Big Mac, and
then regretted it because my 'healthy option' looked and smelled so much
better!  I like to lead him by example rather than nagging!  :D

Signature

Kate  XXXXXX
Lady Catherine, Wardrobe Mistress of the Chocolate Buttons
http://www.diceyhome.free-online.co.uk
Click on Kate's Pages and explore!

* On a minister's stipend in the thirties, the war years and the 50's in
the UK, fast and junk food wasn't available, and my grandfather was a
gardener of the manic 'grow everything yourself' type - a habit he
passed on to all three sons.  He ran the manse garden at Moonzie in Fife
(where he was a missionary!  They are a bit wild in the north of Fife...
;D ) as a market garden to supplement his income by growing things like
capsicums, courgettes, yellow tomatoes, asparagus, and other 'exotic'
vegetables, as well as more mundane carrots, spuds, peas, salad
vegetables, and other stuff.  I remember my father growing ridge
cucumbers and yellow tomatoes, yellow courgettes and  calabrace in the
various RAF quarters gardens we had over the years.  Mum always said he
was a peasant benieth the officer's uniform: couldn't bear to see a bit
of earth without growing vegetables in it!

Ignoramus23878 - 04 Jun 2004 01:18 GMT
>> From my POV, the "fast food" places are for a quick meal when you are
>> out and don't have time to go home to eat, much less cook.  We don't do
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Did not give me violent and painful indigestion that lasted for days (up
> to three!  UGH!)

Look, you should have said right away that your painful indigestion is
due to your lack of gallbladder.

> We have to be very careful as a family to choose well, as DH is an
> insulin defendant diabetic and I'm finding it very hard to cope with
> fatty foods, or things that are overly sweet, as a result of gall
> bladder disease.  The gall bladder is gone, but I have turned out to be
Rosalie B. - 04 Jun 2004 02:21 GMT
>>> From my POV, the "fast food" places are for a quick meal when you are
>>> out and don't have time to go home to eat, much less cook.  We don't do
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>Look, you should have said right away that your painful indigestion is
>due to your lack of gallbladder.

I find that there are specific McDs that give me indigestion, and I
just don't go to them.  Others there's no problem.  I also have no
gallbladder (because of gallstones) and don't have any problem
whatsoever with fats, although I feel a low fat diet is better than a
low carb diet.

>> We have to be very careful as a family to choose well, as DH is an
>> insulin defendant diabetic and I'm finding it very hard to cope with
>> fatty foods, or things that are overly sweet, as a result of gall
>> bladder disease.  The gall bladder is gone, but I have turned out to be

DH likes salty things, and I like sweet things.  I don't care for salt
at all which is one reason I don't eat fries, or drink soft drinks.  I
get water, or lemonade (and then water it down) or tea although the
tea in fast food places tends to be barely drinkable.  

I have decided that there are people who can eat almost anything
almost anywhere and not get sick, and there are people who get sick at
the slightest thing.  I'm one of the former.  I don't even drink
bottled water except in Mexico.  

THere's no point in trying to persuade an eat-anything type like me
that I should be finding fast food or anything else repulsive.  We
just won't believe you because for us - it isn't.  OTOH I promise not
to try to persuade you picky eaters (because I think that's what it is
basically) that you should eat everything just because I can do so.

I've also come to the conclusion that the studies which try to tell us
what we should and shouldn't eat for various health reason aren't much
better for us than what we would normally eat if we ate an old
fashioned healthy diet.  Italian is bad for you, Chinese is bad for
you.  Eat low carb.  Eat low fat.  Eat only certain kinds of fat.  Fat
doesn't matter.  Eat 'organic' (as if any food isn't organic).  Eat
low calorie.  Calories don't matter.  DOn't eat any processed foods.
Don't eat anything white.  Don't eat fast foods.  

grandma Rosalie
dragonlady - 04 Jun 2004 06:57 GMT
> >>> From my POV, the "fast food" places are for a quick meal when you are
> >>> out and don't have time to go home to eat, much less cook.  We don't do
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> whatsoever with fats, although I feel a low fat diet is better than a
> low carb diet.

I, too, am minus a gall bladder due to stones.  I've had serious
problems with digestion ever since.  For multiple reasons, I decided to
try a low carb diet, even though I feared it would make the digestive
problems worse.  Much to my astonishment, it's gotten much better --
even though I am now eating a relatively high fat diet.  I don't think
the improved digestion can be attributed to the weight loss, because the
improvement was almost instant.

I'm a BIG fan of whatever works for people.  For me, and for others in
my family, the low carb approach seems to both work (for weight loss)
and be healthy:  improved cholesterol, improved blood sugars, etc.

Plus I find it easier to do.
Signature

Children won't care how much you know until they know how much you care

Kate Dicey - 04 Jun 2004 09:18 GMT
> I have decided that there are people who can eat almost anything
> almost anywhere and not get sick, and there are people who get sick at
> the slightest thing.  I'm one of the former.  I don't even drink
> bottled water except in Mexico.  

I only drink bottled water if I'm out and the only alternative is
something fizzy!  Fizz will make me belch mightily and add to the
problems!  Ooer, missus!  I don't get sick often - has to be real food
poisoning or a 'proper' bug like Malta Dog/Deli Belly/Montezuma's
revenge or whatever you call it locally!

> THere's no point in trying to persuade an eat-anything type like me
> that I should be finding fast food or anything else repulsive.  We
> just won't believe you because for us - it isn't.  OTOH I promise not
> to try to persuade you picky eaters (because I think that's what it is
> basically) that you should eat everything just because I can do so.

I *USED* to be able to eat anything, believe me!  And I did.  There were
VERY few things I disliked, and nothing gave me indigestion.  Fat on
meat was one dislike (texture, not flavour), rice pudding another, and
my grandmother's baked fish custard...  That's about all!  My parents
had been through the war and strict rationing, and wasting food just
because you didn't like it was NOT allowed.  Result was that most things
I tasted I liked, and the balance was achieved through variety and both
parents being excellent cooks.

Now things are different, and there are things I love and used to eat
lots of that I have to be VERY careful about.  Fatty foods are one, but
coffee, red wine, large quantities if bread, red meat, (but venison is
ok...  Odd, that), chocolate, sweet things in general, and just plain
eating too much in one day can trigger all sorts of evils.  I'm still
experimenting to see what I can eat comfortably and what I can't.  Half
a glass of very nice light red wine was enough last Sunday to set me
off, and I suffered intestinal gales until Tuesday, when it finally
settled down again!  :(

I'm finding that restricting portion size and eating a healthy balanced
mixed diet that is light on the fats and avoiding known triggers works
well.  I'm losing weight slowly and steadily, which is good.  I started
at 15 st 3 lbs [213lbs] and am down to 12st7lbs [175lbs], so I have
another 32 to go to reach the top of the healthy weight range for my
height. At 47, I ain't aiming for the 20" waist I had as a teenager
weighing in at 7st 11lbs dripping wet!

> I've also come to the conclusion that the studies which try to tell us
> what we should and shouldn't eat for various health reason aren't much
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> low calorie.  Calories don't matter.  DOn't eat any processed foods.
> Don't eat anything white.  Don't eat fast foods.  

The old fashioned healthy diet without too many refined foods is what
I'm aiming for.  Everything in moderation, and avoid the things that
hurt!  Home made from raw ingredients wherever possible and sensible: I
don't make my own pasta, for example, or my own sausages, but I do eat
good quality versions of both, and I look out for low fat sausages.

I suppose I'm odd, in some respects.  I have always liked vegetables
(okra being one of the few I dislike - and I'm willing to try it again
in something I haven't eaten yet, just to see if it was the okra or the
recipe I didn't like...), wholemeal and unrefined foods (I do draw the
line at wholemeal pasta!  Might as well eat the cardboard box!), and
dislike overly refined foods and most bought cakes and biscuit/cookies,
and junk food. I come from a family where good cooking is important.
I'm not a fan of faddy eating, and find my present restrictions
annoying.  I would rather live with them than suffer what happens if I'm
less careful, however.

Signature

Kate  XXXXXX
Lady Catherine, Wardrobe Mistress of the Chocolate Buttons
http://www.diceyhome.free-online.co.uk
Click on Kate's Pages and explore!

Karen Ray-Stewart - 05 Jun 2004 21:57 GMT
I don't think it has anything to do with gall bladder.... it has to do with
the greasy food they serve... I fell horrible after a burger at MCD's.  We
eat at Harvey's or Wendy's where you can put what you want on your burger.
At least if you have tomatoes, lettuce, pickles and onion on it you get some
vegies with your meal...not a serving for an adult but close, especially at
Harvey's.. they load on the lettuce.
It's not what you eat that matters when you are talking about children ...it
is how much the children are eaating that makes they obese.....and the
parents who don't make sure they help the children balance their diets.

Karen

> >> From my POV, the "fast food" places are for a quick meal when you are
> >> out and don't have time to go home to eat, much less cook.  We don't do
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> > fatty foods, or things that are overly sweet, as a result of gall
> > bladder disease.  The gall bladder is gone, but I have turned out to be
Me - 03 Jun 2004 21:47 GMT
>> Well, fat as such is not evil.
>
> True, but foods from the group containing fats should not form more than
> 30% of your daily calorie intake,

"From the group containing fats"? I think you'll find that
pretty much all food has fat in it.
 
>and pure fats in cooking oils, spreads
> and the like should be used sparingly.

No, you should eat plenty of fats.
Chookie - 09 Jun 2004 10:06 GMT
> An McD salad is not bad at all. Ahanburger is also not the worst meal
> I can think of.

But a Macca's hamburger is a travesty.

Signature

Chookie -- Sydney, Australia
(Replace "foulspambegone" with "optushome" to reply)

"Life is like a cigarette -- smoke it to the butt." -- Harvie Krumpet

Tori M. - 03 Jun 2004 15:35 GMT
Why not cut out the Mc Flurry order a chicken sandwich split it with your
child. If they want desert order a Fruit and Yogurt parfait.... that is what
I do. I share the fries with my husband and my daughter so a regular size
fry turns into less then a small each.  Also I try to get juice or milk for
my daughter when we eat out.

Tori

--
Bonnie 3/20/02
Anna or Xavier due 10/17/04

> >>Things are out of hand! Practically every child I see now
> >>is overweight and moms and dads keep driving them to
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> http://www.diceyhome.free-online.co.uk
> Click on Kate's Pages and explore!
Ignoramus23878 - 03 Jun 2004 15:47 GMT
> Why not cut out the Mc Flurry order a chicken sandwich split it with your
> child. If they want desert order a Fruit and Yogurt parfait.... that is what
> I do. I share the fries with my husband and my daughter so a regular size
> fry turns into less then a small each.  Also I try to get juice or milk for
> my daughter when we eat out.

The other thing nice abvout mcdonalds is that you know how many
calories you eat. For example, a big mac is 560 calories.

i

> Tori
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>> feed the whole family for the price of a burger, fries, a McFlurry and a
>> coke, and they wouldn't be hungry again half an hour later!
Tori M. - 03 Jun 2004 16:31 GMT
exactly and that is why I never order a big mac.  ;)

Tori

--
Bonnie 3/20/02
Anna or Xavier due 10/17/04
> > Why not cut out the Mc Flurry order a chicken sandwich split it with your
> > child. If they want desert order a Fruit and Yogurt parfait.... that is what
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> >> feed the whole family for the price of a burger, fries, a McFlurry and a
> >> coke, and they wouldn't be hungry again half an hour later!
Ignoramus23878 - 03 Jun 2004 16:51 GMT
> exactly and that is why I never order a big mac.  ;)

560 calories is not a lot.

It makes a perfect sized dinner for me. I have not eaten big macs for
years, because there are better things for me to eat, but they are not
terrible or evil.

i
Susie - 03 Jun 2004 16:58 GMT
Oh I order Big Mac's. I order it with no sauce/ketchup/
throw the roll and have a side salad too.
Susie

> exactly and that is why I never order a big mac.  ;)
> Tori
Tori M. - 03 Jun 2004 17:18 GMT
in that case why dont you order a double cheese burger. they use the same
burger size for  each that would be on the dollar menue and the side salad I
believe is on the dollar menue.. that would be a max of 3$ for a meal.

Tori

--
Bonnie 3/20/02
Anna or Xavier due 10/17/04
> Oh I order Big Mac's. I order it with no sauce/ketchup/
> throw the roll and have a side salad too.
> Susie
>
> > exactly and that is why I never order a big mac.  ;)
> > Tori
Susie - 03 Jun 2004 17:28 GMT
Thanks.......you're right.
Great idea,
Susie

> in that case why dont you order a double cheese burger. they use the same
> burger size for  each that would be on the dollar menue and the side salad I
> believe is on the dollar menue.. that would be a max of 3$ for a meal.
> Tori
Rosalie B. - 03 Jun 2004 18:44 GMT
>in that case why dont you order a double cheese burger. they use the same
>burger size for  each that would be on the dollar menue and the side salad I
>believe is on the dollar menue.. that would be a max of 3$ for a meal.

DH (who is lactose intolerant) orders two plain single hamburgers.
which is very cheap.  

grandma Rosalie
Me - 03 Jun 2004 21:49 GMT
>> Why not cut out the Mc Flurry order a chicken sandwich split it with your
>> child. If they want desert order a Fruit and Yogurt parfait.... that is what
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> The other thing nice abvout mcdonalds is that you know how many
> calories you eat. For example, a big mac is 560 calories.

560? How do they fit so many calories into such a small
piece of food? Then again last time I had a big mac I
vomited it up again 30 minutes later so I guess that's
0 calories.
Banty - 03 Jun 2004 15:52 GMT
>>>Things are out of hand! Practically every child I see now
>>>is overweight and moms and dads keep driving them to
>>>McDonald's. It's nutz.
>>
>> I am curious, don't you think that you could give a child a reasonable
>> meal at McDonalds?

Sure.  As long as it's once in awhile, *any* meal is reasonable.  In my family,
that's a once a month treat.

More often if the ordering is done selectively, like one of their salads (which
are actually pretty decent).

This demonization of McDonald's is just silly.  It's the overall American habit
of *always* eating fatty stuff, and frequently snacking, which is the problem.
Which is an issue of individual behavior.

Banty
Ignoramus23878 - 03 Jun 2004 16:50 GMT
> Sure.  As long as it's once in awhile, *any* meal is reasonable.  In
> my family, that's a once a month treat.
>
> More often if the ordering is done selectively, like one of their
> salads (which are actually pretty decent).

Very decent.

> This demonization of McDonald's is just silly.  It's the overall
> American habit of *always* eating fatty stuff, and frequently
> snacking, which is the problem. Which is an issue of individual
> behavior.

Some stuff at McD I would not touch with a 10 foot pole -- fries,
sugary stuff etc.

But, a Big Mac is not at all a terrible dinner and a small lunch.

i
Chookie - 09 Jun 2004 10:04 GMT
> But, a Big Mac is not at all a terrible dinner and a small lunch.

I understand that if you are on weight watchers, it has to be your breakast
toady and tomorrow as well!

Signature

Chookie -- Sydney, Australia
(Replace "foulspambegone" with "optushome" to reply)

"Life is like a cigarette -- smoke it to the butt." -- Harvie Krumpet

Chookie - 09 Jun 2004 10:03 GMT
> This demonization of McDonald's is just silly.  It's the overall American
> habitof *always* eating fatty stuff, and frequently snacking, which is the
> problem.
> Which is an issue of individual behavior.

The other issue you haven't mentioned is portion size.  Australians who travel
to the USA find the portion sizes astonishing!

(And it's not that we don't have an obesity problem here; we do.)

Signature

Chookie -- Sydney, Australia
(Replace "foulspambegone" with "optushome" to reply)

"Life is like a cigarette -- smoke it to the butt." -- Harvie Krumpet

Ignoramus11156 - 09 Jun 2004 10:12 GMT
>> This demonization of McDonald's is just silly.  It's the overall American
>> habitof *always* eating fatty stuff, and frequently snacking, which is the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> (And it's not that we don't have an obesity problem here; we do.)

I agree that in many restaurants the portion sizes are too big. But
the sizes of McDonalds hamburgers are very reasonable.

i
Banty - 09 Jun 2004 12:43 GMT
>> This demonization of McDonald's is just silly.  It's the overall American
>> habitof *always* eating fatty stuff, and frequently snacking, which is the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>(And it's not that we don't have an obesity problem here; we do.)

McDonald's isn't bad as far as portion size.  As for other restaurants (esp. the
diners around here), I have one word - doggiebag!

Banty
Chookie - 11 Jun 2004 14:02 GMT
>> >> This demonization of McDonald's is just silly.  It's the overall
American
> >> habitof *always* eating fatty stuff, and frequently snacking, which is the
> >> problem.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> McDonald's isn't bad as far as portion size.  As for other restaurants (esp.
> the diners around here), I have one word - doggiebag!

I was adding to your list of Bad Habits, not thinking of Macca's in
particular.  And of course doggie bags aren't always an option for tourists.

Signature

Chookie -- Sydney, Australia
(Replace "foulspambegone" with "optushome" to reply)

"Life is like a cigarette -- smoke it to the butt." -- Harvie Krumpet

Banty - 11 Jun 2004 15:22 GMT
>>> >> This demonization of McDonald's is just silly.  It's the overall
>American
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>I was adding to your list of Bad Habits, not thinking of Macca's in
>particular.  

OK.

>And of course doggie bags aren't always an option for tourists.

In that case I have three words:  leave on plate.

Cheers,
Banty
Chookie - 13 Jun 2004 13:26 GMT
> >And of course doggie bags aren't always an option for tourists.
>
> In that case I have three words:  leave on plate.

That's what they did, but they had the Uncomfortable Feeling that they were
being Looked At!

Signature

Chookie -- Sydney, Australia
(Replace "foulspambegone" with "optushome" to reply)

"Life is like a cigarette -- smoke it to the butt." -- Harvie Krumpet

Banty - 13 Jun 2004 14:22 GMT
>> >And of course doggie bags aren't always an option for tourists.
>>
>> In that case I have three words:  leave on plate.
>
>That's what they did, but they had the Uncomfortable Feeling that they were
>being Looked At!

Naw - only grandmothers cluck cluck and say 'you didn't finish everything on
your plate'.  It's not like you're not standing for the Star Spangled Banner
:-)

Banty
Jane Lumley - 12 Jun 2004 13:31 GMT
>> >> This demonization of McDonald's is just silly.  It's the overall
>American
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>I was adding to your list of Bad Habits, not thinking of Macca's in
>particular.  And of course doggie bags aren't always an option for tourists.

I find portion size high in Australia, too, compared with the UK.  And
we, too, have an obesity problem.

And the thing with the Golden Arches is that it's all very, very
calorie-dense.  

And completely revolting, but that's another matter - read Eric
Schlosser's Fast Food Nation if you think you'd like to wean yourself
off the multinationals.
Signature

Jane Lumley

Ignoramus20002 - 12 Jun 2004 23:15 GMT
Hi Jane, how are you? Still exercising a lot?

i
Jane Lumley - 14 Jun 2004 11:21 GMT
>Hi Jane, how are you? Still exercising a lot?

48 miles running a week - I've cut down a bit.  Nope, I don't use a
bread machine, but I do use a KitchenAid to knead the dough.  
Signature

Jane Lumley

Rupa Bose - 12 Jun 2004 06:07 GMT
Banty <Banty_member@newsguy.com> wrote

> Sure.  As long as it's once in awhile, *any* meal is reasonable.  In my family,
> that's a once a month treat.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Banty

True. But I have to admit, I saw "Supersize Me" recently, and found it
fascinating and funny in a gross sort of way. This guy did the kind of
things to himself that you hear of being done to lab rats. He ate only
at MacD's for a month, and essentially force-fed himself three meals a
day.

His doctors were astonished at how quickly his lipids declined, his
liver seemed endangered, and of course his weight went up. It took him
over 5 months to undo the effects of the one month.

Rupa
dragonlady - 03 Jun 2004 16:31 GMT
> >>Things are out of hand! Practically every child I see now
> >>is overweight and moms and dads keep driving them to
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> feed the whole family for the price of a burger, fries, a McFlurry and a
> coke, and they wouldn't be hungry again half an hour later!

You don't HAVE to have the fried and McFlurry and coke, and a hamburger
there isn't particularly unhealthy:  it's just ground beef and a bun,
and if you want condiments they're there.  And if you're low-carbing,
you can skip the bun.

They also have some decent salads these days.  Check out the nutrition
information.

While it is possible that most people eating at McD's d NOT make great
choices, that doesn't mean it's impossible to do so.
Signature

Children won't care how much you know until they know how much you care

curt - 03 Jun 2004 15:30 GMT
> I am curious, don't you think that you could give a child a reasonable
> meal at McDonalds?
>
> i

You can if you want to.  I don't know why people get all worked up over
McDonalds?  They make what they make.  If you like it go there, if not
don't.  People go to ice cream stores, and that is not necessarily good for
you.  Why not get all worked up over them?

Curt
Ignoramus23878 - 03 Jun 2004 15:46 GMT
>> I am curious, don't you think that you could give a child a reasonable
>> meal at McDonalds?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> don't.  People go to ice cream stores, and that is not necessarily good for
> you.  Why not get all worked up over them?

Besides, you can do much better at mcd than at an ice cream store...

i
Butterfly - 03 Jun 2004 20:03 GMT
Sunday I took my kids to McD's just for the fun of it. They have added apple
slices with caramel dipping sauce, milk chugs, chocolate milk chugs, and
apple juice boxes to the menu. My younger kids played in the playground and
snacked on apple slices. While I spent one on one time with my teenager, who
also had apple slices. I know it's cheaper to buy a bag of apples. It just
wouldn't be as much fun.
Butterfly

> >> I am curious, don't you think that you could give a child a reasonable
> >> meal at McDonalds?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> i
MaryL - 11 Jun 2004 23:03 GMT
> Things are out of hand! Practically every child I see now
> is overweight and moms and dads keep driving them to
> McDonald's. It's nutz.
>
> Karen

McDonald's isn't always the culprit. My friend feeds her kids a
healthy diet, makes sure they exercise and limits their T.V. and
computer time. Yet the twelve year old girl is five foot six and
weighs 155 pounds. The fourteen year old boy is five ten and nearly
two hundred pounds. Both are very muscular and look at least twenty
pounds lighter than they their actual weights.

I think kids are just getting bigger.

M
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.